Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
345
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
345 results for “classification analysis”
FIGURES 52–53 in A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Zopherini with a review of the species and generic classification (Coleoptera: Zopheridae)
FIGURES 52–53. Femora of male Phloeodes plicatus. 52. Male nodule. 53. Cuticular pores.
FIGURES 69–70 in A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Zopherini with a review of the species and generic classification (Coleoptera: Zopheridae)
FIGURES 69–70. Dorsal surface sculpture of pronotum. 69. Verodes guatemalensis; 70. V. inaequalis.
FIGURES 50–51 in A phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Zopherini with a review of the species and generic classification (Coleoptera: Zopheridae)
FIGURES 50–51. Femora of male Phloeodes diabolicus. 50. Male nodule. 51. Cuticular pores.
Figure 8 in Strong sexual dimorphism unraveled by DNA analysis - towards a better understanding of Pseudothyretes classification (Lepidoptera: Erebidae: Arctiinae)
Figure 8. Abundance of Pseudothyretes obscurus sp. nov. in different months of the year.
Figure 1 in Cladistic analysis and a revised classification of fossil and recent mysticetes
Figure 1. Strict consensus tree of six most parsimonious trees resulting from a cladistic analysis of 30 mysticetes (length 134 steps, CI, 0.82, RI, 0.92).
Detection, quantification and classification of ripened tomatoes: a comparative analysis of image processing and machine learning
<p>This is an open dataset.</p>
Detection, quantification and classification of ripened tomatoes: a comparative analysis of image processing and machine learning
<p>In this study, specifically for the detection of ripe/unripe tomatoes with/without defects in the crop field, two distinct methods are described and compared from captured images by a camera mounted on a mobile robot. One is a machine learning approach, known as 'Cascaded Object Detector' (COD) and the other is a composition of traditional customised methods, individually known as 'Colour Transformation': 'Colour Segmentation' and 'Circular Hough Transformation'. The (Viola-Jones) COD generates 'histogram of oriented gradient' (HOG) features to detect tomatoes. For ripeness checking, the RGB mean is calculated with a set of rules. However, for traditional methods, colour thresholding is applied to detect tomatoes either from natural or solid background and RGB colour is adjusted to identify ripened tomatoes. This algorithm is shown to be optimally feasible for any micro-controller based miniature electronic devices in terms of its run time complexity of <i>O</i>(<i>n</i><sup>3</sup>) for a traditional method in best and average cases. Comparisons show that the accuracy of the machine learning method is 95%, better than that of the Colour Segmentation Method using MATLAB.</p>
Figure 4 from: Castello L, Galetto L (2013) How many taxa can be recognized within the complex Tillandsia capillaris (Bromeliaceae, Tillandsioideae)? Analysis of the available classifications using a multivariate approach. PhytoKeys 23: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.23.4507
Figure 4 - Infructescence structure in Tillandsia capillaris complex. a–b Tillandsia capillaris (=Tillandsia capillaris f. incana and Tillandsia capillaris f. hieronymi) a glabrous floral bracts much shorter than the sepals b the ovate-lanceolate sepals are partially fused c–d Tillandsia virescens s.str. (=Tillandsia capillaris f. cordobensis) c pubescent floral bracts equaling the sepals d the acute sepals are much more fused (60-90%) e–f Tillandsia virescens s. l. (=Tillandsia capillaris f. virescens) e pubescent floral bracts equaling the sepals, lacking scapes and violet capsules f the acute sepals are almost totally fused. Abbreviations: s=sepals; b=floral bract, bars=1 mm.
Figure 3 from: Castello L, Galetto L (2013) How many taxa can be recognized within the complex Tillandsia capillaris (Bromeliaceae, Tillandsioideae)? Analysis of the available classifications using a multivariate approach. PhytoKeys 23: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.23.4507
Figure 3 - Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) for 5 different taxa of the Tillandsia capillaris complex. Scatterplots of the first two axis based on 19 characters selected in the PCA and using the Gower distance (sqrt (1-S)). References: Characters used (see Table I); OTUs: f. capillaris (n=21) =red; f. hieronymi (n=24) =blue; f. incana (n=20) =pink; f. virescens (n=12) =green; f. cordobensis (n=23) =orange.
