Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,620
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,620 results for “Molecular Phylogeny”
Figure 3 in Molecular phylogeny of Anomalodesmata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) inferred from 18S rRNA sequences
Figure 3. Maximum-likelihood tree under an HKY85+I+G model (–logL = 25513.945, s/v ratio = 1382, pinvar = 0.189, gamma = 0.463).
Figure 2 in Molecular phylogeny of Anomalodesmata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) inferred from 18S rRNA sequences
Figure 2. Strict consensus tree of 22 most parsimonious trees using all alignment positions of the 18S rRNA data set. Bootstrap values (above branches) refer to 1000 replications, maximum-likelihood puzzling values (below branches; values lower than 30 not given) refer to 100 000 puzzling steps. A, subtree showing the position of Anomalodesmata among the Heterodonta. B, subtree of the Anomalodesmata. Pha., Pharidae; Ven., Veneridae. Asterisks mark species of the polyphyletic Myoida. Arrowheads indicate the anomalodesmatan nodes collapsing when 506 positions of uncertain alignment in the
Figure 1 in Molecular phylogeny of Anomalodesmata (Mollusca: Bivalvia) inferred from 18S rRNA sequences
Figure 1. Single most parsimonious tree resulting from the analysis of the entire morphological data set of Harper et al. (2000). Asterisks mark taxa not available for the present study. The Euciroidae as recognized by Poutiers & Bernard (1995) was not separated from the Verticordiidae.
Figure 3 in Molecular phylogeny of the western Atlantic species of the genus Portunus (Crustacea, Brachyura, Portunidae)
Figure 3. Consensus phylogenetic tree obtained from BAY analysis (50% majority consensus of 9800 trees) of 16S rRNA gene sequences for the western Atlantic species of Portunus, and other selected portunids. Numbers are posterior probabilities; values ≤ 50% are not shown. Letters to right centre on three major clades (A–C), as discussed in the text.
Figure 1 in Molecular phylogeny of the western Atlantic species of the genus Portunus (Crustacea, Brachyura, Portunidae)
Figure 1. One of the three phylogenetic trees obtained from MP analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences for the western Atlantic species of Portunus, and other selected portunids. Numbers are significance values for 1000 bootstraps; values ≤ 50% are not shown. Letters to right centre on three major clades (A–C), as discussed in the text.
Figure 2 in Molecular phylogeny of the western Atlantic species of the genus Portunus (Crustacea, Brachyura, Portunidae)
Figure 2. Single phylogenetic tree obtained from NJ analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences for the western Atlantic species of Portunus, and other selected portunids. Numbers are significance values for 1000 bootstraps; values ≤ 50% are not shown. Letters to right centre on three major clades (A–C), as discussed in the text.
Fig. 5. Namkongnaia lemeslei gen. et comb. nov. A. Labels associated with the syntype lot. B in Molecular phylogeny reveals a new genus of freshwater mussels from the Mekong River Basin (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
Fig. 5. Namkongnaia lemeslei gen. et comb. nov. A. Labels associated with the syntype lot. B. Original figure (after Morelet 1875: pl. 14 fig. 1). C–D. Syntype MNHN MP 3150 (photographs by V. Heros and M. Caballer) from Battambang Province, Cambodia. E. Specimen MUMNH-UNI2669. F. Specimen MUMNH-UNI2829 from Kampong Kdei River, Siem Reap Province, Cambodia. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogeny reveals a new genus of freshwater mussels from the Mekong River Basin (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
Fig. 2. Time-calibrated tree of the subfamily Gonideinae based on the concatenated alignment dataset of COI + 16S + 28S genes. Nodes present time estimates since the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) in millions of years ago (Mya). Node bars indicate 95% highest posterior density interval (HPD) of the node ages. Sufficiently supported nodes (BPP> 0.95) are marked with '*'. The geologic time scale is according to the Geological Society of America, 2019.
Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogeny reveals a new genus of freshwater mussels from the Mekong River Basin (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) tree of the subfamily Gonideinae based on the concatenated dataset of COI + 16S + 28S genes. Bootstrap values from ML and posterior probabilities from Bayesian inference analysis (BI) of the major nodes are listed as ML/BI. Nodes with posterior probabilities of BI ≥ 0.95 and ML bootstrap support values ≥ 70 were considered as sufficiently supported nodes (Huelsenbeck & Hillis 1993; Larget & Simon 1999), and are marked with black circles (supported by both BI and ML), white circles (supported only by BI), or grey circles (supported only by ML).
Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogeny reveals a new genus of freshwater mussels from the Mekong River Basin (Bivalvia: Unionidae)
Fig. 3. Map showing distribution localities of Namkongnaia gen. nov. Boundaries of river basins follow Abell et al. (2008).
