Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

5,287

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

5,287 results for “colorectal cancer”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Example of KRAS oncogene mutational regression and HLA haplotype characterization in oligo-metastatic colorectal cancer patient (ID: PAT2)

<p>KRAS oncogene mutational regression from primary tumour to lung metastasis (evaluated through TSO500 panel, Illumina Novaseq 6000 platform) and HLA haplotype characterization (through PCR) in a representative oligo-metastatic colorectal cancer patient (ID: PAT2).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →
dryad32/100

Data for: Molecular and clinicopathological differences between depressed and protruded T2 colorectal cancer

<p><strong><span>Background</span></strong></p> <p><span>Colorectal cancer (CRC) can be classified into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) according to genomic aberrations and gene expression profiles. CMS is expected to be useful in predicting prognosis and selecting chemotherapy regimens. However, there are still no reports on the relationship between the morphology and CMS. </span></p> <p><strong><span>Methods</span></strong></p> <p><span>This retrospective study included 55 subjects with T2 CRC undergoing surgical resection, of whom 30 had the depressed type and 25 the protruded type. In the classification of the CMS, we first defined cases with deficient mismatch repair as CMS1. And then, CMS2/3 and CMS4 were classified using an online classifier developed by Trinh et al. The staining intensity of CDX2, HTR2B, FRMD6, ZEB1, and KER and the percentage contents of CDX2, FRMD6, and KER are input into the classifier to obtain automatic output classifying the specimen as CMS2/3 or CMS4.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Results</span></strong></p> <p><span>According to the results yielded by the online classifier, of the 30 depressed-type cases, 15 (50%) were classified as CMS2/3 and 15 (50%) as CMS4. Of the 25 protruded-type cases, 3 (12%) were classified as CMS1 and 22 (88%) as CMS2/3. All of the T2 CRCs classified as CMS4 were depressed CRCs. More malignant pathological findings such as lymphatic invasion were associated with the depressed rather than protruded T2 CRC cases.</span></p>

opencc-zeroAug 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Colorectal Cancer Histology Image Tiles for Tissue Multi-class Classification

<p><strong>Content</strong></p> <p>The present dataset is linked to a research aimed at discovering the best normalization pipeline and classification model for colorectal cancer multi-class tissue classification.<br> The 15,856 histological image tiles are completely anomized and are extracted from 10 formalin-fized paraffine-embedded samples of patients affected by colorectal cancer.</p> <p>The materials are inside the following zip file:</p> <p>&ldquo;CRC_Tiles_IRCCS_ISTITUTO_TUMORI_BARI.zip&rdquo;: a zipped folder containing tiles (n=15,856) annotated by a pathologist, grouped in 6 subdirectories, each of them representing a class. Tiles are of size 224 x 224 px, taken at a resolution of 0.5 &mu;m/px.<br> <br> <strong>Ethical Statement</strong></p> <p>The study has been funded by &ldquo;Tecnopolo per la Medicina di Precisione (CUP B84I18000540002)&rdquo;. The institutional Ethic Committee approved the study (Prot n. 780/CE).</p> <p><br> <strong>Related Datasets and Works</strong><br> &nbsp;<br> For further details concerning the aforementioned dataset, refer to the papers below.&nbsp;<br> Please cite the following&nbsp;articles if you need this dataset for your research.</p> <p>Altini N. et al. (2021) Multi-class Tissue Classification in Colorectal Cancer with Handcrafted and Deep Features. In: Huang DS., Jo KH., Li J., Gribova V., Bevilacqua V. (eds) Intelligent Computing Theories and Application. ICIC 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12836. Springer, Cham.&nbsp;<br> https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84522-3_42</p> <p>Altini, N., Marvulli, T. M., Zito, F. A., Caputo, M., Tommasi, S., Azzariti, A., ... &amp; Bevilacqua, V. (2023). The Role of Unpaired Image-to-Image Translation for Stain Color Normalization in Colorectal Cancer Histology Classification.&nbsp;<em>Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine</em>, 107511.&nbsp;<br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107511">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107511</a></p> <p>Please also consider the dataset offered in our previous work:</p> <p>Altini N. et al. (2021). Pathologist&#39;s Annotated Image Tiles for Multi-Class Tissue Classification in Colorectal Cancer (v1.0) [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4785131</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Mouse RNASeq data for "The tumor microbiome reacts to hypoxia and can influence response to radiation treatment in colorectal cancer", part 1

