Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
407
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
407 results for “riparian”
Data from: Riparian hunting spiders do not rely on aquatic subsidies from intermittent alpine streams
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Dispersal versus environmental filtering in a dynamic system: drivers of vegetation patterns and diversity along stream riparian gradients
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Tradeoffs between leaf cooling and hydraulic safety in a dominant arid land riparian tree species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Riparian reserves help protect forest bird communities in oil palm dominated landscapes
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Interactions among herbivory, climate, topography, and plant age shape riparian willow dynamics in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Associations between blooming plants and their bee visitors in a riparian ecosystem in eastern Oregon
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Time for recovery of riparian plants in restored northern Swedish streams: a chronosequence study
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Riparian habitat restoration increases the availability and occupancy of Yellow-breasted Chat territories but brood parasitism is the primary influence on reproductive performance
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Quantification and characterization of vegetation and functional trait diversity of riparian zones of the protected forest of Kashmir Himalaya, India
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: A before-and-after assessment of patch-burn grazing and riparian fencing along headwater streams
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Riparian cottonwood trees and adjacent river sediments have different microbial communities and produce methane with contrasting carbon isotope compositions
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Down by the riverside: Riparian edge effects on three monkey species in a fragmented Costa Rican forest
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Spatial variation in leaf nutrient traits of dominant desert riparian plant species in an arid inland river basin of China
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The abundance and distribution of guilds of riparian woody plants change in response to land use and flow regulation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Environment driven changes in diversity of riparian plant communities along a mountain river
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Windows of opportunity for germination of riparian species after restoring water level fluctuations: a field experiment with controlled seed banks
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
GIS Shapefile - Riparian vegetation (forest and grass only) within a 100ft buffer of all 1:24K streams in Baltimore City.
Riparian vegetation (forest and grass only) within a 100ft buffer of all 1:24K streams in Baltimore City. Vegetation data used in this analysis came from the MD DNR Forest Service IKONOS-derived Strategic Urban Forest Assessment (SUFA) vegetation layer.
GIS Shapefile - Riparian vegetation (forest and grass only) within a 100ft buffer of all 1:24K streams in Baltimore City, block group
Block group summary of riparian vegetation (forest and grass only) within a 100ft buffer of all 1:24K streams in Baltimore City for only those block groups that intersect the stream buffers. The riparian area consists of all land within a 100 ft buffer of 1:24K streams. Vegetation data used in this analysis came from the MD DNR Forest Service IKONOS-derived Strategic Urban Forest Assessment (SUFA) vegetation layer.
Riparian Evapotranspiration (ET) Study (SEON) from the Middle Rio Grande River Bosque, New Mexico (1999-2011 ): CO2 Concentration and Flux data
This study originated with the objective of parameterizing riparian evapotranspiration (ET) in the water budget of the Middle Rio Grande. We hypothesized that flooding and invasions of non-native species would strongly impact ecosystem water use. Our objectives were to measure and compare water use of native (Rio Grande cottonwood, Populus deltoides ssp. wizleni) and non-native (saltcedar, Tamarix chinensis, Russian olive, Eleagnus angustifolia) vegetation and to evaluate how water use is affected by climatic variability resulting in high river flows and flooding as well as drought conditions and deep water tables. Eddy covariance flux towers to measure ET and shallow wells to monitor water tables were instrumented in 1999. Active sites in their second decade of monitoring include a xeroriparian, non-flooding salt cedar woodland within Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge and a dense, monotypic salt cedar stand at Bosque del Apache NWR, which is subject to flood pulses associated with high river flows. These data are CO2 concentration at canopy and CO2 flux from canopy collected as part of this study.
