Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in Evidence for male-produced aggregation pheromone in Sphenophorus incurrens (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)

Fig. 1. Simultaneous responses measured by flame ionization detection (FID) and electroantennographic detection (EAD) in the antennae of Sphenophorus incurrens males to headspace volatiles collected from (A) conspecific males and (B) 10 ng synthetic 2-methyl-4-octanol, on a SPB-1 capillary column.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Рис. 2. ВоΔопΛавающие и окоΛовоΔные виΔы птиц на берегах Ямуны: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha Fig. 2. Waterfowl and shorebird species on the Yamuna River: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha in Aggregation of the wintering birds on the Yamuna River in India

Рис. 2. ВоΔопΛавающие и окоΛовоΔные виΔы птиц на берегах Ямуны: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha Fig. 2. Waterfowl and shorebird species on the Yamuna River: 1 — Anas crecca, Himantopus himantopus; 2 — Ardea alba, Egretta garzetta, Ardeola grayii; 3 — Himantopus himantopus; 4 — Himantopus himantopus, Recurvirostra avosetta; 5 — Phalacrocorax niger, Amaurornis phoenicurus; 6 — Platalea leucorodia, Mycteria leucocephala; 7 — Ardea cinerea; 8 — Anas poecilorhyncha

Fig. 4 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 4 Relationship between the size of bat maternity aggregation (a), percentage of forest cover (b), body condition index (c), and parasite infection of the examined bats in the Carpathians Mountains (2007).

Fig. 1 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 1 Distribution of greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) maternity aggregations (grey circles) and single founding individuals (black dots) in the Beskids (Carpathian Mountains, Poland). Data pooled from Kozakiewicz (2003), Szkudlarek et al. (2008), and our data. For the investigated maternity colonies, forested areas within a 10-km radius is shown

Fig. 3 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 3 Proportions of protonymph (PN), deutonymph (DN), and adult (AD) stages of S. myoti mites, collected from Myotis myotis (bars), and the sex ratios of deutonymph and adult mites (circles)

Fig. 2 in Is parasite load dependent on host aggregation size? The case of the greater mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis (Mammalia: Chiroptera) and its parasitic mite Spinturnix myoti (Acari: Gamasida)

Fig. 2 Micrograph of the adult female Spinturnix myoti, dorsal view. Scanning electron microscopy image, original magnification ×40

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Aggregation and negative interactions in low-diversity and unsaturated monogenean (Platyhelminthes) communities in Astyanax aeneus (Teleostei) populations in a neotropical river of Mexico

Fig. 3. Relationship between component community monogenean species richness and mean infracommunity species richness; A) total samples; B) samples of February; C) samples of August.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Aggregation and negative interactions in low-diversity and unsaturated monogenean (Platyhelminthes) communities in Astyanax aeneus (Teleostei) populations in a neotropical river of Mexico

Fig. 1. Eleven sample locations situated on the opening of streams tributaries to the main Rio Lacantún in the Biosphere Reserve Montes Azules (RBMA), Chiapas, México: (1) Río Tzendales (16̊17′ 10.8″ N; 90̊53′12.6″ W), (2) Río Manzanares (16̊10′14.6″ N; 90̊50′36.2″ W), (3) Arroyo Miranda (16̊08′08.1″ N; 90̊55′14.9″ W), (4) Río Danta (16̊09′08.1″ N; 90̊54′06.3″ W), (5) Arroyo Lagarto (16̊08′14.0″ N; 90̊54′24.4″ W), (6) Embarcadero Estación Chajul (16̊06′38.4″ N; 90̊56′ 23.6″ W), (7) Arroyo José (16̊06′50″ N; 90̊56′03.3″ W), (8) Río Chajul (16̊05′58.2″ N; 90̊57′30.1″ W), (9) Río San Pablo (16̊06′ 10.0″ N; 91̊00′52.2″ W), (10) Río Puerto Rico (16̊05′04.4″ N; 91̊01′11.2″ W), (11) Río Ixcan (16̊07′17.5″ N; 91̊05′11.3″ W).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Aggregated frequencies of transcription initiations observed in FANTOM5 CAGE data on GRCh38, including alignments with low mapping qualities