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Mouse RNASeq data for "The tumor microbiome reacts to hypoxia and can influence response to radiation treatment in colorectal cancer", part 2

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Comparison between 16S rRNA and shotgun sequencing in colorectal cancer, advanced colorectal lesions, and healthy human gut microbiota

<div> <p><span><span>Background</span></span><span><span>: Gut dysbiosis has been associated with colorectal cancer (CRC), the third most prevalent cancer in the world. </span><span>This study compares microbiota taxonomic and abundance results obtained by 16S rRNA gene sequencing (16S) and whole shotgun metagenomic sequencing to investigate their reliability for bacteria profiling. The experimental design included 156 human stool samples from healthy controls, advanced (high-risk) colorectal lesion patients (HRL), and CRC cases</span><span>, with each sample sequenced using both 16S and shotgun methods</span><span>. We thoroughly compared both sequencing technologies at the species, genus, and family annotation levels, the abundance differences in these taxa, sparsity, alpha and beta diversities, ability to train prediction models, and the similarity of the microbial signature derived from these models.</span></span><span>&nbsp;</span></p> </div> <div> <p><span><span>Results</span></span><span><span>: </span><span>As expected, the results showed that </span></span><span><span>16S detects only part of the gut microbiota community revealed by shotgun, although some genera were only profiled by 16S. The </span></span><span><span>16S </span><span>abundance data was sparser and </span><span>exhibited</span><span> lower alpha diversity. In lower taxonomic ranks, shotgun and 16S highly differed, </span><span>partially</span><span> due to a disagreement in reference databases. When considering only shared taxa, the abundance was positively correlated between the two strategies. We also found a moderate correlation between the shotgun and 16S alpha-diversity measures, as well as their </span><span>PCoAs</span><span>. </span><span>Regarding</span><span> the machine learning models, only some of the shotgun models showed some degree of predictive power in an independent test set, but we could not </span><span>demonstrate</span><span> a clear superiority of one technology over the other. Microbial signatures from both sequencing techniques reveal</span><span>ed</span><span> taxa previously associated with CRC development, e.g., </span></span><span><span>Parvimonas</span><span> micra</span></span><span><span>.</span></span><span>&nbsp;</span></p> </div> <div> <p><span><span>Conclusions</span></span><span><span>: </span></span><span><span>Shotgun and 16S sequencing provide two different lenses to examine microbial communities.</span><span> While we have </span><span>demonstrated</span><span> that they can unravel common patterns (including microbial signatures), </span><span>shotgun often gives</span><span> a more detailed snapshot than 16S, both in depth and breadth. </span><span>Instead</span><span>,</span> <span>16S will tend to show only part of the picture, giving greater weight to dominant bacteria in a sample.</span> <span>Therefore, w</span><span>e recommend choosing one or another sequencing technique before launching a study.</span><span> Specifically, </span><span>s</span><span>hotgun sequencing is preferred for stool microbiome samples and in-depth analyses, while 16S is </span><span>more </span><span>suitable for tissue samples</span><span> and</span><span> studies with </span><span>targeted</span> <span>aims</span><span>.</span></span><span>&nbsp;</span></p> </div>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Transcriptome profiling associated with CARD11 overexpres-sion in Colorectal Cancer implicates a potential role for Tumour Immune Microenvironment and Cancer pathways modulation via NF-κB

<p>tables for CARD11</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
zenodo32/100

