Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
684
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
684 results for “Phylogenetic placement”
FIGURES 68–75. 68, P in Description of Khamul, gen. n. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eurytomidae), with a hypothesis of its phylogenetic placement
FIGURES 68–75. 68, P. javensis, lateral mesosoma; 69, K. erwini, male antenna, dorsal flagellomeres; 70, M. oecanthi, posterior head, postgenal bridge; 71, M. oecanthi, anterior head; 72, Chryseida sp. Bolivia, anterior head; 73, P. latrodecti, posterior head; 74, Bephratelloides cubensis, posterior head; 75, B. cubensis, posterior head, postgenal bridge. Note: all females unless otherwise noted.
FIGURES 18–25. 18, K in Description of Khamul, gen. n. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eurytomidae), with a hypothesis of its phylogenetic placement
FIGURES 18–25. 18, K. lanceolatus, apex clava; 19, K. erwini (variant), mandibles; 20, K. lanceolatus, mandible; 21, M. oecanthi, dorsal mesosoma; 22, K. erwini (variant), dorsal mesosoma; 23, K. erwini, ventrolateral mesosoma; 24, Bruchodape sp., ventral mesosoma; 25, A. vogti, dorsal mesosoma. Note: all females.
FIGURES 34 in Description of Khamul, gen. n. (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea: Eurytomidae), with a hypothesis of its phylogenetic placement
FIGURES 34. Strict consensus tree of 286 MPTs from unweighted analysis (step = 156; CI=0.53; RI=0.80).
FIGURE 10 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 10. Bayesian analysis of 225 strains within the Oscillatoriales showing the phylogenetic position of Trichocoleus (Microcoleus) sociatus SAG 26.92 in a clade of an unnamed desert soil genus outside of the Microcoleus sensu stricto. Taxonomic epithets applied to GenBank sequences that we consider to be incorrect are indicated by enclosure in quotation marks.
FIGURE 6. D1–D1 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 6. D1–D1' helix. A. Trichocoleus desertorum JO2-1B. B. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA1-4-KO5/CV13, CMT-1FDIN-NPC12A, FB1-1A. C. ATA2-1-CV2/CV7, ATA4-8-CV2/CV3/CV12, ATA3-4Q-KO9, ATA12-5-KO5, ATA14-3-RM35/RM36 op. 1 and 2; Trichocoleus badius op. 1 and 2. D. Trichocoleus desertorum CMT-1BRIN-NPC4B, WJT8-NPBG3, WJT40-NPBG1/NPBG2, WJT46-NPBG1 op. 1, WJT55-NPBG8. E. Trichocoleus sp. TAA2-1HA2.30. F. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT16-NPBG1. G. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT46- NPBG1 op. 2. H. Leptolyngbya Zehnder 1965/U140. I. Nodosilinea nodulosa.
FIGURE 4 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 4. Detail of the Trichocoleus cluster based on Bayesian analysis with 16S rRNA gene sequence data. Posterior probabilities/ bootstrap support from parsimony analysis reported above node. op. = operon. Holotype is based on strain in bold font.
FIGURE 3 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic position of the genus Trichocoleus within the Pseudanabaenales based on Bayesian analysis with 16S rRNA gene sequence data. Posterior probabilities/bootstrap support from parsimony analysis reported above node. Taxa in quotation marks are outside of correct genus clade but reflect unrevised names given in GenBank.
FIGURE 1 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 1. Morphological variability of the type population of T. desertorum (ATA4-8). A. Multiple trichomes in a sheath. B. Short trichome with conical apical cells. C. Different shapes of apical cells and tapering of trichome. D. Granules in cells (arrows). E–F. Variable cell lengths and sheath properties. G. Short trichomes with pointed apical cells and vivid cyan spots in cells, senescent culture. H. Necridium (arrow). I. Cyan spots in young trichome. Scale = 10 µm (A at lower magnification, B–I share the scale bar from B).
FIGURE 9. V3 helix. A. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA2-1 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 9. V3 helix. A. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA2-1-CV2/CV7. B. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA3-4Q-KO9, Trichocoleus sp. TAA2- 1HA2.30. C. Trichocoleus badius op. 1 and 2. D. Trichocoleus desertorum CMT-1FDIN-NPC12A. E. Trichocoleus desertorum CMT-1BRIN- NPC4B, WJT8-NPBG3, WJT40-NPBG1/NPBG2, WJT46-NPBG1 op. 1. F. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA14-3-RM35/RM36 op. 1, JO2-1B. G. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA1-4-KO5/CV13, ATA4-8-CV2/CV3/CV12. H. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA14-3-RM36 op. 2. I. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA12-5-KO5. J. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT55-NPBG8. K. Trichocoleus desertorum FB1-1A. L. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT16-NPBG1. M. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT46-NPBG1 op. 2. N. Nodosilinea nodulosa.
