Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
435
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
435 results for “Carabids”
Figure 1 from: Tsafack N, Wang X, Xie Y, Fattorini S (2021) Niche overlap and species co-occurrence patterns in carabid communities of the northern Chinese steppes. In: Spence J, Casale A, Assmann T, Liebherr JК, Penev L (Eds) Systematic Zoology and Biodiversity Science: A tribute to Terry Erwin (1940-2020). ZooKeys 1044: 929-949. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1044.62478
Figure 1 Histograms of expected values (blue bars) for niche overlap in carabid beetle communities of Central Asian steppes using the RA3 algorithm to generate 10,000 null matrices. Investigated ecosystems were a desert steppe (a), a typical steppe (b), a meadow steppe (c), three sectors within the typical steppe (d–f), and two sectors within the meadow steppe (g, h). In each graph, the vertical red line indicates the observed value, long-dash lines indicate the one-tailed 95% limits, and the short-dash lines the two-tailed 95% limits.
Figure 1b from: Kotze D, Brandmayr P, Casale A, Dauffy-Richard E, Dekoninck W, Koivula M, Lovei G, Mossakowski D, Noordijk J, Paarmann W, Pizzoloto R, Saska P, Schwerk A, Serrano J, Szyszko J, Taboada Palomares A, Turin H, Venn S, Vermeulen R, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe – from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. ZooKeys 100: 55-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523
Figure 1b - Front covers of the first European meetings, ECM 1–8 and that of Hamburg 1984 (centre cover) (see also Table 2).
Figure 2 from: Kotze D, Brandmayr P, Casale A, Dauffy-Richard E, Dekoninck W, Koivula M, Lovei G, Mossakowski D, Noordijk J, Paarmann W, Pizzoloto R, Saska P, Schwerk A, Serrano J, Szyszko J, Taboada Palomares A, Turin H, Venn S, Vermeulen R, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe – from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. ZooKeys 100: 55-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523
Figure 2 - Different pitfall types. A = Jar or yoghurt can. B and C = traps with an outer can to make collecting of the sample easier. B = funnel trap with small jar. C = trap for moist biotopes (the outer can contains gravel or stones to prevent the can from being pushed up by groundwater). V = preservative (usually formaldehyde 3–4% or propylene glycol), S = stones or gravel.
Figure 1a from: Kotze D, Brandmayr P, Casale A, Dauffy-Richard E, Dekoninck W, Koivula M, Lovei G, Mossakowski D, Noordijk J, Paarmann W, Pizzoloto R, Saska P, Schwerk A, Serrano J, Szyszko J, Taboada Palomares A, Turin H, Venn S, Vermeulen R, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe – from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. ZooKeys 100: 55-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523
Figure 1a - Participants of the first European Carabidologist Meeting in Wijster, 1969. From left to right: Vlijm, Van der Aart, Lindroth, Stein, Wijmans, Hengeveld, Palmén, Van Dijk, Richter, Venema, Mook, Thiele, Tjallingii, Den Boer, Haeck, Neumann, Meijer.
Figure 1c from: Kotze D, Brandmayr P, Casale A, Dauffy-Richard E, Dekoninck W, Koivula M, Lovei G, Mossakowski D, Noordijk J, Paarmann W, Pizzoloto R, Saska P, Schwerk A, Serrano J, Szyszko J, Taboada Palomares A, Turin H, Venn S, Vermeulen R, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Forty years of carabid beetle research in Europe – from taxonomy, biology, ecology and population studies to bioindication, habitat assessment and conservation. ZooKeys 100: 55-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1523
Figure 1c - Front covers of the last five ECMs and of a few major carabidology publications (Thiele 1977; Ball et al. 1998; Erwin et al. 1979; Noonan et al. 1992) (see also Table 2).
Figure 1 from: Wizen G, Gasith A (2011) Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis found in the central coastal plain of Israel. ZooKeys 100: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1526
Figure 1 - Distribution of Epomis species in the study area, central coastal plain, Israel, 2007–2009 (square in left corner shows location of study area).
Figure 1 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 1 - a Consumption of Amara anthobia by the lizard Podarcis sicula b attack on Calathus fuscipes by the staphylinid Ocypus olens c consumption of Campalita maderae by the shrew Crocidura leucodon.
Figure 2 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 2 - Percentage of attacks by Crocidura leucodon (Insectivora: Soricidae) on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles. Black bars represent conspicuous species; grey bars represent non-conspicuous species.
