Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
552
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
552 results for “Literature review”
Systematic Literature Review
<p>This coding table was developed as part of the systematic literature review on the topic of "Sustainable supplier management in the automotive industry" for the realization of my master's thesis.</p>
Dataset for paper: Maturity assessment and maturity models in healthcare: a multivocal literature review
<p><strong>Pool of primary sources</strong><strong> studied in: Maturity assessment and maturity models in healthcare: a multivocal literature review</strong></p>
The Use of Biometric Sensors in Program Comprehension Research: A Literature Review (Appendix)
<p>The appendix of "The Use of Biometric Sensors in Program Comprehension Research: A Literature Review"</p>
Exploring the Spectrum of Biometric Technologies: A Systematic Literature Review of Conventional and Unconventional Modalities
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Reproduction Package for Submission `A Literature Review on Verification and Abstraction of Neural Networks'
<div> <div>This artifact contains the aggregated data for the article "A Literature Review on Verification and Abstraction of Neural Networks".</div> <br> <div>The artifact contains the following data files:</div> <br> <div>|-- phase-1_search-space.csv</div> <div>|-- phase-2-3_process-title-abstract.csv</div> <div>|-- review_sheet.csv</div> <br> <h3>Search space for literature review</h3> <div>The file <code>phase-1_search-space.csv</code> contains the metadata of the papers published in our considered conferences during the observed years.</div> <br> <h3>Filtering process</h3> <div>In the file <code>phase-2-3_process-title-abstract.csv</code>, we include the files that contain our expected keywords.</div> <div>Depending on whether we decided to include the paper in our survey after reading the title and the abstract, we marked each of the papers with `accept` or `decline`.</div> <br> <h3>Review sheet</h3> <div>The file <code>review_sheet.csv</code> contains metadata describing our reviews for each of the publications.</div> <div>It holds information on our final review of each paper, including the group we assigned it to and the reasons for its exclusion.</div> <br> <h3>Generating numbers</h3> <div>The following commands can be executed to reproduce the numbers used in our literature review.</div> <br> <div><code># Change directory to the directory containing the CSV files of this artifact.</code></div> <br> <div><code># Number of papers in our search space.</code></div> <div><code>cat phase-1_search-space.csv | tail -n +2 | wc -l</code></div> <br> <div><code># Number of papers after keyword search.</code></div> <div><code>cat phase-2-3_process-title-abstract.csv | tail -n +2 | wc -l</code></div> <br> <div><code># Number of papers that are excluded based on abstracts and titles.</code></div> <div><code>cut -f9 phase-2-3_process-title-abstract.csv | tail -n +2 | sort | uniq -c</code></div> <br> <div><code># Number of papers in different classes.</code></div> <div><code>cut -f7 review_sheet.csv | tail -n +2 | sort | uniq -c</code></div> <div> </div> </div>
Dataset for the research paper "Automated machine learning in research – a literature review"
<p>This repository contains the literature used in the research paper "Automated Machine Learning in Research – A Literature Review."</p> <p>The four BibTeX files contain the following collections of literature:</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>File</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> <td><strong>Method</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>01_Initial_papers.bib</strong></td> <td>385 Initial papers</td> <td>Keyword search in scientific databases Scopus and Web of Science</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>02_Primary_papers.bib</strong></td> <td>267 Primary papers</td> <td>Removing duplicate articles and filtering for full articles (i.e., conference and journal papers)</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>03_Possibly_relevant_papers.bib</strong></td> <td>54 Possibly relevant papers</td> <td>Identifying possibly relevant papers through abstract scan and application of inclusion criteria</td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>04_Relevant_papers.bib</strong></td> <td>49 Relevant papers</td> <td>Inclusion of relevant papers after full-text analysis and backward and forward searches</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>The following inclusion criteria were used to identify the 54 possibly relevant papers during the abstract scan:</p> <ul> <li>The abstract must mention autoML or related concepts such as low-code ML, meta-learning, or automated hyperparameter tuning and their potential use in research.</li> <li>The abstract must mention reproducibility or related concepts such as transparency or explainability in the context of autoML or the related concepts mentioned above</li> </ul>
