Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,620 results for “Molecular Phylogeny”
Fig. 3. Cladogram for the combined 16S in On ''Molecular Phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the Evolution of Sociality in Wasps''
Fig. 3. Cladogram for the combined 16S data and the morphological and behavioral characters (see appendix 1). The length is 652 steps; consistency index = 0.64 and retention index = 0.69.
Fig. 4. Consensus tree for the combined 28S in On ''Molecular Phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the Evolution of Sociality in Wasps''
Fig. 4. Consensus tree for the combined 28S data and the morphological and behavioral characters (see appendix 1). The length is of the two underlying cladograms is 458 steps; consistency index = 0.81 and retention index = 0.85.
Fig. 5 in On ''Molecular Phylogeny of Vespidae (Hymenoptera) and the Evolution of Sociality in Wasps''
Fig. 5. Cladogram for the combined sequence datasets and the morphological and behavioral characters. The length is 907 steps; consistency index = 0.68 and retention index = 0.75.
Fig. 2 in A Molecular Perspective on the Phylogeny of the Girdled Lizards (Cordylidae, Squamata)
Fig. 2. Tree based on relative cost parameters (transitions: transversions: gaps) at 1: 2: 1. Numbers on internal stems are Bremer values.
Fig. 1 in A Molecular Perspective on the Phylogeny of the Girdled Lizards (Cordylidae, Squamata)
Fig. 1. Tree based on relative cost parameters (transitions: transversions: gaps) at 1: 1: 1. Numbers on internal stems are Bremer values.
Fig. 5 in A Molecular Perspective on the Phylogeny of the Girdled Lizards (Cordylidae, Squamata)
Fig. 5. Tree based on scale structure evidence of Harvey and Gutberlet (1995). A: macrohoneycomb present on venter; B: macrohoneycomb present on dorsal scales; C: flaplike free margins associated with the cellridge system; D: short ridgelike projections in the center of the oberhautchen cells.
Figure 2 in Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and biogeography
Figure 2. Klots' (1933) intuitive phylogeny of the Pieridae, reconstructed from his generic revision and systematic classification, and hypothetical chart of evolution of the subfamilies and main stock of the Pierinae. Dashed lines indicate uncertainty in the phylogenetic position of genera or groups of genera.
Figure 8 in Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and biogeography
Figure 8. Historical biogeographical hypothesis of the Pseudopontiinae + Dismorphiinae, with dispersal and extinction events optimized to reconcile the area cladogram. Letters designate speciation events: a, vicariance between Pseudopontiinae (Africa) and Dismorphiinae (South America), following the final break-up of Western Gondwana (Late Cretaceous); b, long-distance dispersal of the ancestor of Dismorphiinae from northern South America to northern Africa (Late Cretaceous), followed by allopatric speciation of Leptidea in northern Africa (Late Cretaceous). Numbers designate major biogeographical events: 1, dispersal (range expansion) of the ancestor of Leptidea from northern Africa to Eurasia, following contact of Africa with Eurasia (early Tertiary); 2, extinction (range contraction) of Leptidea in northern Africa following formation of the Sahara Desert (Quaternary). Once Leptidea reached Eurasia it colonized much of the Palaearctic, the Neotropical Dismorphiinae subsequently spread into Central America, whereas the Pseudopontiinae contracted to central western Africa.
Figure 7 in Molecular phylogeny and systematics of the Pieridae (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea): higher classification and biogeography
Figure 7. Higher classification of the Pieridae, showing two possible phylogenetic hypotheses according to the combined and all available data analyses of this study (Figs 3, 6). A, consensus tree summarizing nodes that are well supported or that are consistently recovered under different methods of analysis (maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, Bayesian inference), with a question mark denoting uncertainty in the monophyly of the Colotis group. B, fully resolved tree, with question marks denoting uncertainty among nodes and in the monophyly of the Colotis group. Four subfamilies are recognized, with the subfamily Pierinae comprising four major lineages (two tribes, two informal groups); the tribe Pierini is subdivided into five lineages (three subtribes, two subclades of uncertain status).
Figure 2 in Molecular systematics of social skinks: phylogeny and taxonomy of the Egernia group (Reptilia: Scincidae)
Figure 2. Strict consensus tree of the MP and Bayesian trees, showing suggested generic break up of Egernia.
Figure 1. A in Molecular systematics of social skinks: phylogeny and taxonomy of the Egernia group (Reptilia: Scincidae)
Figure 1. A, the strict consensus of the six equally most parsimonious trees (each of length 3021 steps), with bootstrap proportions> 50% shown. B, Bayesian tree. Posterior probability values are shown at relevant nodes.
Figure 24 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Asian Paraleucophenga Hendel (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
Figure 24. Phylogenetic trees deduced from the ND2 sequences. A, strict consensus tree of two equally parsimonious trees (677 steps). B, maximum likelihood (ML) tree. Numbers to the left of nodes in (A) and (B) indicate bootstrap proportions (%) of maximum parsimony (MP) and ML methods, respectively; those to the right of nodes in (B) indicate the Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP).
