Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
41,236
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
41,236 results for “Review of reviews”
Fig. 11 in Annotated review of Cryptocephalinae (Clytrini), Synetinae and part of Galerucinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) described by Carl Peter Thunberg
Fig. 11. Protoclytra taeniata (Thunberg, 1821) comb. nov. A–E. Holotype, ♂, 8.0 mm, UUZM. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Frontal view. D. Label. E. Box label. F–G. Syntype of Clythra fastuosa Lacordaire, 1848, ♂, not measured, ZMHB. F. Dorsal view. G. Labels.
Fig. 13. A–D in Annotated review of Cryptocephalinae (Clytrini), Synetinae and part of Galerucinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) described by Carl Peter Thunberg
Fig. 13. A–D. Holotype of Teinocera catenata (Thunberg, 1821) comb. nov., ♂, 6.7 mm, UUZM. A. Dorsal view. B. Frontal view. C. Label. D. Box label. E–G. Syneta betulae (Fabricius, 1792) (syntype of Crioceris betulina Thunberg, 1787, unsexed, 6.0 mm, UUZM). E. Dorsal view. F. Label. G. Box label.
Fig. 10 in Annotated review of Cryptocephalinae (Clytrini), Synetinae and part of Galerucinae (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae) described by Carl Peter Thunberg
Fig. 10. Phoenicodera scapularis (Thunberg, 1821). A–D. Syntype, ♂, 9.0 mm, UUZM. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Frontal view. D. Label and box label. E–G. Syntype, ♀, 7.8 mm, UUZM. E. Dorsal view. F. Label. G. Box label.
Social websites reviews and ratings of Dublin restaurants situated across 65 locations
<p>The dataset contains user reviews and ratings of restaurants situated across 65 locations in Dublin along with other features such as cuisine, price range etc. which are as follows.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Restaurant ID</strong>: Each ID represents a restaurant which has been given a unique ID to easily identify them. There are 211 restaurants in total.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Location ID</strong>: The locality in which each restaurant is situated have been given ID’s. 65 such unique locations are present in the data. </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Review</strong>: This field represents the user reviews for each restaurant. Reviews have been cleaned to remove punctuations, emojis and special characters.</p> <p><br> <strong>Cuisine</strong>: Represents the cuisine type for each restaurant.</p> <p><strong>Price</strong> <strong>Range</strong>: The average price for dining in the restaurant. It has 3 categories: </p> <p>€30 and under | €31 to €50 | €51 and over</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Food</strong> <strong>Rating</strong>: User given rating between 1 and 5 for the quality of food in the restaurant.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Service Rating</strong>: User given rating between 1 and 5 for the quality of service in the restaurant.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Ambience Rating</strong>: User given rating between 1 and 5 for the ambience in the restaurant.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Overall Rating</strong>: User given rating between 1 and 5 for the restaurant in total.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Restaurant Rating</strong>: The average rating of each restaurant based on general opinion.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Review Sentiment</strong>: Overall sentiment of the user review i.e. either Positive or Negative.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Total Number of Rows</strong>: 10000</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Number of Rows for Positive Sentiment</strong>: 5000</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Number of Rows for Negative Sentiment</strong>: 5000</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Number of Unique Restaurants</strong>: 211</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Number of Unique Locations</strong>: 65</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Number of Unique Cuisines</strong>: 43</p>
Dataset - A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science
<p>Dataset for publication (A Review on Blockchain Technology and Blockchain Projects Fostering Open Science) in "Frontiers in Blockchain" Journal: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbloc.2019.00016/.</p>
Compilation of Moon internal structure models and seismic event locations presented in Garcia et al., Space Science Review, 2019 study
<p>Compilation of of previously published internal structure model of the Moon in "named discontinuities" seismological format + 3 new models associated to the above mentioned study + previously published Moon quake location estimates by various authors.</p> <p>The study, the internal structure models and quake locations compilation were performed by the ISSI international research team on Moon Seismology and internal structure described here: http://www.issibern.ch/teams/internstructmoon/</p>
Fig. 29 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 29. Antenna (basal portion) of female. A. E. minimus (Robertson, 1902), in which F2 is noticeably longer than wide. B. E. asperatus Cockerell, 1910, in which F2 is not noticeably longer than wide. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 27 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 27. Head of female, lateral view. A. E. luteipennis Friese, 1916, in which the frontal keel lacks a tooth-like process. B. E. odyneroides sp. nov., holotype (KUNHM SM0253729), in which the frontal keel has a small tooth-like process (blue arrow). C. E. australis Mitchell, 1962, in which the frontal keel (blue arrow) is strongly raised. D. E. brumleyi Onuferko, 2018, paratype, in which the frontal keel (blue arrow) is weakly protuberant by comparison. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 26 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 26. Epeolus spp., habitus of female, ventral view. A. E. basili Onuferko, 2018, paratype showing antennae, legs, and metasomal sterna with similar reddish-orange coloration. B. E. pusillus Cresson, 1864 showing color contrast between reddish-orange legs and dark brown antennae and metasomal sterna. Scale bars = 3 mm.