Intermediate-onset colorectal cancer: a clinical and familial boundary between both early and late-onset colorectal cancer

<p>Comparative studies of colorectal cancer (CRC) according to the age of onset<br> have found differences between early-onset CRC (EOCRC) and late-onset CRC<br> (LOCRC). Using this as a starting point, we wished to determine whether intermediateonset<br> CRC (IOCRC) might also be considered as an independent group within CRC.<br> We performed a retrospective comparative study of the clinicopathological and familial<br> features, as well as of the symptoms and their duration, of a total of 272 subjects<br> diagnosed with CRC classified into three groups according to the age-of-onset (98<br> EOCRC, 83 IOCRC and 91 LOCRC). The results show that from a clinicopathological<br> point of view, IOCRC shared certain features with EOCRC (gender, prognosis), and<br> with LOCRC (multiple primary CRCs), whereas it also had characteristics that were<br> specific for IOCRC (mean number of associated polyps). A gradual progression was<br> observed from EOCRC to LOCRC from a greater family aggregation to sporadic cases,<br> in parallel with a change of Lynch Syndrome cases to the sporadic microsatellite<br> instability pathway, with the IOCRC being a boundary group that is more related to<br> EOCRC. With respect to symptoms, duration and correlation with stages, IOCRC<br> appeared more similar to EOCRC. Clinically, IOCRC behaves as a transitional group<br> between EOCRC and LOCRC, with features in common with both groups, but also<br> with IOCRC-specific features. Excluding cases with familial cancer history, the<br> awareness for EOCRC diagnosis should be extended to IOCRC.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

Transcriptome profiling associated with CARD11 overexpres-sion in Colorectal Cancer implicates a potential role for Tumour Immune Microenvironment and Cancer pathways modulation via NF-κB

<p>Images for CARD11 study in IJMS</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2024View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Incidence of cancer-associated thromboembolism in Japanese gastric and colorectal cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a single-institutional retrospective cohort analysis (Sapporo CAT study)

Objective: Few data regarding the incidence of cancer-associated thromboembolism (TE) are available for Asian populations. We investigated the incidence of TE (TEi) and its risk factors among gastric and colorectal cancer (GCC) patients who received chemotherapy in a daily practice setting. Design: A retrospective cohort study. Setting: A single institutional study that used data from Sapporo City General Hospital, Japan, on patients treated between January 2008 and May 2015. Participants: Five hundred Japanese GCC patients who started chemotherapy from January 2008 to May 2015. Primary and secondary outcome measures: TE was diagnosed by reviewing all the reports of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) performed during the follow-up period. All types of thrombosis detected by CT or additional imaging tests, such as venous TE, arterial TE, and cerebral infarction, were defined as TE. Medical records of all identified patients were reviewed and potential risk factors for TE including clinicopathological backgrounds were collected. We defined the following patients as 'active cancer'; patients with unresectable advanced GCC, cancer recurrence during or after completing adjuvant (Adj) chemotherapy, and/or presence of other malignant tumours. Results: Of the 500 patients, 70 patients (14.0%) developed TE during the follow-up period. TEi was 9.2% and 17.3% in gastric and colorectal cancer patients, 18.1% and 3.5% in active and non-active cancer patients, and 24.0% and 12.9% in multiple and single primary, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that colorectal cancer (odds ratio [OR], 2.371; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.328 to 4.233), active cancer (OR 7.593; 95% CI 2.950 to 19.543), and multiple primary (OR 2.527; 95% CI 1.189 to 5.370) were independently associated with TEi. Conclusion: TEi was 14.0% among Japanese GCC patients received chemotherapy, and was significantly higher among patients with colorectal cancer, active cancer, and multiple primary than among those with gastric cancer, non-active cancer, and single primary, respectively.

opencc-zeroJul 2019View details →
zenodo32/100

Intravoxel incoherent motion model of diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging in differentiating of local colorectal cancer recurrence from scar/fibrosis tissue by multivariate logistic regression analysis