Figure 2 from: Wizen G, Gasith A (2011) Predation of amphibians by carabid beetles of the genus Epomis found in the central coastal plain of Israel. ZooKeys 100: 181-191. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1526
Figure 2 - Predation of amphibians by adult Epomis: a Bufo viridis juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus b Hyla savignyi juvenileby Epomis circumscriptus c Bufo viridis juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus d Salamandra salamandra infraimmaculata metamorph by Epomis dejeani e Hyla savignyi juvenile by Epomis circumscriptus f Triturus vittatus metamorph by Epomis dejeani (photographs by Gil Wizen).
Figure 3 from: Bonacci T, Brandmayr P, Zetto Brandmayr T (2011) Predator feeding choice on conspicuous and non-conspicuous carabid beetles: first results. ZooKeys 100: 171-179. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1525
Figure 3 - Interspecific aggregation of Brachinus sclopeta a Anchomenus dorsalis b and individuals of Poecilus cupreus c. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 5 from: Harry I, Drees C, Hofer H, Assmann T (2011) When to sample in an inaccessible landscape: a case study with carabids from the Allgäu (northern Alps) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 255-271. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1531
Figure 5 - Dendrogram of sites with data from complete sampling (comp) and sampling periods 1 and 3 (part). The dendrogram is based on Bray-Curtis distances and uses Ward´s minimum variance method.
Figure 3 from: Harry I, Drees C, Hofer H, Assmann T (2011) When to sample in an inaccessible landscape: a case study with carabids from the Allgäu (northern Alps) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 255-271. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1531
Figure 3 - Phenology of single species. a Species with an early activity peak, b Species with a delayed activity peak and c Species without a clear activity peak. On the horizontal axis the sampling interval is given. For exact sampling periods, see Table 2.
Figure 2 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 2 - IndVals at different levels in the UPGMA tree. Result for a single species, Dicheirotrichus gustavii, calculated by the original IndVal program. Eight values of the nine levels are significant. Data: abundance/frequency data. 7/4: a total of seven specimens were found in four of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 1 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 1 - Result of a cluster analysis using Relative Euclidean distances and Ward's method. Most traps of the site at the lowest elevation (-20 cm below MHW) cluster with those of 100 cm above MHW. Arrow: One trap of -20 behaves differently.
Figure 3 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 3 - Model graphs based on the parameters in Table 1 for the relationship between MIB values (mg) and age of stands for the first 60 years in A planted stands on forest soil, B naturally regenerated stands on post-agricultural soil, C planted stands on post-agricultural soil, D stands on ash heap, and E stands on mining heap (Open circles indicate that MIB was calculated from less than 25 individuals; broken lines indicate that the respective part of the graph cannot be verified due to a lack of data).
Figure 2 from: Harry I, Drees C, Hofer H, Assmann T (2011) When to sample in an inaccessible landscape: a case study with carabids from the Allgäu (northern Alps) (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 255-271. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1531
Figure 2 - Phenology of ground beetles. a Overview over all sites. Number of individuals is converted to percentage of total catch. b Seperated for the three site classes of altitude. On the horizontal axis the sampling interval is given. For exact sampling periods, see Table 2.
Figure 2 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 2 - Schematic illustration of the model. Succession starts from an 'initial degradation level', followed by a facultative 'delay phase' (characterized by the time of 'delay'). The optional 'delay phase' is followed by an 'increase phase' (characterized by the 'increase rate'), and a 'stagnation phase' in which the succession process runs towards a 'recovery level'. The type of area, origin of vegetation, and landscape-related aspects are assumed to influence the trajectory of succession.
Figure 3 from: Mossakowski D, Dormann W (2011) A plea for using qualitative aspects in the interpretation of ecological field data as revealed by carabid beetle assemblages of a pristine salt marsh. ZooKeys 100: 273-286. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1532
Figure 3 - Results of the IndVal procedure depend on the tree used. Data: abundance/frequency of Cillenus lateralis along the elevation gradient. 3/3: a total of three specimens was found in three of the five traps. Sites 102 and 103 are omitted.
Figure 1 from: Schwerk A, Szyszko J (2011) Model of succession in degraded areas based on carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 100: 319-332. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1534
Figure 1 - Relationship between MIB values (mg) and age of stands in A planted stands on forest soil (r = 0.343, p <0.05), B naturally regenerated stands on post-agricultural soil (r = 0.677, p <0.001), C planted stands on post-agricultural soil (r = 0.238, p <0.001), D stands on ash heap (r = 0.025, n.s.) and E stands on mining heap (r = 0.839, p <0.001) (Open circles indicate that MIB was calculated from less than 25 individuals).
Figure 3 from: Šerić Jelaska L, Dumbovich V, Kucinic M (2011) Carabid beetle diversity and mean individual biomass in beech forests of various ages. ZooKeys 100: 393-405. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.100.1536
Figure 3 - Proportion of species according to their hibernation strategies (larvae – black columns, adults – white columns) in relation to forest age (years).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.