Fig. 25 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 25. Metasoma of female, dorsal view. A. E. novomexicanus Cockerell, 1912. B. E. basili Onuferko, 2018, paratype. Scale bars = 2 mm.
Fig. 28 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 28. Pygidial plate of male, dorsal view. A. E. australis Mitchell, 1962 (longer than wide and apically narrowed). B. E. brumleyi Onuferko, 2018, allotype (about as long as wide and broadly rounded apically). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 24 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 24. Mandibles of female A. E. ainsliei Crawford, 1932, each of which lacks a preapical tooth. B. E. rufulus Cockerell, 1941, each of which has a blunt, obtuse preapical (almost submedial) tooth (blue arrow). Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 23 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 23. Head of male, posterior view. A. E. ainsliei Crawford, 1932, in which the preoccipital ridge joins the hypostomal carina (blue arrow). B. E. rufulus Cockerell, 1941, in which the preoccipital ridge does not join the hypostomal carina (blue arrow). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Fig. 20 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 20. Epeolus spp., habitus of male, lateral view. A. E. bifasciatus Cresson, 1864. B. E. scutellaris Say, 1824. C. E. basili Onuferko, 2018, paratype. D. E. mesillae (Cockerell, 1895). E. E. australis Mitchell, 1962. F. E. asperatus Cockerell, 1910. Scale bars = 3 mm.
Fig. 19. Epeolus pulchellus Cresson, 1865 A in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 19. Epeolus pulchellus Cresson, 1865 A. Female, habitus, lateral view. B. Female, habitus, dorsal view. C. Male, habitus, lateral view. D. Female axillae and mesoscutellum, dorsal view (blue lines indicate the posterior extent of the axilla relative to the length of the horizontal dorsal portion of the mesoscutellum). Scale bars: A–C = 3 mm; D = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 18 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 18. Epeolus odyneroides sp. nov. A–B, D. Holotype, ♀ (KUNHM SM0253729). C. Allotype, ♂ (KUNHM SM0255860). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Axillae and mesoscutellum, dorsal view (blue lines indicate the posterior extent of the axilla relative to the length of the mesoscutellum). Scale bars: A–C = 3 mm; D = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 17. Epeolus obscuripes Cockerell, 1917 stat. nov. A in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 17. Epeolus obscuripes Cockerell, 1917 stat. nov. A. Female, habitus, lateral view. B. Female, habitus, dorsal view. C. Male, habitus, lateral view. D. Female axillae and mesoscutellum, dorsal view (blue lines indicate the posterior extent of the axilla relative to the length of the horizontal dorsal portion of the mesoscutellum). Scale bars: A–C = 3 mm; D = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 11. Epeolus fumipennis Say, 1837. A in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 11. Epeolus fumipennis Say, 1837. A. Female, habitus, lateral view. B. Female, habitus, dorsal view. C. Male, habitus, lateral view. D. Female axillae and mesoscutellum, dorsal view (blue lines indicate the posterior extent of the axilla relative to the length of the horizontal dorsal portion of the mesoscutellum). Scale bars: A–C = 3 mm; D = 0.5 mm.
Fig. 9 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 9. Epeolus danieli (Genaro, 2014) comb. nov., holotype, ♀ (MNHNSD 18.107). A. Habitus, lateral view. B. Habitus, dorsal view. C. Mesosoma, dorsal view. D. Posterior part of metasoma, dorsal view (blue arrow indicates process of S6). Images courtesy of G. de los Santos, MNHNSD. Scale bars: A–B = 3 mm; C–D = 1 mm.
Fig. 15 in A review of the cleptoparasitic bee genus Epeolus Latreille, 1802 (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Caribbean, Central America and Mexico
Fig. 15. Epeolus niger (Michener, 1954). A. Female, habitus, lateral view. B. Female, habitus, dorsal view. C. Male, habitus, lateral view. D. Female axillae and mesoscutellum, dorsal view. Scale bars: A–C = 3 mm; D = 0.5 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.