Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,772
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,772 results for “sensors”
Risk and anomaly sensor for the steel production [CSS5] - Integrated
<p>The CAPRI risk and anomalies sensor for the steel production aims to provide an estimate of the processing risk for intermediate products at different stages of the processing chain. This risk estimation will be the basis for a decision support system, which will provide recommendations regarding the further processing of a semi-product. For instance, if an item will likely fail to meet the quality specification for its original customer order, the support system could recommend changing the target order the product will be assigned to, or it could recommend to immediately recycle the item or to do some reprocessing. The earlier we identify a problematic item, the less energy and time needs be wasted in its further processing, therefore the solution can lead to substantial savings both in cost and CO2 emissions.</p> <p>This video describes the integration of the risk and anomalies sensor into CAPRI's cognitive automation platform (CAP).</p>
The ER folding sensor UGGT1 acts on TAPBPR-chaperoned peptide-free MHC I
<p>Adaptive immune responses are triggered by antigenic peptides presented on major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) at the surface of pathogen-infected or cancerous cells. Formation of stable peptide-MHC I complexes is facilitated by tapasin and TAPBPR, two related MHC I-specific chaperones that catalyze selective loading of suitable peptides onto MHC I in a process called peptide editing or proofreading. On their journey to the cell surface, MHC I complexes must pass a quality control step performed by UGGT1, which senses the folding status of the transiting N-linked glycoproteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). UGGT1 reglucosylates non-native glycoproteins and thereby allows them to revisit the ER folding machinery. Here, we describe a reconstituted <em>in-vitro</em> system of purified human proteins that enabled us to delineate the function of TAPBPR during the UGGT1-catalyzed quality control and reglucosylation of MHC I. By combining glycoengineering with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, we show that TAPBPR promotes reglucosylation of peptide-free MHC I by UGGT1. Thus, UGGT1 cooperates with TAPBPR in fulfilling a crucial function in the quality control mechanisms of antigen processing and presentation.</p>
Zigbee sensor range extension experiments with LoRaWAN in Langenlois Austria
<p>This dataset contains log files and a brief overview of a field expedition in Langenlois/Austria, where range extension of Zigbee sensors with LoRaBridge in out-door conditions was successfully verfied.</p>
Case study of a rapid prototyping method for optimizing soft gripper structures with integrated piezoresistive sensors
<p>Closed-loop control systems and monitoring the activities of soft robots in the natural environment require sensing elements in soft actuator modules. In this study, additive manufacturing is used for sensorized soft actuator modules to investigate the influence of the Shore hardness and design aspects of an open-source tendon-based gripper structure, in a time-efficient way. Additionally, the placement of the piezoresistive sensing element (tension or compression side on the bending soft gripper) was investigated. A user-friendly method, based on thermoplastic material extrusion, has been explored to improve the future design optimization in of active soft robotic structures successfully. A higher Shore hardness resulted in a higher total deflection and a higher force to bend the gripper structure. By increasing the geometrical stiffness of the gripper printed with low Shore hardness, the total deflection was increased, but the force needed to activate the movement was higher in comparison to high Shore hardness and low geometrical stiffness. Moreover, the sensing element on the substrate of higher Shore hardness, leads to low drift, monotonic response, with good sensitivity, independent of the sampling rate. The gripper of higher Shore hardness had a larger functional range, being capable of gripping small and larger objects.</p>
Data from laboratory granular-flow experiments with acoustic sensors
