Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 16–19 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 16–19. Bruchidius grandemaculatus (male): 16—median lobe (ventral view); 17—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius haladai: 18—median lobe (ventral view); 19—lateral lobes (ventral view).

FIGURES 13–15 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 13–15. Bruchidius glomeratus (male): 13—median lobe (ventral view); 14—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius basilewskyi (male, paratype, MNHN): 15—median lobe (ventral view).

FIGURES 20–24 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 20–24. Bruchidius ishwaensis (male): 20—median lobe (ventral view); 21—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius ishwaensis (female): 22—spermatheca (lateral view); Bruchidius tanaensis (male): 23—median lobe (ventral view); 24—lateral lobes (ventral view).

FIGURES 1–4 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 1–4. Bruchidius albosparsus (male): 1—median lobe (ventral view); 2—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius aurivillii (male): 3—median lobe with internal sac evaginated (lateral view); 4—sclerites of the internal sac (ventral view).

FIGURE 27 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURE 27. Results of molecular phylogenetic analyses. On the left side the best-fit maximum likelihood (ML) tree is figured. Support values are only provided for nodes leading to species (BV <50% are not figured). On the right side the majority-rule consensus topology from Bayesian inference (BI) analyses is figured. Support values are only provided for nodes leading to species (PP <50% are not figured). Representatives of the Bruchidius albosparsus species group are highlighted using a red frame.

FIGURES 9–12 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 9–12. Bruchidius nongoniermai (male): 9—median lobe (ventral view); 10—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius gerrardiicola (male): 11—median lobe (ventral view); 12—lateral lobes (ventral view).

FIGURES 25–26 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 25–26. Bruchidius uberatus (male): 25—median lobe (ventral view); 26—lateral lobes (ventral view).

FIGURES 5–8 in Molecular phylogenetics, systematics and host-plant associations of the Bruchidius albosparsus (Fåhraeus) species group (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae) with the description of four new species

FIGURES 5–8. Bruchidius elnairensis (male): 5—median lobe (ventral view); 6—lateral lobes (ventral view); Bruchidius eminingensis (male): 7—median lobe (ventral view); 8—lateral lobes (ventral view).

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic reconstruction for 33 in Revision of the genus Devadatta Kirby, 1890 in Borneo based on molecular and morphological methods, with descriptions of four new species (Odonata: Zygoptera: Devadattidae)

FIGURE 6. Phylogenetic reconstruction for 33 specimens of Devadatta and one outgroup taxon from the combined COI+16S+ITS+28S data, using Bayesian Inference analysis. Posterior probability values are shown (as percentages) if less than 100%. RMNH collection codes are shown for each specimen, with the RMNH.INS. prefix omitted for clarity.

FIGURE 4 in A molecular phylogenetic study on South Korean Tettigonia species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) using five genetic loci: The possibility of multiple allopatric speciation

FIGURE 4. Inter- (gray) and intraspecific (open) genetic differences in Tettigonia species for CO1 calculated using the pdistance method and treatment of pairwise deletion for gaps with the range of genetic difference within clusters. The box plot displays the median (internal transverse thick line) and interquartile range (box). Short lines indicate maximum and minimum genetic differences. Asterisk denotes a sequence from NCBI; T. viridissima, JN609414–JN609420; T. hispania, EF515121; T. chinensis, HQ609468–HQ609470. (JJ-TU = Jeju Island population of T. ussuriana; JS-TU = Jeongseon population of T. ussuriana; PC-TU = Pyeongchang population of T. ussuriana; MJ-TU = Muju population of T. ussuriana; MG-TU = Mungyeong population of T. ussuriana)

FIGURE 3 in A molecular phylogenetic study on South Korean Tettigonia species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) using five genetic loci: The possibility of multiple allopatric speciation

FIGURE 3. Neighbor-joining tree inferred from the concatenated dataset of all five genetic loci: CO1, CO2, ND1, TA1, and ITS2. Neighbor-joining (left) and parsimony (right) bootstrap values are indicated above internodes; Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown below internodes.

FIGURE 2 in A molecular phylogenetic study on South Korean Tettigonia species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) using five genetic loci: The possibility of multiple allopatric speciation

FIGURE 2. Neighbor-joining (A), parsimony (B), and Bayesian inference (C) trees inferred from the combined dataset of three mtDNA loci (CO1 + CO2 + ND1). Numbers next to nodes are bootstrap or posterior probability values.

FIGURE 1 in A molecular phylogenetic study on South Korean Tettigonia species (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) using five genetic loci: The possibility of multiple allopatric speciation

FIGURE 1. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree of each mtDNA gene analysis: (A) CO1, (B) CO2, (C) ND1. Numbers next to nodes are bootstrap values. Numbers on arrows are genetic differences between two clusters.

