Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
14,185
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
14,185 results for “phylogenies”
Fig. 3 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 3. Ectocuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area
Fig. 5 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 5. Entocuneiform facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area
Fig. 6 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 6. Cuboid facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.
Fig. 1 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 1. Proximal (A), distal (B), lateral (C) and dorsal (D) views of the OH 8 navicular showing the measured lengths, and proximal (E), distal (F), lateral (G) and dorsal (H) views of a left gorilla navicular showing the measured angles; a = talar facet major axis (dorsoplantar) diameter, b = talar facet minor axis (mediolateral) diameter, c = ectocuneiform facet dorsoplantar diameter, d = ectocuneiform facet mediolateral diameter, e = mesocuneiform facet dorsoplantar diameter, f = mesocuneiform facet mediolateral diameter, g = entocuneiform facet mediolateral diameter, h = entocuneiform facet dorsoplantar diameter, i = navicular maximum length, j = cuboid facet dorsoplantar diameter, k = cuboid facet mediolateral diameter, l = depth of talar facet along major axis, m = depth of talar facet along minor axis; 1 = frontal talocuboid angle, 90° 2 = navicular torsion, 3 = frontal mesoectocuneiform angle, 4 = entoectocuneiform angle 5 = sagittal taloectocuneifrom angle, 6 = transverse mesoectocuneiform angle, 7 = transverse cuboectocuneiform angle. In all cases the lines chosen for angular measurements bisect facets into approximately equal halves. For comparative purposes the major bisecting axes of the talar head and cuneiform facets are referred to in the text as the dorsoplantar axes. In neither great apes nor humans do all these axes have a dorsoplantar orientation, but are held in varying inclination to a dorsoplantar axis according to talar head and navicular torison and the frontal mesoectocuneiform angle. The crosssectional area of the talar, ectocuneiform, mesocuneiform entocuneiform and cuboid facets are given by the products of a and b, c and d, e and f, g and h, and j and k, respectively. Relative crosssectional area for each facet is compared as a percentage of the sum of all of the navicular facets. The subtended angle of curvature and the radius of curvature of the talar facet along the dosoplantar (major) and mediolateral (minor) axes are given by 4 arctan(2l/a) and (l2 + a2/4)/ 2l, and 4 arctan(2m/b) and (m2 + b2/4)/2m, respectively.
Fig. 2 in The Os Navicular of Humans, Great Apes, OH 8, Hadar, and Oreopithecus: Function, Phylogeny, and Multivariate Analyses
Fig. 2. Talar facet crosssectional area (mm2) vs. total navicular facet crosssectional area (mm2) in humans, great apes, and fossil hominoids. Arrows point to fossils.
Figure 1. Most parsimonious phylogeny among 12 in Monophyly and taxonomy of the Neotropical seasonal killifish genus Leptolebias (Teleostei: Aplocheiloidei: Rivulidae), with the description of a new genus
Figure 1. Most parsimonious phylogeny among 12 species of the Rivulidae (tree length, L = 118; consistency index, CI = 0.82; retention index, RI = 0.85). Numbers above branches are bootstrap values.
Figure 12 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 12. Mesochaetopterus rogeri sp. nov., seasonal pattern in abundance at Punta del Tordera, in relation to water temperature and wave height. A, Water temperature at 20-m deep and significant wave height. B, Population density.
Figure 11. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Dorsalmost uncini from neuropodia B1. B, Ventralmost uncini from neuropodia B1. C, Uncini from notopodia B2. D, Uncini from neuropodia B2. E, Uncini from notopodia B3. F, Uncini from neuropodia B3. G in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 11. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Dorsalmost uncini from neuropodia B1. B, Ventralmost uncini from neuropodia B1. C, Uncini from notopodia B2. D, Uncini from neuropodia B2. E, Uncini from notopodia B3. F, Uncini from neuropodia B3. G, Uncini from the anterior region of notopodia C2. H, Uncini from the posterior region of notopodia C2. I, Uncini from the anterior region of neuropodia C2. J, Uncini from the posterior region of neuropodia C2. K, Uncini from notopodia C30. L, Uncini from neuropodia C30. Scale bars are in Mm.
Figure 10. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 10. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Chaetal arrangement of the modified A4 chaetiger. B–J, Chaetae. B, Tip of the dorsal finely pointed lancet-like chaeta 'd'. C, Dorsolateral transparent knife-like chaeta 'ld1'. D, Dorsolateral transparent knife-like chaeta 'ld2'. E, Dorsolateral brownish knife-like chaeta 'ld3'. F, Lateroventral brownish knife-like chaeta 'ld3'. G, H, I, Typical modified chaetae: lv2, lateral; lv3, lateroventral; v, ventralmost. J, Tip for the ventralmost modified chaeta 'v'. Scale bars are in Mm.
Figure 9. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Dorsalmost capillary chaeta from A8. B in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 9. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Dorsalmost capillary chaeta from A8. B, Dorsolateral fine-lanceolate chaeta from A8. C, Lateroventral sickle-like chaeta from A8. D, Tip of the lateroventral sickle-like chaeta from A8. E, Ventralmost lancet-like chaeta from A8. F, Tip of the ventralmost lancet-like chaeta from A8. G, Ventralmost sickle-like chaeta from A10. Scale bars are in Mm.
