Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-zeroJan 2024View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Walter HE, Cádiz-Véliz A, Meriño BM, Villalobos-Barrantes HM, Guerrero PC (2024) Taxonomic dissection based on molecular evidence of the Eriosyce curvispina complex (Cactaceae): identifying nine endemic species from Central Chile. PhytoKeys 237: 117-139. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.237.107403

New accessions of taxa used in the phylogenetic analyses, including their laboratory code, population locality, and GenBank numbers

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2024View details →

Replication Package for "Data-Driven Evidence-Based Syntactic Sugar Design"

<p>Replication Package supplementing the submission of "Data-Driven Evidence-Based Syntactic Sugar Design"</p>

opencc-zeroMar 2024View details →

Supplementary material 5 from: Gaudeul M, Sweeney P, Munzinger J (2024) An updated infrageneric classification of the pantropical species-rich genus Garcinia L. (Clusiaceae) and some insights into the systematics of New Caledonian species, based on molecular and morphological evidence. PhytoKeys 239: 73-105. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.239.112563

Molecular phylogeny of Garcinia L. based on a combined ITS and chloroplast DNA (psbM-trnD, trnQ-rps16 and rps16-trnK) dataset and Bayesian inference

FIGURES 9–10 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURES 9–10. Wings of Rhyacophila fasciata Hagen 1859 and Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov. 9a, forewing of R. fasciata, lectotype [Museum of Comparative Zoology of Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA (MCZH), with permission]; 9b, forewing of R. fasciata male from Slovakia; 9c, hind wing of R. fasciata male from Slovakia. 10a, forewing of R. anatolica male. 10b, hind wing of R. anatolica male. St = stigma. Major veins: C = costa, Sc = subcosta, R 1 –R = 5 radius, M 1 –M 4 = media, Cu1–Cu2 = cubitus, A1–A3 = anal; m-cu = crossvein between medial and cubital veins, cu-a = crossvein between second cubital and first anal veins (from Holzenthal et al. 2007). Scale bars: 2 mm. 9a: specimen preserved dry, 9b–c, 10a–b: specimens preserved in ethanol.

FIGURES 15–18 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURES 15–18. Males and females of Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov. and Rhyacophila fasciata Hagen 1859. 15, male of R. anatolica: 15a, 2nd segment of left inferior appendage, left lateral; 15b, apicodorsal lobe of segment IX and preanal appendages, dorsal; 15c, parameres and ventral lobe of aedeagus (phallicata), ventral; 15d, left paramere, left lateral. 16, male of R. fasciata: 16a, 2nd segment of left inferior appendage, left lateral; 16b, apicodorsal lobe of segment IX and preanal appendages, dorsal; 16c, parameres and ventral lobe of aedeagus (phallicata), ventral; 16d, left paramere, left lateral. 17, female segments VIII–XI of R. anatolica: 17L, left lateral; 17D, dorsal; 17V, ventral. 18, female segments VIII–XI of R. fasciata: 18L, left lateral; 18D, dorsal; 18V, ventral. Scale bars: Figures 15a–c, 16a–c = 0.5 mm, Figures 15d, 16d = 200 μm, Figures 17, 18 = 1 mm.

FIGURE 8 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURE 8. Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov., paired abdominal hook plates of male pupa. 8l and 8r, left and right hook plates, respectively. A = anterior hook plates, dorsal, P = posterior hook plates, dorsal; III–VII = abdominal terga III through VII, dorsal. Scale bars: 50 μm.

FIGURE 1 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURE 1. Setae (S) and sensory pits (P) of the head and thorax of Rhyacophila larvae. 1a, head, dorsal; 1b, prothorax, right sclerite, dorsal (from Williams & Wiggins 1981).

