Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,292
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,292 results for “DNA Barcode”
Figure 5 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 5 - A frequency histogram of elevations of Malaise samples, for 1) all LLAMA samples, 2) those with Pimpla croceipes, and 3) those with Pimpla molesta.
Figure 4 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 4 - Neighbour-joining tree of the successfully DNA barcoded LLAMA specimens (species; sex; DNA voucher code; location). Numbers above the branches are bootstrap proportions. The two species Pimpla croceipes and Pimpla molesta (stat. rev.) are clearly separated into two well-supported clusters. The results were further supported by morphological examination.
Figure 3 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 3 - The LLAMA study sites where specimens of either Pimpla croceipes, Pimpla molesta, or both, were collected 1 Suchitepequez 2 Sacatepequez 3 Baja Vera Paz 4 Zacapa 5 Ocotepeque 6 Cortés 7 Comayagua 8 Olancho: "La Muralla" 9 Olancho: "Catacamas". See text for more specific descriptions of site locations.
Figure 7 from: Veijalainen A, Broad G, Wahlberg N, Longino J, Sääksjärvi I (2011) DNA barcoding and morphology reveal two common species in one: Pimpla molesta stat. rev. separated from P. croceipes (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae). ZooKeys 124: 59-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.124.1780
Figure 7 - Lissonota sp. male (Ichneumonidae: Banchinae) collected at Comayagua (Honduras) showing a similar mimicry pattern to Pimpla croceipes and Pimpla molesta.
Figures 1-11 from: Bu Y, Bai Y (2013) Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. from Jiangsu Province, Eastern China, with analyses of DNA barcodes (Protura, Acerentomata, Hesperentomidae). ZooKeys 338: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.338.6099
Figures 1-11 - Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. Holotype. 1 Habitus 2 pseudoculus 3 pronotum 4 mesonotum (sl=sublateral pore) 5 metanotum 6 sternite II 7 sternite IV 8 prosternum 9 mesosternum 10 metasternum 11 sternite VII. Arrows show pores. Scale bar: 100 μm in Fig. 1, others, 20 μm.
Figures 23-25 from: Bu Y, Bai Y (2013) Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. from Jiangsu Province, Eastern China, with analyses of DNA barcodes (Protura, Acerentomata, Hesperentomidae). ZooKeys 338: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.338.6099
Figures 23-25 - Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. 23 Tergites VIII–XII, left side (pm= posteromedial pore) 24 male squama genitalis 25 sternites VIII–XII (pl=posterolateral pore) 23 and 25 holotype 24 paratype NJ-10. Arrows show pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.
Figures 12-22 from: Bu Y, Bai Y (2013) Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. from Jiangsu Province, Eastern China, with analyses of DNA barcodes (Protura, Acerentomata, Hesperentomidae). ZooKeys 338: 29-37. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.338.6099
Figures 12-22 - Hesperentomon yangi sp. n. Holotype. 12 Head, dorsal view (cp=clypeal pores, ip=interpseudocular pores, op =occipital pores) 13 pseudoculus 14 canal of maxillary gland 15 labial palpus 16 maxillary palpus, 17 foretarsus, exterior view 18 foretarsus, interior view 19 tergite VII, left side (al=anterolateral pore, psm=posterosubmedial pore, psl=posterosublateral pore) 20 sternite VII and lateral part of tergite VII 21 Comb 22 female squama genitalis. Arrows show pores. Scale bar: 20 μm.
Figure 9 from: Hosoishi S, Ogata K (2014) Description and DNA barcoding of Crematogaster fraxatrix Forel, 1911 and two new closely related species from Cambodia and Indonesia (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 374: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.374.5874
Figure 9 - Neighbor-joining (Saitou and Nei 1987) tree of genetic distances (Kimura-2-parameter model (Kimura 1980), Bootstrap 1000 bootstrap replicates) of cytochrome c oxidase I (COI) for three Crematogaster species. Numbers on the nodes show the bootstrap values (>50%). Numbers in parentheses are specimen sample IDs.
Figures 3-6 from: Hosoishi S, Ogata K (2014) Description and DNA barcoding of Crematogaster fraxatrix Forel, 1911 and two new closely related species from Cambodia and Indonesia (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). ZooKeys 374: 57-68. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.374.5874
Figures 3-6 - Crematogaster fraxatrix. 3 lateral view 4 dorsal view of mesosoma 5 full face view 6 dorsal view of petiole and postpetiole.
Figure 21 from: Luan Y, Bu Y, Gao Y (2012) Redescription of arenicolous dipluran Parajapyx pauliani (Diplura, Parajapygidae) and DNA barcoding analyses of Parajapyx from China. ZooKeys 221: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.221.3207
Figure 21 - Neighbour-joining tree (p-distance, Bootstrap 1000 replicates) of Chinese Parajapyx inferred from COI gene sequences. Numbers on the nodes show the bootstrap values (> 50%).
Figures 18-20 from: Luan Y, Bu Y, Gao Y (2012) Redescription of arenicolous dipluran Parajapyx pauliani (Diplura, Parajapygidae) and DNA barcoding analyses of Parajapyx from China. ZooKeys 221: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.221.3207
Figures 18-20 - Habitats of Parajapyx pauliani in Hainan (S China). 18 shingly beach of Ximaozhou Island, inset shows the size of stone 19 sand beach of Ximaozhou Island, inset show the size of sand granules 20 sand beach of Qizi Bay, inset show the size of sand granules ✱ indicates the sample site.
