Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 5 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538

Figure 5 - Mean individual numbers per trap and day (± SE) and total species numbers of springtails of the pitfall traps of location 1 and location 6 (n=3) over the vegetation period 2008. Hygrophilic and hygrotolerant species (black bars) and xerotolerant as well as mesophilic species (grey bars) are shown. Abbreviations: ef = ecological flooding; spe = strong precipitation event.

Figure 3 from: Schuldt A, Assmann T (2011) Belowground carabid beetle diversity in the western Palaearctic – effects of history and climate on range-restricted taxa (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 461-474. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1540

Figure 3 - Partitioning of variation from regression modelling for species richness of belowground carabids. Values give the % of the total variation independent and shared effects of spatial (S), topographic (T) and climate (C) models account for in the explanation of richness patterns. U is the unexplained variation.

Figure 7 from: Lessel T, Marx M, Eisenbeis G (2011) Effects of ecological flooding on the temporal and spatial dynamics of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) and springtails (Collembola) in a polder habitat. ZooKeys 100: 421-446. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1538

Figure 7 - Mean number of individuals of hygrophilic/hygrotolerant (A/B) and xerotolerant/mesophilic (C/D) collembolan species at the fallow (A/C) and ruderal area (B/D) during different moisture conditions. Abbreviations: ef = ecological flooding (higher Rhine water levels); spe = flood caused by a strong precipitation event; dc = drought conditions; ° outliers. Different letters represent statistically significant differences (Mann-Whitney U-test).

Figure 2 from: Schuldt A, Assmann T (2011) Belowground carabid beetle diversity in the western Palaearctic – effects of history and climate on range-restricted taxa (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 461-474. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1540

Figure 2 - Relationship between species richness of belowground carabid beetles (log10-transformed) and a latitude (R²adj.=0.51; p=0.012), b range in elevation (i.e., topograohic variability; R²adj.=0.52; p<0.001) and c annual potential evapotranspiration (R²adj.=0.38; p=0.020) in the western Palaearctic.

Figure 1 from: Schuldt A, Assmann T (2011) Belowground carabid beetle diversity in the western Palaearctic – effects of history and climate on range-restricted taxa (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 461-474. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1540

Figure 1 - Distribution of species richness of belowground carabid beetles across the western Palaearctic, based on Löbl and Smetana (2003). Shadings and symbols indicate the number of species recorded for each country. Countries with 11–20 subterranean species are marked by a filled circle, countries with 1–10 species by an open circle. Countries for which no subterranean species have been recorded are white and without a symbol.

Figure 1 from: Davidson R, Ryyken J, Farrell B (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 497-526. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2111

Figure 1 - Figure 1. Location of Boston Harbor Islands national park area. Islands/peninsulas sampled for carabid beetles are shaded in black.

Figure 2 from: Davidson R, Ryyken J, Farrell B (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and distribution in Boston Harbor Islands national park area (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 497-526. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2111

Figure 2 - Figure 2. Relationship between island area and species richness of carabid beetles in Boston Harbor Islands national park area. Value for species richness has been standardized across all islands to include only one full season of sampling.

Figure 4 from: Šerić Jelaska L, Dumbovich V, Kucinic M (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and mean individual biomass in beech forests of various ages. ZooKeys 100: 393-405. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1536

Figure 4 - Dendrogram of cluster analyses among forest sites using presence/absence carabid beetle data. Two distinct clusters are formed at roughly 30% similarity. Marks 60y 1–3, 80y 1–3 and 150y. 1–3 denote investigated sites placed in the 60-, 80- and 150-year-old forests.

Figure 1 from: Šerić Jelaska L, Dumbovich V, Kucinic M (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and mean individual biomass in beech forests of various ages. ZooKeys 100: 393-405. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1536

Figure 1 - Position of investigated sites labelled according to the age of the forest ("60y 1–3" denote sites 1 to 3 in the 60-year-old forest, "80y 1–3" denote sites 1 to 3 in the 80-year-old forest and "150y 1–3" denote sites 1 to 3 in the 150-year-old forest). Insert: location of Papuk Nature Park in Croatia.

Figure 7 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 7 - Summary of relationships in Trechitae and related taxa. Branches (including those subtended by triangles) indicate monophyletic groups supported by the combined analyses and at least two of the genes; quadrangles indicate groups whose status is unresolved.