FIGURES 11–12 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURES 11–12. Male and female genitalia of Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov., respectively. 11, male: 11A, 2nd segment of left inferior appendage, left lateral; 11BV, 11BL, parameres: 11BV, parameres (p) and ventral lobe of aedeagus (phallicata) (vl), ventral; 11BL, left paramere, left lateral. 11CL, 11CD, aedeagus (phallicata) and lateroventral lobes: 11CL, aedeagus and its left lateroventral lobe, left lateral; 11CD, aedeagus and its lateroventral lobes (lvl), dorsal. 10DD, apicodorsal lobe of segment IX (al) and preanal appendages (pa), dorsal; 11DV, segment X, ventral, ab = apical band, as = anal sclerites, va = non-sclerotized ventral area. 12, female segments VIII–XI: 12L, left lateral; 12D, dorsal; 12V, ventral. Scale bars: unlabelled = 1 mm; ● = 0.5 mm; * = 200 μm.

FIGURES 2–7 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURES 2–7. Larva of Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov. 2a–2d, head: 2a, dorsal; 2b, right lateral; 2c, ventral; 2d, frontoclypeus, dorsal. 3D–3V, mandibles from last instar larval exuviae, left (l) and right (r): 3D, dorsal; 3V, ventral. 4a–4b, prothorax: 4a, dorsal; 4b, left hemisclerite, left lateral. 5, abdominal segment III, dorsal, A = anterior edge. 6, abdominal tergite IX. 7a–7c, details of anal prolegs: 7a, right anal claw, right lateral; 7b, detail of basolateral plate with sword process (sp) and basoventral hook (bh), right lateral; 7c, detail of right claw, right lateral. Scale bars: unlabelled = 1 mm; ● = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 20 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURE 20. Spatial distribution of Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov. in Turkey. Star: specimens with DNA information. B. Bulgaria, C: Cyprus, Ge: Georgia, Gr: Greece, I: Iraq, R: Russia, S: Syria.

FIGURES 13–14 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURES 13–14. Larvae of Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid sp. nov. and Rhyacophila fasciata Hagen 1859. 13, R. anatolica: 13a, head, dorsal; 13b, prothorax, dorsal; 13c, abdominal tergite IX, dorsal; 13d, left anal proleg, left lateral. 14, R. fasciata: 14a, head, dorsal. 14b, prothorax, dorsal; 14c, abdominal tergite IX, dorsal; 14d, left anal proleg, left lateral. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIGURE 19 in The Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex (Trichoptera: Rhyacophilidae) in Turkey with description of a new species, Rhyacophila anatolica Ekingen & Valladolid, sp. nov., based on morphological, genetic, and ecological evidence

FIGURE 19. Phylogenetic relationships among the species of the "Rhyacophila fasciata Species Complex" included in this study. The ML tree represents a combination of Bayesian inference and maximum likelihood trees based on COI. Support for each node is represented by the posterior probabilities (PP) resulting from the Bayesian inference analysis and the bootstrap support values (BS) obtained for the maximum likelihood tree (PP/BS, respectively). 19a, Rhyacophila cf. obliterata, outgroup; 19b–19k, R. fasciata Complex: 19b, Rhyacophila septentrionis McLachlan 1865; 19c, R. viteceki Valladolid & Kučinić 2020 (by Valladolid et al. 2020); 19d, R. loeffleri Valladolid & Waringer (by Valladolid et al. 2023); 19e, R. macedonica Karaouzas, Valladolid & Ibrahimi 2022 (by Valladolid et al. 2022); 19f, R. fasciata Hagen 1859; 19g, R. delici Kučinić & Valladolid 2020 (by Valladolid et al. 2020); 19h, R. denticulata McLachlan 1879; 19i, R. sociata Navás 1916; 19j, R. anatolica sp. nov.; 19k, R. kykladica Malicky & Sipahiler 1993. Data for specimens are summarized in Table 1 (R. anatolica) and by Valladolid et al 2024. Scale bar: mean number of nucleotide substitutions per site or nucleotide position on the respective branch.

opennotspecifiedAug 2011View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest. in Suidae

