Find research datasets worth reusing

Figures 33-38 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 33-38 - 33–35 Chamberlinius hualienensis Wang, 1956, ♂ from CiiLan Forest Amusement Park (棲蘭森林遊樂園), left gonopod (33–35). 33 Entire gonopod, sublateral view 34 Tip of telopodite, sublateral view. Arrows: a bifid solenophore 35 Entire gonopod, medial view. Figures 36–38. Chamberlinius pessior sp. n., holotype, right gonopod. 36, 37 Entire gonopod and tip of solenophore (arrow), respectively, submedial view 38 Apical part of telopodite, medial and slightly ventral view. Scale bars = 0.5 mm (33, 35, 36); 0.1 mm (34, 37); 0.25 mm (38). co: coxa; dp: dentiform process; f: femorite; m: apical lamina; l: membranous lobe; pof: postfemoral region; prf: prefemur; sl: solenomere; sph: solenophore.

Figures 1-8 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 1-8 - Chamberlinius hualienensis Wang, 1956, ♂ and ♀ from Siji forest path (四季林道) (1) and ♂ from Basianshan Forest Recreation Area (八仙山森林遊樂區) (2–8). 1 Entire body, dorsal view 2 Anterior body portion, lateral view. Circle: caudal tooth of pleurosternal carinae 3 Segments 10–12, dorsal view. up arrow: transverse sulcus; down arrow: stricture 4 Segments 9–11, lateral view. down arrow: calluses; up arrow: pleurosternal carinae; triangle: ozopore 5, 6 Epiproct, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 7 Hypoproct, ventral view 8 Spiracle-bearing cones lateral to gonopod aperture (arrows). Scale bars: 5.0 mm (1); 1.0 mm (2–6, 8); 0.5 mm (7). c:collum; epi: epiproct; hyp: hypoproct; meta: metatergum; p:paraterga; pap: pre-apical papillae; pro: prozona; s9-s12: segments 9–12 separately.

Figures 9-16 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 9-16 - Chamberlinius piceofasciatus (Gressitt, 1941), ♂ and ♀ from HuaGer water source (華岡水源) (9) and ♂ from AliShan (阿里山) (10–16). 9 Entire body, dorsal view 10 Anterior body portion, lateral 11, 12 segments 10 and 11, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 13, 14 Epiproct, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 15 Hypoproct, ventral view 16 Spiracle-bearing cones/ridges lateral to gonopod aperture (arrows). Scale bars: 5.0 mm (9); 1.0 mm (10–16). s10 and s11: segments 10 and 11 separately.

Figures 58-59 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 58-59 - Right gonopod of Riukiupeltis falcatus (Attems, 1953), ♂ from Bi Doup National Park, southern Vietnam, medial and ventral views, respectively. Scale bar: 0.5 mm.

Figures 25-32 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 25-32 - Chamberlinius sublaevus sp. n., ♀ and ♂ paratypes from Yuanping forest path (元平林道) (25–31)and Syuan (思源) (32), respectively. 25 Entire body, dorsal view 26 Anterior body portion, lateral 27, 28 Midbody segments, dorsal and lateral views, respectively. arrow: axial line 29, 30 Epiproct, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 31 Hypoproct, ventral view 32 Cones lateral to gonopod aperture (arrows). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. s7-s10: segments 7–10 separately.

Figures 17-24 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 17-24 - Chamberlinius pessior sp. n., holotype. 17 Entire body, dorsal view 18 Anterior body portion, lateral 19, 20 segments 10 and 11, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 21, 22 Epiproct, dorsal and lateral views, respectively 23 Hypoproct, ventral view 24 Spiracle-bearing cones lateral to gonopod aperture (arrows). Scale bar: 1.0 mm. s10 and s11: segments 10 and 11 separately.

Figures 45-46 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 45-46 - Chamberlinius piceofasciatus (Gressitt, 1941), ♂ from AliShan (阿里山), left gonopod, submedial view. 45 Entire, lateral view 46 Apical part of telopodite, submedial view. Figures 47–48. Chamberlinius sublaevus sp. n., ♂ paratype from Syuan (思源), left gonopod, submedial view. 47 Entire, dotted line shows a broken tip of solenophore 48 Apical part of telopodite. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (45, 47); 0.25 mm (46, 48). sl: solenomere; sph: solenophore.

Figures 53-57 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 53-57 - 53 Chamberlinius piceofasciatus (Gressitt, 1941), ♂ from AliShan (阿里山), entire gonopods, ventral view. Figures 54–57. Chamberlinius sublaevus sp. n., ♂ paratypes from Meifeng (梅峰) (54) and Syuan (思源) (55–57). 54 Entire gonopods, ventral view 55 Segment 10, lateral view 56–57 Right gonopod, medial and dorsal views, respectively. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (53, 54); 1.0 mm (55–57).