Figure 6 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 6 - Summary of subtribal and tribal relationships supported by individual genes. Triangles indicate monophyletic groups; quadrangles represent paraphyletic groups A 28S rDNA B 18S rDNA C wingless.

Figure 3 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 3 - Majority-rule consensus tree of trees sampled in Bayesian analysis, with branch lengths proportional to average branch lengths across trees that contain that branch, for 18S rDNA data. See caption of Fig. 2 for additional details.

Figure 5 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 5 - Majority-rule consensus tree of trees sampled in Bayesian analysis for all three genes analyzed together. Ovals on branches indicate support for the clade based upon Bayesian (left), maximum likelihood (center), and parsimony (right) analyses. Darkest tones indicate strongest support for (grays and black) or against (pinks) the clade, with values indicating posterior probability expressed as a percentage (Bayesian), or bootstrap percentage (likelihood and parsimony).

Figure 4 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 4 - Majority-rule consensus tree of trees sampled in Bayesian analysis, with branch lengths proportional to average branch lengths across trees that contain that branch, for the complete wingless data. See caption of Fig. 2 for additional details.

Figure 1 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 1 - Phylogenies of Trechitae from morphological studies A Strict consensus tree of most parsimonious trees from larval data, with all characters treated as unordered, from Grebennikov (2008); this is the tree presented in Grebennikov (2008: Fig. 3) B Strict consensus tree of most parsimonious trees from larval data, with some characters treated as ordered, as specified by Grebennikov (2008); this tree is not presented in that paper, but was inferred from the described conditions C "Best fit" tree presented by Roig-Juñent and Cicchino (2001) based upon adult morphological data.

Figure 2 from: Maddison D, Ober K (2011) Phylogeny of minute carabid beetles and their relatives based upon DNA sequence data (Coleoptera, Carabidae, Trechitae). ZooKeys 147: 229-260. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.1871

Figure 2 - Majority-rule consensus tree of trees sampled in Bayesian analysis, with branch lengths proportional to average branch lengths across trees that contain that branch, for 28S rDNA data. Branch lengths were reconstructed by MrBayes; scale bar units are substitutions per site. Thickness and shade of branches indicate support for that clade, based upon estimated Bayesian Posterior Probability percentages (BPP), Maximum Likelihood bootstrap values (MLBoot), and parsimony bootstrap values (parsBoot).

Figure 11 from: Kavanaugh D, Hieke F, Liang H, Dong D (2014) Inventory of the carabid beetle fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, western Yunnan Province, China: species of the tribe Zabrini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 407: 55-119. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.407.7353

Figure 11 - Amara (Amara) silvestrii Baliani. a dorsal habitus (CASENT1035225) b–c median lobe of aedeagus of male (CASENT1035225) b left lateral aspect c dorsal aspect; scale lines = 1.0 mm d Map of localities records (red circles) for Amara silvestrii in the Gaoligong Shan region, scale line = 100 km.

Figure 9 from: Kavanaugh D, Hieke F, Liang H, Dong D (2014) Inventory of the carabid beetle fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, western Yunnan Province, China: species of the tribe Zabrini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 407: 55-119. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.407.7353

Figure 9 - Amara (Zezea) davidi Tschitschérine. a dorsal habitus (CASENT1010925) b–c median lobe of aedeagus of male (CASENT8125447) b left lateral aspect c dorsal aspect; scale lines = 1.0 mm d Map of localities records (red circles) for Amara davidi in the Gaoligong Shan region, scale line = 100 km.

Figure 8 from: Kavanaugh D, Hieke F, Liang H, Dong D (2014) Inventory of the carabid beetle fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, western Yunnan Province, China: species of the tribe Zabrini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 407: 55-119. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.407.7353

Figure 8 - Apical region of median lobe (dorsal aspect) and apex of right paramere (medial aspect) of aedeagus of males. a Amara lucidissima Baliani b all other species of subgenus Reductocelia (for comparative purposes only, no other species of this subgenus in the area).

Figure 7 from: Kavanaugh D, Hieke F, Liang H, Dong D (2014) Inventory of the carabid beetle fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, western Yunnan Province, China: species of the tribe Zabrini (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 407: 55-119. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.407.7353

Figure 7 - Apical and subapical region of median lobe (dorsal aspect) and apex of right paramere (medial aspect) of aedeagus of males. a–b Amara silvestrii Baliani c–d Amara shaanxiensis Hieke e–f Amara congrua Morawitz.