Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,561
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,561 results for “institution”
Fig. 33 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 33. Syntype of Lycoris sanguinea Maxim. (LE 01012633; KPM-NX0001297).
Fig. 25 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 25. Syntype of Iris tectorum Maxim. (LE 01011511; KPM-NX0001280).
Fig. 27 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 27. Lectotype of Allium japonicum Regel (LE 01012554; KPM-NX0001287).
Fig. 19 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 19. Isolectotype of Veratrum stamineum Maxim. (LE 01012503; KPM-NX0001255).
Fig. 43 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 43. Syntype of Juncus effusus L. var. decipiens Buchenau (LE 01012468; KPM-NX0001316).
Fig. 22 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 22. Syntype of Calypso japonica Maxim. ex Kom. (LE 01012253; KPM-NX0001920).
Fig. 18 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 18. Isolectotype of Veratrum stamineum Maxim. (LE 01012502; KPM-NX0001256).
Fig. 13 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 13. Holotype of Najas serristipula Maxim. (LE 01011708; KPM-NX0001252).
Fig. 16 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 16. Lectotype of Veratrum stamineum Maxim. (LE 01012500; KPM-NX0001258).
Fig. 12 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 12. Isolectotype of Alisma rariflorum Sam. (LE 01011711; KPM-NX0001250).
Fig. 7 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 7. Syntypes of Chamaecyparis breviramea Maxim. (LE 01042739, LE 01011613; KPM-NX0001923).
Fig. 56 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 56. Lectotype of Calamagrostis yatabei Maxim. (LE 01042711; KPM-NX0001925).
Fig. 10 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 10. Lectotype of Lindera hypoglauca Maxim. (LE 01014213; KPM-NX0001248).
Fig. 54 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 54. Lectotype of Scirpus concolor Maxim. (LE 01011725; KPM-NX0001335).
Fig. 23 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 23. Syntype of Malaxis japonica Maxim. (LE 01012245; KPM-NX0001275).
Fig. 2 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 2. Syntype of Lycopodium cryptomerinum Maxim. (LE 01009939; KPM-NX0001852).
Fig. 1 in Plant Type Materials from Kanagawa Prefecture (Japan) in the Herbarium of the Komarov Botanical Institute (LE; Russia): Lycophytes, Ferns, Gymnosperms, and Angiosperms (Monocots and some Dicots)
Fig. 1. Lectotype of Lycopodium cryptomerinum Maxim. (LE 01009938; KPM-NX0001851).
Data for EUA Trends 2024 - European higher education institutions in times of transition
<p>Since 1999, the EUA Trends reports have consistently mapped developments in the European higher education landscape, by presenting comparative data from the perspective of higher education institutions. In the ninth edition of the European University Association’s long-running series, the Trends 2024 report provides an overview of how European higher education institutions have experienced changes over the past five years, due to higher education reforms, and in the wider context of societal, political, economic and technological changes, marked among others by the implications of Covid-19 pandemic and Russia’s war against Ukraine.</p> <p>Trends 2024 is based on survey data collected in April to July 2023.</p> <p>Responses were gathered from 489 higher education institutions in 46 European higher education systems. The survey was open to all higher education institutions in the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) that provide study programmes in at least one of the three degree cycles (bachelor’s, master’s, doctoral). One response per institution was collected.</p> <p>The survey addressed the higher education institutions’ perspectives and strategies regarding:</p> <p>· The institution and its context</p> <p>· The student life cycle and experience</p> <p>· Learning, teaching and teachers </p> <p>· Inclusion, equity and diversity</p> <p>· Engagement and outreach with society and community </p> <p>· Internationalisation</p> <p>Results of the survey are published in “<a href="https://www.eua.eu/publications/reports/trends-2024.html"><strong>Trends 2024 - European higher education institutions in times of transition</strong></a>”.</p> <p>The following files are available:</p> <ul> <li>Codebook including original questionnaire</li> <li>Dataset</li> </ul>
Exploring opportunities and challenges for intangible cultural heritage at the intersection of institutions, civil society, and migrant communities
<p>This data set was produced in the CultureLabs project to explore the needs and expectations of migrant and refugee communities in several European countries in relation to communicating and sharing their intangible cultural heritage (ICH) practices as well as of cultural and civil society organisations that plan to support this. </p> <p>The data was gathered across Europe in early 2019 and consists of 101 surveys administered and 27 interviews. 101 surveys were administered to people belonging to migrant and refugee communities in several hosting countries, mostly Italy and Germany, while the countries of origin of respondents covered four continents. The survey consisted of closed-ended questions and was structured into eight thematic areas related to a balanced mix of independent and dependent variables for the generation of correlations and clusters. The thematic areas included: background information; employment status; socioeconomic status; residency or migration status; individual preferences, attitudes, and activities; intercultural awareness; extent of interest and preparedness to become actively involved in cultural activities; and access to and use of digital tools. 27 semi-structured interviews were also conducted. The interviewees were recruited from the collaborative network of the nine partner institutions in the CultureLabs project. Although each interview gave space to the issues raised by the interviewees, four themes were deepened with the majority of participants: interest in cultural activities, expectations from cultural activities, the importance of digital tools for cultural activities, and the relevance of cultural heritage activities for individuals and their socio-cultural integration in the host society.</p> <p>The findings resulted in a peer-reviewed publication available at the following link: <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13527258.2021.1922934">https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13527258.2021.1922934</a> </p> <p>The original dataset has been processed by removing details and parts that might compromise the anonymity of the participant. </p> <p>This work is supported by the European Union’s Horizon2020 project CultureLabs: Recipes for Social Innovation, under Grant Agreement 770158. The sole responsibility of this work lies with the authors. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Exploring the needs of institutional stakeholders involved in the cultural heritage and social innovation sectors
<p>This data set was produced to gather information and lessons learnt from institutional stakeholders directly or indirectly involved in cultural approaches and/or promoting social integration of disadvantaged groups in order to understand what they need to facilitate participatory and inclusive initiatives. </p> <p>The data was gathered across Europe in early 2019 and consists of 90 surveys administered and 17 interviews. 90 surveys were administered to actors working at the intersection of cultural heritage and social innovation. The survey’s goal was to gather insights about the barriers these actors face in the implementation of participatory approaches and the measures adopted to overcome them. Semi-structured interviews (n=17) expanded upon the survey data and were carried out through an opportunistic sample of the survey respondents. The findings provided relevant insights in relation to the configuration of approaches for participatory projects, the main faced barriers, and the achieved level of impact.</p> <p>The original dataset has been processed by removing details and parts that might compromise the anonymity of the participant. </p> <p>This work is supported by the European Union’s Horizon2020 project CultureLabs: Recipes for Social Innovation, under Grant Agreement 770158. The sole responsibility of this work lies with the authors. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.