Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
558
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
558 results for “Species interactions”
FIGURE 3 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)
FIGURE 3. Maximum likelihood tree derived from COI sequences of our copepod samples (labeled as P. tortugensis) plus voucher sequences from related copepods in the suborder Ergasilida (see Table 5 for a list). Sequences of copepods confamilial to P. tortugenis (Chondracanthidae) are labelled to species (and shaded blue in the online colour version), and members other taxa are labeled to family (and shaded pink in the colour online version). Support values for bipartitions are indicated, and divergence represented by dark blue scale bar = 3 %.
FIGURE 1 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)
FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood tree derived from COI sequences of our goby samples plus voucher sequences from all Coryphopterus species except C. punctipectophorus. Voucher sequences are identified by GenBank sequence ID. Sequences from several other goby species are included as outgroups (not all are identified in the figure; see Table 4 for a list). Support values for bipartitions are indicated, and divergence represented by scale bar = 6%.
FIGURE 2 in Using DNA barcoding to identify host-parasite interactions between cryptic species of goby (Coryphopterus: Gobiidae, Perciformes) and parasitic copepods (Pharodes tortugensis: Chondracanthidae, Cyclopoida)
FIGURE 2. Differences in body depth between goby species. A boxplot of body depth (as a % of body length in SL) for the three gobies, with sample sizes in parentheses. For the boxplot: box boundaries represent 25th and 75th percentiles respectively; line inside box indicates the median, lower and upper error lines indicate 10th and 90th percentiles respectively, and circles show data falling outside 10th and 90th percentiles.
Interactions with soil fungi alter density-dependence and neighborhood effects in a locally abundant dipterocarp species
<p>Seedling recruitment can be strongly affected by the composition of nearby plant species. At the neighborhood scale (on the order of tens of meters), adult conspecifics can modify soil chemistry and presence of host microbes (pathogens and mutualists) across their combined canopy area or rooting zones. At local or small spatial scales (on the order of one to few meters), conspecific seed or seedling density can influence the strength of intraspecific light and resource competition and also modify the density-dependent spread of natural enemies such as pathogens or invertebrate predators. Intrinsic correlation between proximity to adult conspecifics (i.e. recruitment neighborhood) and local seedling density, arising from dispersal, make it difficult to separate the independent and interactive factors that contribute to recruitment success. </p> <p>Here, we present a field experiment in which we manipulated both the recruitment neighborhood and seedling density to explore how they interact to influence the growth and survival of Dryobalanops aromatica, a dominant ectomycorrhizal tree species in a Bornean tropical rainforest. First, we found that both local seedling density and recruitment neighborhood had effects on performance of D. aromatica seedlings, though the nature of these impacts varied between growth and survival. Second, we did not find strong evidence that the effect of density on seedling survival is dependent on the presence of conspecific adult trees. However, accumulation of mutualistic fungi beneath conspecifics adults does facilitate establishment of D. aromatica seedlings. In total, our results suggest that recruitment near adult conspecifics was not associated with a performance cost and may have weakly benefitted recruiting seedlings. Positive effects of conspecifics may be a factor facilitating the regional hyperabundance of this species. </p> <p>Synthesis: Our results provide support for the idea that dominant species in diverse forests may escape the localized recruitment suppression that limits abundance in rarer species.</p>
FIGURE 1 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 1. Megalothorax anterolenis sp. nov. (A) Chaetotaxy of trunk tergites from Th. I to Abd. IV, with representation of the secondary granulation. (B, C, D) Head, (B) dorsal side including labrum and maxillary palp, (C) ventral side including labium basal fields, (D) variant morphology of the connection between linea ventralis and integumentary channels.
FIGURE 6 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 6. Megalothorax zealanterolenis sp. nov. (A) Chaetotaxy of trunk tergites from Th. I to Abd. V, (B) Head dorsal side. (C) Mandibula. (D) Antenna.
FIGURE 5 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 5. Megalothorax tasmanterolenis sp. nov. (A) Chaetotaxy of antenna, arrow indicates a facultative chaeta. (B) Claw I. (C) Claw II. (D) Claw III. (E) Furca posterior side.
FIGURE 9 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 9. Megalothorax tasmanterolenis sp. nov. (A) Integument with secondary granules and area of enlarged primary hexagons devoid of secondary granules, abdominal region dorsal side. (B) Integument, with area of enlarged primary granules, dorso-anterior part of head. (C) Enlarged and clear S-chaeta Sa2 on Ant. IV, compared with (D) normal, dark S-chaetae (e.g. Sb3, Sb4, Sb5) on Ant. IV. Megalothorax zealanterolenis sp. nov. (E) mucro with focus on the smooth and waved internal posterior lamella.
FIGURE 4 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 4. Megalothorax tasmanterolenis sp. nov. (A) Chaetotaxy of trunk tergites from Th. I to Abd. IV, area of repartition of the secondary granulation represented in grey, (B) Head dorsal side. (C, D) anterior side of the labrum anterior process, (D) labrum posterior side. (E) Maxillary outer lobe. (F) Mandibula. (G) Maxilla.
FIGURE 2 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 2. Megalothorax anterolenis sp. nov. (A, B) Labrum anterior process, (A) posterior side, (B) anterior side. (C) Maxillary outer lobe internal side. (D) Mandibula. (E) Maxilla. (F, G) Antenna (F) posterior side, (G) anterior side. (H) Abd. VI tergite and sternite, Abd. V and IV sternites, and posterior side of manubrium and dens (furca), chaeta and lobe in dotted line are missing on the figured specimen but normally present. (I) dens anterior side. (J) Mucro.
