Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-zeroJun 2018View details →

Supplementary material 6 from: Sieber I, Borges P, Burkhard B (2018) Hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services: the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories of the European Union. One Ecosystem 3: e24719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719

Regional Overview: Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Indian Ocean EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories

opencc-zeroJun 2018View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Sieber I, Borges P, Burkhard B (2018) Hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services: the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories of the European Union. One Ecosystem 3: e24719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719

Regional Overview: Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the Polar and South Polar EU Overseas Countries and Territories

opencc-zeroJun 2018View details →

Supplementary material 5 from: Sieber I, Borges P, Burkhard B (2018) Hotspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services: the Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories of the European Union. One Ecosystem 3: e24719. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.3.e24719

Regional Overview: Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystem Services in the South Atlantic EU Overseas Countries and Territories

FIGURE 3 in DNA analysis of a non-native lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana species complex (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Middle Asia supports the Chinese origin of the European invaders

FIGURE 3. Shell of a specimen of Sinanodonta cf. gibba (Benson in Cantor, 1842) from the Amu Darya River. Scale bar = 3 cm. (Photo: Ekaterina Konopleva).

FIGURE 5 in DNA analysis of a non-native lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana species complex (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Middle Asia supports the Chinese origin of the European invaders

FIGURE 5. Majority-rule consensus Bayesian phylogenetic tree based on the COI haplotypes of Sinanodonta spp. and related taxa. Numbers close to nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities. The scale bar indicates the branch length.

FIGURE 4 in DNA analysis of a non-native lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana species complex (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Middle Asia supports the Chinese origin of the European invaders

FIGURE 4. Median-joining network of the COI sequences of Sinanodonta cf. gibba (Benson in Cantor, 1842) (N = 53; list of additional sequences in Appendix 1). The red numbers near branches indicate the numbers of nucleotide substitutions between haplotypes. Size of circles corresponds to the number of available sequences for each haplotype (smallest circle = 1 sequence).

FIGURE 2 in DNA analysis of a non-native lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana species complex (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Middle Asia supports the Chinese origin of the European invaders

FIGURE 2. Habitat of Sinanodonta cf. gibba (Benson in Cantor, 1842) from Uzbekistan: a floodplain lake of the Amu Darya River near the town of Xonqa. (Photo: Alexey Chernyak).

FIGURE 1 in DNA analysis of a non-native lineage of Sinanodonta woodiana species complex (Bivalvia: Unionidae) from Middle Asia supports the Chinese origin of the European invaders

FIGURE 1. Distribution range of Sinanodonta cf. gibba (Benson in Cantor, 1842) in Uzbekistan. The red circle indicates our sequenced record from the Amu Darya River and the blue circles indicate published records (Appendix 2). The color hatching indicates the corresponding river drainage basins.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

Dataset for optimal Wind+Hydrogen+Other+Battery+Solar (WHOBS) electricity systems for European countries

Data outputs from optimisation of Wind+Hydrogen+Other+Battery+Solar (WHOBS) electricity systems for European countries. Input data and code can be found here: https://github.com/PyPSA/WHOBS The summary of the results with metadata can be found here: https://github.com/PyPSA/WHOBS/tree/master/results-181002 if you don't want to download 6 GB. To load the data, install PyPSA and do e.g. for Germany (DE) in 2030: network = pypsa.Network("DE-2030.nc") Note that in these files, in some hours batteries discharge and charge at the same time. This is because the model wants to dump energy and this behaviour has the same cost and effect as curtailing wind and solar. In the latest version of the github code, wind and solar have tiny marginal costs (0.02 and 0.01 EUR/MWh respectively) to prevent this behaviour. With these costs, curtailment is preferred.

opennotspecifiedOct 2018View details →

FIGURE 1 in Interrelation of Proctodrilus species (Oligochaeta: Lumbricidae) with lessivage and layering in European soil profiles

FIGURE 1. Ecological species separation in the genus Proctodrilus: Soil profiles with two or three co-occurring species, each in a different layer. For further details see text. Bottom right: Generalized scheme of preferred occurrence of Proctodrilus species in the soil profile: close to layer boundaries and in the layer with finer particle size.

Fig. 17 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 17. Open Access benefits, from Aston University Library Services (available from https://www.yearofopen.org/march-open-perspective-open-access/).

Fig. 2 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 2. Here, "Whalen (1989)" is cited in the taxonomic treatment but not listed in the references section (Knapp et al. 2017).

Fig. 1 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 1. The reference highlighted in yellow is listed under the references section, even though it has not been cited anywhere else in the article (Coritico et al. 2017).

Fig. 6 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 6. Authorships formally presented as references, those in yellow are listed in the references section whereas those in orange are not considered as bibliographic references. A. Musavu Moussavou (2017). B. Mendoza-Garfias et al. (2017).

Fig. 9 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 9. In this example the references in yellow are not provided in the bibliographic section, but the the one in green is, because it has been formally mentioned elsewhere in the article as a reference (Rakotondrainibe & Jouy 2016).

Fig. 13 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 13. The authorships highlighted in yellow are cited nowhere else in the article and yet they are listed in the references section (Schott & Evans 2016).

Fig. 5 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 5. Authorship formally presented as a reference. A. Kim et al. (2017). B. Lanteri & del Rio (2017).

Fig. 15 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 15. Different routes for disseminating scientific publications (Cabut & Larousserie 2013, redrawn by Laurence Bénichou from Infographie du Monde).

Fig. 8 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 8. All authorships cited highlighted in yellow are listed in the references section even though they are not cited as a bibliographic reference anywhere else in the text (Pole & McLoughlin 2017).

Fig. 14 in Consortium of European Taxonomic Facilities (CETAF) best practices in electronic publishing in taxonomy

Fig. 14. Scholar production costs. Four steps are needed to produce scholar papers, of which three are publicly-funded. In the first scenario, the library pays back the final product by subscription to the publisher while in the second, the publishing costs are supported by the publisher (commercial or institutional) and then the access is free for the reader.