<p>Experimental data of dynamic pressures generated by dry granular flows moving down and impacting on a plate embedded in an inclined chute facility. The data consists of basal impact pressures measured with a pressure sensor for variable slope angle ranging from 30° to 38° with an initial mass of 100 kg.</p>
Infection safe workplace IoT sensor measurements
<p>This dataset has been collected and created by "Datu Tehnoloģiju Grupa" and Riga Technical University. This dataset contains data collected from IoT devices scattered in the office workplace. The measurements have been collected in a .csv file, with 150000 records. Project “Platform for the Covid-19 safe work environment” (ID. 1.1.1.1/21/A/011) is founded by European Regional Development Fund specific objective 1.1.1 «Improve research and innovation capacity and the ability of Latvian research institutions to attract external funding, by investing in human capital and infra-structure». The project is co-financed by REACT-EU funding for mitigating the consequences of the pan-demic crisis.</p>
SensEURCity: A multi-city air quality dataset collected using networks of open low-cost sensor systems
<p>We provide a unique curated dataset of urban air quality measurements acquired using dense networks of low-cost sensor systems in three European cities for the years 2020 and 2021. The dataset includes the raw sensor data of quality-controlled sensor networks along with co-located reference data sets. Sensor data are collected using the AirSensEUR sensor system, including sensors to monitor NO, NO2, O3, CO, PM2.5, PM10, PM1, CO2, and meteorological parameters. In total, 85 sensor systems were deployed throughout the years 2020 and 2021 in three European cities (Antwerp , Oslo and Zagreb), resulting in a dataset comprising different meteorological and ambient conditions. The main data collection included two co-location campaigns in different seasons at an air quality monitoring station in each city and a deployment at different locations in each city (including also locations at other air quality monitoring stations). The dataset consists of data files with sensor and reference data, and metadata files with description of locations, deployment dates and description of sensors and reference instruments. </p>
Kilometer-scale global warming simulations and active sensors reveal changes of tropical deep convection
<p>This zip file contains data and codes to reproduce the figures of a manuscript on X-SHiELD.</p> <p>Contact mbolot@princeton.edu for questions.</p>
Data set for Wireless SAWR sensors: FFT, EMD or wavelets for the frequency estimation in one shot?
<p>This data set is the basis for the publication "Wireless SAWR sensors: FFT, EMD or wavelets for the frequency estimation in one shot?", submitted to Journal of Sensors and Sensor Systems.<br> It contains the following data:</p> <p>- "Scipioni_JSSS23_Fig5_WaveletChoice.txt" contains results to obtain the best wavelet for this study. For this, a SAWR (Fig. 3a) signal is noised by an additive Gaussian white noise with different SNR values. The signal is then denoised by wavelets for each SNR value. Results are the new SNR values after denoising.</p> <p>- "Scipioni_JSSS23_Fig9_to_15_F_Ref.txt" contains all the frequencies around F=10700 MHz chosen to test the three methods: Fourier, wavelets, EMD.</p> <p>- 10 files "Scipioni_JSSS23_Fig10_to_14_SAW_EMDvsWavelet_FRef_XX_Occ_100.txt" contain results of the frequency and uncertainty measurement for each noisy SAWR signal versus frequencies and SNR values.</p> <p>- 3 files "Scipioni_JSSS23_Fig17_Tab2_3_Experimental SAWR signal_NoX" contain the values of 3 different experimental SAWR signals.</p>
Multi-stage sleep classification using photoplethysmographic sensor
<p>The conventional approach to monitoring sleep stages requires placing multiple sensors on the patients, which is inconvenient for long-term monitoring and requires expert support. We propose a single sensor Photoplethysmographic (PPG) based automated multi-stage sleep classification. This experimental study recorded the PPG during the entire night's sleep of ten patients. Data analysis was performed to obtain 82 features from the recordings, which were then classified against the sleep stages. The classification results using SVM with the polynomial kernel gave the overall accuracy of 84.66%, 79.62%, and 72.23% for two, three, and four-stage sleep classification. These results show that using only PPG; it is possible to conduct sleep stage monitoring. These findings open the opportunities for PPG-based wearable solutions for home-based automated sleep monitoring.</p>
