Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,416
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,416 results for “Evidence Base”
Figure 14 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 14. Diplomma polyophthalma (Gibson & Sundberg, 2001) comb. nov. (formerly Correanemertes polyophthalma Gibson & Sundberg, 2001). Proboscis nerves (arrowed) in the holotype, MTQ G20024 (A) and paratype, MTQ G20025 (B). Scale bars = 100 Mm.
Figure 19 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 19. Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855). A, transverse section through brain region, showing epidermis and divided longitudinal musculature; arrowhead indicates connective tissue layer that divides longitudinal musculature into two layers; B, horizontal section through brain region; arrowhead indicates fibres from outer longitudinal muscle layer; C, transverse section through proboscis insertion; white arrow indicates rhynchodaeal sphincter; black arrowhead indicates fibre from outer longitudinal muscle layer; D, tangential section of body wall, showing lattice-type diagonal muscles; E, transverse section through intestinal region, showing dorsoventral muscle (indicated by arrowhead) running between intestinal lateral diverticula; F, transverse section through anterior portion of proboscis, showing 12 proboscis nerves (indicated by arrows). A, E, F, neotype (ZIHU-1352); B, paraneotype (ZIHU-1354); C, paraneotype (ZIHU-1353); D, paraneotype (ZIHU-1356). Abbreviations: BG, basophilic cephalic gland; BR, brain; CR, cephalic retractor muscle; EP, epidermis; ID, intestinal lateral diverticulum; IL, inner portion of divided body-wall longitudinal muscle layer; IN, intestine; LN, lateral nerve cord; OL, outer portion of divided body-wall longitudinal muscle layer; PI, proboscis insertion; PR, proboscis; RD, rhynchodaeum. Scale bars: A, C, D, F = 50 Mm; B, E = 100 Mm.
Figure 3 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 3. Bayesian tree of a selected number of distromatonemerteans, using the general time-reversible model with invariant sites and gamma-distributed rates model based on 18S rRNA gene sequences (1248 bp after alignment), rooted with cratenemerteans as the outgroup. Numbers above branches are bootstrap percentages from the maximum likelihood analysis (values> 50% are shown); numbers below are posterior probabilities (values> 95% are shown). In this paper we transfer Correanemertes polyophthalma to the genus Diplomma.
Figure 7 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 7. Diplomma albimarginata comb. nov. (formerly Paramphiporus albimarginatus Kirsteuer, 1965). One of the two syntypes (AMNH 277). Transverse section to show the two anterior 'pouches' (AP) situated laterally to the pylorus (PY); note the exceedingly expanded rhynchocoel (RC), compared to the body diameter and the proboscis (PR). Scale bar = 100 Mm.
Figure 15 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 15. Diplomma polyophthalma (Gibson & Sundberg, 2001) comb. nov. (formerly Correanemertes polyophthalma Gibson & Sundberg, 2001). Holotype (MTQ G20024). Intestinal caecum below pylorus; arrow indicates dorsoventral muscle fibre running outside lateral nerve cord. Abbreviations: IC, intestinal caecum; LN, lateral nerve cord; PR, proboscis; PY, pylorus; RC, rhynchocoel. Scale bar = 100 Mm.
Figure 23 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 23. Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855). A, photomicrograph of stylet apparatus, taken from life; B, transverse section through junction between anterior and posterior stomach regions; C, transverse section through pyloric region; D, transverse section to show apical organ; E, transverse section through precerebral region, showing various components of cephalic glands; arrowheads indicate coarsely granular acidophilic glands; F, horizontal section through precerebral region, showing improvised duct (indicated by arrowhead). A, paraneotype (ZIHU- 1357); B, C, E, neotype (ZIHU-1352); D, paraneotype (ZIHU-1353); F, paraneotype (ZIHU-1354). Abbreviations: AO, apical organ; AS, anterior portion of stomach; BG, basophilic cephalic gland; CC, cerebral sensory organ canal; IC, intestinal caecum; LN, lateral nerve cord; PS, posterior portion of stomach; PY, pylorus; RC, rhynchocoel; RD, rhynchodaeum. Scale bars: A, C, E = 100 Mm; B, D = 50 Mm; F = 30 Mm.
Figure 22 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 22. Diplomma serpentina (Stimpson, 1855). A, transverse section showing ocelli (indicated by arrowheads); B, transverse section through cerebral organ; C, transverse section through excretory collecting tubule; arrowhead indicates efferent duct; D, transverse section through intestinal region, showing immature gonad; arrowhead indicates gonoduct. A–C, neotype (ZIHU-1352); D, paraneotype (ZIHU-1353). Abbreviations: CC, cerebral sensory organ canal; CO, cerebral sensory organ; EX, excretory collecting tubule; GO, gonad; LN, lateral nerve cord; IN, intestine; PA, parenchyma. Scale bars: A–D = 50 Mm.
