Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,036
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,036 results for “Late Miocene”
FIGURE 1. Location plate and field photographs. A in Approaching the Khersonian Crisis: Fish otoliths from the upper Bessarabian (middle Sarmatian s.l.; Late Miocene) of Jurkine (Kerch Peninsula, Crimea)
FIGURE 1. Location plate and field photographs. A) Jurkine cliff and outcrop with indication of stratigraphy, lithological levels (Roman numerals), and sample levels (Arabic numerals). B) Detail of middle Sarmatian section with lithological levels (Roman numerals) and sample levels (Arabic numerals); Ot1 and Ot2 indicate levels from which the studied otoliths were obtained for Bratishko et al. (2023). C) Insert map of Ukraine with Kerch Peninsula highlighted. D) Simplified geological map of Kerch Peninsula modified after Andrusov (1893). E) Goby monument in Berdyansk, Ukraine.
FIGURE 4 in Approaching the Khersonian Crisis: Fish otoliths from the upper Bessarabian (middle Sarmatian s.l.; Late Miocene) of Jurkine (Kerch Peninsula, Crimea)
FIGURE 4. Sarmatian Sea in the area of Crimean Peninsula and adjacent territory during the middle to late Sarmatian s.l. (Bessarabian and Khersonian) (after Kelsnikov, 1940, and Belokrys, 1966). Map based on Google Earth.
FIGURE 1 in Stable isotope (ẟ C, ẟ O) paleoecology of the late Early Miocene mammalian fauna from Buluk, Kenya
FIGURE 1. (A) Geographic map of East Africa with the location of Buluk indicated by the red star. The location of sites with comparative data included in these analyses, Moroto, Maboko, and Fort Ternan, are indicated by black circles. (B) Simplified stratigraphic column of the Bakate Formation, adapted from McDougall and Watkins (1985) and Watkins (1989).
FIGURE 7 in Paleoecology of the Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Béon 1, Montréal-du-Gers (late early Miocene, SW France): Insights from dental microwear texture analysis, mesowear, and enamel hypoplasia
FIGURE 7. Percentages of specimens above anisotropy (epLsar> 0.005) or complexity (Asfc> 2) cutpoints by species, facet, and preparation type. Triangles: living rhinoceros' species; circles: Béon 1 fossil rhinocerotids; size proportional to the number of specimens.
FIGURE 8 in Paleoecology of the Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Béon 1, Montréal-du-Gers (late early Miocene, SW France): Insights from dental microwear texture analysis, mesowear, and enamel hypoplasia
FIGURE 8. Barplots of mesowear scores on permanent teeth by method (ScoreA, ScoreB, Ruler) and by species. A- ScoreA: mesowear score based on Winkler and Kaiser (2011); B- ScoreB: mesowear score adapted from Fortelius and Solounias (2000); C- Ruler: mesowear score based on Mihlbachler et al. (2011). Only one tooth per specimen was considered.
FIGURE 1 in Paleoecology of the Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Béon 1, Montréal-du-Gers (late early Miocene, SW France): Insights from dental microwear texture analysis, mesowear, and enamel hypoplasia
FIGURE 1. Location map of Béon 1 locality, Montréal-du-Gers (MN4; mid-Orleanian, late early Miocene, south western France). The locality of Béon 1 is located (red circle) on the map of France (upper left corner) and on the zoom of south western France. Main cities (grey circles; bold) and rivers are indicated on the zoomed map. Dashed line represents the Spain-France frontier. Modified from Antoine and Duranthon (1997).
FIGURE 5 in Paleoecology of the Rhinocerotidae (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) from Béon 1, Montréal-du-Gers (late early Miocene, SW France): Insights from dental microwear texture analysis, mesowear, and enamel hypoplasia
FIGURE 5. Comparison of the DMTA patterns by species, facet and preparation type. Upper graphs: hand-prepared specimens; lower graphs: sand-prepared specimens. Left graphs: grinding facet; right graphs: shearing facet. Boxplots of anisotropy and complexity were plotted along with the dotplots to facilitate graph interpretation.
FIGURE 6. 50 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 6. 50% majority rule consensus tree of 1994 most parsimonious trees to show the phylogenetic position of YPM 11851.The clades Odontoceti, Aetiocetidae, Eomysticetidae, Balaenidae, Cetotheriidae and a clade comprising Isanacetus, Parietobalaena and related taxa are collapsed (see Appendix 5 for cladogram with all taxa shown). The numbers on the each branch are branch lengths. The numbers next to the branch lengths show the percentages of the shortest trees supporting each node. 100% supported nodes are omitted the percentages.
FIGURE 2. 1-4 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 2. 1-4, Skull of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis (YPM 11851) in anterior view (1, 2), posterior view (3, 4), photos (1, 3), line drawings (2, 4).