Importance of riparian reserves and other forest fragments for small mammal diversity in disturbed and converted forest landscapes
<b>Description: </b><p>The primary objective of this study was to document the species richness, community composition of the small mammals in riparian remnants within oil palm plantation and in degraded forests. The purpose is to assess the value of retaining riparian remnants within oil palm plantation and logged forest habitats for small mammals conservation. <br>Main questions <br>1. Is there a difference in species richness and community composition of small mammals in riparian remnants within oil palm and logged forests? <br>2. What effects do maintaining riparian remnants in oil palm and logged forests have on small mammal diversity? <br>3. Does the structure and width of riparian remnants in oil palm and logged forests affect small mammal species diversity? <br>4. How does the structure of riparian reserves could be managed to improve the extent to which they retain small mammals communities in oil palm and logged forests?<br>Methods<br>Sampling will be conducted at several sites representing four habitat treatments: (1) riparian reserves in old growth forests as control treatment (at Maliau Basin Conservation Area); (2) riparian reserves of different widths in logged forests (SAFE project area); (3) riparian remnants of different widths in oil palm (south of SAFE project area); and (4) oil palm without any riparian remnants (south of SAFE project area). In addition, sampling was conducted in other forest remnants within oil palm habitats. Each habitat treatment will be represented by three sites serving as replicates. <br>Used a grid trapping of 4 x 12 grid points (23m spacing) for sampling the small mammals. We shall establish one grid at each site with 48 trap stations. Two wire-mesh cage traps (28 x 15 x 12.5 cm), baited with oil palm fruits, will be placed at each station. Trapping of small mammals and searchers for amphibians will be conducted in four sampling sessions. In each session we will visit randomly four sites representing the four habitat treatments. Each sampling session at each site will last for four months. Overall, each habitat treatment will be sampled three times over a 12 months period. The following variables will be collected for each sampling site to characterize the habitat structure: canopy cover, number of large and small logs, number of large and small trees, percentage leaf litter cover and other variables that may influence the distribution and abundance of small mammals.</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/3"><b>Importance of riparian reserves and other forest fragments for mammal and amphibian diversity in disturbed and converted forest landscapes</b></a></p><p><b>Funding: </b>These data were collected as part of research funded by: </p><ul><li>Universiti Malaysia Sabah (Grant)</li></ul><p>This dataset is released under the CC-BY 4.0 licence, requiring that you cite the dataset in any outputs, but has the additional condition that you acknowledge the contribution of these funders in any outputs.</p><p></p><p><b>Permits: </b>These data were collected under permit from the following authorities:</p><ul><li>Sabah biodiversity council (Research licence Local)</li></ul><p></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3908128">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: UMS_Small_mammal_data.xlsx</p><p><b>UMS_Small_mammal_data.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 1 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Data</b> (described in worksheet Data)</p><p>Description: small mammal presence and absense</p><p>Number of fields: 29</p><p>Number of data rows: 140</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>landuse</b>: Habitat type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>site</b>: Location of sampling (Field type: location)</li><li><b>plot</b>: Plot name (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>day</b>: Day of sampling (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Callosciurus notatus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Echinosorex gymnurus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Haeromys margarettae</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Lariscus hosei</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Leopoldamys sabanus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys alticola</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys baeodon</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys ochraceiventer</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys rajah</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys surifer</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Maxomys whiteheadi</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Niniventer cremoriventer</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Rattus exulans</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Rattus rattus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Rattus tiomanicus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sundamys muelleri</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sundasciurus hippurus</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sundasciurus lowii</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Sundasciurus tenuis</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Trichys fasciculata</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Tupaia glis</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Tupaia gracilis</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Tupaia minor</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Tupaia tana</b>: Number of species caught (Field type: abundance)</li><li><b>Grand Total</b>: Total (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2015-03-01 to 2019-04-30</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.5000 to 5.0700</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>116.7500 to 117.8200</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Chordata <br> -  -  -  Mammalia <br> -  -  -  -  Rodentia <br> -  -  -  -  -  Sciuridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Callosciurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Callosciurus notatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Lariscus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Lariscus hosei</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundasciurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundasciurus hippurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundasciurus lowii</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundasciurus tenuis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Hystricidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Trichys fasciculata</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Muridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys alticola</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys baeodon</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys ochraceiventer</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys rajah</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Maxomys surifer</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rattus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rattus exulans</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rattus rattus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rattus tiomanicus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundamys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sundamys muelleri</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Haeromys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Haeromys margarettae</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Niviventer</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Niviventer cremoriventer</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chrotomys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chrotomys whiteheadi</i> (as homotypic_synonym: <i>Maxomys whiteheadi</i>)<br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leopoldamys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leopoldamys sabanus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Erinaceomorpha <br> -  -  -  -  -  Erinaceidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Echinosorex</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Echinosorex gymnura</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Scandentia <br> -  -  -  -  -  Tupaiidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tupaia</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tupaia glis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tupaia gracilis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tupaia minor</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Tupaia tana</i> <br></div><p></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.