Figures 20–23. 20, 21 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Asian Paraleucophenga Hendel (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
Figures 20–23. 20, 21, Paraleucophenga longiseta sp. nov. ♂; 22, 23, Paraleucophenga tanydactylia sp. nov. ♂. 20, 22, epandrium, cercus, and surstylus; 21, 23, hypandrium, paramere, gonopod, aedeagus, and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figures 16–19. 16, 17 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Asian Paraleucophenga Hendel (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
Figures 16–19. 16, 17, Paraleucophenga brevipenis sp. nov. ♂; 18, 19, Paraleucophenga hirtipenis sp. nov. ♂. 16, 18, epandrium (epand), cercus (cerc) and surstylus (sur); 17, 19, hypandrium (hypd), paramere (pm), gonopod (gon), aedeagus (aed), and aedeagal apodeme (aed a). Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figures 9–15 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Asian Paraleucophenga Hendel (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
Figures 9–15. Abdominal fifth sternite in males. 9, Paraleucophenga argentosa (Okada, 1956); 10, Paraleucophenga emeiensis Sidorenko, 1998; 11, Paraleucophenga javana Okada, 1988; 12, Paraleucophenga brevipenis sp. nov.; 13, Paraleucophenga hirtipenis sp. nov.; 14, Paraleucophenga longiseta sp. nov.; 15, Paraleucophenga tanydactylia sp. nov. Scale bars: 0.1 mm.
Figures 1–8 in Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of the Asian Paraleucophenga Hendel (Diptera, Drosophilidae)
Figures 1–8. Abdominal tergite patterns in males. 1, Paraleucophenga argentosa (Okada, 1956); 2, Paraleucophenga emeiensis Sidorenko, 1998; 3, Paraleucophenga invicta (Walker, 1857); 4, Paraleucophenga javana Okada, 1988; 5, Paraleucophenga shimai Okada, 1988; 6, Paraleucophenga brevipenis sp. nov.; 7, Paraleucophenga longiseta sp. nov.; 8, Paraleucophenga anydactylia sp. nov.
Figure 2 in Morphological and molecular evidence for phylogeny and classification of South American pitvipers, genera Bothrops, Bothriopsis, and Bothrocophias (Serpentes: Viperidae)
Figure 2. Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) 50% majority-rule consensus phylogram, including taxa with morphological data only (analysis 8). The phylogram is derived from an analysis of 2343 bp mitochondrial and 85 gap-weighted or majority-coded morphological characters. The posterior probabilities are shown above nodes; bootstrap values from parsimony analysis of the same data set are shown below nodes (analysis 7). The parsimony analysis shows minor topological differences from the Bayesian analysis; refer to Figure S3 for the parsimony cladogram. Grey circles indicate posterior probabilities of 95 or greater, and bootstrap values of 70 or greater. Dashes indicate support values of less than 50. Letters correspond to the major lineages: A, Bothrocophias clade; B, Bothrops alternatus clade; C, Bothrops neuwiedi + Bothrops jararaca clade; D, Bothriopsis clade; E, Bothrops atrox clade.
Figure 1 in Morphological and molecular evidence for phylogeny and classification of South American pitvipers, genera Bothrops, Bothriopsis, and Bothrocophias (Serpentes: Viperidae)
Figure 1. Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) 50% majority-rule consensus phylogram, excluding taxa with morphological data only (analysis 11). The phylogram is derived from an analysis of 2343 bp of mitochondrial DNA and 85 gap-weighted or majority-coded morphological characters. The posterior probabilities are shown above nodes; bootstrap values from parsimony analysis of the same data set are shown below nodes (analysis 10). The parsimony analysis shows minor topological differences from Bayesian analysis; refer to Figure S1 for parsimony cladogram. Grey circles indicate posterior probabilities of 95 or greater and bootstrap values of 70 or greater. Letters correspond to major lineages: A, Bothrocophias clade; B, Bothrops alternatus clade; C, Bothrops neuwiedi + Bothrops jararaca clade; D, Bothriopsis clade; E, Bothrops atrox clade.
Figure 24 in Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies
Figure 24. Bosmina (Eubosmina) tanakai sp. nov.: adult male from Ichiyanagi Numa Pond, Aomori Prefecture, Japan. A, antenna II; B, distal anterior seta; C–E, limb I; F, tip of copulatory hook; G, subdistal lobe in distal view. Scale bars: 100 Mm.
Figure 22 in Revision of the genus Bosmina Baird, 1845 (Cladocera: Bosminidae), based on evidence from male morphological characters and molecular phylogenies
Figure 22. Bosmina (Eubosmina) tanakai sp. nov.: female from Ichiyanagi Numa Pond, Aomori Prefecture, Japan (A, D–G), and from Konuma (B) and Kussharo (C), Hokkaido Prefecture, Japan. A–C, body outline of large adult; D, E, postabdonem of large adult; F, midgut with loops of an atypical specimen; G, juvenile female. Scale bars: 100 Mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.