Overview Aligned reads of the FANTOM5 CAGE data have been used after filtering (ones with mapping quality less than 20 or percent identity less than 85% were discarded) for general purpose, resulting in the data set consisting of only the reads aligned with confidence. The filtering process made possible to interpret the data without ambiguity, however it also limited interpretation of paralogous or duplicated regions within the genome. Here all of the 5'-ends of the CAGE read alignments, including the ones with low mapping quality, were counted. The counts in the individual profiles were aggregated and summed up.    Special usage note As noted above, this data derived from the alignments with low mapping qualities, as well as the ones with high mapping qualities. The result has to be examined very carefully: observations on the genome does not support transcription initiation with confidence, and even absence of such observation does not support silence of transcription with confidence. For example, file size on the forward strand is substantially larger than the one on the reverse strand, which is likely caused by an arbitrary preference of the alignment process. It does not mean transcription happens more frequently on the forward strand. Interpretation has to be made always in comparison with the standard data (BED files under http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/reprocessed/hg38_v4/basic/ or bigWig files under http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datahub/hg38/reads/).   Data files The resulting data files are formatted as bigWig (https://genome.ucsc.edu/FAQ/FAQformat.html#format6.1). '*.fwd.bw' and '*.rev.bw' represent forward and reverse strand on the genome, respectively.    Methods The BAM files under http://fantom.gsc.riken.jp/5/datafiles/reprocessed/hg38_v4/basic/ were subjected to 5'-end counting by bedtools v2.27.1 (https://github.com/arq5x/bedtools2), followed by conversion into bigWig with jksrc v357 (http://hgdownload.cse.ucsc.edu/admin/).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Data for: Resource landscapes explain contrasting patterns of aggregation and site fidelity by red knots at two wintering sites

This repository contains data for the paper: Oudman et al. 2018. Resource landscapes explain contrasting patterns of aggregation and site fidelity by red knots at two wintering sites. Movement Ecology 6(14) 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-018-0142-4. Please cite the original publication when using this data.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2019View details →

Dataset From: Surfactant mediated particle aggregation in nonpolar solvents

The dataset for the publication "Surfactant mediated particle aggregation in nonpolar solvents". DOI: 10.1039/c9cp01985e Files containing data have .TXT extension and are in text format.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2014View details →

Fig. 2 in Unusual Age Structure Of The Winter Aggregation Of Nyctalus Noctula (Mammalia, Chiroptera) In Kyiv

Fig. 2. Age of common noctule bats in the examined sample: A — total sample, n = 113, the model of the logarithmic regression is indicated with the line; B — females, n = 31; C — males, n = 77.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2015View details →

Text-fig. 10. Schema of transversal section of A. tschemrylica (sample 97/04). v – vessel, r – ray, ar – aggregate ray, grb – growth-ring boundary. in New Fossil Woods From The Paleogene Of Doupovské Hory And České Středohoří Mts. (Bohemian Massif, Czech Republic)

Text-fig. 10. Schema of transversal section of A. tschemrylica (sample 97/04). v – vessel, r – ray, ar – aggregate ray, grb – growth-ring boundary.

Figure 8 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 8. Golden proportion manifested in the shape of bird eggs: 1, 13, 25, 37, ovoid profiles; 2, 14, 26, 38, ovoid profile profiles for comparison with bird eggs. Bird eggs: 3 – Alectoris chukar; 4 – Glareola pratincola; 5 – Sturnus vulgaris; 6 – Sylvia nisoria; 7 – Milvus milvus; 8 – Buteo buteo; 9 – Falco cherrug; 10 – Lanius collurio; 11 - Perdix perdix; 12 – Garrulus glandarius; 15 – Sylvia communis; 16 – Perdix perdix; 17 – Numida meleagris; 18 – Alectoris chukar; 19 – Garrulus glandarius; 20 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 21 – Larus melanocephalus; 22 – Dendrocopos major; 23 – Picus canus; 24 – Jynx torquilla; 27 – Luscinia svecica; 28 – Oenanthe oenanthe; 29 – Turdus merula; 30– Picus canus; 31– Aquila pomarina; 32 – Perdix perdix; 33 – Lanius collurio; 34 – Anthus trivialis; 35 – Jynx torquilla; 36– Hieraaetus pennatus; 39 – Turdus philomelos; 40 – Oriolus oriolus; 41 – Ficedula albicollis; 42 – Dendrocopos leucotos; 43 – Delichon urbica; 44 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 45 – Garrulus glandarius; 46 – Corvus frugilegus; 47 – Turdus merula; 48 – Gallinula chloropus.