Replication Package for the Paper: Identifying Key Factors for Using Ethnography in Software Requirements Elicitation - A Systematic Literature Review
<p>This is the replication package for the paper: "Identifying Key Factors for Using Ethnography in Software Requirements Elicitation - A Systematic Literature Review"</p> <p>It contains:</p> <ul> <li>Review protocol (in spanish)</li> <li>Extracted data for each research question</li> <li>List of primary studies</li> <li>Appendix</li> </ul> <p> </p>
Coding and results Literature. Review: Professional Learning Communities and Professional Capital in the Improvement of Learning Outcomes
<p>Project PID2020-117020GB-I00 , funded by : Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación de España/<br>AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the predoctoral contracts grant for the training of PhD implemented by<br>the [grant number PRE2021-098075]</p>
Dataset from literature review of the paper "A Classification and Interpretation of Methodological Approaches to Pursue Natural Capital Valuation in Forest Research"
<p>This is a dataset of papers used for the analysis of the literature review of the paper "A Classification and Interpretation of Methodological Approaches to Pursue Natural Capital Valuation in Forest Research". The paper was acceped in the FORESTS Journal on 25th September 2024. </p> <p> The papers selected for the review were collated in a spreadsheet and coded using an inductive approach by considering the goals, methods, and typologies of natural capital (NC) approaches implemented in each case study. We have formulated a subjective classification of NC approaches that suits the reviewed case studies and builds on the knowledge summarised in the guidance suite “Enabling a Natural Capital Approach” (ENCA), produced by the UK Gov to help policy and decision makers when considering NC values.</p> <p>Codes used, as reported in the Excel file, are the following:</p> <ol> <li> Authors 2. Title of the publication 3. Journal/book 4. Goal<br>5. Methods 6. Details of the methods 7. NC approach classification 8. Provisioning services 9. Regulating services 10. Cultural services Location 11. Payment for ecosystem services 12. Country 13. Location 14. Policy goal 15. Theme </li> </ol> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Strategies to mitigate differences between environments using Rapid Review on Grey Literature
<p>The comparison spreadsheet serves as a comprehensive repository for organizing and synthesizing data extracted from Grey Literature sources. It contains coded information related to strategies for mitigating configuration differences in software development, allowing for a systematic analysis of the identified practices. The spreadsheet links to different sections of the paper by providing a structured framework for data analysis. In the 'Data synthesis' section, the spreadsheet supports a mixed-method approach, combining qualitative and quantitative methods for analyzing the data. It aids in thematic analysis by translating codes into themes and creating higher-order themes for a more in-depth understanding of the collected data. Additionally, the spreadsheet connects to the 'Extract and Code data' section, where it houses all relevant codes and facilitates discussions on pertinent information extracted from Grey Literature sources. By referencing unique identifiers within the spreadsheet, researchers can track and link specific entries to the research questions, ensuring alignment with the study's objectives. Overall, the comparison spreadsheet plays a pivotal role in organizing, analyzing, and synthesizing data from Grey Literature sources, contributing to the robustness and coherence of the research findings presented in the paper.</p>
FEATURES OF THE EXOGRAPHDIAGNOSIS OF POLYMORPHISM OF UTERINE VALVES IN PATIENTS WITH MAYER-ROKITANSKY-KUSTER-HAUSER SYNDROME (LITERATURE REVIEW)
<p><span><span>Синдром Майера–Рокитанского–Кюстнера–Хаузера — это врожденный порок развития половых органов, который характеризуется врожденным отсутствием матки и влагалища или отсутствием матки и верхних 2/3 влагалища, нормально функционирующими яичниками у пациенток с женским кариотипом (46, ХХ) и физиологически развитыми вторичными половыми признаками (женский фенотип). [22]</span></span></p> <p><span><span>Синдром Майера-Рокитанского-Кюстера-Хаузера для которого характерны:</span></span></p> <p><span><span>– врожденное отсутствие матки и влагалища (матка обычно имеет вид одного или двух рудиментарных мышечных валиков);</span></span></p> <p><span><span>– нормальная функция яичников;</span></span></p> <p><span><span>– женский фенотип (нормальное развитие молочных желез, пропорциональное тело, характер оволосения и развитие наружных половых органов по женскому типу);</span></span></p> <p><span><span>– женский кариотип (46, ХХ);</span></span></p> <p><span><span>– часто встречающееся сочетание с другими врожденными пороками развития (скелета, органов мочевыделения).</span></span></p>
