Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy of European Damaeidae (Acari: Oribatida) VII. Redescription of Neobelba pseudopapillipes Bulanova-Zachvatkina, 1967 with comments on its generic status

FIGURE 1. Metabelba (Neobelba) pseudopapillipes (Bulanova-Zachvatkina, 1967)—habitus and dorsal setae. A—dorsal view, B—ventral view, C—bothridial area and sensillus, D—dorsal setae. Bar representing 100 µm (A, B) or 50 µm (C–D). Abbreviations: bo—bothridium, dis—discidium, apd—prodorsal area. Other markings refer to the name of setae or tubercular structures. Black arrows indicate the light spots on the notogaster.

FIGURE 10 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 10. Male of A. cabrerae Frey. A: Shape of right antenna. Figured are pedicel and flagellum with apical arista. Scale bar: 0.1 mm. B: Right wing with main veins and cells indicated. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. C: Dorsal view of thorax. Scale bar: 0.5 mm. D: Dorsal view of abdomen with tergites 2–5. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 7 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 7. Genetic variability of A. orbiculus, based on uncorrected p-distances of COI, within and between populations of clade B. Red colour: Maximum genetic distance within populations. Blue: Minimum genetic distances between populations. Numbers correspond to those of the DNA vouchers given in Table 1 and the Appendix.

FIGURE 6 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 6. Geographic distribution of DNA barcoded A. orbiculus (empty circle: clade A; empty star: clade B) and type locality (full circle) of 1) Syrphus orbiculus; 2) Paracrocera manevali; 3) Paracrocera minuscula; 4) Acrocera laeta.

FIGURE 9 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 9. Male of A. cabrerae Frey. A: Lateral view. B: Dorso-lateral view. Photos: Antonio Camacho.

FIGURE 4 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 4. Maximum likelihood tree of COI dataset computed with MEGA5; software settings: HKY+G+I model, all positions and substitutions included. Support values of critical nodes are shown (left: bootstrap; right: posterior probabilities). Scale bar indicates 0.1 substitutions per amino acid position. Separate box on right hand side showing maximum intraspecific genetic distances (MAGD) within the individual clades as well as minimum interspecific genetic distance (MIGD) between clade A and B.

FIGURE 2 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 2. Juvenile Evarcha jucunda (Lucas), host specimen of Ogcodes reginae Trojan. A: Dorsal view. B: Lateral view. Photos: Emídio Machado.

FIGURE 3 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 3. Last instar larva of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) emerging from subadult Amaurobius erberi (Keyserling) and moulting into adult. A–B (16.X.2011): the spider shows no aberrant behaviour, despite a white marking at the dorsoanterior region of the opistosoma where the endoparasitoids will emerge (red arrow). C (19.X.2011, 8 a.m.): last instar larva fully emerged from host spider but is still attached. D (19.X.2011, 1 p.m.): last instar larva still attached to its host ingesting rest of opistosoma's content, letting opistosoma shrivle. E (19.X.2011, 4 p.m.): last instar larva detached from its host. F (21.X.2011): praepupa of A. orbiculus. G (24.X.2011): pupa of A. orbiculus with prepupal skin and meconium attached to posterior body end. H (25.X.2011): matured pupa of A. orbiculus. I (01.XI.2011): emerged male adult of A. orbiculus. Photos: Frits Broekhuis.

FIGURE 5 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 5. Bayesian topology of COI dataset. Bayesian posterior probabilities are plotted onto the phylogram. Scale bar indicates 0.1 substitutions per amino acid position.

FIGURE 8 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 8. Variability in body size and abdominal coloration in female A. orbiculus collected in south-western France. A: DNA-voucher CK680 body length 2.5 mm. B: DNA-voucher CK681 body length 4.2 mm.

FIGURE 1 in New host records for European Acroceridae (Diptera), with discussion of species limits of Acrocera orbiculus (Fabricius) based on DNA-barcoding

FIGURE 1. Pupa and adult of reared Ogcodes reginae Trojan from a subadult Clubiona leucaspis (Simon). A: Spider remains. B: Adult O. reginae. C: Pupa dorsal view. D: Pupa lateral view. Photos: Hélène Dumas.

FIGURES 14–17 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 14–17. Leptoiulus trilineatus (C.L. Koch, 1847), male. 14, gonopods (mesal view); 15, gonopod promere (caudal view); 16, gonopod mesomere (front view); 17, gonopod opisthomere (nearly caudal view, slightly laterally); s, interior parabasal spine.

FIGURES 12–13 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 12–13. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 12, gonopods (mesal view); 13, gonopods (lateral view). Scale in mm.

FIGURE 1 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURE 1. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. Habitus in lateral view. Photographed not to scale.

FIGURES 10–11 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 10–11. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., female paratype. 10, vulva (caudal view); 11, vulva (lateral view).

FIGURES 6–9 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 6–9. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 6, gonopod promere (caudal view); 7, gonopod opisthomere and mesomere (front view); 8, gonopod opisthomere and mesomere (mesal view); 9, gonopod opisthomere (nearly caudal view); ph, phylacum; v, velum; s, interior parabasal spine.

FIGURES 2–5 in Genus Leptoiulus Verhoeff, 1894 new to the fauna of the Asian part of Russia, with description of a new species from the Altai and its comparison with the European Leptoiulus trilineatus (C. L. Koch, 1847) (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

FIGURES 2–5. Leptoiulus tigirek sp. nov., male paratype. 2, gnathochilarium; 3, leg pair 1(front view); 4, penes and coxae 2; 5, gonopods (mesal view).

FIGURE 7. a–m in European Rhogogaster s. str., with notes on several Asian species (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)

FIGURE 7. a–m: Rhogogaster magniserrula (holotype)—a dorsal view, b–c head and thorax dorsal view, d head and thorax laterally, e lance and lancet, f serrulae from the middle of the saw, g claw of hind leg, h hind tarsus, i 1st – 3rd plantar lobe, j face, k mesoscutellum and appendage in dorsolateral view, l labels, m antenna. n–r: R. magniserrula (paratype from Kirov)— n dorsal view, o head and thorax dorsolateral view p face oblique, q head dorsally, r labels.

FIGURE 5. a–f in European Rhogogaster s. str., with notes on several Asian species (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)

FIGURE 5. a–f: serrulae from the middle of the saw, with marked angle of cypsella—a–b Rhogogaster scalaris, c R. viridis, d R. polaris, e R. magniserrula, f R. magniserrula (worn). g–n: lancet (in h and k also lance) with details of serrulae—g, i, k R. polaris, h R. punctulata, j, l R. scalaris, m R. viridis, n R. magniserrula.

FIGURE 6. a–j in European Rhogogaster s. str., with notes on several Asian species (Hymenoptera: Tenthredinidae)

FIGURE 6. a–j: penis valves—a–b Rhogogaster scalaris, c R. chlorosoma, d R. auctor (holotype), e R. punctulata, f R. polaris, g R. sibirica (paralectotype), h R. viridis, i R. naias (paratype). j–n: drawings of penis valves by Benson (1943, 1952, 1965) and Ross (1943)—j R. scalaris (as R. viridis), k R. chlorosoma, l R. punctulata, m R. californica, n R. viridis (as R. dryas). o: variability of penis valves in R. polaris (all from Sweden, Abisko area). p: records of R. magniserrula (displayed with Map data, © Basarsoft, Google).