Ultraconserved elements resolve the phylogeny and corroborate patterns of molecular rate variation in herons (Aves: Ardeidae)
<p>Thoroughly sampled and well-supported phylogenetic trees are essential to taxonomy and to guide studies of evolution and ecology. Despite extensive prior inquiry, a comprehensive tree of heron relationships (Aves: Ardeidae) has not yet been published. As a result, the classification of this family remains unstable, and their evolutionary history remains poorly studied. Here, we sample genome-wide ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and mitochondrial DNA sequences (mtDNA) of >90% of extant species to estimate heron phylogeny using a combination of maximum likelihood (ML), coalescent, and Bayesian inference (BI) methods. The UCE and mtDNA trees are mostly concordant with one another, providing a topology that resolves relationships among the five heron subfamilies and indicates that the genera <em>Gorsachius</em>, <em>Botaurus</em>, <em>Ardea</em>, and <em>Ixobrychus</em> are not monophyletic. We also present the first genetic data from the Forest Bittern <em>Zonerodius</em> <em>heliosylus</em>, an enigmatic species of New Guinea; our results suggest that it is a member of the genus <em>Ardeola</em> and not the Tigrisomatinae (tiger herons), as previously thought. Lastly, we compare molecular rates between heron clades in the UCE tree with those in previously constructed mtDNA and DNA-DNA hybridization trees. We show that rate variation in the UCE tree corroborates rate patterns in the previously constructed trees, i.e., that bitterns (<em>Ixobrychus</em> and <em>Botaurus</em>) evolved comparatively faster, and some tiger herons (<em>Tigrisoma</em>) and the Boat-billed Heron (<em>Cochlearius</em>) more slowly, than other heron taxa. </p>
Fig. 13 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 13. Bergera tetramera (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A. Plants. B. Inflorescence. C. Flowers. D–E. Infructescence. Photos taken by Jian Huang and Feng-Juan Mou in China.
Fig. 14. Bergera unifolia C.L.Deng & F.J.Mou. A. Inflorescence. B. Fruit. C–D in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 14. Bergera unifolia C.L.Deng & F.J.Mou. A. Inflorescence. B. Fruit. C–D. Dorsal side of leaf. E. Flower. F. Flower parts. Photos taken by Feng-Juan Mou in China.
Fig. 12 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 12. Bergera stenocarpa (Drake) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A. Plant. B. Leaves. C–D. Dorsal side of leaf. E. Infructescence. Photos taken by Nguyen Manh Cuong in Vietnam and Feng-Juan Mou.
Fig. 11 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 11. Branches, leaves, flowers and fruits of Bergera siamensis (Craib) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A. Winit 849, K000382432 (holotype: the Kew Herbarium, K). B. SN055887 (isotype: Bangkok Forest Herbarium, BKF). C. D.D. Soejarto et al. 5834, L.2127107 (National Herbarium Nederland, Leiden University branch, L). D. Put Nai 2440, TCD0013457 (Trinity College Dublin Herbarium, TCD).
Fig. 10 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 10. Bergera microphylla (Merr. & Chun) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A–C. Plants. D–E. Infructescence. F. Ovary crossection. Photos taken by Feng-Juan Mou and Dan Liang in China.
Fig. 9 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 9. Bergera macrophylla (C.C.Huang) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A. Plants. B. Inflorescence. C. Flower and pistil. D–E. Infructescence. F. Seeds. Photos taken by Feng-Juan Mou in China.
Fig. 6 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 6. Bergera glabra (Guillemin) F.J.Mou comb. nov. A. Plant. B. Leaf. C. Inflorescence. D. Flower. E. Flower parts. F. Infructescence. G. Fruit. H. Seeds. Photos taken by Tran The Bach and Dr Truong in Vietnam.
Fig. 2 in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 2. Bayesian tree, inferred from cpDNA markers of representatives of Bergera J.Koenig ex L., Clausena Burm.f., Murraya elongata DC. ex Hook.f. and Merrillia caloxylon Swingle. Branch lengths are proportional to the number of nucleotide changes (indicated above branches with Bayesian posterior probabilities, PP); bootstrap support (BS) values for maximum likelihood (ML) are given below the branches.
Fig. 7. Bergera koenigii L. A. Plants. B. Inflorescence. C. Pistil and stamens. D–E. Infructescence. F. Fruits. G. Seeds. H in Taxonomic revision of Bergera J.Koenig ex L. (Rutaceae) based on the molecular phylogeny and morphology
Fig. 7. Bergera koenigii L. A. Plants. B. Inflorescence. C. Pistil and stamens. D–E. Infructescence. F. Fruits. G. Seeds. H. Ovary crossection. Photos taken by Feng-Juan Mou in China.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.