Data from: Understanding the role of physician attire on patient perceptions: a systematic review of the literature— targeting attire to improve likelihood of rapport (TAILOR) investigators
Objectives: Despite a growing body of literature, uncertainty regarding the influence of physician dress on patients' perceptions exists. Therefore, we performed a systematic review to examine the influence of physician attire on patient perceptions including trust, satisfaction and confidence. Setting, participants, interventions and outcomes: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Biosis Previews and Conference Papers Index. Studies that: (1) involved participants ≥18 years of age; (2) evaluated physician attire; and (3) reported patient perceptions related to attire were included. Two authors determined study eligibility. Studies were categorised by country of origin, clinical discipline (eg, internal medicine, surgery), context (inpatient vs outpatient) and occurrence of a clinical encounter when soliciting opinions regarding attire. Studies were assessed using the Downs and Black Scale risk of bias scale. Owing to clinical and methodological heterogeneity, meta-analyses were not attempted. Results: Of 1040 citations, 30 studies involving 11 533 patients met eligibility criteria. Included studies featured patients from 14 countries. General medicine, procedural (eg, general surgery and obstetrics), clinic, emergency departments and hospital settings were represented. Preferences or positive influence of physician attire on patient perceptions were reported in 21 of the 30 studies (70%). Formal attire and white coats with other attire not specified was preferred in 18 of 30 studies (60%). Preference for formal attire and white coats was more prevalent among older patients and studies conducted in Europe and Asia. Four of seven studies involving procedural specialties reported either no preference for attire or a preference for scrubs; four of five studies in intensive care and emergency settings also found no attire preference. Only 3 of 12 studies that surveyed patients after a clinical encounter concluded that attire influenced patient perceptions. Conclusions: Although patients often prefer formal physician attire, perceptions of attire are influenced by age, locale, setting and context of care. Policy-based interventions that target such factors appear necessary.
List of documents and patterns identified by multivocal literature review of software engineering patterns for machine learning applications
We performed a multivocal literature review of both academic and gray literature to collect software engineering for machine learning (ML) application systems and software design. For the academic literature, we chose Engineering Village. For the gray literature, we used a Google search on August 16, 2019. We retrieved 32 scholarly documents and 48 gray literature documents. We vetted whether each document should be included in our review using the following criteria: Documents written in English addressing concrete software-engineering patterns or practices to design ML application systems and software should be included. Documents focusing on design of ML techniques and algorithms should be excluded. This process identified 19 scholarly documents and 19 gray documents. Although 69 patterns related to the design of ML application systems were initially identified, 33 remained after the vetting process. Finally, industrial ML developers reviewed the 33 candidates from the viewpoint of practical usefulness. They identified only 15 ML patterns.
Dataset for CIIE 2018 folio number 2018062802133: A Computational Literature Review of Educational Innovation
<p>Dataset for CIIE 2018 folio number 2018062802133: A Computational Literature Review of Educational Innovation</p>
Protocol - Systematic Literature Review
<p>The full protocol used in our Systematic Literature Review of Fault Tolerance and Security Techniques for Smart Cities Applications.</p>
Dataset Literature Review on Cyber law and Forensics
<p>Berikut adalah data mengenai topik forensics dalam cyber law yang didapat pada lens.org</p>
Dataset Literatur Review on Cyberlaw OR Cyber Law AND Identification
<p>Berikut merupakan Dataset Literatur Review on Cyberlaw OR Cyber Law AND Identification</p>
Dataset Literatur Review on Cyberlaw OR and motorcycles
<p>Dataset Literatur Review On Cyberlaw and motorcylces </p>
Dataset Literatur Review Or Cyber Law And Interpersonal Relations
<p>Merupakan Sebuah Dataset Literatur Review Or Cyber Law And Interpersonal Relations</p>
Dataset Literatur Review On CyberLaw And Victims
<p>Ini merupakan dataset dari literatur review cyberlaw and victims </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.