Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,761
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,761 results for “phylogenetic relationship”
Figure 2 from: Dogan B, Duran A, Çetin Ö, Öztürk M, Martin E (2015) Study of phylogenetic relationship of Turkish species of Klasea (Asteraceae) based on ISSR amplification. PhytoKeys 56: 29-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.56.5608
Figure 2 - Dendrogram showing genetic relationship of Klasea, Serratula, Centaurea and Jurinea species as shown using inter simple sequence repeats. (Serratula tinctoria, Klasea quinquefolia, Klasea oligocephala, Klasea kotschyi, Klasea serratuloides, Klasea erucifolia, Klasea lasiocephala, Klasea cerinthifolia, Klasea grandifolia, Klasea radiata subsp. radiata, Klasea hakkiarica, Klasea haussknechtii, Klasea coriaceae, Klasea radiata subsp. radiata, Klasea kurdica, Klasea bornmuelleri, Centaurea ptosimopappoides, Centaurea straminicephala, Jurinea cataonica)
Figure 4 from: Del Latte L, Bortolin F, Rota-Stabelli O, Fusco G, Bonato L (2015) Molecular-based estimate of species number, phylogenetic relationships and divergence times for the genus Stenotaenia (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha) in the Italian region. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 31-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8808
Figure 4 - Dated phylogeny. Estimates of divergence time, calculated using 28S sequences and two priors (age of the root and substitution rate) in the package BEAST v1.7.2 (see text). 95% High Posterior Density intervals are represented by coloured bars for the most robust nodes, emphasized by a circle. Greek letters refer to the species tentatively recognised (see Fig. 1). The tree has the same topology of the concatenated ML tree of Fig. 3, but for the position of Tuoba sydneyensis and the relationships within the group formed by species β, ε, γ and the specimen from Iran. The specimen from Volpago (species δ) is absent because its 28S sequence was not obtained. Time scale is different in the two intervals 0–100 and 100–200 Ma.
Figure 3 from: Del Latte L, Bortolin F, Rota-Stabelli O, Fusco G, Bonato L (2015) Molecular-based estimate of species number, phylogenetic relationships and divergence times for the genus Stenotaenia (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha) in the Italian region. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 31-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8808
Figure 3 - Maximum likelihood phylogeny. ML tree obtained from concatenated COI and 28S sequences, by the GTR+I+G model, and manually rooted. The following support values are indicated at the nodes (only for those present in the topology obtained from the concatenated sequences): ML bootstrap for the analysis of concatenated genes (upper left); Bayesian posterior probabilities (upper right, in italics); ML bootstrap for the analysis of COI sequences (lower left); ML bootstrap for the analysis of 28S sequences (lower right). Bootstrap values < 50% and posterior probabilities < 0.50 are not shown. Circles indicate ingroup nodes that are highly supported in the tree based on concatenated sequences. Terminal node groupings indicated by Greek letters refer to the species tentatively recognized (see text and Fig. 1). The specimen from Volpago (species δ) is absent because its 28S sequence was not obtained.
Figure 1 from: Del Latte L, Bortolin F, Rota-Stabelli O, Fusco G, Bonato L (2015) Molecular-based estimate of species number, phylogenetic relationships and divergence times for the genus Stenotaenia (Chilopoda, Geophilomorpha) in the Italian region. In: Tuf IH, Tajovský K (Eds) Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Myriapodology, Olomouc, Czech Republic. ZooKeys 510: 31-47. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.510.8808
Figure 1 - Sampling localities of Stenotaenia in the Italian region. Greek letters refer to the species tentatively recognized after the analyses (see text).
Figure 9 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 9 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia varicosa (a–f), Phyllidia ocellata (g–i). Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4 (c dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers or locality code (074, dried-out).
Figure 8 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 8 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia coelestis (a), Phyllidia varicosa (b–i). Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4 (d dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 7 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 7 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia elegans (a–f), Phyllidia sp. (g dorsal and ventral sides), Phyllidia exquisita (h), Phyllidia coelestis (i). Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4. Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers or locality code (058, dried-out).
Figure 6 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 6 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia elegans. Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4 (d dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers and locality codes (137 and 156, dried-out).
Figure 5 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 5 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia elegans. Order of specimens (a–h) according to Figure 4 (f, h dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH. Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 4 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 4 - Phylogeny reconstruction of the Phyllidiidae based on COI gene sequence data of 109 specimens (including outgroups). Topology derived from Bayesian inference 50% majority rule, significance values are posterior probabilities / bootstrap values. Numbers refer to GenBank accession numbers / RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 17 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 17 - Phylogeny reconstruction of the Phyllidiidae based on 16S mtDNA of 17 specimens of 14 species (including outgroup). Topology derived from Bayesian inference 50% majority rule, significance values are posterior probabilities/bootstrap values. Numbers refer to GenBank accession numbers. *Re-identification according to Yonow (pers. comm.)
Figure 16 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 16 - a Cladogram based on COI gene sequence data showing topology of four genera of Phyllidiidae b Cladogram according to Brunckhorst (1993) based on morphological data showing topology of six genera of Phyllidiidae c Cladogram based on 16S mtDNA sequence data showing topology of four genera of Phyllidiidae (Valdés 2003) d Cladogram based on morphological data (Valdés 2002) showing topology of five genera of Phyllidiidae.
Figure 14 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 14 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidiopsis xishaensis (a), Phyllidiopsis shireenae (b–c), Phyllidiopsis krempfi (d–i). Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4 (c dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 13 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 13 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidiella pustulosa (a–h), Phyllidiopsis xishaensis (i–j). Order of specimens (a–j) according to Figure 4. Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 12 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 12 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidiella pustulosa. Order of specimens (a–j) according to Figure 4. Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers or locality code (75F, dried-out).
Figure 15 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 15 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidiopsis krempfi. Order of specimens (a–g) according to Figure 4 (f, g dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 11 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 11 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidiella rudmani (a), Phyllidiella nigra (b–h), Phyllidiella pustulosa (i–j). Order of specimens (a–j) according to Figure 4. Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 10 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 10 - External morphology and colouration of Phyllidiidae specimens used for COI phylogeny reconstruction: Phyllidia picta (a–c), Phyllidia babai (d), Phyllidia cf. babai (e–f), Reticulidia fungia (g), Reticulidia halgerda (h), Phyllidiopsis fissuratus (i). Order of specimens (a–i) according to Figure 4 (e dorsal and ventral sides). Numbers refer to RMNH.Moll catalogue numbers.
Figure 1 from: Stoffels BEMW, van der Meij SET, Hoeksema BW, van Alphen J, van Alen T, Meyers-Muñoz MA, de Voogd NJ, Tuti Y, van der Velde G (2016) Phylogenetic relationships within the Phyllidiidae (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). ZooKeys 605: 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.605.7136
Figure 1 - Location of field areas: Halmahera (including Ternate) and West Papua (including Raja Ampat).
Supplementary material 2 from: Grewe F, Lagostina E, Wu H, Printzen C, Lumbsch HT (2018) Population genomic analyses of RAD sequences resolves the phylogenetic relationship of the lichen-forming fungal species Usnea antarctica and Usnea aurantiacoatra. MycoKeys 43: 91-113. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.43.29093
Overview of RADseq results after individual steps of RAD analyses :
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.