FIGURE 5. 1-7 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 5. 1-7, Periotics of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis (YPM 11851) in right side (1, 2, 4, 5), left side (3, 6, 7), anterior view (1), ventral view (2, 6, 7), lateral view (3), medial view (4, 5), photos (1-4, 6), line drawing (5, 7).
FIGURE 1 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 1. Maps showing the locality of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis (YPM 11851). The base map of the right one is from the online topographic maps published by the Geospatial Information Authority of Japan. The distribution of formations follows Tamiya and Applied Geological Society of Yamagata (2016).
FIGURE 4. 1-6 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 4. 1-6, Skull of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis (YPM 11851) in right lateral view (1 and 4), dorsal view (2, 5), left lateral view (3, 6), photos (1-3), line drawings (4-6).
FIGURE 3. 1-2 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 3. 1-2, Skull of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis (YPM 11851) in ventral view., photo (1), line drawing (2).
FIGURE 7 in A new skull of an early diverging rorqual (Balaenopteridae, Mysticeti, Cetacea) from the late Miocene to early Pliocene of Yamagata, northeastern Japan
FIGURE 7. Comparison between the holotype and referred specimens of cf. Miobalaenoptera numataensis periotics in ventral view. YPM 11851 (1), holotype NFL 18 (2). Illustration of M. numataensis is modified from Tanaka and Watanabe (2019a).
FIGURE 8 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 8. Assemblage of the redeposited Miocene marine and terrestrial molluscs. 1, Dorsanum sp. 2, Gibbula (Gibbula) pseudoangulata (Sinzov, 1875). 3, Anisus cf. spirorbis (Linnaeus, 1758). 4, Blinia cf. angulata (d'Orbigny, 1844). 5, Cardiidae indet. (cf. Obsoletiformes). 6, Cardiidae indet. 7, Barbotella intermedia (Radovanović et Pavlović, 1893).
FIGURE 5 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 5. Assemblage of the Maeotian freshwater molluscs (layer 3). 1, Borysthenia cf. pronaticina (Lindholm, 1932). 2-3, Lithoglyphus acutus Cobălcescu, 1883; 2, smooth shell; 3, shell with keel. 4, Viviparus cf. karaganicus Volkova, 1939. 5, Viviparus cf. maeoticus (Bogachev and Shishkina, 1919). 6, Lymnaea sp. 7, Sphaerium rivicola Lamarck, 1818. 8, Gyraulus cf. acronicus (Ferrussac, 1807). 9-10, Bithyniidae, opercula.
FIGURE 1. 1 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 1. 1, General scheme of the territory: black rectangle – position of the studied area. 2, geological map (Geological Map of the southern Federal district of the Russian Federation, 2013) showing the location of the Morskaya 2 site in the northeastern part of the Azov Sea. ƿ3-N1 – Upper Series of the Paleogene System (Oligocene) – Lower Series of the Neogene System (Miocene); N1-2 – Neogene System (Miocene – Pliocene stages); N1 – the Miocene; N 3 – Upper Miocene; grey colour indicates the Carboniferous System, green – Cretaceous System, red star – the 1 Morskaya 2 site location.
FIGURE 3 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 3. Assemblage of the Middle Sarmatian (Bessarabian) marine bivalves (layer 1). 1-2, Polititapes ponderosa (d'Orbigny, 1844). 3-4, Polititapes vitaliana (d'Orbigny, 1844). 5-6, Sarmatimactra fabreana (d'Оrbigny, 1844). 7-8, Obsoletiformes obsoletum ingratum (Kolesnikov, 1929). 9-10, Obsoletiformes obsoletum obsoletum (Eichwald, 1830). 11, Plicatiforma fittoni fittoni (d'Orbigny in Murchison et al., 1845). 12-13, Ervilia dissita dissita (Eichwald, 1830).
FIGURE 9 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 9. Correlation of the studied mollusc complexes of the Morskaya 2 site with the subdivisions of the International Stratigraphical Chart (Berggren et al., 1995; Cohen et al., 2013; updated), the Regional Stratigraphical Scheme of the Neogene deposits of the South of the European part of Russia (Nevesskaja et al., 2004, 2005; Popov et al., 2006; Krijgsman et al., 2019), mammalian zones (Mein, 1975; Fejfar et al., 1998; Vangengeim and Tesakov, 2008; Hilgen et al., 2012) and the palaeogeographical conditions during the period of sedimentation.
FIGURE 7 in Late Miocene molluscs of the Morskaya 2 site (Azov Sea region, Russia)
FIGURE 7. Assemblage of the redeposited Miocene marine and terrestrial molluscs. 1, Vertigo sp. 2, Hydrobia enikalensis Kolesnikov, 1935. 3, Hydrobia elongata Eichwald, 1830. 4, Gibbula sp. 5, Gibbula (Sarmatigibbula) podolica (Du Bois de Montpéreux, 1831). 6, Gibbula sp. 7, Acteocina lajonkaireana (Basterot, 1825).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.