Figure 7. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 7. Mesochaetopterus xerecus. A, Dorsal view of region A (preserved). B, Ventral view of region A (preserved). C–J, Chaetae. C, Dorsalmost capillary chaeta from A1. D, Dorsolateral fine-lanceolate chaeta from A1. E, Ventral oar-like chaeta from A1. F, Tip of the ventral oar-like chaeta from A1. G, Dorsalmost fine-lanceolate chaeta from A3. H, Tip of the dorsalmost fine-lanceolate chaeta from A3. I, Ventral oar-like chaeta from A3. J, Tip of the ventral oar-like chaeta from A3. Scale bars are in cm in A and B, and are in Mm in C–J.
Figure 6 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 6. Mesochaetopterus rogeri sp. nov. A, Dorsalmost uncini from neuropodia B1. B, Ventralmost uncini from neuropodia B1. C, Uncini from notopodia B2. D, Uncini from neuropodia B2. E, Uncini from notopodia B3. F, Uncini from neuropodia B3. G, Uncini from the anterior region of notopodia C2. H, Uncini from the posterior region of notopodia C2. I, Uncini from the anterior region of neuropodia C2. J, Uncini from the posterior region of neuropodia C2. Scale Bars are in Mm.
Figure 3 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 3. Individual gene trees generated by Bayesian inference for 18S rRNA (A), cytochrome oxidase I (COI) (B), and by combining both genes (C). Only posterior probability node support values greater than 0.75 were represented. Med, Mediterranean; NS, North Sea.
Figure 5 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 5. Mesochaetopterus rogeri sp. nov. A, Chaetal arrangement of the modified A4 chaetiger. B–L, Chaetae. B, Tip of the dorsal finely pointed capillary chaeta 'd'. (C) Dorsolateral transparent knife-like chaeta 'ld1'. D, Tip of the dorsolateral transparent knife-like chaeta 'ld1'. E, Dorsolateral brownish knife-like chaeta 'ld2'. F, Tip of the dorsolateral brownish knife-like chaeta 'ld2'. G, I, K, Whole view of the typical modified chaetae 'lv1' (lateral), 'lv2' (lateroventral), and 'v' (ventralmost). H, J, L, Tips of G, I, K, respectively. Scale bars are in Mm.
Figure 4 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 4. Mesochaetopterus rogeri sp. nov. A, Dorsalmost capillary chaeta from A1. B, Tip for the dorsalmost capillary chaeta from A1. C, Dorsal fine-lanceolate chaeta from A1. D, Tip of the dorsal fine-lanceolate chaeta from A1. E, Ventral oar-like chaeta from A1. F, Tip of the ventral oar-like chaeta from A1. G, Ventral oar-like chaeta from A3. H, Tip of the ventral oar-like chaeta from chaetiger A3. I, Dorsal fine-lanceolate chaeta from A8. J, Tip of the dorsal fine-lanceolate chaeta from A8. K, Ventral sickle-like chaeta from A8. L, Tip of the ventral sickle-like chaeta from A8. Scale bars are in Mm.
Figure 2 in Description of a new species of Mesochaetopterus (Annelida, Polychaeta, Chaetopteridae), with redescription of Mesochaetopterus xerecus and an approach to the phylogeny of the family
Figure 2. Mesochaetopterus rogeri sp. nov., location of reports. A, Iberian Peninsula. B, Catalan coast. C, Blanes litoral. Key:, seasonal monitoring at the Punta del Tordera; 1, Almería; 2, Alicante; 3, Valencia.
Figure 5 in A new genus of xenophyophores (Foraminifera) from Japan Trench: morphological description, molecular phylogeny and elemental analysis
Figure 5. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICPMS) values for the composition of the total fragment and different structural parts of Shinkaiya lindsayi gen. et sp. nov. (total fragment), and of the environmental sediment. The mass of elemental aluminium (Al), lead (Pb), magnesium (Mg), uranium (U), barium (Ba), strontium (Sr), and mercury (Hg), per gram of dry material, is shown. A semiquantitative method has been used for Pb, U, and Hg.
Figure 4 in A new genus of xenophyophores (Foraminifera) from Japan Trench: morphological description, molecular phylogeny and elemental analysis
Figure 4. Phylogenetic position of Shinkaiya lindsayi gen et sp. nov. among Foraminifera, based on complete small-subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) gene sequences. The tree was obtained using the maximum-likelihood method with the general time-reversible (GTR + G + I) model, with four rates categories, and 1000 replicates for bootstrap analysis. Only bootstrap support values higher than 70% are indicated.
Figure 3 in A new genus of xenophyophores (Foraminifera) from Japan Trench: morphological description, molecular phylogeny and elemental analysis
Figure 3. Shinkaiya lindsayi gen. et sp. nov. A, scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of an open tube, showing its inner surface with many radiolarian tests, a granellare string (right-hand arrow), and a stercomare string (left-hand arrow). B, SEM image of an open stercomare string, containing stercomata (spherical pellets). C, SEM image of the organic sheath of the granellare. D, SEM image showing details of the external surface of the test, with agglutinated material. E, F, transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) images of a stercomare section, showing its wall (W), stercomata (S), and cytoplasm (C). Scale bars: 100 Mm (A), 10 Mm (B–D), 2 Mm (E), 1 Mm (F).
Figure 1 in A new genus of xenophyophores (Foraminifera) from Japan Trench: morphological description, molecular phylogeny and elemental analysis
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the small-subunit ribosomal DNA (SSU rDNA) sequence of Shinkaiya lindsayi gen. et sp. nov., showing the conserved regions, as well as the largest insertion and primers used for DNA amplifications.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.