Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2005View details →

Figure 2 in A biogeographical analysis of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) of the island of Thasos in the context of the Aegean Islands (Greece)

Figure 2. Relationship between the proportion of Balkan (BAL, circles) and Anatolian (ANA, squares) taxa and longitude. Arrows show the position of Thasos.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2005View details →

Figure 1 in A biogeographical analysis of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) of the island of Thasos in the context of the Aegean Islands (Greece)

Figure 1. Map of the study area. Studied islands are in black: 1, Thasos; 2, Lemnos; 3, Lesvos; 4, Skopelos; 5, Skiros; 6, Chios; 7, Euboea; 8, Samos; 9, Andros 10, Tinos; 11, Mikonos 12, Kea; 13, Siros; 14, Kithnos; 15, Serifos; 16, Paros; 17, Naxos; 18, Sifnos; 19, Pano Koufonissi; 20, Amorgos; 21, Kos; 22, Kimolos; 23, Ios; 24, Sikinos; 25, Milos; 26, Folegandros; 27, Santorini; 28, Anafi; 29, Rhodos; 30, Castellorizo; 31, Karpathos; 32, Kriti.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2006View details →

Figure 2. Majority rule consensus tree for the 16S in Genus Baseodiscus (Nemertea: Heteronemertea): Molecular identification of a new species in a phylogenetic context

Figure 2. Majority rule consensus tree for the 16S rRNA data resulting from the Bayesian analysis (model GTR+G+I), 1,000,000 generations. Numbers refer to posterior probabilities.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2006View details →

Figure 1 in Genus Baseodiscus (Nemertea: Heteronemertea): Molecular identification of a new species in a phylogenetic context

Figure 1. Parsimony tree based on the 16S rRNA data with bootstrap support values from 5000 replicates (heuristic search, random additions, five replicates).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →

Diversity in citations to a single study: Supplementary data set for citation context network analysis