Figure 1 from: Castello L, Galetto L (2013) How many taxa can be recognized within the complex Tillandsia capillaris (Bromeliaceae, Tillandsioideae)? Analysis of the available classifications using a multivariate approach. PhytoKeys 23: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.23.4507
Figure 1 - Quantitative analyses of reproductive and vegetative traits in the complex Tillandsia capillaris in Argentina. Box plots featuring medians (solid black square), means, and first and third quartiles (large box). Kruskal-Wallis (H) tests performed of selected characters are also included. Different letters above box-plots indicate statistical differences among taxa using a posteriori Dunn tests (p=0,05) (Balzarini et al. 2008). References: OTUs: ca: capillaris (n=21); hi: hieronymi (n=24); in: incana (n=20); vi: virescens (n=12); co: cordobensis (n=23).
Figure 2 from: Castello L, Galetto L (2013) How many taxa can be recognized within the complex Tillandsia capillaris (Bromeliaceae, Tillandsioideae)? Analysis of the available classifications using a multivariate approach. PhytoKeys 23: 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.23.4507
Figure 2 - PCA for 5 different taxa of the Tillandsia capillaris complex. Plot of all specimens (100 OTUs) and leaning of the most influential 19 characters represented on the first two principal components resulting from principal component analysis (see Table 2 for abbreviations). References: OTUs: f. capillaris (n=21) =red; f. hieronymi (n=24) =blue; f. incana (n=20) =pink; f. virescens (n=12) =green; f. cordobensis (n=23) =orange.
Figure 7 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 7 - Strict consensus of 12 most parsimonious trees (L = 314; ci = 0.28; ri = 0.56). Characters are mapped onto the consensus only if their optimization is not ambiguous and if they are present among all the MPTs. The consensus is used to map homoplasy at the level of characters. Black rectangles represent single, non-homoplasious character state transformations, and white rectangles represent multiple, homoplasious character state transformations. The number depicted above each rectangle represents the character and the number below the rectangle represents the character state. The bigger number below the branches corresponds to Bootstrap values over 50%. The combination of characters for each terminal is not shown. Three important synapomorphies are illustrated in the cladogram: the filiform antennae (3:0), as the single synapomorphy of the tribe, and the number of spermathecal tubes (41:1) plus the terminal position of the accessory gland (49:2), as the synapomorphies supporting a mostly Neotropical clade. These character states are reported for the first time for the tribe. Two shades of gray in the cladogram indicate the subtribe to which the terminals belong (except Nautes). Colors in the terminals indicate their geographic distribution. Below seven terminals the former classification (genus or subgenus) is shown. An asterisk indicates the type species included in the analysis: Tarpela browni and Nautes fervidus.
Figure 6 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 6 - Aedeagal characters (male genitalia) representing the different morphological types found in or sample of Helopini: A evident setae (57: 0) representing the helopiod type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a, 2005), distributed over half of the parameres (58:0), illustrated from Helops caeruleus (Linnaeus), not included in the analysis (lateral view) B evident setae (57:0); representing the catomoid type (Nabozhenko 2006), distributed over two thirds of parameres (58:1) in Nautes fervidus Pascoe C not evident setae over parameres (57:1) representing the nalassoid type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a, 2002b), illustrated from Odocnemis californicus Mannerheim D parameres not convergent (59:1), with blunt apex (62:0) in Helops caeruleus (ventral view) E parameres not convergent (59:1) with weakly constricted apex (61:1) in Nautes fervidus F parameres convergent (59:0), with acute (60:1) not constricted apex (62:1) in O. californicus.
Figure 4 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 4 - Internal morphological characters (female genitalia) representing the different morphological types found in our sample of Helopini ag = accessory gland, sp = spermatheca, st = spermathecal tube(s), cd = common duct of accessory gland and spermatheca, v = vagina, ov = oviduct: A infundibular vagina (40:0), single spermatheca branched near its base (41:0, 42:0) and accessory gland in the common duct (49:1) illustrated from Helops insignis Germar representing the helopiod type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a, 2002b, 2005) B vagina strongly curved and narrowed before the apex (40:1), single spermatheca not branched near the base (41:0, 42:1) illustrated from Nalassus plebejus Küster representing the nalassoid type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a, 2002b) C female genital tract with three serial spermathecal tubes (41:1) close to each other (43:0) and terminal accessory gland (49:2) in Helops farctus LeConte, illustrating the pattern previously reported for some Pimeliinae species (Doyen 1994), here reported for the first time in Tenebrioninae D distant spermathecal tubes (43:1) in Helops perforatus Horn with terminal accessory gland (49:2), illustrating a pattern described here for the first time. Total length of the accessory gland is not represented in A and B.
