Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 34 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 34. Distribution map of Eutriphora costai Fernandes & Pimenta, 2015; red circle = type locality.

Fig. 5 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 5. Isotriphora leo sp. nov. A. MNRJ 29392*, holotype, 2.39 mm. B. MORG 25615*, 2.00 mm. C–D. MORG 25645*, 1.76 mm and 1.79 mm, respectively. E–I. HolotypE. Scale bars: A–E = 1 mm; F–G = 100 µm; H–I = 500 µm.

Fig. 1 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 1. Cheirodonta dupliniana (Olsson, 1916). A–C. PRI 1376, 5.75 mm (original description) or 6.31 mm (scale bar provided), lectotype, illustrated in Olsson (1916). D–E. PRI 11016, 5.57 mm, paralectotype, not illustrated in Olsson (1916). F–G. MCZ 34426, 6.75 mm and 6.35 mm, respectively. H. FLMNH 160564, 6.00 mm. I–J. FLMNH 507930, 4.60 mm. Scale bars: B–I = 1 mm; J = 500 µm. Photo credits B–E: Leslie Skibinski (Cornell University).

Fig. 10 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 10. Monophorus caracca (Dall, 1927) comb. nov. A. USNM 108343, lectotype, 7.1 mm. B–E. MNHN*, 4.42 mm, 6.84 mm, 4.50 mm and 5.74 mm, respectively. F–J. Same shell as E. Scale bars: A–F = 1 mm; G = 100 µm; H = 20 µm; I = 250 µm; J = 500 µm.

Fig. 6 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 6. Isotriphora sp. 1. A–B. MORG 52611*, 2.08 mm and 1.58 mm, respectively. C–D. Same shell as A. E–F. ZUEC-GAS 7489, 1.44 mm. G. ZUEC-GAS 7489, same shell as E. Scale bars: A–C, E–F = 1 mm; D, G = 100 µm. Photo credits E–G: Aramys Cesar (UNICAMP).

Fig. 3 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 3. Isotriphora tricingulata Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2015. A, C. MNRJ 32558*, 2.75 mm and 3.04 mm, respectively. B. MNRJ 17929*, 4.62 mm. D. MNRJ 32574*, 3.29 mm. E–I, K. Same shell as A. J. Same shell as D. Scale bars: A–E = 1 mm; F–H = 500 µm; I–K = 100 µm.

Fig. 8 in Unraveling one of the 'Big Five': update of the taxonomy of Triphoridae (Gastropoda, Triphoroidea) from Brazil

Fig. 8. Marshallora ostenta Rolán & Fernández-Garcés, 2008 from Brazil. A–C, E. IBUFRJ 19532, same shell as Fig. 7N. D. MNRJ 18623*. F. MNRJ 31017*, same shell as Fig. 7K. G. MNRJ 33801*, same shell as Fig. 7F. H–I. MNRJ 30750*, same shell as Fig. 7J. Scale bars: A–C = 500 µm; D–H = 100 µm; I = 50 µm.

Map 5 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Map 5: Distributions of Quedius problematicus (black circles: revised records; white circles: literature records) and Q. petraensis (black triangle) in the Middle East.

Figs 63-68 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Figs 63-68: Quedius josue from Syria (63-65) and Q. petraensis, holotype (66-68; figures in transparent light): (63) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (64, 67) median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view; (65, 68) paramere; (66) aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figs 25-27 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Figs 25-27: Quedius orientalis (25) and Q. microcapillatus (26-27): (25-26) habitus; (27) posterosutural portion of elytra. Scale bars: 25-26: 1.0 mm; 27: 0.1 mm.

