Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2. The light trap. A in Light trap capture of live Elenchus koebelei (Strepsiptera: Elenchidae)

Fig. 2. The light trap. A. Schematic of the PVC skeleton. Electronics were placed in the bucket, which could be suspended from the trap at high tide. B. PVC parts. Some parts were cemented together for strength and ease of construction. C. Trap with sheet and lights in place. In taller grass, longer trap legs can be used to help provide a crease into which attracted Strepsiptera can fly, walk, or fall. This reduces specimen loss through desiccation or drop-off into grass. In short grass it may be better to wet the trap base and use a long ultraviolet light. D. The base of the trap when used with the long light.

Fig. 4 in Light trap capture of live Elenchus koebelei (Strepsiptera: Elenchidae)

Fig. 4. Successful sampling days, grouped by year and ordered by start time. The figure displays the delay between the beginning of sampling and the first live capture, the time between live captures, and the time afer the last live capture until disbanding of daily sampling. Seven captures were made during astronomical twilight, all of which occurred at Wakulla Beach: 5 on one morning, and 2 on another. There were no sampling days with live catches between 24 and 50 at either site.

Fig. 7 in Light trap capture of live Elenchus koebelei (Strepsiptera: Elenchidae)

Fig. 7. Influence of initial temperature on total catch. Black boxes indicate the fraction of total Strepsiptera captured at the given temperatures; adjacent hashed boxes represent the fraction of mornings at each temperature. The most productive days were those with dawn temperatures ranging from 22.8 to 25 °C (73–77 °F). Elenchus koebelei was not found to fly on mornings when the temperature was below 17.2 °C (63 °F). The ratio of E. koebelei caught to collection days drops off dramatically for temperatures above 25.5 °C (78 °F).

Fig. 3 in Attraction of thrips (Thysanoptera) to colored sticky traps in a Florida olive grove

Fig. 3. Differences in mean numbers of thrips (± SE) collected by tap and brush samples between plots. Bars with different letters indicate significantly different means (P <0.05).

Fig. 1 in Light trap capture of live Elenchus koebelei (Strepsiptera: Elenchidae)

Fig. 1. Above: Image of an adult male Elenchus koebelei standing on an an- esthetic stage. Note its bifurcated antennae, black tapioca-like eyes, modified forewing that forms a haltere (only 1 of the pair is visible), silver sheen hindwings (iridescent in color images), and extensive thorax. Below: An E. koebelei positioned above a penny for size comparison. [When closing in on a calling female, E. koebelei fly upright with the abdomen tip turned under (Muir 1906).] Adjacent are 3 pictures of visibly stylopized planthoppers. Pupating male E. koebelei bulge from the sides of their hosts. The arrows indicate puparia.

Fig. 5 in Attraction of thrips (Thysanoptera) to colored sticky traps in a Florida olive grove

Fig. 5. Collection of mean numbers of thrips (± SE) (all species and stages combined) from differently colored sticky traps with combined data from all collection dates, or collections from bloom period alone. Bars with different letters indicate significantly different means (P <0.05).

Fig. 2 in Attraction of thrips (Thysanoptera) to colored sticky traps in a Florida olive grove

Fig. 2. Spectral reflectance of sticky card traps (white, blue, yellow, and clear), and abaxial and adaxial surfaces of olive leaves.

Fig. 1 in Amount and bagging of the bait food affect the captures of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by pheromone-baited traps

Fig. 1. Mean (+ SE) number of Scyphophorus acupunctatus captured per trap baited with different amounts of fresh agave tissue in 2 trials. The 1st trial was performed from 18 Jan to 8 Feb 2013 (A), while the 2nd trial was carried out from 11 Apr to 23 May 2013 (B). Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's, a = 0.05).

Fig. 1 in Capture of melon flies and oriental fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast-borax or CeraTrap in Hawaii

Fig. 1. Numbers of female and male Z. cucurbitae captured in Multilure traps baited with torula yeast-borax pellets (TYB) or CeraTrap (CT) over the 6-wk sampling period. Symbols represent averages of 15 traps per bait type; whiskers represent + 1 SE.

Fig. 2 in Amount and bagging of the bait food affect the captures of Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by pheromone-baited traps

Fig. 2. Mean (+ SE) number of Scyphophorus acupunctatus captured per trap baited with pheromone plus bagged or unbagged fresh agave tissue. The experiment was performed from 24 May to 14 Jun 2013. Bars with the same letter are not significantly different (Tukey's, a = 0.05).

Fig. 1 in Using hydrogen stable isotope ratios to trace the geographic origin of the population of Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) trapped in northern China

Fig. 1. Implied relationship standard curve equation between Bactrocera dorsalis and precipitation based on a δ2H stable isotope (solid line indicates the linear regression and dash lines indicate the 95% confident intervals).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Dispersal records of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari (Zehntner) (Hemiptera: Aphididae), through the Midwest Suction Trap Network

Fig. 1. Seasonal population dynamics of the sugarcane aphid, Melanaphis sacchari, collected between 2015 and 2017 from selected states in the Midwest Suction Trap Network.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry

Fig. 1. Bucket-type emergence trap seated into cranberry field. Inner bucket with mesh lid is descending into support bucket.

Fig. 1 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries

Fig. 1. The laboratory assay conducted in a wind chamber testing the effectiveness of baits to attract Drosophila suzukii.

Fig. 3 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries

Fig. 3. Mean (± SE) number of adult Drosophila suzukii captured in baited traps suspended in a wind chamber. Treatments with the same letter are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Comparison of two traps for monitoring California red scale (Hemiptera: Diaspididae)

Fig. 2. (A) Mean (± SE) number of California red scale per trap by sampling date, based on estimate California red scale counts. Male flight periods are delimited with vertical dashed lines. (B) Degree-d accumulation across sampling dates, for temperature data collected from onsite weather station and regional weather station. Solid horizontal lines correspond to the degree-d requirements for the second and fourth male flights.

Fig. 6 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries

Fig. 6. Mean (± SE) number of female Drosophila suzukii captured in yeast + sugar traps placed in a blueberry field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Populations were monitored weekly during a 6-wk period; asterisks indicate those treatments that were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) during a sample period.

Fig. 8 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries

Fig. 8. Mean (± SE) number of Drosophila suzukii reared from blueberries collected from a field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Fruit was collected weekly for 6 wk. Treatments were not significantly different (P> 0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in A bucket-type emergence trap for detecting overwintered Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) and its parasitoids in cranberry

Fig. 2. Number (mean + SEM) of overwintered cranberry tipworms and parasitoids detected per emergence trap per wk in 2015. Julian Date 124 = 4 May; 152 = 1 Jun; 187 = 6 Jul; 215 = 3 Aug. Number of traps per wk was 30, 50, 59, 60, 60, 46, 56, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 57, 51, 51, respectively, for the 17 wk.

Fig. 5 in Comparison of attractants, insecticides, and mass trapping for managing Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in blueberries

Fig. 5. Mean (± SE) number of adult Drosophila suzukii captured in yeast + sugar traps placed in a blueberry field in Hawthorne, Florida, USA, blocked into 4 separate treatments: border spray, mass trapping, alternative row spray, and an untreated control. Populations monitored weekly during a 6-wk period; asterisks indicate those treatments that were significantly different (P ≤ 0.05) during a sample period.