Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 31 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 31. Strict consensus when Palaeognathae relationships are constrained to the relationships found by Mitchell et al. (2014).

FIG. 14 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 14. The pectoral girdle and humeri of AMNH 30560. The pectoral and humeri are in white whereas other elements of the skeleton are in dark gray. Scale = 1 cm. See anatomical abbreviations.

FIG. 23 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 23. Strict consensus (TL = 470; MPTs = 2724; CI = 0.452; RI = 0.691; RC = 0.312) of the "total" analysis. Bremer supports located above branches.

FIG. 7 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 7. The pelvic girdle, sacrum, and caudal series of Calciavis grandei, gen. et sp. nov. (AMNH 30578) in ventral view (in white). Other elements of AMNH 30578 are in dark gray. Scale = 1 cm. See anatomical abbreviations.

FIG. 30 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 30. Strict consensus when Palaeognathae relationships are constrained to the relationships found by Baker et al. (2014).

FIG. 12 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 12. The largely disarticulated skeleton of AMNH 30560 (white elements) with feather impressions (in

FIG. 26 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 26. Strict consensus when Lithornithidae is constrained as the sister taxon of all other Palaeognathae.

FIG. 24 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 24. Strict consensus (TL = 470; MPTs = 29; CI = 0.451; RI = 0.676; RC = 0.305) of the "core lithornithid" analysis. Bremer supports located above branches.

FIG. 29 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 29. Strict consensus when Palaeognathae relationships are constrained to the relationships found by Phillips et al. (2010).

FIG. 5 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 5. The complete skull of Calciavis grandei, gen. et sp. nov. (AMNH 30578) in left lateral view (in white). Other elements of AMNH 30578 are in dark gray. Scale = 1 cm. See anatomical abbreviations.

FIG. 8 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 8. Left forelimb of Calciavis grandei, gen. et sp. nov. (AMNH 30578) in ventral view (in white). Other elements of AMNH 30578 are in dark gray. Scale = 1 cm. See anatomical abbreviations. See anatomical abbreviations.

FIG. 28 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 28. Strict consensus when Lithornithidae is constrained as not monophyletic and Paracathartes howardae is the sister taxon to all extant ratites.

FIG. 20 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 20. Skeleton of WGS U1b-2001 (in white) with feather preserved (in dark gray). Scale = 5 cm. See anatomical abbreviations.

FIG. 1 in The Anatomy And Taxonomy Of The Exquisitely Preserved Green River Formation (Early Eocene) Lithornithids (Aves) And The Relationships Of Lithornithidae

FIG. 1. Previous hypotheses of early diverging avians that incorporated Lithornis: A, Houde 1986; B–D, three alternative hypotheses of relationships proposed by Houde, 1988; E, Leonard et al., 2005$; F, Johnston, 2011; G, Livezey and Zusi, 2006; 2007; H, Clarke, 2004; and I, Dyke, 2003. A–E were not based on numerical analyses, whereas the relationships in F–I were calculated in phylogenetic programs. Notes: *taxa collapsed into larger clades; † extinct; lithornithids taxa in bold; $ this position of lithornithids was not found in Dyke, 2003, as cited in Leonard et al., 2005. Abbreviations: "GRP," Pseudocrypturus cercanaxius.

FIG. 7 in Early Eocene Caenogastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Haymana-Polatl Basin, Central Anatolia (Turkey): taxonomy and palaeoecology

FIG. 7. — Caenogastropods (deposited in the repositories of the Natural History Museum of Vienna and in the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara): A, Tympanotonos sp.; B,?Melanoides sp.; C, Terebralia sp. 1; D, Terebralia sp. 2; E, Vicinocerithium seni n. sp. (paratype-Vienna museum); F, Vicinocerithium seni n. sp. (paratype-MTA, Ankara); G, Vicinocerithium seni n. sp. (holotype-MTA, Ankara); H, "Cerithiid" indet.; I, Haustator granulosa (Deshayes, 1824); J, Haustator sp.; A-D, G, H, NHMV; E, F, I, J, MTA. Scale bars: 1 cm.

FIG. 4 in Early Eocene Caenogastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Haymana-Polatl Basin, Central Anatolia (Turkey): taxonomy and palaeoecology

FIG. 4. — Biometric parameters of the caenogastropods used in this study (see Appendix 1 for measurements). Abbreviations: A, apex angle; D1, diameter of shell; D2, diameter of spire; HA, height of aperture; HL, height of body whorl; HT, height of the shell; LA, width of aperture; LT, width of shell. Scale bars: 1 cm.

FIG. 1 in Early Eocene Caenogastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Haymana-Polatl Basin, Central Anatolia (Turkey): taxonomy and palaeoecology

FIG. 1. — Geological map of the Paleocene-Eocene units exposed in the studied region and sample points of the MacunkÖy section (from Bilgin et al. 2009): 1, Eskipolatlı Formation; 2, llgınlıkdere Formation; 3, Kırkkavak Formation; 4, Kırkkavak Formation; Kayabaşı Member; 5, Kartal Formation.

FIG. 6 in Early Eocene Caenogastropods (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from Haymana-Polatl Basin, Central Anatolia (Turkey): taxonomy and palaeoecology

FIG. 6. — Caenogastropods (deposited in the repositories of the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara): A, Cerithium puigcercosensis (Cossmann, 1897) n. comb.; B-F, Vicinocerithium cf. subacutum (d'Orbigny, 1850); G, S, Bellatara ankaraensis n. sp., holotype; H, I, Tympanotonos turris (Deshayes, 1833); J, Cerithium cf. anguloseptum Rauff, 1884; K-M, Gantechinobathra vulcani (Brongniart, 1823); P-R, "Crommium" sp. 2. Scale bars: 1 cm.

opencc-zeroDec 2002View details →

FIG. 11 in Taxonomie et paléoécologie de nouveaux ostracodes limniques Candonidae dans l'Oxfordien (Jurassique supérieur) du Portugal

FIG. 11. — Candona? parvissima n. sp., échantillon VV-12; A, carapace femelle, vue latérale droite (holotype); B, carapace femelle, vue latérale gauche; C, carapace mâle, vue latérale droite; D, carapace mâle, vue latérale gauche; E, carapace femelle, vue dorsale; F, carapace mâle, vue dorsale; G, valve gauche femelle, vue interne; H, valve gauche femelle, vue interne (détail de la charnière). Échelles: A-G, 100 µm; H, 50 µm.