Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

536

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

536 results for “Tyrannosaurus rex”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Figure 16 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 16 Bivariate scatterplot showing the relationship between chronological age with maturity among eight specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex. The comparison is limited to specimens that have been histologically aged; growth stages (x-axis) and chronological age (y-axis) have been converted to ranks. See Table 14 for the raw data. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-16

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 3 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 3 Scatterplot showing the noncongruence in Tyrannosaurus rex between the completeness of specimens (i.e., number of characters scored) and the number of synontomorphies at each corresponding node. Per cent completeness (decreasing away from the origin) and the number of synontomorphies supporting the corresponding node (decreasing away from the origin) have been converted to ranks. A Spearman correlation test on these data results in a nonsignificant correlation coefficient; ergo, the number of synontomorphies at an internode is not an artifact of specimen completeness. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-3

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 30 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 30 Comparison of recapitulatory synontomorphies of Tyrannosaurus rex with tyrannosauroid phylogeny. Ten unambiguously optimized synontomorphies are congruent with unambiguously optimized synapomorphies of tyrannosauroid phylogeny, providing limited evidence of recapitulation (see text for details). Numbers to the right correspond to the growth stages in Fig. 2. If recapitulation was present, then the growth stage numbers should increase with progressively exclusive clades; that pattern is not seen here. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-30

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 29 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 29 Reptile Encephalization Quotients (REQs) of Hurlburt, Ridgley & Witmer (2013) mapped onto the growth curve of Tyrannosaurus rex. The REQ is based on a brain mass to endocranial volume ratio of 37% and the parenthetical values following the REQs corresponds to the two different body mass estimates, in metric tonnes, from which the REQs were derived (see Hurlburt, Ridgley & Witmer, 2013 for details). Overall, the REQ of the juvenile greatly exceeds that of adults, and the adults show an increasing ontogenetic progression of REQ values, as first reported by Hurlburt, Ridgley & Witmer (2013). Key to specimens numbered on the growth curve is in Fig. 12. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-29

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 26 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 26 Heat maps of the ontogenetic changes seen in the skull and mandible of Tyrannosaurus rex. Illustrations show per centage of the total number of unambiguously optimized synontomorphies per bone (A) and functional module (B). Darker shades of gray indicate higher proportions of growth change, whereas lighter shades indicate lower proportions of change. The results show that the greatest amount of growth changes are at the lacrimal (A) or along the dorsal skull roof (B). Hatchure indicates empty space; stipple indicates unprepared matrix. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-26

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 25 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 25 The results of Therrien, Henderson & Ruff (2005) compared with the growth curve of Tyrannosaurus rex. Vertical bending strength and relative bending strength (sensu Therrien, Henderson & Ruff, 2005) mapped onto the growth curve of T. rex. Values for juveniles are missing for mid-dentary dorsoventral strength and mid-dentary relative strength. In general, strength increases ontogenetically, a trend that becomes obscured in adulthood. Key to specimens numbered on the growth curve is in Fig. 12. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-25

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 1 Results of the cladistic analysis of 1,850 characters among 44 specimens of Tyrannosaurus rex. (A) Strict consensus of 50 MPTs showing the recovery of three primary growth stages separated by the specimen BMRP 2002.4.1. (B) The single ontogram recovered after the exclusion of wildcard specimens, reducing the number of OTUs to 31. Numbers to the left of the internodes are bootstrap and jackknife values, respectively; numbers to the right are Bremer decay indices. Asterisk indicates the type specimen. Ellipses enclose the regions of polytomies produced by the wildcard specimens, which are listed in the lower right hand corner of the corresponding ellipse. Note that the ellipses are limited to one side or the other relative to BMRP 2002.4.1, which corresponds to the topology of the strict consensus ontogram. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-1

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 2 in A high-resolution growth series of Tyrannosaurus rex obtained from multiple lines of evidence