<p>We&nbsp;uploaded&nbsp;mean of diffusion coefficient (MD) and mean of diffusional Kurtosis values of 56 patients related to the manuscript:&nbsp;Fusco, Roberta, Vincenza Granata, Mario Sansone, Robert Grimm, Paolo Delrio, Daniela Rega, Fabiana Tatangelo, Antonio Avallone, Nicola Raiano, Giuseppe Totaro, Vincenzo Cerciello, Biagio Pecori, and Antonella Petrillo. 2020. &quot;Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model of Diffusion Weighted Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging in Differentiating of Local Colorectal Cancer Recurrence from Scar/Fibrosis Tissue by Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis&quot; Applied Sciences 10, no. 23: 8609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10238609</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →
zenodo32/100

Hydroxymethylation profile of cell free DNA is a biomarker for early colorectal cancer

<p>The files in this data release represent&nbsp;processed data from the FORESEE study conducted by Cambridge Epigenetix Ltd, and reported in the preprint manuscript:&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;Hydroxymethylation profile of cell free DNA is a biomarker for early colorectal cancer&quot; (<a href="https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-667874/v1">Walker et al. 2021</a>).&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>As described in the manuscript, classifiers were trained and validated on genomic features extracted from sequencing datasets across&nbsp;cases and controls.&nbsp; Several classes of genomic features were constructed for training and validation data sets which are described below:</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>CRC_enhancer_znorm_training_matrix_v1.csv<br> CRC_enhancer_znorm_validation_matrix_v1.csv</strong></p> <p>Columns contain sample names, rows contain genomic features.&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Description of feature generation process.&nbsp;</em></p> <p>To calculate 5hmC levels at gene enhancers, we first calculated read counts using Bam readcounts v0.01. RPKM were calculated over candidate gene-enhancers downloaded from GeneCards v4.4.&nbsp;5hmC enrichment was computed as the log2 ratio between the hydroxymethylome library RPKM and the input library RPKM after the inclusion of pseudocounts. Feature scaled (z-score normalization) 5hmC levels&nbsp;of enhancers quantile-normalized over samples.</p> <p><br> <strong>CRC_cegxdelfi_znorm_training_matrix_v1.tsv<br> CRC_cegxdelfi_znorm_validation_matrix_v1.tsv</strong></p> <p>Columns contain sample names, rows contain genomic features.&nbsp;<br> &nbsp;</p> <p><em>Description of feature generation process.&nbsp;</em><br> We divided the genome into 100KB bins and quantified cfDNA fragment sizes per bin. We removed blacklisted regions, genomic gaps (UCSC table) and non-standard chromosomes a priori.&nbsp;We excluded outlier bins in fragment size, only retaining fragments between 100nt to 220nt length. Finally, we split the genome into 100KB bins (in total 26170 non-overlapping genomic regions)&nbsp;&nbsp;and calculated the following characteristics of fragment size distribution per genomic bin: number of short fragments (100-150nt), number of long fragments (151-220nt), ratio between short and&nbsp;&nbsp;long fragments and the total number of fragments. This approach generates 26170 features per metric and per sample. The last step is the averaging of the 100 KB bins into larger non-overlapping&nbsp;&nbsp;genomic regions of 5 MB (in total 512 bins).</p> <p><br> <strong>CRC_cegxnps_znorm_training_matrix_v1.tsv</strong></p> <p><strong>CRC_cegxnps_validation_matrix_v1.tsv</strong></p> <p>&nbsp; Columns contain sample names, rows contain genomic features. &nbsp;<br> <em>Description of feature generation process.&nbsp;</em><br> &nbsp; &nbsp; Further detail in the manuscript:&nbsp;<a href="http://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-667874/v1">Walker et al. 2021</a></p> <p><br> <strong>FORESEE_sample_description.tsv</strong></p> <p>This file holds sample data for colorectal cancer and control samples described in <a href="http://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-667874/v1">Walker et al. 2021</a></p> <ul> <li>The sample_name column&nbsp;links to the column names in the *_matrix.tsv files</li> <li>The columns denoted raw_file1 and raw_file2 link the sample metadata with the enhancer&nbsp;readcount files contained in the gh_readcount_training.tar and gh_readcount_validation.tar.