Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Figure 2 in DNA barcoding of two amphidromous goby postlarvae ('penja') morphotypes from Mandar River, West Sulawesi, Indonesia

Figure 2. – Neighbour-joining phylogenetic tree of amphidromous gobiid post-larvae ('penja') from the Mandar River based on Cytochrome oxydase I (COI) sequences.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Figure 3 in DNA barcoding of two amphidromous goby postlarvae ('penja') morphotypes from Mandar River, West Sulawesi, Indonesia

Figure 3. – Penja gobiid post-larvae from the Mandar River: A. 'penja alus' (Stiphodon semoni), B. 'penja mawassar' (Sicyopterus longifilis).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in DNA barcode development for three recent exotic whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) invaders in Florida

Fig. 1. Maximum Likelihood phylogeny of whiteflies using the mitochondrial coxI barcode. Log-likelihood: −9515.93005, substitution model: MtART+I+G, support values: bootstrap % / SH approximate likelihood ratio test. Highlighted nodes 1: Aleyrodidae, 2: Paraleyrodes, 3: Aleurodicus dispersus–Lecanoideus floccissimus complex, 4: Singhiella + Massilieurodes + Aleurolobus + Bemisia. Accessions KF059961 and HQ446157 are possible specimen misidentifications in GenBank given the phylogeny.

Fig. 6. K2P pairwise comparisons generated from MEGA X in Biodiversity of the Buffalo Leeches Genus (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) in Southern Thailand Revealed from DNA Barcoding.

Fig. 6. K2P pairwise comparisons generated from MEGA X showing barcoding gaps of 1.54 to 2.88% between intra- and interspecific genetic distances of buffalo leeches genus Hirudinaria.

Fig. 5 in Biodiversity of the Buffalo Leeches Genus (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) in Southern Thailand Revealed from DNA Barcoding.

Fig. 5. Genetic distance based on K2P model from BOLD. (A) comparison of maximum intraspecific distance of each species and distance to its nearest neighbor (B) comparison of mean intraspecific distance of each species and distance to its nearest neighbor. Red diagonals indicate where intraspecific distance equals distance to nearest neighbor.

Fig. 3 in Biodiversity of the Buffalo Leeches Genus (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) in Southern Thailand Revealed from DNA Barcoding.

Fig. 3. BEAST ultrametric tree of buffalo leeches genus Hirudinaria. Leeches from southern Thailand are highlighted in bold. Numbers on nodes are bootstrap values from ML tree generated by IQ-TREE, Bayesian posterior probability from BI tree generated by MrBayes, and from ultrametric tree generated by BEAST, respectively. Black bars indicate morphological identification (MORPHO) and delineated OTUs suggested by four species delimitation approaches (GMYC, bPTP, BIN, and ABGD). Grey bars indicate samples that were not available for morphological identification.

Fig. 2 in Biodiversity of the Buffalo Leeches Genus (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) in Southern Thailand Revealed from DNA Barcoding.

Fig. 2. External morphology of living Hirudinaria leeches from southern Thailand. (A) dorsal and (B) ventral sides of H. bpling from Satun Province (C) dorsal and (D) ventral sides of H. manillensis 3 from Songkhla Province. Scale bar = 1 cm.

Fig. 1 in Biodiversity of the Buffalo Leeches Genus (Arhynchobdellida, Hirudinidae) in Southern Thailand Revealed from DNA Barcoding.

Fig. 1. Map showing sampling localities of buffalo leeches genus Hirudinaria in (A) Asia and (B) southern Thailand. Dotted lines indicate hypothetical fauna transition zones in southern Thailand: Isthmus of Kra and Surat Thani-Krabi Line.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Fig. 3 in DNA barcoding of Euphorbiaceae in Korea

Fig. 3. Neighbour-joining (NJ) tree from the combined analysis of ITS, rbcL, and matK loci from Euphorbiaceae in Korea. Numbers above the branches indicate bootstrap values ≥50% in the NJ/ Maximum Parsimony (MP) analysis, respectively.