Figures 1-17 from: Luan Y, Bu Y, Gao Y (2012) Redescription of arenicolous dipluran Parajapyx pauliani (Diplura, Parajapygidae) and DNA barcoding analyses of Parajapyx from China. ZooKeys 221: 19-29. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.221.3207
Figures 1-17 - Parajapyx pauliani 1 Habitus 2 head, dorsal view (Di= dorsal interior setae; De= dorsal exterior setae; Dl= dorsal lateral setae) 3 head, ventral view (ad= admentum cx= coxae lp= labial palps area sm= submentum po= pli oral region) 4 pronotum 5 mesonotum 6 metanotum 7 prosternum (al= anterior lobe ml= middlelobe pl= posterior lobe, same for figs 8–9) 8 mesosternum 9 metasternum 10 cerci 11 subcoxal organ of urosternite I, right side 12 urotergite I 13 urotergite II 14 urotergite VII 15 urosternite I (so= subcoxal organ) 16 urosternite II (ev= eversible vesicles) 17 urosternite VII. Scale bar: 0.5 mm in Fig. 1; 0.1 mm in Figs 2–17.
Figure 5 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 5 - Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling plot of K2P-distance between MCR sequences of Stenella coeruleoalba (in blue), Delphinus delphis (in red) and Stenella frontalis (in green). Individuals of each species are clearly clustered together, and unidentified samples (in black) stranded along the coasts of Brittany group with one of the three species. Dd280211A (Ds1), Ds130210 (Ds3), Ds230409 (Ds4), Ds250412 (Ds5) and Sc210910 (Ds6) are putatively identified as Delphinus delphis, whereas Ds080410 (Ds2) would more likely belong to Stenella coeruloalba.
Figure 2 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 2 - Organization of the stranding network in Brittany (North West of France) and localization of the stranded specimens used in this study. Numbers indicate the 18 geographic sections of the stranding network in this area. The map was drawn using ArcGIS Desktop: Release 9.3.1 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA, USA) with WGS 84 coordinates.
Figure 1 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 1 - Numbers of different species of marine mammals stranded along the coasts of Brittany (North West of France) in the period 2003–2012.
Figure 4 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 4 - Examples of marine mammals stranded along the coasts of Brittany and the species-level identifications of which were determined or confirmed thanks to DNA barcoding. A Sample Ms250511, stranded on the "Île de Sein" during May 2011, and identified as a Balaenoptera physalus B Sample Ds160111, stranded on the Ushant Island during January 2011, and identified as a Grampus griseus C Sample Ds130211, stranded on the Ushant Island in February 2011, and identified as belonging to the Delphininae subfamily (putatively identified as a Delphinus delphis on the nMDS plot in Figure 5) D Sample Ds080410 stranded on the Ushant Island during April 2010, and identified as belonging to the Delphininae (putatively identified as a Stenella coeruleoalba on the nMDS plot in Figure 5).
Figure 3 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 3 - Neighbour-Joining tree of major species of marine mammals, based on K2P-distances calculated from 507 bp of COI. All sequences come from the IMMB project on BOLD, and only 5 harbour porpoise and 5 grey seal samples among those of the IMMB project have been included in the analysis.
Figure 6 from: Jung J, Alfonsi E, Méheust E, Fuchs S, Carpentier F, Quillivic Y, Viricel A, Hassani S (2013) The use of DNA barcoding to monitor the marine mammal biodiversity along the French Atlantic coast. ZooKeys 365: 5-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5873
Figure 6 - Haplotype network established from the COI sequences of 45 harbour porpoises stranded along the Atlantic coast of France (Appendix 1). Numbers on a line connecting two haplotypes correspond to the sequence position of the mutation differentiating these haplotypes. Two mitochondrial haplogroups appear (black circles - grey circles), that group the same individuals as the haplogroups alpha and beta determined using MCR polymorphisms and described in Alfonsi et al. (2012).
Figure 2 from: Ballardini M, Mercuri A, Littardi C, Abbas S, Couderc M, Ludeña B, Pintaud J (2013) The chloroplast DNA locus psbZ-trnfM as a potential barcode marker in Phoenix L. (Arecaceae). ZooKeys 365: 71-82. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5725
Figure 2 - Structure and variation of the minisatellite in the trnG-trnfM intergenic spacer. The repeats of the two mutational motifs (1 and 2) are indicated above the sequence alignment of the 7 haplotypes recorded. The pattern of inverted repeats generated by the two motifs and their reverse complements (RC) is shown below the alignment. See Table 1 for haplotype distribution among species.
Figure 3 from: Nijman V, Vonk R, Roselaar K, van Brandwijk H, Beentjes K (2013) DNA barcoding of Dutch birds. ZooKeys 365: 25-48. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.6287
Figure 3 - Haplotype networks constructed with statistical parsimony based on 694 bp of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene (COI) of the Sylvia group (25 individuals). Each circle represents one haplotype; size of circles is proportional to haplotype frequency.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.