Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 2. Majority rule consensus tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of the rps16 matrix with coded indels. Bayesian posterior probabilities are given in regular typeface next to the respective branches when greater than 0.9; bootstrap values from the corresponding maximum parsimony consensus tree are given in italics when greater than 75%. Well supported major clades and subclades are named according Results. The white arrows at right point the placement of the different accessions of Stoibrax. The black arrows point the

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy of the tribe Apieae (Apiaceae) revisited as revealed by molecular phylogenies and morphological characters

FIGURE 1. Majority rule consensus tree obtained from the Bayesian analysis of ITS matrix with coded indels. Bayesian posterior probabilities are given in regular typeface next to the respective branches; bootstrap values from the corresponding maximum parsimony consensus tree are given in italics when greater than 75%. Well supported major clades and subclades are named according to Results. The white arrows at right point the placement of the different accessions of Stoibrax. The black arrows point the placement of the different

FIGURE 5. Pseudocodon petiolatus D. Y. Hong & Q. Wang. 1, plant. 2, root. 3 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudocodon (Campanulaceae) based on character analysis and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 5. Pseudocodon petiolatus D. Y. Hong & Q. Wang. 1, plant. 2, root. 3, stamens & ovary. The illustration was drawn by Ai-Li Li.

FIGURE 3. The 50 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudocodon (Campanulaceae) based on character analysis and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 3. The 50% majority rule consensus tree derived from the Bayesian analysis of ITS. Ranges of parsimony jackknife support (JK) above 50 are reported with bootstrap value of likelihood, and Bayesian posterior probability values (MP/ML/BI) above branches. The putative new species from Muli is indicated by grey shadow.

FIGURE 2 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudocodon (Campanulaceae) based on character analysis and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 2. Principal coordinate analysis on 11 groups (the characters used are explained and described in Table 2): A, convolvulacea group; B, forrestii group with petiole <6 mm; C, forrestii group with petiole ≥ 6 mm; D, efilamentosa group; E, vinciflora group from NW Yunnan and SW Sichuan; F, vinciflora group from W & NW Sichuan; G, vinciflora group from SE Tibet; H, grey-wilsonii group; I, hirsuta group; J, graminifolia group, and K, the group possibly representing a new species.

FIGURE 4. The 50 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudocodon (Campanulaceae) based on character analysis and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 4. The 50% majority rule consensus tree derived from the Bayesian analysis of combining four chloroplast DNA fragments. Ranges of parsimony jackknife support (JK) above 50 are reported with bootstrap value of likelihood, and Bayesian posterior probability values (MP/ML/BI) above branches. The putative new species from Muli is indicated by grey shadow.

FIGURE 1 in Taxonomic revision of the genus Pseudocodon (Campanulaceae) based on character analysis and molecular phylogeny

FIGURE 1. Polymorphism of leaf shape and petiole length within a population of Codonopsis forrestii / Codonopsis efilamentosa (Kunming, Yunnan Prov., D. Y. Hong et al., H10012, PE, photographed by De-Yuan Hong). Scale bar = 1 cm.

FIGURE 6 in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 6. Chromosomes of Smilax microdontus sp. nov. and other two closer species: A & B. Smilax sp.nov. 2n=32, (A. mHB, B. mZZ: 2n=32); C. Smilax biflora (bAM: 2n=40); D. Smilax trinervula (tYS: 2n=32).

FIGURE 2 in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 2. Principal component analysis (PCA) of 13 morphological characters of the Smilax china complex. Axes R1 and R2 explain 44.68% and 24.36% of the total variation, respectively.

FIGURE 5. Smilax microdontus Z.S. Sun & C.X in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 5. Smilax microdontus Z.S. Sun & C.X. Fu, sp. nov. A. Fertile branch with fruits; B. Enlarged leaf margin, show the small teeth; C. Narrowly winged petiole; D. Staminate flower; E. Fruit; F. Seed. Drawn by Dr. Xiaofeng Jin.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 4. Phylogram of the best maximum likelihood tree of the Smilax china complex based on combined nrITS and cpDNA (matK, rbcL, rbcL–aptB intron, and trnS–trnG intron) data. Maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony bootstrap values greater than 50% are presented on the branches.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 1. Geographical distribution of the Smilax china complex, indicating locations of diploid populations in this study. See Table 1 for population abbreviation.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular, chromosomal and morphological characters reveal a new diploid species in the Smilax china complex (Smilacaceae)

FIGURE 3. Morphology and karyotype of Smilax microdontus sp. nov.. A. Inflorescence & male flowers; B. Leaf blade (dry), showing pale green color abaxially and minutely serrulate blade margin; C. The chromosomes of population mYXS (mitotic metaphase); D. Habit, showing the sub-erect stem and flowers in May; E. red fruits in October. Bars represent 1 cm.

FIGURE 2 in Hyphodontia dimitica and H. subefibulata spp. nov. (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters

FIGURE 2.Microscopic structures of Hyphodontia dimitica (Dai 11686).a Basidiospores. b Basidia and basidioles. c Rhombic crystals. d Hyphae from trama. e Hyphae from subiculum.

FIGURE 5 in Hyphodontia dimitica and H. subefibulata spp. nov. (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters

FIGURE 5. Strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of Hyphodontia and its related species generated by maximum parsimony based on ITS sequences. Branches are labeled with parsimony bootstrap proportions (before slanting line) high than 50% and bayesian posterior probabilities (after slanting line) more than 0.95.

FIGURE 4 in Hyphodontia dimitica and H. subefibulata spp. nov. (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters

FIGURE 4. Microscopic structures of Hyphodontia subefibulata (Dai 10526).a Basidiospores. b Basidia and basidioles. c Cystidia. d Hyphae from trama. e Hyphae from subiculum.

FIGURE 1 in Hyphodontia dimitica and H. subefibulata spp. nov. (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters

FIGURE 1. Basidiocarps of Hyphodontia dimitica (Dai 15321). a. A fresh basidiocarp. b. Pore surface.

FIGURE 3 in Hyphodontia dimitica and H. subefibulata spp. nov. (Schizoporaceae, Hymenochaetales) from southern China based on morphological and molecular characters

FIGURE 3. Basidiocarps of Hyphodontia subefibulata (Dai 10803). a. A fresh basidiocarp. b. Spine surface.

opennotspecifiedAug 2017View details →

FIGURE 2. Reproductive characters. a in Molecular, morphological, and biogeographic perspectives on the classification of Acrobolboideae (Acrobolbaceae, Marchantiophyta)

FIGURE 2. Reproductive characters. a. Marsupium terminal on leafy shoot drawn from T. saccatus Shaw 6318 (LB178); b. basal gynoecia on abbreviated branches (at arrow) drawn from M. epiphytum Engel 21928; c. leaf (=L) with large bract (=B) drawn from T. sylvaticus Shaw 4109; d. leaf (=L) with reduced bract (=B) drawn from T.urvilleanus von Konrat 6505. e. intercalary androecia with large bracts drawn from Acrobolbus spinifolius Engel 28447 (LB192); f. basal androecia with small, spicate bracts (at arrow) drawn from Marsupidium knightii Engel 26663; g. dissected male bract showing placement of three antheridia (at arrow) drawn from Tylimanthus laxus Schäfer-Verwimp 22378; h. typical long, biseriate antheridial stalk drawn from T. urvilleanus Engel 26269.