Figures 49-52 from: Chang H, Chen C, Golovatch S, Chen S (2011) Revision of the Taiwanese millipede genus Chamberlinius Wang, 1956, with descriptions of two new species and a reclassification of the tribe Chamberlinini (Diplopoda, Polydesmida, Paradoxosomatidae, Paradoxosomatinae). ZooKeys 98: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.98.1183

Figures 49-52 - Chamberlinius pessior sp. n., holotype. 49 Segment 10, lateral view 50–52 Right gonopod, medial, dorsal and sublateral views, respectively. Scale bars: 1.0 mm (49); 0.5 mm (50–52). l: membranous lobe; sg: seminal groove ; sl: solenomere; sph: solenophore; o: ozopore; r: rugulosity.

Figure 11 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 11 - Geographic distribution and genetic structures of Kurixalus eiffingeri and the two newly discovered cryptic species from Taiwan and its two adjacent islands. Red: Kurixalus eiffingeri; Green: Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n.; B: Kurixalus wangi sp. n. Bold lines mark the boundaries of each species' distribution, dotted lines discriminate different genetic groups intra species. Below: a consensus ML tree to show the variation between haplotypes. GenBank number accession numbers KT259055–KT259131.

Figure 9 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 9 - PCA morphometric comparisons of four Kurixalus species from Taiwan. Scatterplots of (A) principal components 1 and 2, and (B) principal components 2 and 3 of size-adjusted morphometric data for male frogs of the four Kurixalus species. The 95% confidence ellipses for each population (ELM) are shown.

Figure 3 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 3 - Four Kurixalus species of Taiwan. A Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n.(holotype, adult, dark morph) B Kurixalus wangi sp. n. (holotype) C Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. (sub-adult) D Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. (adult, light morph) E Kurixalus eiffingeri F Kurixalus idiootocus.

Figure 4 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 4 - Nesting sites of three tree-hole breeding Kurixalus species (a nest is made by the animal). A eggs of Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. B eggs of Kurixalus wangi sp. n.; note that the parents were present with eggs C eggs of Kurixalus eiffingeri.

Figure 7 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 7 - Advertisement calls of four Kurixalus species from Taiwan. A. Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. "slow call" B. Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. "rapid call" C. Kurixalus wangi sp. n. "slow call" D Kurixalus wangi sp. n. "rapid call" E Kurixalus eiffingeri F Kurixalus idiootocus.

Figure 2 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 2 - Holotype of Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. Dorsal (A), ventral (B), and ventral view of hand (C) and foot (D). Scale bars: 10 mm.

Figure 8 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 8 - Holotype of Kurixalus wangi sp. n. Dorsal (A), ventral (B), and ventral view of hand (C) and foot (D). Scale bars 10 mm in (A) and (B); 5 mm in (C) and (D).

Figure 5 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 5 - Dorsal view of tadpole head region of three oophagus Kurixalus species. A Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. B Kurixalus wangi sp. n. C Kurixalus eiffingeri. Scale bars 1 mm.

Figure 10 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 10 - Phylogenetic relationship of all Kurixalus species from Taiwan. A phylogram showing the phylogenetic relationships of the four Kurixalus species, obtained by a maximum likelihood search based on 1207 nucleotides from mtDNA CO1 and 16S rRNA genes. Feihyla palpebralis and Rhacophorus moltrechti were used as outgroups. The three values on each branch are maximum likelihood (ML), maximum parsimony (MP), and neighbor-joining (NJ) analyses with bootstrapping support based on 2000 replicates. Bootstrapping values below 50% are not shown. (JP: Ryukyu Islands of Japan; N. TW: northern Taiwan; C. TW: central Taiwan).

Figure 6 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 6 - Lateral view of tadpoles of three oophagus Kurixalus species. A Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. B Kurixalus wangi sp. n. C Kurixalus eiffingeri. Scale bars 1 mm.

Figure 1 from: Wu S-P, Huang C-C, Tsai C-L, Lin T-E, Jhang J-J, Wu S-H (2016) Systematic revision of the Taiwanese genus Kurixalus members with a description of two new endemic species (Anura, Rhacophoridae). ZooKeys 557: 121-153. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.557.6131

Figure 1 - Sampling localities of this study. Localities 1 through 22 are around Taiwan island, locality 23 from Iriomote isle, locality 24 from Ishigaki isle. The two isles belong to the southern end of Ryukyu archipelago. Color refers to the geographical distribution of the three Kurixalus species. Red: Kurixalus eiffingeri; Green: Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n. (Taxon 1); B: Kurixalus wangi sp. n. (Taxon 2). Loc. 20: Ligia, type locality of Kurixalus berylliniris sp. n.; Loc. 21: Shouka, type locality of Kurixalus wangi sp. n.