Virtual sensors for wind energy applications benchmark study data - preliminary version
<p>Test version of the time series data for the wind energy virtual sensing benchmark study data.</p>
Gyroscope sensor data of shank motion during normal and barefoot walking
<p>The measurements were performed in closed and disturbance free space, where an unobstructed 10 m walkway was arranged. All tests were performed on a hard floor surface first with shoes that were adapt for walking (indoor sports shoes, sneakers etc.) and afterwards walking barefooted the same protocol. The subjects had clothing which did not restrict lower limb movement. In each test, the 10 m walking was repeated three times. Prior to testing, the procedure was demonstrated, and the sensors were carefully positioned to correct locations. The subjects were instructed to walk with their own natural walking velocity and to begin each 10 m walk from a completely stationary position.</p>
Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution - Part B - Particle Number Concentrations - Dataset
<p>This repository contains the data used for the analysis of the paper "Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution - Part B - Particle Number Concentrations (PNC)" which is under submission.</p> <p> </p> <p>The experimental conditions and the instruments used are detailed in Bulot, F.M.J.; Russell, H.S.; Rezaei, M.; Johnson, M.S.; Ossont, S.J.J.; Morris, A.K.R.; Basford, P.J.; Easton, N.H.C.; Foster, G.L.; Loxham, M.; Cox, S.J. Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution. <em>Sensors</em> <strong>2020</strong>, <em>20</em>, 2219. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20082219</p> <p>The files are available in .csv and in .rds (for R) formats. For details about the measurement equipment used<br> during this study, please refer to the methods section of the paper.</p> <p> </p> <p>sensors_raw.csv contains the following headers:</p> <ul> <li>Bin0 to Bin15: Alphasense OPC-R1 particle number concentrations for different size bins</li> <li>Bin[1-3-5-7]MToF: mean time of flight of particles within the corresponding size bins of the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>Checksum: checksum of the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>SFR: sample flow rate of the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>Humidity: relative humidity measured by the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>Temperature: temperature measured by the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>SamplingPeriod: sampling period of the Alphasense OPC-R1</li> <li>gr03um, gr05um, gr10um, gr25um, gr50um, gr100um: PNC measured by the Plantower PMS5003</li> <li>n05, n1, n25, n4, n10: PNC measured by the Sensirion SPS30</li> <li>humidity: relative humidity measured by a Sensirion SHT-3x</li> <li>temperature: temperature measured by a Sensirion SHT-3x</li> <li>sensor: id of the sensors</li> <li>site: name of the air quality monitor hosting the sensors</li> <li>exp: name of the experiment conducted</li> <li>source: source used to generate PM (incense or candle)</li> <li>variation: whether the sensors were exposed to stable or peak concentrations of PM pollution</li> <li>date: date in format yyyy-mm-dd HH:MM:SS</li> </ul> <p>For more explanations about the fields of individual sensors, please refer to their manual (Alphasense OPC-R1: https://kolegite.com/EE_library/datasheets_and_manuals/sensors/OPC/072-0500_OPC-R1_manual_issue_1_250219.pdf ; Plantower PMS5003: https://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/aq-spec/resources-page/plantower-pms5003-manual_v2-3.pdf ; Sensirion SPS30: https://sensirion.com/products/catalog/SPS30/)</p> <p> </p> <p>ops.csv and ops.rds contains the readings from the OPS with the following cut sizes for the bins:</p> <ul> <li>Bin 1 Cut Point (um),0.300</li> <li>Bin 2 Cut Point (um),0.374</li> <li>Bin 3 Cut Point (um),0.465</li> <li>Bin 4 Cut Point (um),0.579</li> <li>Bin 5 Cut Point (um),0.721</li> <li>Bin 6 Cut Point (um),0.897</li> <li>Bin 7 Cut Point (um),1.117</li> <li>Bin 8 Cut Point (um),1.391</li> <li>Bin 9 Cut Point (um),1.732</li> <li>Bin 10 Cut Point (um),2.156</li> <li>Bin 11 Cut Point (um),2.685</li> <li>Bin 12 Cut Point (um),3.343</li> <li>Bin 13 Cut Point (um),4.162</li> <li>Bin 14 Cut Point (um),5.182</li> <li>Bin 15 Cut Point (um),6.451</li> <li>Bin 16 Cut Point (um),8.031</li> <li>Bin 17 Cut Point (um),10.000</li> </ul> <p>nanotracer.csv and nanotracer.rds contain the measurements from the Nanotracer:</p> <ul> <li>N.1.: particles/cm3</li> <li>dp_avg.1.: mean diameter of the particles (nm)</li> <li>P.1.:</li> <li>S_al.1.: Lung Deposited Surface Area in um2/cm3</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p>experimental_conditions.csv and experimental_conditions.rds contain the end dates and start dates of each of the experiment conducted.