Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Diatom responses to river water quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

Figure 2. Long-term changes in two selected river chemical parameters in the Olifants, Letaba and Sabie rivers between 1983 and 2015. The closed symbols represent data extracted from the Department of Water Affairs and Sanitation. Open symbols represent the values recorded at sites within the three focal rivers during the present study in 2015.

Figure 1 in The influence of land use-impacted tributaries on water quality and phytoplankton in the Mooi River, North West Province, South Africa

Figure 1: Catchment area of the Mooi River from its source to the confluence with the Vaal River, showing the position of sampling sites in the main stream (1–8) and in the tributaries (WFS, GM and WS). Different types of land use activities in the catchment are also indicated on the map.

Figure 1. A in Diatom responses to river water quality in the Kruger National Park, South Africa

Figure 1. A map of the Kruger National Park, showing the location of the study area and diatom sampling sites.

Figure 3 in The influence of land use-impacted tributaries on water quality and phytoplankton in the Mooi River, North West Province, South Africa

Figure 3: Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) of the physico-chemical environmental variables, natural log of the phytoplankton data, and the different sites located in the Mooi River for 2015.

Fig. 7 in Description of a new species of Anoplocheilus MacLeay, 1838 from South Africa, with review of the genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae)

Fig. 7 – Comparative dorsal habitus (A) and aedeagus (B) of Diphrontis matilei (Antoine & Lequeux, 2001) comb. nov. and of Diphrontis cruenta Gerstaecker, 1883 (C, D), the type species of the genus. Photos: Gerhard Beinhundner.

Fig. 5 in Description of a new species of Anoplocheilus MacLeay, 1838 from South Africa, with review of the genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae)

Fig. 5 – Known distribution of Anoplocheilus (A.) rusticus (Gory & Percheron, 1833) and A. (A.) clarki sp. nov. in the western South African region (map adapted from www.freeworldmaps.net).

Fig. 3 in Description of a new species of Anoplocheilus MacLeay, 1838 from South Africa, with review of the genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae)

Fig. 3 – Anoplocheilus (A.) rusticus (Gory & Percheron, 1833). Male: A, dorsal habitus; B, ventral habitus; C, lateral habitus (Photographs by Lynette Clennell).

Fig. 2 in Description of a new species of Anoplocheilus MacLeay, 1838 from South Africa, with review of the genus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae, Cetoniinae)

Fig. 2 – Anoplocheilus (A.) clarki sp. nov. Holotype male: A, clypeus; B, pygidium; C, parameres, dorsal view; D, parameres, lateral view; E, parameres, frontal view. Photographs by Lynette Clennell.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Fig. 3 in A new species of Ischnostomiella Krikken, 1978 from the Limpopo Province of South Africa (Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae, Xiphoscelidini)

Fig. 3 – Distribution range of the three species of Ischnostomiella Krikken, 1978 within the southern African region. (Map: Google Earth Pro with image from Landsat/Copernicus 12/14/2015).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Fig. 1 in A new species of Ischnostomiella Krikken, 1978 from the Limpopo Province of South Africa (Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae, Xiphoscelidini)

Fig. 1 – Ischnostomiella rudebecki sp. nov., Holotype ♀: A) dorsal habitus; B) ventral habitus; C) lateral habitus; D) clypeus; E) pygidium; F) specimen labels. Photos: John Irish.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Fig. 2 – A in A new species of Ischnostomiella Krikken, 1978 from the Limpopo Province of South Africa (Scarabaeidae: Cetoniinae, Xiphoscelidini)

Fig. 2 – A, dark ♂, Namibia, Karibib; B, brown-orange ♂, ibidem; C, dark ♀, Namibia, Omaruru. I. werneri Beinhundner, 2005: D, Holotype ♂, Botswana, Gweta; E, Paratype ♂, ibidem; F, "allotype" ♀, ibidem.

Fig. 4 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 4. Partial ontogenetic sequence representing sub−adult to adult stages in the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa. A. UCMP 41286 in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. SAM−PK−3008 in dorsal (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. CGP/1/135 in dorsal (C1) and ventral (C2) views; arrows indicate ontogenetically variable characters of the cranium of X. africanus, as discussed in the text. Grey shading represents the preserved portions of each skull.

Fig. 3 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 3. Mastodonsaurid temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa, referred specimen CGP/1/135. A. Interpretive drawing (A1) and reconstruction (A2) in dorsal view. B. Interpretive drawing (B1) and reconstruction (B2) in ventral view. Grey shading represents plaster−of−Paris; heavy stiple represents matrix; cross−hatching represents broken bone.

Fig. 2 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 2. Mastodonsaurid temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus (Haughton, 1925) from the Middle Triassic (Cynognathus Assemblage Zone, Beaufort Group) of the Karoo Basin, South Africa. Skulls of three specimens used in this study, reproduced to the same scale. A. Referred specimen CGP/1/135 in dorsal (A1) and ventral (A2) views. B. Lectotype SAM−PK−2360 in dorsal (B1) and ventral (B2) views. C. Referred specimen SAM−PK−3008 in dorsal (C1) and ventral (C2) views.

Fig. 1 in A giant skull of the temnospondyl Xenotosuchus africanus from the Middle Triassic of South Africa and its ontogenetic implications

Fig. 1. Locality map and simplified stratigraphic column. The map shows the extent of surface outcrop of the Cynognathus Assemblage Zone within the main Karoo Basin, South Africa. Stratigraphic column shows only the Triassic part of the Beaufort Group sequence. Skull icon indicates the horizon of Xenotosuchus africanus. Localities: 1, Cuylerville, Queenstown District; 2, Vaalbank, Winaarsbaaken, and Nooitgedacht, Burgersdorp District; 3, Matabele and Koudekraal, Rouxville District.

Figure 4 in Plume moths in the protected areas of KwaZulu Natal province, Republic of South Africa

Figure 4. View of the Giants Castle Game Reserve section of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site (Photo: Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife).

Figure 3 in Plume moths in the protected areas of KwaZulu Natal province, Republic of South Africa

Figure 3. View of the Cathedral Peak State Forest section of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site (Photo: Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife).

Figure 5 in Plume moths in the protected areas of KwaZulu Natal province, Republic of South Africa

Figure 5. View of the Royal Natal National Park section of the uKhahlamba-Drakensberg Park World Heritage Site (Photo: Ezemvelo KZN Wildlife).

Figure 1 in Plume moths in the protected areas of KwaZulu Natal province, Republic of South Africa

Figure 1. Map showing the location of the protected areas sampled for Pterophoridae in KwaZulu-Natal province, South Africa.