Introduction This document describes the data set used for all analyses in 'Diversity in citations to a single study: A citation context network analysis of how evidence from a prospective cohort study was cited' accepted for publication in Quantitative Science Studies [1]. Data Collection The data collection procedure has been fully described [1]. Concisely, the data set contains bibliometric data collected from Web of Science Core Collection via the University of Edinburgh’s Library subscription concerning all papers that cited a cohort study, Paul et al. [2], in the period <1985. This includes a full list of citing papers, and the citations between these papers. Additionally, it includes textual passages (citation contexts) from 343 citing papers, which were manually recovered from the full-text documents accessible via the University of Edinburgh’s Library subscription. These data have been cleaned, converted into network readable datasets, and are coded into particular classifications reflecting content, which are described fully in the supplied code book and within the manuscript [1].  Data description All relevant data can be found in the attached file 'Supplementary_material_Leng_QSS_2021.xlsx', which contains the following five workbooks: <ul> <li>“Overview” includes a list of the content of the workbooks.</li> <li>“Code Book” contains the coding rules and definitions used for the classification of findings and paper titles.</li> <li>“Node attribute list” includes a workbook containing all node attributes for the citation network, which includes Paul et al. [2] and its citing papers as of 1984. Highlighted in yellow at the bottom of this workbook is two papers that were discarded due to duplication - remove these if analysing this dataset in a network analysis. The columns refer to:</li> </ul> <ol> <li>Id, the node identifier</li> <li>Label, the formal citation of the paper to which data within this row corresponds. Citation is in the following format: last name of first author, year of publication, journal of publication, volume number, start page, and DOI (if available).  </li> <li>Title, the paper title for the paper in question.</li> <li>Publication_year, the year of publication.</li> <li>Document_type, the document type (e.g. review, article)</li> <li>WoS_ID, the paper’s unique Web of Science accession number.</li> <li>Citation_context, a column specifying whether citation context data is available from that paper</li> <li>Explanans, the title explanans terms for that paper;</li> <li>Explanandum, the explanandum terms for that paper.</li> <li>Combined_Title_Classification, the combined terms used for fig 2 of the published manuscript.</li> <li>Serum_cholesterol_(SC), a column identifying papers that cited the serum cholesterol findings.</li> <li>Blood_Pressure_(BP), a column identifying papers that cited the blood pressure findings.</li> <li>Coffee_(C), a column identifying papers that cited the coffee findings.</li> <li>Diet_(D), a column identifying papers that cited the dietary findings.</li> <li>Smoking_(S), a column identifying papers that cited the smoking findings.</li> <li>Alcohol_(A), a column identifying papers that cited the alcohol findings.</li> <li>Physical_Activity_(PA), a column identifying papers that cited the physical activity findings.</li> <li>Body_Fatness (BF), a column identifying papers that cited the body fatness findings.</li> <li>Indegree, the number of within network citations to that paper, calculated for the network shown in Fig 4 of the manuscript.</li> <li>Outdegree, the number of within network references of that paper as calculated for the network in Fig 4.</li> <li>Main_component, a column specifying whether a node is contained in the largest weakly connect component as shown in Fig 4 of the manuscript.</li> <li>Cluster, provides the cluster membership number as discussed within the manuscript (Fig 5).</li> </ol> <ul> <li>“Edge list” includes a workbook including the edges for the network. The columns refer to:</li> </ul> <ol> <li>Source, contains the node identifier of the citing paper.</li> <li>Target, contains the node identifier of the cited paper.</li> </ol> <ul> <li>“Citation context classification” includes a workbook containing the WoS accession number for the paper analysed, and any finding category discussed in that paper established via context analysis (see the code book for definitions). The columns refer to:</li> </ul> <ol> <li>Id, the node identifier</li> <li>Finding_Class, the findings discussed from Paul et al. within the body of the citing paper.  </li> </ol> <ul> <li> “Citation context data” includes a workbook containing the WoS accession number for papers in which citation context data was available, the citation context passages, the reference number or format of Paul et al. within the citing paper, and the finding categories discussed in those contexts (see code book for definitions). The columns refer to:</li> </ul> <ol> <li>Id, the node identifier</li> <li>Citation_context, the passage copied from the full text of the citing paper containing discussion of the findings of Paul et al.</li> <li>Reference_in_citing_article, the reference number or format of Paul et al. within the citing paper.</li> <li>Finding_class, the findings discussed from Paul et al. within the body of the citing paper. </li> </ol> Software recommended for analysis For the analyses performed within the manuscript, Gephi version 0.9.2 was used [3], and both the edge and node lists are in a format that is easily read into this software. The Sci2 tool was used to parse data initially [4]. Notes <ol> <li>Leng, R. I. (Forthcoming). Diversity in citations to a single study: A citation context network analysis of how evidence from a prospective cohort study was cited. Quantitative Science Studies.</li> <li>Paul, O., Lepper, M. H., Phelan, W. H., Dupertuis, G. W., Macmillan, A., McKean, H., et al. (1963). A longitudinal study of coronary heart disease. Circulation, 28, 20-31. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.28.1.20">https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.28.1.20</a>.</li> <li>Bastian, M., Heymann, S., & Jacomy, M. (2009). Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.</li> <li>Sci2 Team. (2009). Science of Science (Sci2) Tool. Indiana University and SciTech Strategies. Stable URL: <a href="https://sci2.cns.iu.edu">https://sci2.cns.iu.edu</a></li> </ol>

Fig. 4 in Modelling the change in the distribution of the black-shanked douc, Pygathrix nigripes (Milne-Edwards) in the context of climate change: Implications for conservation

Fig. 4. The predicted distribution of the black-shanked douc (P. nigripes) generated by the MaxEnt software under the RCP8.5 scenario. BGM = Bu Gia Map National Park; CYS = Chu Yang Sin National Park; CT = Cat Tien National Park; HB = Hon Ba Nature Reserve; KL-SM = Kalon-Song Mao Nature Reserve; KT = Krong Trai Nature Reserve; NK = Nam Ka Nature Reserve; NN = Nam Nung Nature Reserve; NC = Nui Chua National Park; NO = Nui Ong Nature Reserve; TK = Takou Nature Reserve; VC = Vinh Cuu Nature Reserve.