Subspecies and Distribution. S. s. scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 — W Europe, from Denmark, Germany, Poland, and Czech Republic to N Italy and N Iberian Peninsula; possibly also Albania. The taxonomic status of animals in Austria, Switzerland, Slovenia, and Slovakia is unclear but presumably these populations are included in scrofa, as are the populations of Sweden, Finland, and the Baltic states. However, restocking of once depleted populations, for example in Italy, has likely involved the introduction and mixing of this subspecies with other subspecies, such as attila. S. s. affinis Gray, 1847 — S India and Sri Lanka. S. s. algirus Loche, 1867 — Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco, on the coastal side of the mountains or in the low montane areas. S. s. attila Thomas, 1912 — Hungary, Ukraine, C & S Belarus, Romania, Moldova, and S Russia towards the N flank of the Caucasus, but not including the Transcaucasian countries of Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The range possibly extends as far S as the Mesopotamian Delta in Iraq, in which case it would likely include W & SW Iran, and possibly E Turkey and Syria, where it borders with lybicus. Such a range could not be easily reconciled with a statement by Groves that "the difference between pigs from N and S of the Caucasus is quite striking; Transcaucasian boars are certainly not attila." This subspecies may also extend into C Asia and include Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, and Turkmenistan, but no data exist to support this. S. s. baeticus Thomas, 1912 — originally described from Coto Donana, S Spain, and later merged with meridionalis; also S Portugal. Unless evidence is found that these Italian and Iberian populations are the relics of a much larger formerly contiguous range, this subspecies should be kept as distinct. S. s. coreanus Heude, 1897 — Korean Peninsula. S. s. eristatus Wagner, 1839 — Himalayas S to C India and E to Indochina (N of the Kra Isthmus). S. s. davidi Groves, 1981 — the arid zone from E Iran to Gujarat, including Pakistan and NW India, and perhaps N to Tajikistan. S. s. leucomystax Temminck, 1842 — main Is ofJapan (Honshu, Shikoku, Kyushu, Nakadori, Hiburijima, Tojima, Kushima, and other smaller Is). S. s. lybicus Gray, 1868 — Bulgaria, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Jordan, Israel, Palestine, in the past also in Lybia, and Egypt. The former Yugoslavia was included in its range, which would suggest that now Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, and Kosovo are within the range of this subspecies, although the exact boundaries are unclear. Pigs from Albania have been assigned to S. s. scrofa. S. s. majori De Beaux & Festa, 1927 — C & S Italian Peninsula. S. s. menidionalis Forsyth Major, 1882 — Corsica and Sardinia, with the proviso that the two populations are very likely to be introduced or feral. S. s. moupinensis Milne-Edwards, 1871 — China, S to Vietnam and W to Sichuan. S. s. nigripes Blanford, 1875 — the flanks of the Tianshan mountains in Kyrgyzstan and NW China (Xinjiang). An animal photographed in NE Iran (Golestan) looked like this subspecies. S. s. nukiuanus Kuroda, 1924 — Iriomote, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Tokunoshima, Amamioshima, and Kakerome Is in the Ryukyu chain in extreme S Japan, though some of these populations have hybridized with introduced domesticates. S. s. sibiricus Staffe, 1922 — Mongolia and Transbaikal (S & E of Lake Baikal). S. s. tawvanus Swinhoe, 1863 — Taiwan. S. s. ussuricus Heude, 1888 — far E Russia and the Manchurian region (China). Korean populations were previously included in this subspecies, but based on new evidence, the Korean taxon seems more similar to moupinensis. S. s. vittatus Boie, 1828 — Malay Peninsula, S of the Isthmus of Kra, the offshore islands of Terutai and Langkawi, Sumatra, Riau Archipelago, Java, Bali, and a range of smaller islands around these, including Babi, Bakong, Batam, Bawean, Bengkalis, Bintan, Bulan, Bunguran, Cuyo, Deli, Durian, Enggano, Galang, Jambongan, Karimon (Riau Is), Kundur, Lagong, Laut, Lingga, Lingung, Mapor, Moro Kecil, North Pagai, Nias, Panaitan, Payong, Penang, Pinie, Rupat, Siantan, Siberut, Simeulue, Singkep, Sugi, Sugi Bawa, Telibon, Tinggi, Tuangku, and the Tambelan Is. This species was originally present from the British Is in the extreme W, through Eurasia from S Scandinavia to S Siberia, extending as far E as Korea and Japan, and SE into some of the Sunda Is and Taiwan. In the S the species ranged along the Nile Valley to Khartoum, and N of the Sahara in Africa, more orless following the continental coasts of S, E, and SE Asia. Within this range it was absent only from extremely dry deserts, e.g. the driest regions of Mongolia and in China W of Sichuan; and alpine zones, such as the high altitudes of Pamir and Tien Shan. In recent centuries, the range of S. scrofa has changed dramatically because of hunting and changes in available habitat. The species disappeared from the British Is in the 17" century, from Denmark in the 19" century, and was greatly reduced in range and numbers in the 20" century from areas as distant as Tunisia, Sudan, Germany, and Russia. Following these severe declines, there were some slight population recoveries in Russia, Italy, Spain, and Germany in the mid-20™ century, and natural and assisted range expansions in Denmark and Sweden. The species has also been inadvertently reintroduced in various locations in the Great Britain via escapees of mixed origin from commercial farming enterprises. Ex-S. scrofa stocks also occur as introduced feral populations in various other parts of the world, including Australia, New Zealand, the eastern Malay Archipelago, and in North, Central, and South America. In all of these areas they are now generally recognized as a major pest.