FIGURE 8 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 8. (A) Diagram of dorsal head chaetotaxy, chaeta in blue present only in M. tasmanterolenis sp. nov. and M. zealanterolenis sp. nov., channel in blue present only in M. tasmanterolenis sp. nov. (B) Diagram of ventral head chaetotaxy. (C) Diagram of antenna chaetotaxy. (D) Body chaetotaxy diagram, s-chaetae shape based on M. anterolenis sp. nov. (E) Connection of integumentary channels and linea ventralis: (a) crossed, (b) transitional form, (c) circular.
FIGURE 7 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 7. Megalothorax zealanterolenis sp. nov. (A) chaetae of Abd. IV sternites. (B) Leg I. (C) Leg II. (D) Leg III. (E) Claw I. (F) Claw II. (G) Claw III. (H, I, J) Mucro variations.
FIGURE 10 in A new group of species of the genus Megalothorax (Collembola, Neelidae) with Gondwanan distribution, and introducing an open interactive identification key of Megalothorax species
FIGURE 10. Molecular phylogeny of the genus Megalothorax, with optimization of taxonomically relevant character states. New OTUs names are indicated in bold. Bootstrap node support is shown next to the node, only when below 100 %.
High temperature frequently increases facilitation between aquatic foundation species: A global meta-analysis of interaction experiments between angiosperms, seaweeds, and bivalves
<ol> <li><span>Many studies have quantified ecological impacts of individual foundation species (FS). However, emerging data suggest that FS often co-occur, potentially inhibiting or facilitating one another, thereby causing indirect, cascading effects on surrounding communities. Furthermore, global warming is accelerating, but little is known about how interactions between co-occurring FS vary with temperature. </span></li> <li><span>Shallow aquatic sedimentary systems are often dominated by three types of FS: slower-growing clonal angiosperms, faster-growing solitary seaweeds, and shell-forming filter- and deposit-feeding bivalves. Here, we tested the impacts of one FS on another by analyzing manipulative interaction experiments from 148 papers with a global meta-analysis.</span></li> <li> <span>We calculated </span><span>1,942 (non-independent) Hedges' <em>g</em> effect sizes,</span> <span>from 11,652 extracted values over performance responses, such as abundances, growths or survival of FS, and their associated standard deviations and replication levels. Standard aggregation procedures generated 511 independent Hedges' <em>g</em> that was classified into six types of reciprocal impacts between FS. </span> </li> <li><span>We found that (i) seaweeds had consistent negative impacts on angiosperms across performance responses, organismal sizes, experimental approaches, and ecosystem types; (ii) angiosperms and bivalves generally had positive impacts on each other (e.g., positive effects of angiosperms on bivalves were consistent across organismal sizes and experimental approaches, but angiosperm effects on bivalve growth and bivalve effect on angiosperm abundance were not significant); (iii) bivalves positively affected seaweeds (particularly on growth responses); (iv) there were generally no net effects of seaweeds on bivalves (except for positive effect on growth) or angiosperms on seaweeds (except for positive effect on 'other processes'); and (v) bivalve interactions with other FS were typically more positive at higher temperatures, but angiosperm-seaweed interactions were not moderated by temperature.</span></li> <li> <em><span>Synthesis</span></em><span>: Despite variations in experimental and spatiotemporal conditions, the stronger positive interactions at higher temperatures suggest that facilitation, particularly involving bivalves, may become more important in a future warmer world. Importantly, addressing research gaps, such as the scarcity of FS interaction experiments from tropical and freshwater systems and for less studied species, as well as testing for density-dependent effects, could better inform aquatic ecosystem conservation and restoration efforts and broaden our knowledge of FS interactions in the Anthropocene.</span> </li> </ol>
Data for: Interspecific interactions between gray woolly monkeys (Lagothrix lagotricha cana) and nine syntopic primate species
<p>Assemblage structure and acquisition of high-value resources will usually be affected by changes in resource availability and differential competitive abilities of assemblage members. In fragmented habitats where carrying capacity limits are exceeded due to high population densities and biomass, interspecific interactions can be expected to occur at a high frequency, potentially turning into an important cost for coexistence. We studied assemblage- and guild-level patterns of interspecific interactions in two highly diverse isolated primate assemblages in southern Amazonia. Specifically, we assessed the effects of temporal variation in fruit availability on the rates of interspecific interactions between gray woolly monkeys (<em>Lagothrix lagotricha cana</em>), one of the largest tree-dwelling mammals of the Amazon forests, and nine syntopic primate species. This dataset includes the rates of interactions at the guild-level and assemblage-level, as well as the rates of interactions with each individual species. Additionally, the dataset provides estimations of fruit availability at both study sites.</p>
Data from: Biotic interactions in species distribution models enhance model performance and shed light on natural history of rare birds: a case study using the Straight-billed Reedhaunter (Limnoctites rectirostris)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The biotic interactions hypothesis partially explains bird species turnover along a lowland Neotropical precipitation gradient
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Tri-trophic interactions with avian predators: the effect of host plant species and herbivore-induced plant volatiles on recruiting avian predators
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Plant neighbors differentially alter a focal species’ biotic interactions through changes to resource allocation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Foliar damage beyond species distributions is partly explained by distance dependent interactions with natural enemies
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.