FIGURE 2 in The Yellow-green Bush-tanager is neither a bush-tanager nor a sparrow: Molecular phylogenetics reveals that Chlorospingus flavovirens is a tanager (Aves: Passeriformes; Thraupidae)

FIGURE 2. Maximum clade credibility trees reconstructed in BEAST for the core tanagers (Thraupinae) based on ND2 (A) and Cyt b (B) genes. While the ND2 topology indicates that Chlorospingus flavovirens is closely related to Bangsia arcaei, the Cyt b topology points to C. flavovirens as sister to all Bangsia species, although this relationship is weakly supported. For each node, the posterior probability from the BEAST analysis is given above the branch leading to that node, and the maximum likelihood value from the RAxML analysis is given below the branch. Nodes that lacked bootstrap support based on 1000 maximum-likelihood replicates are indicated by ''–''. Numbers in front on taxon names correspond to sample ID (see Supplementary file).

FIGURE 3 in The Yellow-green Bush-tanager is neither a bush-tanager nor a sparrow: Molecular phylogenetics reveals that Chlorospingus flavovirens is a tanager (Aves: Passeriformes; Thraupidae)

FIGURE 3. Maximum clade credibility tree reconstructed in BEAST for the Core Tanagers (Thraupinae) based on concatenated ND2 and Cyt b sequences. The phylogeny indicates that Chlorospingus flavovirens is nested within a clade of Bangsia species, and most closely related to Bangsia arcaei. For each node, the posterior probability from the BEAST analysis is given above the branch leading to that node, and the maximum likelihood value from the RAxML analysis is given below the branch. Nodes that lacked bootstrap support based on 1000 maximum-likelihood replicates are indicated by ''–''. Illustrations are from C. flavovirens and Bangsia species (courtesy of Lynx Edicions; Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol. 16, 2011). Numbers in front on taxon names correspond to sample ID (see Supplementary file).

FIGURE 1 in The Yellow-green Bush-tanager is neither a bush-tanager nor a sparrow: Molecular phylogenetics reveals that Chlorospingus flavovirens is a tanager (Aves: Passeriformes; Thraupidae)

FIGURE 1. Maximum clade credibility tree reconstructed in BEAST showing relationships of Chlorospingus flavovirens and representatives of six families of nine-primaried oscines, based on ATPase 6 & 8 genes. The phylogeny indicates that Chlorospingus flavovirens is more closely related to tanagers (Thraupidae) than to other Chlorospingus species (Emberizidae). For each node, the posterior probability from the BEAST analysis is given above the branch leading to that node, and the maximum likelihood value from the RAxML analysis is given below the branch. Nodes that lacked bootstrap support based on 1000 maximum-likelihood replicates are indicated by ''–''. Illustrations are from C. flavovirens and some selected Chlorospingus species (courtesy of Lynx Edicions; Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 16, 2011). Numbers in front on taxon names correspond to sample ID (see Supplementary file).

FIGURE 2 in Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) based on Hexamerin Sequences

FIGURE 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree resulting from analysis of thirty-four the hexamerins sequences in insects. Next to nodes are bootstrap values. The outgroup species of proteins as follows: AmeHex70c: Apis mellifera, XM-392869; CfeHex2: Camponotus festinatus, AJ251271; BheHex: Bracon hebetor, I25974; AmeHex70b: Apis mellifera, AY601637; CfrHx1: Campodea fragilis, JX867269; CfrHx2: Campodea fragilis, JX867270; CspHex1: Campodea sp., CAX63173.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) based on Hexamerin Sequences

FIGURE 1. Multiple alignment of Orthoptera hexamerin sequences. Putative hexamerins from L. migratoria (LmiHx2), R. microptera (RmiHx2), A. cinerea (AciHx2), C. italicus (CitHx2), M. wardi (MwaHx2), O. tibetanus (OtiHx2), C. versicolor (CveHx2), A. sinensis (AsiHx2), C. brunneus (CbrHx2), H. brunneriana (HbrHx1 and HbrHx2), X. japonicus (XjaHx1,2,4,5), P. soochowensis (PsoHx2), P. teretrirsostris (PteHx2), T. subulata (TsuHx1,2,5), Gryllotalpa sp. (GspHx1 and GspHx2), T. commodus (TcoHx1 and TcoHx2) and Ceuthophilus sp. (CespHx2 and CespHx3) were compared. The copper-binding histidines are shaded in gray; other strictly conserved residues are shaded in blue, Putative signal peptides are underlined.

FIGURE 3 in Molecular Phylogenetic Analysis of the Orthoptera (Arthropoda, Insecta) based on Hexamerin Sequences

FIGURE 3. Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree resulting from analysis of thirty-four the hexamerins sequences in insects. Next to nodes are bootstrap values.

FIGURE 3. A in A new species of Mud Snake (Serpentes, Homalopsidae, Gyiophis Murphy & Voris, 2014) from Myanmar with a first molecular phylogenetic assessment of the genus

FIGURE 3. A: Holotype of Gyiophis salweenensis sp. nov. in life. B: Venter of the holotype of Gyiophis salweenensis sp. nov. C: Pattern on the dorsum of the holotype of Gyiophis salweenensis sp. nov. Photographs by Evan Quah.