Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular and phytochemical systematics of the subtribe Hypochaeridinae (Asteraceae, Cichorieae)

Fig. 3 Overview of the distribution of caffeoyl tartaric acid derivatives within the phylogenetic context of the Hypochaeridinae

Fig. 5 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Fig. 5 Fossil-calibrated phylogeny based on the three-gene dataset. Node bars denote the mean ages of 95% highest posterior density (HPD). Fossil calibrations are marked by star signs. Mya, million years ago

Fig. 4 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Fig. 4 Phylogenetic trees inferred from Bayesian Inference (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses. Left is the BI and ML tree based on the AA dataset. Right is the BI tree based on the NT dataset; taxon names correspond to the left tree. Numbers close to the nodes for the left tree indicate bootstrap support (BS)/posterior probabilities (PP), and those for the right tree indicate PP. Hidden node numbers and asterisks (*) denote PP> 0.9 and BS> 75%. Different colored clades represent four subfamilies in Unionidae. Pentagrams symbolize sequences from this study. Dotted lines in the right tree indicate inconsistent clades compared to the left tree. The figure depicts the topology of Unionidae, while the complete topology is presented in Supplementary Fig. S5

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Fig. 2 Anatomical features of Lepidodesma aligera with left valve removed and Lepidodesma languilati with right valve removed. a L. aligera; b L. languilati. c–h close-up of apertures and gills: c–e Lepidodesma aligera; f–h, Lepidodesma languilati. Abbreviations: aam, anterior adductor muscle; pam, posterior adductor muscle; exa, excurrent aperture; ia, incurrent aperture; f, foot; ig, inner gill; og, outer gill; lp, labial palps; m, mantle; p ia, papillae in incurrent aperture; pg exa, pigmentation of excurrent aperture

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogeny and comparative morphology reveal the species validity and systematic position of Lepidodesma (Bivalvia: Unionidae)

Fig. 1 Shell images of Lepidodesma aligera and Lepidodesma languilati. a (1–4): Lepidodesma aligera; b (1–4): Lepidodesma languilati

FIGURE 4 in Diplazoptilon (Asteraceae) is merged with Saussurea based on evidence from morphology and molecular systematics

FIGURE 4. Living plant of Saussurea picridifolia. From Zayü, Xizang, China (FLPH Tibet Exped. 12-1382), photographed by Yousheng Chen on 16 September 2012.

FIGURE 2. The 50 in Diplazoptilon (Asteraceae) is merged with Saussurea based on evidence from morphology and molecular systematics

FIGURE 2. The 50% majority rule consensus tree derived from Bayesian analysis of the combined nuclear ITS and plastid trnL-F and psbA-trnH sequences. Numbers above branches are Posterior probabilities, and Bootstrap support values from MP/ML analyses are given below branches receiving>50% values in both analyses.

FIGURE 1 in Diplazoptilon (Asteraceae) is merged with Saussurea based on evidence from morphology and molecular systematics

FIGURE 1. SEM morphology of Diplazoptilon picridifolium. A. achene; B. the apical rim of achene; C. the surface of the achene; D. the reticulate ornamentations of pollen; E. the equatorial plane of pollen; F. pappus.

FIGURE 3. Saussurea picridifolia. A in Diplazoptilon (Asteraceae) is merged with Saussurea based on evidence from morphology and molecular systematics

FIGURE 3. Saussurea picridifolia. A. habit; B. anther; C. pappus; D. style branches; E. floret; F. achene; G. inner pappus bristle; H. outer pappus bristle; I. phyllaries (from left to right, inner to outer series). All from FLPH Tibet Expedition 12-1382(PE). Drawn by Mrs. Z. J. Chen.

FIGURE 21 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 21. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Chamaetrichon strains grown on MIEB12 medium. A, B. SAG 1.87, general and close view of filaments, with a common mucilage, C. UTEX 1918, filaments with rudimentary branching, surrounded by common mucilage stained with indian ink, D. SAG 23.88, branched filaments, E. ULVO-15, short branched filaments surrounded by mucilage at the edge of the colony, F. SAG 2396, short filaments and packets, surrounded by common matrix.

FIGURE 14 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 14. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Sarcinofilum strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A,B. SAG 4.90, C. SAG 24.93, D. SAG 29.94, E. 26.94, F. SAG 26.88.

FIGURE 11 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 11. Morphology of A–C. Halofilum helgolandicum SAG 2.95 and D–G. H. ramosum SAG 2050 grown on 1/2SWES medium.

FIGURE 8 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 8. Morphology of Paulbroadya petersii SAG 2240 grown on SWES medium. A, B. general view of plants, C–G. morphology of filaments in two-weeks of growth.

FIGURE 4 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 4. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Pseudendoclonium strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A. ULVO-21, B. ULVO-29, C. ULVO-26, D. SAG 2237, E. SAG 467-2, F. CCAP 415/1.

FIGURE 19 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 19. Morphology of Rhexinema edaphica ULVO-10 grown on MiEB12 medium. A–E. cells packets and rudimentary branching, F,G. single cells and packets surrounded by common mucilage contrasted by indian ink.

FIGURE 13 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 13. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Ctenocladus strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A,B. ULVO-16, C. ULVO-18, D,E. ULVO-24, F. SAG 467-1.

FIGURE 1 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 1. Molecular phylogeny of the Ulvophyceae based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons. The phylogenetic tree shown was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on a data set of 1770 aligned positions of 106 taxa using PAUP 4.0b10. For the analysis, the GTR+I+G (base frequencies: A 0.23760, C 0.22733, G 0.28379, T 0.25128; rate matrix A-C 1.0063, A-G 2.3095, A-T 1.3005, C-G 0.7427, C-T 4.0954, G-T 1.0000) with the proportion of invariable sites (I = 0.5552) and gamma shape parameter (G = 0.4527) was chosen, which was calculated as the best model by Modeltest 3.7. The branches in bold are highly supported in all analyses (Bayesian values> 0.95 calculated with PHASE and MrBayes; bootstrap values> 70% calculated with PAUP using maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony and RAxML using maximum likelihood). The sister group of the Oltmannsiellopsis-clade was chosen as outgroup. The clade designations was given after the represented genera. The strains originally assigned as Dilabifilum and Pseudendoclonium basiliense are marked with * and # behind the accession number, respectively. The generic names after taxonomic revision are given in white boxes.

FIGURE 16 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 16. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Rhexinema strains grown on MiEB12 medium. A. R. paucicellularis SAG 463-1, B. SAG 29.93, C. SAG 8.90, D. SAG 466-2; E. R. planctonica UTEX 1570, F,G. R. sancta-tomea ACOI 592.

FIGURE 15 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 15. Morphology of Planophila bipyrenoidosa A–I. ULVO-1 and J–Q. ULVO-55 grown on 3NBBM medium. A–C. settled zoospores and sporangium, D–I. cell packets, J. settled zoospores, K–Q. variety of vegetative cells.

FIGURE 12 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 12. Morphology of Ctenocladus circinnatus CCMP 2158 grown on 1/2SWES medium, two-weeks old cultures.