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p>"pm100_cf1","pm10_cf1","pm25_cf1"</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a IMEC/University of Ghent sensor on the terrace of a building in LOS to one antenna in the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2023-02-21)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a MVG EME Spy Evolution sensor while walking in LOS and NLOS to two antennas through the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2022-11-10)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a MVG EME Spy Evolution sensor while walking in LOS and NLOS to two antennas through the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2023-02-15)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a MVG EME Spy Evolution sensor while driving in LOS and NLOS to several antennas through Luxembourg-Hollerich and Luxembourg Center, Luxembourg (2022-08-25)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>- Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a MVG EME Spy Evolution sensor close to a window of a building in LOS to two antennas in the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2023-02-07)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a IMEC/University of Ghent sensor in a building behind the window in LOS to one antenna in the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2023-01-31)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
5G-EMIT Project: EMF measurements of 2G/3G/4G/5G frequency bands captured with a IMEC/University of Ghent Sensor on the terrace of a building in LOS to one antenna in the Esch-Belval Area, Luxembourg (2023-02-07)
<p>During the 5G-EMIT project, EMF measurements of relevant mobile frequency bands have been taken at various sites around known antennas.</p> <p>Focus was in measuring the the following standard frequency bands:</p> <ul> <li>5G 700 <ul> <li>Band 28 FDD down</li> <li>758 - 803 MHz (Luxembourg: 758 - 788 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 800 <ul> <li>Band 20 FDD down<br> 791 - 821 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM 900 <ul> <li>Band 8 FDD down</li> <li>925 - 960 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>GSM/LTE 1800 <ul> <li>Band 3 FDD down</li> <li>1805 - 1880 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>UMTS 2100 <ul> <li>Band 1 FDD down</li> <li>2110 - 2170 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 38 TDD</li> <li>2570 - 2620 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>LTE 2600 <ul> <li>Band 7 FDD down</li> <li>2620 - 2690 MHz</li> </ul> </li> <li>5G 3500 <ul> <li>Band 78 TDD</li> <li>3300 - 3800 MHz (Luxembourg: 3400 - 3800 MHz)</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> Two sensor have been used: The MVG EME Spy Evolution and a sensor developed by IMEC/University of Ghent.</p> <ul> <li>The MVG Spy Evolution sensor is able to measure all of the requested frequency bands as defined by the standard.</li> <li>The IMEC/University of Ghent sensor is only able to measure the LTE 800, GSM 900, GSM/LTE 1800 bands as defined by the standard.<br> In the 5G 3500 band it is only able to measure the range of 3550-3700 MHz (3465-3785 MHz within a -5db response).</li> </ul> <p>The datasets of the ZIP file has following structure:</p> <ul> <li>measurements: <ul> <li>the files of the measurements as provided by the sensor or application</li> <li>combined file of measurements in case the measurements have been split into several parts</li> <li>potentially analysis files of the measurements </li> </ul> </li> <li>pictures: <ul> <li>pictures of the antennas</li> <li>pictures of the sensor</li> <li>pictures of the location of the sensor</li> </ul> </li> <li>Readme.txt: <ul> <li>Used time-zone in the tables</li> <li>Used units in the tables</li> <li>Calculation of the total values in the tables</li> <li>Used labels of the the frequency bands</li> <li>Used sensor (MVG EME Spy Evolution or IMEC/University of Ghent)</li> <li>Locations of the target antennas</li> <li>Potentially location of the fixed sensor</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.