Figs 13-24 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Figs 13-24: Quedius hermonensis from Cyprus (13-14), Q. orientalis (15-17), and Q. microcapillatus (18-24) from Iraq (18-20), Turkey (21), and Iran (22-24): (13, 15, 22) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (14, 17, 20, 24) paramere; (16, 19, 23) median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view; (18, 21) aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figs 28-32 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Figs 28-32: Quedius semirufus: (28) aedeagus in lateral view; (29) aedeagus in ventral view; (30) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (31) median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view; (32) paramere. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figs 53-62 in On the taxonomy and zoogeography of some West Palaearctic Quedius species, with a focus on the East Mediterranean and the species allied to Quedius umbrinus and Q. nivicola (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Staphylininae)

Figs 53-62: Quedius josue from Lebanon (53), Israel (54-56), and Cyprus (57-62): (53-54, 57, 60) aedeagus in lateral view; (55, 58, 61) median lobe of aedeagus in ventral view; (56, 59, 62) paramere. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figs 30–35 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)

Figs 30–35. Variation of the male palps, left palps, prolateral views. 30–33. Loxosceles tolantongo sp. nov. 30–32. Tourist Center Grutas de Tolantongo, Municipality of Cardonal, Hidalgo (type locality). 33. 500 m west of the entrance No. 5 to the Tourist Center Grutas de Tolantongo, Municipality of Cardonal, Hidalgo. 34–35. Loxosceles jaca Gertsch & Ennik, 1983. 2.5 km north of Jacala de Ledezma, Municipality of Jacala de Ledezma, Hidalgo. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 56 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)

Fig. 56. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from the concatenated matrix (CO1 + ITS2) of species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 from Mexico. Colors of branches and bars indicate different species. Numbers above bars represent the delimitation methods: 1 = morphology (M); 2 = neighbor joining (NJ); 3 = ABGD with initial partitions (IP); 4–5 = ABGD with recursive partitions (RP); 6 = GMYC yule analysis; 7 = GMYC coalescent analysis; 8 bPTP with ML; 9 = bPTP with IB. Numbers below bars represent species recovered for each delimitation method. Red numbers correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities, black numbers are bootstrap support values from the ML analysis.

Figs 20–25 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)

Figs 20–25. Loxosceles tolantongo sp. nov., ♂ holotype (CNAN-T01317). 20–22. Left palp, prolateral, dorsal and retrolateral views, respectively. 23–25. Detail of the bulb and embolus, retrolateral, dorsal and apical views, respectively. Scale bars: 20–22 = 0.5 mm; 23–25 = 0.2 mm.

Fig. 54 in Description of a new species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe (Araneae, Sicariidae) recluse spiders from Hidalgo, Mexico, under integrative taxonomy: morphological and DNA barcoding data (CO1 + ITS2)

Fig. 54. Maximum likelihood tree inferred from CO1 gene of species of Loxosceles Heineken & Lowe, 1832 from Mexico. Colors of branches and bars indicate different species. Numbers above bars represent the delimitation methods: 1 = morphology (M); 2 = neighbor joining (NJ); 3 = ABGD with initial partitions (IP); 4–6 = ABGD with recursive partitions (RP); 7 = GMYC yule analysis; 8 = GMYC coalescent analysis; 9 = bPTP with ML; 10 = bPTP with IB. Numbers below bars represent species recovered for each delimitation method. Red numbers on branches correspond to Bayesian posterior probabilities, black numbers are bootstrap support values from the ML analysis.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2014View details →

Figure 15 in Updating the taxonomy of the bee genus Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Augochlorini) including revision of the Brazilian species

Figure 15. Distribution records of Megalopta species. (A) M. chaperi Vachal; (B) M. guimaraesi Santos & Silveira (black circles) and M. mura sp. n. (grey squares); (C) M. piraha sp. n (grey squares) and M. yanomami sp. n. (black circles); (D) M. atlantica Santos & Silveira (grey square), M. guarani sp. n (triangle), M. xavante sp. n (hexagon), M. karitiana sp. n (black circle), M. mapinguari sp. n (black square) and M. purpurata Smith (grey circle).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2014View details →

Figure 12 in Updating the taxonomy of the bee genus Megalopta (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Augochlorini) including revision of the Brazilian species

Figure 12. Males of Megalopta. (A‒C) Habitus, dorsal view; (A) M. xavante sp. n. from Nova Xavantina, Brazil; (B) M. atlantica Santos & Silveira from Ipanema, Brazil; (C) M. purpurata (holotype) Smith from Tefé, Brazil; (D‒F) posterolateral view of mesosoma; (D) M. yanomami sp. n. from Parauapebas, Brazil; (E) M. piraha sp. n. from Manaus, Brazil; (F) M. munduruku sp. n. from Belterra, Brazil. Scale bar 1 mm.