FIGURE 5 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic relationships among Trichocoleus strains based on parsimony analysis with 16S–23S ITS region sequence. Values above branches represent bootstrap values from this analysis. Holotype is based on strain in bold font. Letters in parentheses represent ITS helices shown in Figs. 6–9 in order: D1–D1'/Box-B/V2/V3. Helix pattern for operons not included in the ITS tree are shown in lower right corner.
FIGURE 2 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 2. Morphological variability of various T. desertorum populations. A. Multiple trichomes in a common sheath (ATA3-4Q-KO9). B. Short trichome with short, strongly constricted cells (ATA1-4-KO5). C. Asymmetrical cell division (WJT40-NPBG1). D–E. Asymmetrical cell division and granules (arrows) in cells (CMT-1BRIN-NPC4B). F. Multiple trichomes in a colorless lamellated sheath with greyish light refraction (ATA14-3-RM36). G–H. Thylakoids in fascicles (arrows) (G. ATA14-3-RM36, H. ATA2-1-CV2). I–J. Involution cells (arrow) (I. WJT40-NPBG1, J. WJT55-NPBG8). K. Tapering trichome with pointed apical cell (ATA1-4-CV13). Scale = 10 µm.
FIGURE 8. V2 helix. A. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA14-3 in Polyphasic characterization of Trichocoleus desertorum sp. nov. (Pseudanabaenales, Cyanobacteria) from desert soils and phylogenetic placement of the genus Trichocoleus
FIGURE 8. V2 helix. A. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA14-3-RM35/RM36 op. 1 and 2. B. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA1-4-KO5/CV13, ATA3-4Q-KO9, ATA4-8-CV2/CV3/CV12, ATA12-5-KO5. C. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT8-NPBG3, WJT40-NPBG1/NPBG2, WJT46- NPBG1 op. 1, CMT-1BRIN-NPC4B. D. Trichocoleus desertorum WJT55-NPBG8. E. Trichocoleus badius op. 2. F. Trichocoleus badius op. 1. G. Trichocoleus sp. TAA2-1HA2.30. H. Trichocoleus desertorum ATA2-1-CV2/CV7. I. Leptolyngbya Zehnder 1965/U140.
FIGURE 6. Pseudoepicoccum cocos. a in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 6. Pseudoepicoccum cocos. a. Colonies on leaf spots. b. Culture on MEA. c. Sporodochia. d. Conidia.
FIGURE 5. Cancellidium applanatum. a in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 5. Cancellidium applanatum. a. Colony on host. b. Culture on MEA. c–e Conidia. f. Chains of monilioid cells.
FIGURE 4. Bahusandhika indica. a in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 4. Bahusandhika indica. a. Colony on host. b. Culture on MEA. c–d. Conidial chains with conidiogenous cells.
FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 3. Maximum likelihood tree of Pseudoepicoccum cocos and related taxa based on combined analysis of ITS and LSU sequences. Species described in this study is in bold.
FIGURE 2 in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood tree of Cancellidium applanatum and related taxa based on combined analysis of ITS and LSU sequences. Species described in this study is in bold.
FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic placement of Bahusandhika, Cancellidium and Pseudoepicoccum (asexual Ascomycota)
FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood tree of Bahusandhika indica and related taxa based on combined analysis of ITS and LSU sequences. Species described in this study is in bold.
FIGURE 3 in A multiple gene genealogy reveals phylogenetic placement of Rhopalostroma lekae
FIGURE 3. Rhopalostroma lekae in OA after 2 weeks (MFLUCC 13-0123). A: Averse showing melanized pigments and central mycelia. B: Reverse side of culture. C: Development of stromatal primordia in the culture. D: Melanized mycelia at the centre. E–G: Conidiophores from simple to more complex structure. H–J: Development of conidia and conidiogenesis cells. K: Conidia. Bars: c–d 1mm; e–k 50 µm.
FIGURE 2 in A multiple gene genealogy reveals phylogenetic placement of Rhopalostroma lekae
FIGURE 2. Rhopalostroma lekae (MFLU 13-0440). A: Habit on bark. B: Separated mature stromata. C: Stromata with dark purplish pigments in head part. D: Longitudinal section of stroma showing perithecial alignment in the periphery of stroma. E: Cross section of the stroma (head) showing perithecia. F and G: Mature ascus in water. H: Ascus in Melzer's reagent, Note the lack of an apical apparatus. I: KOH extractable pigments of stroma (left-head, right–stipe). J–l: Mature ascospores in water. Bars: a–b 5 mm; c–d 1 mm; e 2 mm; f–l 10 µm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.