Figure 5 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 5. Comparison of geometric standards (1, 7, 13, 19, 25, 31) with profiles of real eggs: 2 – Athene noctua; 3 – Neophron percnopterus; 4 – Merops apiaster; 5 – Phylloscopus sibilatrix; 6 – Alcedo atthis; 8 – Falco vespertinus; 9 – Aegithalos caudatus; 10 – Merops apiaster; 11 – Ficedula hypoleuca; 12 – Jynx torquilla; 14 – Sterna hirundo; 15 – Buteo buteo; 16 – Falco cherrug; 17 – Upupa epops; 18 – Dendrocopos major; 20 – Picus canus; 21 – Perdix perdix; 22 – Phasianus colchicus; 23 – Corvus monedula; 24 – Coccothraustes coccothraustes; 26 – Limosa limosa; 27 – Pica pica; 28 – Luscinia luscinia; 29 – Corvus frugilegus; 30 – Alca torda; 32 – Uria aalge; 33 – Numenius arquata; 34 – Recurvirostra avosetta; 35 – Alca torda; 36 – Corvus corax.

Figure 3 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 3. Discrete variants of combinations of the lateral arcs of the ovoid profiles (matrices): a - 0.75D; b -1.0 D; c - 1.25D; d - 1.5D; e - 1.75D.

Figure 7 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 7. Construction of ovoid profiles with golden ratio: a - construction of ovoids with doubling of radii of circles; b - construction of ovoids with increasing of radii of circles by F=1,618; c - getting golden section by a combination of four circles; d - construction of ovoids with golden section by pentagons.

Figure 11 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 11. Schematics for calculating the complementarity indices of avian eggs: 1, 2, 9, 10 - scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index close to unity (rc=ri=(L–D)/2); 3 – Podiceps cristatus; 4 – Cygnus olor; 5 – Egretta alba; 6 – Pelecanus crispus; 7 – Egretta garzetta; 8 – Mergus serrator; 11 – Anser anser; 12 – Casuarius casuarius; 13 – Porzana parva; 14 – Phalacrocorax carbo; 15 – Podiceps nigricollis; 16 – Ardea cinerea; 17, 18 - scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index close to 1,333 (rc=ri=lipz=L/3); 19 – Pygoscelis papua; 20 – Nyctea scandiaca; 21 – Strutio camelus; 22 – Dendrocopos minor; 23 – Alcedo atthis; 24 – Buteo chemilasius; 25 – Jynx torquilla; 26 – Asio otus; 27 – Streptopelia decaocto; 28 – Merops apiaster; 29 – Asio flammeus; 30 – Aquila pomarina; 31 – Bubo bubo; 32 – Columba oenas; 33, 34 – scheme and geometric profile of eggs with a complementarity index greater than 1,5 (rc=ri/lipz˃1,5); 35 – Athene noctua; 36 – Otus scops; 37 – Otus brucei; 38 – Merops apiaster; 39 – Strix aluco; 40 – Pygoscelis papua; 41 – Alcedo atthis; 42 – Merops superciliosus; 43 – Milvus migrans; 44 – Asio flammeus; 45 – Strutio camelus; 46 – Hieraaetus pennatus; 47 – Strix aluco; 48 – Accipiter nisus.

Figure 2 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 2. Relationship between the ovoid constructs with the diagonals of the square and the double square.

Figure 6 in Discrete aggregate analysis of ovoid egg shapes in various bird species

Figure 6. Ovoid profiles (a) Erkoca, 2021; (b) Rojas, 2002; (c) Dixon, 1987; (d) Petrović et al., 2010.