Fig. 1 in Morphological description and DNA barcode information of seven newly reported nudibranch species from Korea

Fig. 1. Images of seven Nudibranchia species in Korea. A, Dendronotus primorjensis Martynov, Sanamyan & Korshunova, 2015; B, Doto japonica Odhner, 1936; C, Trinchesia ornata (Baba, 1937); D, E, Antiopella fusca (O'Donoghue, 1924); F, Cadlina paninae Korshunova, Fletcher, Picton, Lundin, Kashio, N. Sanamyan, K. Sanamyan, Padula, Schrödi & Martynov, 2020; G, Rostanga bifurcata Rudman & Avern, 1989; and H, Goniodoridella savignyi Pruvot-Fol, 1933.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2019View details →

Figures 1–4 in Halictus hedini hedini (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) newly recorded from Japan, revealed by DNA barcoding and morphology

Figures 1–4. Photographs of Halictus hedini hedini Blüthgen and H. rubicundus (Christ). 1–2. Lateral habitus of H. hedini hedini (1 female, 2 male). 3–4. 1st metasomal tergum of female (3 H. hedini hedini, 4 H. rubicundus).

Fig. 4. A in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 4. A. Amynthas masatakae (Beddard, 1892) Busan specimen showing spermathecal and male regions. B. Metaphire ryunome Blakemore, 2012 Busan specimen [boxed is X2 enlargement of its18rhs male pore that appears elevated, non-superficial, i.e.,=Metaphire].

Fig. 2. A. Drawida songae yeongdo subsp. n in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 2. A. Drawida songae yeongdo subsp. n. holotype (H, DNA H1) showing prostomium, gizzards, pygidium, habitus with reproductive organs in situ and all four genital marking glands in 8-11lhs plus a nephridium from 15rhs. B. D. songae songae after Hong (2002: fig. 1) with GMs in 7, 10-11 (but not 12?) for fair use comparison.

Fig. 1. MEGA5 in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 1. MEGA5 Maximum Likelihood phylogram of DNA code results for Busan specimens compared to similar taxa. Solid squares (■) are Busan samples; open circles (○) are unconfirmed GenBank names (from China, Korea or Japan); closed circles (●) are from the author's Japanese studies. (Sample codes and provisional or new species names are explained in the Appendix legend).

Fig. 5. A in Survey of Busan Oligochaeta earthworms supported by DNA barcodes

Fig. 5. A. Eisenia japonica vaga sub-sp. n. Busan holotype (H, DNA H5). B. Eisenia j. japonica (Michaelsen, 1892) Berlin syntype Nr. 2117 (as anticipated, DNA was not extractable from this older material), author's sketch after Blakemore and Grygier (2011, fig. 2) that compares to Hamburg syntypes V119-V121 (see Blakemore and Grygier, 2011, fig. 3).

Fig. 14 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 14 Phorcus turbinatus (Born, 1778). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 for genus Phorcus. Phorcus turbinatus (petrol) separates from all other species. b Representative specimen of Ph. turbinatus from this study. c One syntype of Ph. turbinatus (NHMW 14002). Scale bars 5 mm

Fig. 12 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 12 Phorcus richardi (Payraudeau 1826). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 of genus Phorcus. Phorcus richardi (maroon) is the most abundant species in the current sample. It separates well from Ph. articulatus and Ph. turbinatus. One group of Ph. mutabilis is not distinguishable from Ph.

Fig. 11 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 11 Steromphala divaricata (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC2 from genus Steromphala. Steromphala divaricata (pink) cannot be recovered as a completely separated group as it shows a small overlap with St. varia. Type material and material from this study do not overlap. Three individuals (Linné 41–43) of the type material (pink group on the

Fig. 10 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 10 Steromphala varia (Linnaeus, 1758). a PCA plot of PC1 vs. PC3 of genus Steromphala. Steromphala varia (blue) separates from all other species. Specimens from this study overlap with the type material. b

Fig. 4 in Revision of the genus complex Gibbula: an integrative approach to delineating the Eastern Mediterranean genera Gibbula Risso, 1826, Steromphala Gray, 1847, and Phorcus Risso, 1826 using DNA-barcoding and geometric morphometrics (Vetigastropoda, Trochoidea)

Fig. 4 Plot of first and third principal component of combined lateral and ventral landmark data from Phorcus and Steromphala individuals. A morphological separation of the two genera becomes apparent