Fig. 2 in Modelling the change in the distribution of the black-shanked douc, Pygathrix nigripes (Milne-Edwards) in the context of climate change: Implications for conservation

Fig. 2. The predicted distribution of the black-shanked douc (P. nigripes) generated by the MaxEnt software under the RCP4.5 scenario. BGM = Bu Gia Map National Park; CYS = Chu Yang Sin National Park; CT = Cat Tien National Park; HB = Hon Ba Nature Reserve; KL-SM = Kalon-Song Mao Nature Reserve; KT = Krong Trai Nature Reserve; NK = Nam Ka Nature Reserve; NN = Nam Nung Nature Reserve; NC = Nui Chua National Park; NO = Nui Ong Nature Reserve; TK = Takou Nature Reserve; VC = Vinh Cuu Nature Reserve.

Fig. 3 in Modelling the change in the distribution of the black-shanked douc, Pygathrix nigripes (Milne-Edwards) in the context of climate change: Implications for conservation

Fig. 3. Response curve plots illustrate the dependence of predicted potential distribution on the three most important environmental variables for the black-shanked douc (P. nigripes). The curve shows the mean response of 10 replicates by MaxEnt (red line) and the standard deviation (blue band).

Fig. 1. The 472 in Modelling the change in the distribution of the black-shanked douc, Pygathrix nigripes (Milne-Edwards) in the context of climate change: Implications for conservation

Fig. 1. The 472 points recorded for the black-shanked douc (P. nigripes) that were used in this study. BGM = Bu Gia Map National Park; CYS = Chu Yang Sin National Park; CT = Cat Tien National Park; HB = Hon Ba Nature Reserve; KL-SM = Kalon-Song Mao Nature Reserve; KT = Krong Trai Nature Reserve; NK = Nam Ka Nature Reserve; NN = Nam Nung Nature Reserve; NC = Nui Chua National Park; NO = Nui Ong Nature Reserve; TK = Takou Nature Reserve; VC = Vinh Cuu Nature Reserve.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Text-fig. 1. Geographical position and stratigraphic context of the Pleistocene sites from the Czech Republic and Slovakia containing Apodemus material analyzed in this paper. in Genus Apodemus In The Pleistocene Of Central Europe: When Did The Extant Taxa Appear?

Text-fig. 1. Geographical position and stratigraphic context of the Pleistocene sites from the Czech Republic and Slovakia containing Apodemus material analyzed in this paper.

Fig. 18 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 18. Electrophoretic phenotypes of five proteins as expressed on separate gels. PEPA, a dimeric enzyme, for three lizards. LDH1, a tetrameric enzyme, for three lizards. ESTD, a dimeric enzyme, for three lizards. sMDH, a dimeric enzyme, for four lizards. TF, a monomeric enzyme, for six lizards; white dots mark the three isozymes from the hybrid. Letters below gel identify allozymes based on alleles present (table 13). Lanes for individual lizards are labeled beside the gel (with genotype) as follows: I, A. inornata; M, A. tigris marmorata; N, A. neomexicana; NC, A. neomexicana from Conchas Lake; NF, A. neomexicana from Fort Sumner; N 3 S, the hybrid; S, A. sexlineata viridis. Anode is to the right, ^ indicates relative position of sample applications.

Fig. 17 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 17. Karyotype of a triploid whiptail lizard (AMNH R151739; 3n 5 69) from Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. This is a hybrid between A. neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis. The three haploid genomes (two rows of chromosomes each) are arranged to illustrate ancestry of the hybrid, as follows: A. tigris marmorata (top) 3 A. inornata (middle), which were inherited from the diploid maternal parent of the hybrid (A. neomexicana), and A. sexlineata viridis (bottom), from the paternal parent. Bar 5 10 mm.

Fig. 16 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 16. Pattern of morphological distinctiveness expressed by the distribution of canonical variate scores derived from a linear canonical variate analysis of eight meristic characters in 49 A. neomexicana (Ơ), 26 A. sexlineata viridis (m 5? and M 5 /), 13 A. neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis (v 5? and V 5 /), AMNH 144085 5 UADZ 3272 (3, assigned to the hybrid group as indicated by Walker et al., 1990), OMNH 35109 (1, assigned to the hybrid group as suspected by B.E. Leuck), and 26 A. tesselata C (n) from Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. Ellipses represent the 95% confidence limits of each group.