Figure 12. Poseidonemertes gondwanae Kirsteuer, 1965 in Systematics and phylogeny of the hoplonemertean genus Diplomma (Nemertea) based on molecular and morphological evidence
Figure 12. Poseidonemertes gondwanae Kirsteuer, 1965. Holotype (AMNH 278). A–F, serial transverse section to show that mid-dorsal vessel enters rhynchocoel. Abbreviations: DV, mid-dorsal vessel; LV, lateral blood vessel; RC, rhynchocoel; VP, vascular plug. Scale bar = 50 Mm.
Figure 13. Subtree E in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 13. Subtree E. Majority rule consensus (MRC) tree for species of Thinocoridae, Phalaropodidae, and Scolopacidae (part) in the present study. See Figure 9 for definitions of the symbols used.
Figure 15 in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 15. Phylogenetic tree proposed by Pereira & Baker (2005) for species of Tringa and allied genera, with Phalaropus as the most closely related out-group.
Figure 9. Subtree A in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 9. Subtree A. Majority rule consensus (MRC) tree for species of Pedionomidae, Jacanidae, Rostratulidae, and Glareolidae in the present study. Percentages for branches in the MRC are given above the branches (•, 100%), and bootstrap percentages are given below branches (O, <50%; •, 100%).
Figure 11. Subtree C in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 11. Subtree C. Majority rule consensus (MRC) tree for species of Vanellinae in the present study. See Figure 9 for definitions of the symbols used.
Figure 10. Subtree B in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 10. Subtree B. Majority rule consensus (MRC) tree for Pluvianellidae and Chionididae, terminals for Alcidae, Stercorariidae, Larinae, Sterninae, and Rynchopidae, and species of Burhinidae, Ibidorhynchidae, Recurvirostridae, Haematopodidae, and Dromadidae in the present study. See Figure 9 for definitions of the symbols used.
Figure 6 in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 6. Prior phylogenetic analyses of Charadriiformes: A, Baker et al. (2007); B, Fain & Houde (2007).
Figure 8 in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 8. Higher-order groups of Charadriiformes in the present study. Majority rule consensus (MRC) tree for subordinal and family-group nodes. All nodes shown are conserved at 100% in an MRC tree. Dashes indicate nodes that are either monotypic or analysed as familial exemplars; bootstrap percentages (O, <50%; •, 100%); decay (Bremer) indices are given below selected branches.
Figure 3 in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 3. Prior phylogenetic analyses of Charadriiformes: A, Paton et al. (2003); B, Fain & Houde (2004).
Figure 1 in Phylogenetics of modern shorebirds (Charadriiformes) based on phenotypic evidence: analysis and discussion
Figure 1. Prior phylogenetic analyses of Charadriiformes: A, Strauch (1978); B, Sibley & Ahlquist (1990) fide Harshman (1994).
FIGURE 1. Pleioblastus triangulata. A in Pleioblastus triangulata (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), a new combination for Indosasa triangulata based on morphological and molecular evidence
FIGURE 1. Pleioblastus triangulata. A: Habit; B: Branches at mid-culm node; C: Culm bud and internodes with thick white powder; D: New shoot; E: Culm leaf blade; F: Culm leaf ligule, auricles and oral setae; G: Rhizome with a new shoot. All photos by Z.Y.Niu.
FIGURE 2. Pleioblastus triangulata. A in Pleioblastus triangulata (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), a new combination for Indosasa triangulata based on morphological and molecular evidence
FIGURE 2. Pleioblastus triangulata. A: Culm leaf, detached, the arrows showing black lines near margins of culm sheath apex; B: Dark brown dotted lines on culm leaf sheath; C: Culm leaf auricles and oral setae; D: Culm leaf ligule, the arrow showing a black band at base; E: Ultimate leafy branches; F: Foliage leaf inner and outer ligule. All photos by Z.Y.Niu.
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic relationships among Indosasa triangulata and other 17 in Pleioblastus triangulata (Poaceae: Bambusoideae), a new combination for Indosasa triangulata based on morphological and molecular evidence
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic relationships among Indosasa triangulata and other 17 species belonging to Arundinarieae derived from Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian analysis. Numbers on the nodes are bootstrap values from 1000 replicates and posterior probabilities after 6,000,000 generations.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.