Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-zeroOct 2019View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Biscotti N, Bonsanto D, Viscio GD (2018) The traditional food use of wild vegetables in Apulia (Italy) in the light of Italian ethnobotanical literature. Italian Botanist 5: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.5.22297

Tables S1, S2, S3 : Explanation note: Table S1 (Learning areas divided by territorial district), Table S2 (Wild vegetables gathered and consumed in Apulia region) and Table S3 (Wild food plants of popular use in Italy by regions (Checklist)).

Fig. 4 Usnea parafloridana K in Evaluation of traditionally circumscribed species in the lichen-forming genus Usnea, section Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) using a six-locus dataset

Fig. 4 Usnea parafloridana K. Mark, Will-Wolf & Randlane sp. nov. – view of general habit (a, b), soralia with isidiomorphs (c), fibrils (d), soralia (e), and branch anatomy (f). Scale bars 7 mm (a, b), 1.5 mm (c), 2 mm (d), 0.4 mm (e), and 0.3 mm (f). Photographed specimens WW14807 (holotype; a, c, e), WW14858 (b, d), and WW14857 (f)

Fig. 3 in Evaluation of traditionally circumscribed species in the lichen-forming genus Usnea, section Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) using a six-locus dataset

Fig. 3 STACEY maximum clade credibility SMC-tree with posterior probabilities (PP) from STACEY (above branches) and *BEAST (below) analyses together with similarity matrix for the section Usnea dataset. The squares represent posterior probabilities (white = 0, black = 1) for pairs of individuals to belong to the same cluster. The lines in the matrix separate major groups (named above matrix), while

Fig. 1 Bayesian 50 in Evaluation of traditionally circumscribed species in the lichen-forming genus Usnea, section Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) using a six-locus dataset

Fig. 1 Bayesian 50 % consensus tree of 18 currently accepted Usnea species based on six concatenated loci, inferred by BEAST. Major groups and secondary chemistry are indicated right of the tree. Branch supports are given in circles: Black circles reflect strong support from both inferences (PP ≥ 95 % for BEAST and BP ≥ 70 % for RAxML), and gray circles strong support from BEAST only. Location and laboratory code are given in brackets. Scale bar shows the number of substitutions per site. Secondary metabolites: BAR barbatic acid, BMY baeomycesic

Fig. 2 in Evaluation of traditionally circumscribed species in the lichen-forming genus Usnea, section Usnea (Parmeliaceae, Ascomycota) using a six-locus dataset

Fig. 2 Box plots of cortex (a, d) and medulla (b, e) thickness measurements and bar charts of medulla density categories (c, f) in clades barbata-chaetophora-dasopoga-diplotypus (bar-das-dip) and barbata-intermedia-lapponica-substerilis (bar-int-lap; first row of charts), and between Usnea barbata specimens from these clades (second row of charts). Box plots show the percentages of the whole width of the measured branch. Center lines are the medians, box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software, whiskers extend

opennotspecifiedJun 2024View details →

Fig. 6 in Disentangling morphological variation in metapodials of giraffids: Modern and traditional approaches

Fig. 6 Shape variation grids illustrating the extreme values of PC1 for the metacarpals a and the metatarsals b. For both skeletal elements, extreme positive PC1 values depict robust metapodials, whereas extreme negative PC1 values depict gracile ones

opennotspecifiedJun 2024View details →

Fig. 4 in Disentangling morphological variation in metapodials of giraffids: Modern and traditional approaches

Fig. 4 PC1 vs. PC2 scatter plots of the results of the geometric morphometrics with projected phylogeny analysis for the metacarpals a and the metatarsals b

opennotspecifiedJun 2024View details →

Fig. 3 in Disentangling morphological variation in metapodials of giraffids: Modern and traditional approaches

Fig. 3 PC1 vs. PC2 scatter plots of the results of the geometric morphometrics analysis for the metacarpals a and the metatarsals b

opennotspecifiedMar 2024View details →

FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic position of Vanda coelestis (Rchb.f.) Motes (Orchidaceae; Aeridinae): evidence from complete plastome and combined traditional sequences

FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood tree for Vanda based on combined nuclear (nrITS) and plastid DNA regions (matK, psbA-trnH, and trnL-trnF). The previously recognized sections from Gardiner et al. (2013) are highlighted by the color of branches and species. The numbers near the nodes are bootstrap percentages and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BP, BP, PP). A dash (-) indicates that a node ML MP is inconsistent between the topology of the MP/ML trees and the Bayesian tree; *node is 100 bootstrap percentage or 1.00 posterior probability.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

Data for replication of figures in "In situ imaging of a kleptoplastidic ciliate thin layer indicates traditional sampling underestimates oceanic mixotroph biomass", Barua et al. Communications Earth & Environment (2024).