Figure 2 Ontogram of Tyrannosaurus rex showing growth stages, synontomorphies, individual variation, individual specimens, and chronological ages. Arrowhead points to the most mature specimen and the direction of the entire ontogenetic axis; that is, the least mature specimen is at the lower left whereas the most mature specimen is at the upper right. Asterisk indicates the type specimen. Individual variation occurs as progressions until young adulthood, where reversals are first seen. The maximum amount of change occurs at growth stages 5 and 6, which corresponds to the transition from a long and low skull and jaws to a deep and stout skull frame; this event, marked by the concentration of an extreme number of changes, is evidence that the ontogeny of T. rex is metamorphic (sensu Rose & Reiss, 1993). Each circle represents a numbered growth stage; these numbers do not correspond to those seen in Fig. 12. The star at growth stage 7 marks the ~3,000 kg threshold that separates T. rex from its closest, but smaller, relatives. Color key: red, small juveniles; orange, large juveniles; yellow, subadults; green, young adults; blue, adults; violet, senescent adults. See text for definition of growth categories. Skulls are to scale; AMNH FARB 5027 is scaled to a premaxilla to quadrate length of 1.3 m. Full-size DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9192/fig-2

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 5 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 5. Heat maps depicting Von Mises strains in Gekko gecko (A–C), Psittacus erithacus (D–F), and Tyrannosaurus rex (G–I) in Left, Neutral; Middle, FAM; and Right, MLM postures of each taxon. Models are shown in left oblique (top), left lateral (middle), and ventral (bottom) views. Heat maps show strains in postural models with all muscles fired simultaneously. Areas of high strain appear in warmer colors; white areas are beyond the scales presented with the models. Cooler colors depict areas of low strain concentration. Bones of the left lateral dermatocranium (i.e., portions of the maxilla, jugal, lacrimal, postorbital, and quadratojugal bones) have been removed on heat maps of T. rex to show details of the palate, although all bones were in place for the analysis.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 3 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 3. Mapped attachments of jaw muscles used to load finite element models of (A) Gekko gecko; (B) Psittacus erithacus, and (C) Tyrannosaurus rex in Top: left oblique; Middle: left lateral; and Bottom: ventral views for each taxon. Muscle map colors follow same palate and hypotheses of homology as Holliday (2009).

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 2 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 2. Comparisons of postures using overlays of each of the three models: Left, Gekko gecko; Middle, Tyrannosaurus rex; Right, Psittacus erithacus showing postural change in left lateral (A) and ventral (B) views and in rostral (C), lateral, (D), and ventral (E) views showing overlaid postural configurations used to model kinetic competency. Postures are overlaid using the jaw joint as the origin of the axes. Neutral models are represented in gray, FAM models in orange, and MLM models in blue. Angles of rotation/translation at the otic joint are shown using color-coded angle measurements in (A) and (B).

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 1 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 1. Postural Kinetic Competency modeling workflow followed in this study. Microcomputed Tomography data (A) are segmented to build 3D models by segmenting individual bones (or bony segments; e.g., beak, braincase) as separate elements (B). 3D models are reconstructed in kinetic postures with individual elements realistically articulated (C). The resulting models are imported into Strand7 as stereolithographical files and are meshed using 4-node tetrahedra (D). Meshed models are prepared for finite element analysis (FEA) by mapping muscles on the surface and eliminating tetrahedra in joint areas (E1). Beams are attached to the facing sides of joint surfaces and are given material properties reflecting capsular or sutural ligaments (E2). The resulting finite element model is loaded using distributed muscle forces via the BoneLoad MATLAB program and Strand7 FEA software (F).

