Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-3.0Jan 2017View details →

Fig. 9 in Taxonomy of the ant genus Nesomyrmex Wheeler (Formicidae, Myrmicinae) in the Afrotropical region, with a review of current species groups and description of a new species of the N. angulatus group from Mozambique

Fig. 9. Body in profile. A. Nesomyrmex angulatus (Mayr, 1862) (CASENT0922010). B. N. grisoni (Forel, 1916) (CASENT0908994).

Fig. 10. — A in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 10. — A. Pyrops effusus, in natura, Borneo, Kalimantan, Wehea Protected Forest, 25 Sep. 2010, K. Norby. — B. Pyrops gunjii, in natura, Borneo, East Kalimantan, 0°32'4.70"S 117°27'46.73"E, 3 Jul. 2011, M. Hauskrecht. — C–F. Fulgora viridicastanea, holotype (Photographs A. Kennedy). C. Dorsal view. D. Left lateral view. E. Head, normal view of frons. F. Labels.

Figs 7–9 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Figs 7–9. Pyrops effusus group, ♂ genitalia. 7. Pyrops effusus. 8. Pyrops gunjii. 9. Pyrops whiteheadi. — A. Lateral view. B. Dorsal view. C. Posteroventral view. An = anal tube, G = gonostylus, Py = pygofer. Scale bar = 1 mm. Photographs by J. Brecko.

Fig. 5 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 5. Pyrops whiteheadi ♂, Sabah, Danum Valley (RMNH). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 11 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 11. Pyrops synavei sp. nov. in natura. A–B. Borneo, Kalimantan, Long Alango, Lalut Birai Sacred Forest, 2 Sep. 2011, J. Woltering. C–D. Borneo, Kalimantan, Lalut Birai Forest, 13 Mar. 2009, D. Forney.

Fig. 4 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 4. Pyrops synavei sp. nov. ♀, holotype (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 12. Pyrops whiteheadi and P in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 12. Pyrops whiteheadi and P. intricatus, in natura, trophobiosis. — A–E. P. whiteheadi. A–B. Tended by cockroaches (Blattodea, Dorylaea, probably D. magna (Schelford, 1909)), Sabah, Danum Valley, 4 Jul. 2013, A. Sorokin. C. Tended by small cockroach (Blattodea, Pseudophyllodromiinae), Sabah, Danum Valley, 15 Dec. 2008, C.C. Lee. D. Sabah, Lower Kinabatangan River, 9 Aug. 2012, N. Messina. E. Tended by an adult gecko, Gehyra mutilata (Wiegmann, 1835) (Squamata: Gekkonidae), Sabah, Sepilok, 6 Jun. 2013, C.C. Lee. — F. P. intricatus tended by cockroach (Blattodea, Dorylaea sp.), Sarawak, Mulu National Park, 15 Oct. 2009, C.C. Lee.

Fig. 2 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 2. Pyrops effusus ♀, Kalimantan, Batulicin (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 3 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 3. Pyrops gunjii ♂, E Kalimantan, Samarinda, Mt Beratus (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 1 in Review of the effusus group of the Lanternfly genus Pyrops Spinola, 1839, with one new species and notes on trophobiosis (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha: Fulgoridae)

Fig. 1. Pyrops intricatus ♀, Kalimantan, Mt Bawan (RBINS). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Habitus, ventral view. C. Habitus, lateral view. D. Head and thorax, lateral view. E. Frons, normal view. Scale bar = 30 mm (D–E not to scale).

Fig. 1 in Review of tapeworms of rodents in the Republic of Buryatia, with emphasis on anoplocephalid cestodes

Fig. 1. Study sites in Buryatia. 1-6, Kamensk, Pasolskaya, Ganzurinov, Nizhnaya Ivolga, Verhnaya Berezovka, Utochkina Pad; 7, Maloje Kolesova; 8-10, Barguzin River, Shapen'kovo, Nesteriha; 11-13, Muhorshibir, Sharaldai, Zabaikalsk; 14, Tseremushki.

Figure 19 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 19. Eutrichodesmus similis sp. n., ♂ paratype from Gui Dong 2 Cave; A, anterior part of body, ventral view; B, segments 5-9, ventral view; C, posterior part of body, ventral view; D, cross-section of segment 4, caudal view; E, texture of prozonite, limbus and bisegmented seta; F, metatergal cerotegument with a bisegmented seta. − Scale bars: A, D, 0.5 mm, B, 1.0 mm, C, 0.02, E, 0.01 mm & F, 0.005 mm.

Figure 17 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 17. Eutrichodesmus latus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Yan Wu Dong Cave; A, leg 9; B & C, left gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively (dp = distofemoral process). − Scale bar: A, 0.1 mm; B & C, 0.2 mm.

Figure 18 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 18. Eutrichodesmus similis sp. n., ♂ paratype from Gui Dong 2 Cave; A, anterior part of body, lateral view; B, midbody segments, lateral view; C, posterior part of body, lateral view; D, anterior part of body, dorsal view; E, midbody segments, dorsal view; F, posterior part of body, dorsal view. − Scale bars: A-E, 0.5 mm & F, 0.2 mm.

Figure 16 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 16. Eutrichodesmus latus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Yan Wu Dong Cave; A, midbody sterna, ventral view; B, gonopods, ventral view; C, same, ventral view; D, gonopod apices, ventral view; E, tip of distofemoral process of gonopods, ventral view. − Scale bars: A-C, 0.1 mm, D & E, 0.02 mm.

Figure 14 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 14. Eutrichodesmus latus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Yan Wu Dong Cave; A, habitus, lateral view; B, anterior part of body, lateral view; C, posterior part of body, lateral view; D, same, dorsal view; E, same, ventral view; F, anterior part of body, ventral view. − Scale bars: A, 1.0 mm, B, C, E, 0.2 mm, D, F, 0.5 mm.

Figure 12 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 12. Eutrichodesmus communicans sp. n., ♂ paratype from Fapon doline 3; A, metatergal cerotegument and bisegmented setae; B, same with microvilli, lateral view; C, same with base of a bisegmented seta; D, legs, ventral view; E, gonopods, ventral view; F, left gonopod, dorsolateral view. − Scale bars: A, B, 0.01 mm, C, 0.005 mm, D, F, 0.05 mm.

Figure 10 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 10. Eutrichodesmus communicans sp. n., ♂ paratype from Fapon doline 3; A, habitus, lateral view; B, midbody segments, dorsal view; C, posterior part of body, dorsal view; D, same, ventral view; E, anterior part of body, ventrolateral view; F, same, front view. − Scale bars: A, 0.2 mm, B-F, 0.1 mm.

Figure 11 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 11. Eutrichodesmus communicans sp. n., ♂ paratype from Fapon doline 3; A, anterior part of body, ventral view; B, same, ventrocaudal view; C, antenna; D, apex of antenna; E, cross-section of a midbody segment, caudal view; F, texture of prozonite and limbus. − Scale bars: A, B, E, 0.1 mm, C, 0.05 mm, D, 0.01 mm & F, 0.02 mm.

Figure 21 in Review of the millipede family Haplodesmidae Cook, 1895, with descriptions of some new or poorly-known species (Diplopoda, Polydesmida)

Figure 21. Eutrichodesmus similis sp. n., ♂ paratype from Gui Dong 2 Cave; A, left gonopod, mesal view; B & C, distal half of right gonopod, mesal and lateral views, respectively (dp = distofemoral process). − Scale bar: 0.2 mm.