This dataset contains the relevant information needed to reproduce data plots in Figures 1-5 and Supplementary Figures 2-3 of the following manuscript. In situ imaging of a kleptoplastidic ciliate thin layer indicates traditional sampling underestimates oceanic mixotroph biomass Ranjoy Barua, Lisa Nyman, Buyu Guo, Matthew D. Johnson, Anvita U. Kerkar, Jiarong Hong, Adam T. Greer, John Lehrter, Malcolm McFarland, Bradley Penta, Aditya R. Nayak Communications Earth & Environment (2024).

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURE 3 in On the taxonomic identity of a fungal morph used in traditional medicine in Kerala State, India

FIGURE 3. The phylogenetic tree obtained from the ML analysis using ITS sequence data. Values in the branches indicate the BS support of the clades. BS values greater than 50% are shown. GenBank accession numbers are given after the name of each taxon.

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURE 1. A, B in On the taxonomic identity of a fungal morph used in traditional medicine in Kerala State, India

FIGURE 1. A, B: The fungal morph (nilamanga) recently collected from Kerala; A. Stromata; B. Section showing the stromal interior. C, D: Sclerotium stipitatum; C. Holotype (K(M) 125991); D. Section showing the stromal interior. Scale bars: A, C=10 mm; B, D=10 μm.

opennotspecifiedMar 2015View details →

FIGURE 2 in On the taxonomic identity of a fungal morph used in traditional medicine in Kerala State, India

FIGURE 2. The phylogenetic tree obtained from the MP analysis using ITS sequence data. Values in the branches indicate the BS support of the clades. BS values greater than 50% are shown. GenBank accession numbers are given after the name of each taxon.

FIGURE 9 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 9. Schematic transverse sections of mericarp of Schrenkia alaica Pimenov (Pimenov et al. 503, MW), drawn from Pimenov, Vasilieva et Lavrova 503.1 = exocarp; 2 = outer layer of mesocarp; 3 = middle (sclerenchymatous) layer of mesocarp; 4 = inner layer of mesocarp; 5 = endocarp; 6 = endosperm; 7 = vascular bundle of funicle; scale bar = 1mm.

FIGURE 7 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 7. Known geographical distribution of Schrenkia vaginata. Dots represent localities where herbarium specimens were collected. Details of accession codes are indicated in the Appendix.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 4. Schematic transverse sections of mericarps. A. Schtschurowskia meifolia (Pimenov et al. 113, MW); B. Sclerotiaria pentaceros (Sovetkina, TAK). Fruits are not divided into two mericarps at maturity. A-B: redrawn from Politova (Politova, unpublished). 1 = exocarp; 2 = mesocarp: sclerenchymatous layer; 3 = secretory ducts; 4 = endosperm; scale bar= 1mm.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 3. SEM micrographs of mericarp surfaces, (scale bar = 1000 μm) and schematic transverse sections of mericarps: A. smooth and glabrous in Schrenkia golickeana (Pimenov et al.135, MW); B. smooth with tubercles in Schrenkia papillaris (Pimenov et al.216, MW); C. ribbed with big hardened teeth in Lipskya insignis (Pimenov et al.380, MW).

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 1. Majority rule consensus tree (50%) of the Bayesian analysis of the ITS data. Numbers are posterior probabilities and maximum parsimony bootstrap support values. Scale bar corresponds to 0.1 substitutions per site. Members of the tribe Coriandreae are indicated by shading.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 2. Majority rule consensus trees (50%) of the Bayesian analysis of the 45 accessions datasets. Numbers are posterior probabilities and maximum parsimony bootstrap support values. Scale bar corresponds to 0.1 substitutions per site.

FIGURE 6 in Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analyses of the traditional tribe Coriandreae (Umbelliferae-Apioideae)

FIGURE 6. Diversity of petals in the tribe Coriandreae: A. Bifora testiculata (Davis 28034, ANK); B. Coriandrum sativum (Grizi and Leinkram s.n., MHA) C. Schrenkia congesta (Pimenov et al.157, MW). A-C: redrawn from Politova (Politova, unpublished).