Figure 24 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 24. Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855). A, transverse section through cerebral ring, showing cephalic vessels protruded into rhynchocoel (indicated by arrowheads); B, higher magnification of (A); C, putative position of compressed and flattened cephalic vessels (indicated by arrowheads); D higher magnification of (C). A, B, paraneotype (ZIHU-1356); C, D, paraneotype (USNM-1136675). Abbreviations: BR, brain; OE, oesophagus; PR, proboscis; RC, rhynchocoel. Scale bars: A = 50 Mm; B = 20 Mm; C = 30 Mm; D = 10 Mm.

Figure 10 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 10. Diplomma bothwellae comb. nov. (formerly Poseidonemertes bothwellae Gibson, 1982). Holotype (AM W.5890). Transverse section through the pylorus (PY) and intestinal caecum (IC); arrows indicate dorsoventral muscle fibres running lateral to the lateral nerve cord (LN). Scale bar = 100 Mm.

Figure 8 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 8. Diplomma albimarginata comb. nov. (formerly Paramphiporus albimarginatus Kirsteuer, 1965). Syntype (AMNH 277). A, transverse section showing anterior portion of unpaired intestinal caecum (arrowed) situated on one side of the pylorus (PY); B, ten sections posterior to A, showing the intestinal caecum (arrowed) lateral and ventral to the PY; C, seven sections posterior to B, showing the PY opening to the dorsal wall of the intestine. Scale bar = 50 Mm.

Figure 5 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 5. Diplomma albimarginata comb. nov. (formerly Paramphiporus albimarginatus Kirsteuer, 1965). Syntype (AMNH 277). Transverse section showing the proboscis nerves (arrowed). Scale bar = 50 Mm.

Figure 2 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 2. Bayesian tree of a selected number of morphologically known distromatonemerteans using the general timereversible model with invariant sites and gamma-distributed rates based on 28S rRNA gene sequences (718 bp after alignment). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages from the maximum likelihood analysis (values> 50% are shown); numbers below are posterior probabilities (values> 95% are shown). Nipponnemertes bimaculata was used as the outgroup.

Figure 13. Poseidonemertes gondwanae Kirsteuer, 1965 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 13. Poseidonemertes gondwanae Kirsteuer, 1965. Holotype (AMNH 278). A, diagonal muscle layer between body-wall outer circular and inner longitudinal muscle layers. B, horizontal nervous thread from lateral nerve cord to the epidermis (indicated by white arrows); black arrows indicate dorsoventral muscle fibres running inside lateral nerve cord. Abbreviations: CM, body-wall circular muscle layer; DE, dermis; DM, diagonal muscle layer; IN, intestine; LN, lateral nerve cord; RC, rhynchocoel. Scale bars: A = 30 Mm; B = 50 Mm.

Figure 4. Bootstrap 50 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence

Figure 4. Bootstrap 50% majority-rule consensus unrooted tree of a selected number of distromatonemerteans, based on a maximum likelihood analysis with the general time-reversible model with invariant sites and gamma-distributed rates using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I gene sequences (535 bp after alignment). Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages from the maximum likelihood analysis (values> 70% are shown); numbers below are posterior probabilities (values> 95% are shown). In this paper we transfer Correanemertes polyophthalma to the genus Diplomma.