Figure 2 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 2 - Examples of non-traditional external characters in Helopini: A reduced recurrent cell (rc) (26:0) in fully developed wing (25:1) of Helops californicus Mannerheim B wide recurrent cell (rc) (26:1) in fully developed wing (25:1) of Tarpela aerifera Allard C head width and interocular width (6:0) and pronotum width and length (18:0) in Tarpela costata Champion 1887, showing a gibbous pronotum disk surface (8:0), with very dense (9:0) and very deep (10:0) pronotum punctures.
Figure 1 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 1 - Examples of external characters (mainly diagnostic), traditionally used in Helops, Tarpela and Nautes, (number of character: character state): A broad apical antennomere (5:0), shorter than the third antennomere (4:0) illustrated from Helops aereus Germar B filiform apical antennomeres (5:2), as long as the third antennomere (4:1) illustrated from Nautes fervidus Pascoe C male maxillary palps with length of inner edge 2.6–2.9 times the length of posterior edge (7:2) illustrated from Nautes chrysomeloides Champion D third lobate segment of male tarsi (30:0) and short fourth tarsomere (31:0) illustrated from Nautes fervidus E not prominent prosternum (27:1) in Helops cisteloides Germar F prominent-acute prosternum (27:0) in Nautes fervidus.
Figure 3 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 3 - Internal morphological characters (female genitalia) in Helopini: A length of paraproct (pp) three or more times length of coxite (cx) (39:0) illustrated from the ovipositor of Helops cisteloides Germar B long gonostyles (gt) (37:1) with wide apex (38:1), represented by the ovipositor of Odocnemis exaratus Germar, not included in the analysis C reduced gonostyles (37:0), with base as wide as apex (38:0) represented by the ovipositor of Tarpela micans (Fabricius), not included in the analysis D blunt, narrow apex of eighth sternite (33:0), not evident arms (34:1) and not dilated distal end of the spiculum ventrale (sv) (35:1) illustrated from Helops cisteloides E trapeziform apex of eighth sternite (33:1), evident arms (34:0) and dilated distal end of spiculum ventrale (35:0), represented by sclerite of Odocnemis exaratus.
Figure 5 from: Cifuentes-Ruiz P, Zaragoza-Caballero S, Ochoterena-Booth H, Morón Rios M (2014) A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the New World Helopini (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae, Tenebrioninae) indicates the need for profound rearrangements of the classification. ZooKeys 415: 191-216. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.415.6882
Figure 5 - Internal morphological characters (male genitalia) representing the different morphological types found in our sample of Helopini: A pleural rods of gastral spicula close only at the end (50:2), representing the nalassoid type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a), illustrated from Stenomax aeneus (Scopoli) B pleural rods of gastral spicula close towards the middle of their length (50:0), representing the helopiod type (Nabozhenko 2001b, 2002a, 2005), illustrated from Tarpela micans (Fabricius), not included in the analysis C narrow and acute lobes of eighth sternite (54:1) and deep notch (52:0) in Helops farctus LeConte D broad lobes of eighth sternite (54:0) and shallow notch (52:1) in Stenomax aeneus E projected anterior part of basal piece (basal piece "J" shaped) in Odocnemis californicus Mannerheim (67:0) F anterior part of basal piece not projected in Nautes fervidus Pascoe (67:1), character state used for the first time in this study.
Figure 5 from: Trajano E, Carvalho MR (2017) Towards a biologically meaningful classification of subterranean organisms: a critical analysis of the Schiner-Racovitza system from a historical perspective, difficulties of its application and implications for conservation. Subterranean Biology 22: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.9759
Figure 5 - Highly troglomorphic catfish, genus Rhamdiopsis (Siluriformes: Heptapteridae), a relict from Campo Formoso karst area, northeastern Brazil (Photo: Dante Fenolio).
Figure 2 from: Trajano E, Carvalho MR (2017) Towards a biologically meaningful classification of subterranean organisms: a critical analysis of the Schiner-Racovitza system from a historical perspective, difficulties of its application and implications for conservation. Subterranean Biology 22: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.22.9759
Figure 2 - Interrelationships between evolutionary (historical) and ecological (present-day) factors, defining the conditions of trogloxenes versus troglophiles versus troglobites for subterranean organisms.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.