Fig. 10 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 10. Unusual dorsal pattern in OMNH 35109, a putative hybrid female, SVL 69 mm, of Aspidoscelis neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis from South of Clabberhill Ranch (CL1*), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico.

Fig. 9 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 9. Life colors in three lizards used in genetic studies. A. Diploid Aspidoscelis neomexicana adult female, AMNH R151740, SVL 72 mm, Cove Campground (CL13), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. B. Triploid Aspidoscelis neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis hybrid male, AMNH R151739, SVL 74 mm, from South Recreation Area (CL2*), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. C. Diploid A. sexlineata viridis adult male, AMNH R108142, SVL 69 mm, from Kiowa County, Colorado.

Fig. 3. A in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 3. A relatively stable topographically and ecologically complex area located north of the Canadian River and east of Conchas Lake Dam as viewed from the south side of the river, San Miguel County, New Mexico. North of Canadian River (CL4); V near middle shows the area with openstructured mesquite, grassesweeds, and junipers along an unpaved road on the upper bench near a precipice from which individuals of Aspidoscelis neomexicana, A. tesselata C, and A. exsanguis, but not A. sexlineata viridis or A. tesselata D, have been collected; lower V shows bench near the river with dense mesquite, grasses, and weeds in which only individuals of A. neomexicana have been observed. The presence of Aspidoscelis neomexicana along the rocky precipice at CL4, from which it flees into the boulders below when threatened, makes this site the most unusual known to us for the species throughout its range.

Fig. 13. Subadult Aspidoscelis neomexicana 3 A in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 13. Subadult Aspidoscelis neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis hybrids from components of the South Recreation Area (CL2*), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. A. UADZ 7561?, CL2J*, SVL 49 mm. B. UADZ 7556 /, CL2H*, SVL 49 mm. C. UADZ 7555 /, CL2H*, SVL 47 mm. D. UADZ 7452?, CL2H*, SVL 37 mm. E. UADZ 7448?, CL2H*, SVL 45 mm. F. UADZ 7455 /, CL2C*, SVL 48 mm.

Fig. 11 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 11. Adult specimens of Aspidoscelis neomexicana of special significance. A. AMNH R151740 /, SVL 73 mm, from Cove Campground (CL13), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico, used in karyotypic and electrophoretic analyses in this study. B. MSB 65617 /, SVL 79 mm, from Fort Sumner–De Baca County Landfill (FS1), Fort Sumner, De Baca County, New Mexico; first reported specimen of the species from the county (Taylor, 2002). C. AMNH R151741 /, SVL 73 mm, from Fort Sumner–Railroad Depot (FS2), Fort Sumner, De Baca County, New Mexico, used in karyotypic and electrophoretic analyses in this study.

Fig. 8 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 8. Four or five generations represented by specimens of Aspidoscelis neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis from South Recreation Area (CL2*), Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico, inferred from date of collection and snout–vent length (mm). Some lizards are active at the site from May to October (MJJASO) each year; horizontal line representing each lizard extends from the inferred year and month of hatching to the actual year and month of collection (. 5 younger or older age uncertain).

Fig. 15 in Hybridization Between Parthenogenetic Lizards (Aspidoscelis neomexicana) and Gonochoristic Lizards (Aspidoscelis sexlineata viridis) in New Mexico: Ecological, Morphological, Cytological, and Molecular Context

Fig. 15. Pattern of morphological variation expressed by the distribution of scores on the first two principal components extracted from a correlation matrix of eight meristic characters for 49 A. neomexicana (Ơ), 26 A. sexlineata viridis (m 5? and M 5 /), 13 A. neomexicana 3 A. sexlineata viridis (v 5? and V 5 /), AMNH 144085 5 UADZ 3272 (3, assigned to the hybrid group as indicated by Walker et al., 1990), OMNH 35109 (1, assigned to the hybrid group as suspected by B.E. Leuck), and 26 A. tesselata C (n) from Conchas Lake, San Miguel County, New Mexico. Ellipses represent the 95% confidence limits of each group.