</li> </ul> <p>The columns in the table are briefly described below:</p> <p><em>sample_name</em>:<em> </em>Sample identifier<br> <em>Title</em>: Composed of the the disease name, gender and sample_name<br> <em>Source_name</em>: Tissue source<br> <em>Organism</em>: Contains the term: &ldquo;Homo sapiens&rdquo;<br> <em>Characteristics_indication</em>: Disease indication&nbsp;<br> <em>Characteristics_stage</em>: Cancer stage where appropriate. Indicated by roman numerals (I,II,III,IV)<br> <em>Characteristics_gender</em>: Described as &ldquo;Female&rdquo; or &ldquo;Male&rdquo;<br> <em>Characteristics_ethnicity</em>: Ethnicity description<br> <em>Characteristics_age_at_collection</em>: Age value in years<br> <em>Molecule</em>: Contains the value &ldquo;cell free DNA&rdquo;<br> <em>Description</em>: Contains value: &ldquo;Training sample&rdquo; or &ldquo;Validation sample&rdquo;</p> <p><em>Processed_data_file</em>: Contains the term: &ldquo;CRC_enhancer_training_matrix&rdquo; or &ldquo;CRC_enhancer_validation_matrix&rdquo;. &nbsp;<br> <em>raw_file1</em>: Refers to the readcount file from the 5hmC capture library<br> <em>raw_file2</em>: Refers to the readcount file from the Input control (shallow sequenced) library</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>gh_readcount_training.tar<br> gh_readcount_validation.tar</strong></p> <p>These tar files include the raw read counts computed across enhancer regions for case and control data and are referenced in the FORESEE_sample_description.tsv file.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Manuscript Abstract</strong></p> <p>Our classifier discriminated CRC samples from controls with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 90% (sensitivity was 55% at 95% specificity). Performance was similar&nbsp;for&nbsp;early stage 1 (AUC 89%) and late stage 4 CRC (AUC 94%). Performance was independent of the proportion of tumor-DNA in the cell free DNA.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p> <p>We expanded the classifier to include information about cell free DNA fragment size and abundance across the genome. Overall performance was similar (AUC 91%), with gains in sensitivity (63% at 95% specificity).&nbsp;</p> <p>The 5-hydroxymethylcytosine signal&nbsp;allows detection of CRC, even&nbsp;in&nbsp;cell free DNA&nbsp;samples with undetectable tumor DNA.&nbsp;Including&nbsp;5-hydroxymethylcytosine in multi-analyte&nbsp;screening, will improve&nbsp;sensitivity&nbsp;for early-stage cancer.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2021View details →
zenodo32/100

NGS results of metastatic colorectal cancer patients.

<p>Anonymized examples of complete NGS results of 6 metastatic colorectal cancer patients included in a prognostic analysis focused on p53 mutational status.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Follow-up representative source data of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with TAS-102 and regorafenib

<p>Follow-up representative source data of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with TAS-102 and regorafenib (date of vital status and tomographic scans).</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Bortezomib in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00052507. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Study of Intravenous Aflibercept in Combination With FOLFIRI in Japanese Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00921661. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Advanced Colorectal Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02923622. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Comparison of Diagnostic Sensitivity Between ctDNA Methylation and CEA in Colorectal Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05558436. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 12.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Vaccine Therapy and Chemotherapy With or Without Tetanus Toxoid Compared With Chemotherapy Alone in Treating Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00027833. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

A Study of On-treatment ctDNA Changes in Chemo-refractory Colorectal Cancer Patients

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05487248. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 2. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record