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 10 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 10. Illustration of Tyrannosaurus skull in left lateral (top) and ventral (bottom) views with key functional characteristics of the feeding apparatus. Numerous features of the skull of Tyrannosaurus suggest it was not capable of substantial cranial kinesis.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 9 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 9. Comparison of neutral postures of Tyrannosaurus rex and Psittacus erithacus in left rostrolateral view showing effects of protractor muscle activation, constraints, and sutural materials on the behavior of models. Jaw joint constraints with activated (A) and deactivated (B) protractor muscles reveal few differences in strains in the model. Occipital constraints with activated (C) and deactivated (D) protractor muscles reveal significant differences in strain distribution in the palate. Regions of models with hatching represent areas that have been cut away to allow for better visualizations of internal structures. Psittacus erithacus is presented to show differences between using rodent sutural properties (E) and canine sutural properties (F). Rodent sutural properties were used in Psittacus and Gekko and canine sutural properties were used in Tyrannosaurus. Sutural properties were considered based on taxon size.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 8 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 8. Strains of regions of interest in the palatal elements of Tyrannosaurus rex. Regions of interest and scatter plots showing individual sample points as well as median strains (color-coded by sampling region) are represented. Otic, middle, and ventral regions correspond to sampling of the quadrate whereas Rostral, middle, and caudal regions correspond to sampling areas of the palatine and pterygoid. Each sampling region consists of 50 tetrahedra sampled randomly from the surface of the skeletal element. Horizontal lines representing the median value of the neutral posture are shown in red in each region of the palatal bones to facilitate comparison across postures.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 7 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 7. Strains of regions of interest in the palatal elements of Psittacus erithacus. Regions of interest and scatter plots showing individual sample points as well as median strains (color-coded by sampling region) are represented. Otic, middle, and ventral regions correspond to sampling of the quadrate whereas Rostral, middle, and caudal regions correspond to sampling areas of the palatine and pterygoid. Each sampling region consists of 50 tetrahedra sampled randomly from the surface of the skeletal element. Horizontal lines representing the median value of the neutral posture are shown in red in each region of the palatal bones to facilitate comparison across postures.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 4 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 4. The relationship between fiber length, pennation angle, and force in muscle physiology and its application to reconstructing function in fossil taxa using recent case studies. PCSA is a function of pennation angle and fiber length and is mapped as a heatmap with contour lines. We replotted the regression line from Bates and Falkingham, 2018 (labeled "B&F 2018") showing the classic prediction that increasing pennation in order to accommodate shorter muscle fibers increases PCSA. PCSA values from recent studies, Gignac and Erickson, 2017 (labeled "G&E 2017") and Bates and Falkingham, 2018, of Tyrannosaurus cranial biomechanics are also plotted to show similarities in approaches.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Fig. 6 in Palatal Biomechanics and its Significance for Cranial Kinesis in Tyrannosaurus rex

Fig. 6. Strains of regions of interest in the palatal elements of Gekko gecko. Regions of interest and scatter plots showing individual sample points as well as median strains (color-coded by sampling region) are represented. Otic, middle, and ventral regions correspond to sampling of the quadrate whereas rostral, middle, and caudal regions correspond to sampling areas of the palatine and pterygoid. Each sampling region consists of 50 tetrahedra sampled randomly from the surface of the skeletal element. Horizontal lines representing the median value of the neutral posture are shown in red in each region of the palatal bones to facilitate comparison across postures.

opennotspecifiedDec 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Skull Tyrannosaurus Rex - PARIS 190819

Skull Tyrannosaurus Rex - Muséum national d'histoire naturelle. Recovery Proyects 41 JPG Photos Compact Camera 19 / 08 / 2019 Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab

opencc-by-nc-1.0Nov 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the mounted skeleton of Tyrannosaurus rex, chiefly from Amer. Mus. 5027, partly from the type specimen Amer. Mus. 973. The sternal ribs are not restored. (The structure of the manus is unknown as yet; the restoration of the digits is conjectural. About natural size. in Skeletal Adaptations of Ornitholestes, Struthiomimus, Tyrannosaurus

Anterior, lateral, and posterior aspects of the mounted skeleton of Tyrannosaurus rex, chiefly from Amer. Mus. 5027, partly from the type specimen Amer. Mus. 973. The sternal ribs are not restored. (The structure of the manus is unknown as yet; the restoration of the digits is conjectural. About natural size.

opennotspecifiedDec 1916View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record