Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Molecular phylogenetics and species-level systematics of Baylisascaris

Fig. 1. Bayesian consensus tree based on combined FULL data (8 genes; not including hars1). Branch lengths are scaled to the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above nodes are Bayesian posterior probabilities, shown when 0.90 and greater.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Molecular phylogenetics and species-level systematics of Baylisascaris

Fig. 3. Bayesian consensus tree based on FULL mitochondrial gene sequences (3 genes). Branch lengths are scaled to the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above nodes represent Bayesian posterior probabilities, shown when 0.90 and greater.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogenetics and species-level systematics of Baylisascaris

Fig. 2. Bayesian consensus tree based on FULL data from nuclear genes (5 genes; not including hars1). Branch lengths are scaled to the expected number of substitutions per site. Numbers above nodes represent Bayesian posterior probabilities, shown when 0.90 and greater.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2015View details →

Fig. 3. Neighborjoining phylogenetic tree constructed from a in Report on 14 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea that belong to the phyla Bacteroidetes and Deinococcus-Thermus

Fig. 3. Neighborjoining phylogenetic tree constructed from a comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between the strains isolated in this study and their relatives of the class Bacteroidetes. Numbers at nodes are levels of bootstrap support for branch points, based on 1,000 resampling; values are shown only if greater than 70%. Filled circles at nodes indicate that the corresponding nodes were also recovered using maximumlikelihood algorithm. Bar, 5% sequence divergence.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2015View details →

Fig. 2. Neighborjoining phylogenetic tree constructed from a in Report on 14 unrecorded bacterial species in Korea that belong to the phyla Bacteroidetes and Deinococcus-Thermus

Fig. 2. Neighborjoining phylogenetic tree constructed from a comparative analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships between the strains isolated in this study and their relatives of the class DeinococcusThermus. Numbers at nodes are levels of bootstrap support for branch points, based on 1,000 resampling; values are shown only if greater than 70%. Filled circles at nodes indicate that the corresponding nodes were also recovered using maximumlikelihood algorithm. Bar, 2% sequence divergence.

Fig. 3. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from a in Isolation and characterization of two unrecorded yeast species in the phylum Basidiomycota

Fig. 3. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from a comparative analysis of 26S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships of strain DJ1-5-B-10C with closely related species. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown at the branch nodes. Bar, 0.02 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Fig. 2. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from a in Isolation and characterization of two unrecorded yeast species in the phylum Basidiomycota

Fig. 2. A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree constructed from a comparative analysis of 26S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationships of strain B2UV-201 with closely related species. Bootstrap values (>70%) are shown at the branch nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Fig. 3. A Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree reconstructed from a in Isolation and characterization of two unrecorded yeast species in the order Filobasidiales

Fig. 3. A Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree reconstructed from a comparative analysis of 26S rRNA gene sequences showing the rela- tionships of strain PG1-1-10C with closely related species. Bootstrap values (>70%) based on neighbor-joining methods are shown at the branch nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Fig. 2. A Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree reconstructed from a in Isolation and characterization of two unrecorded yeast species in the order Filobasidiales

Fig. 2. A Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree reconstructed from a comparative analysis of 26S rRNA gene sequences showing the relation- ships of strains GW1-3 with closely related species. Bootstrap values (>70%) based on neighbor-joining methods are shown at the branch nodes. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position.

Fig. 12 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 12. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., buccal apparatus and the oral cavity armature seen in PCM (paratypes, IZiBB). A. Dorso-ventral projection of the entire buccal apparatus. B–E. Oral cavity armature visible in dorsal (B, D) and ventral (C, E) views in a large and a small specimen, respectively. F–G. Placoid morphology visible in dorsal (F) and ventral (G) views, respectively. Empty indented arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth in the oral cavity, filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth in the oral cavity, whereas empty flat arrowheads indicate central constrictions in first macroplacoids and subterminal constriction in second macroplacoids. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 9 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 9. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., cuticular structures on legs (paratypes, IZiBB). A–B. External granulation on legs III and I seen in PCM (A) and SEM (B), respectively. C–D. A cuticular bulge (pulvinus), granulation and a cuticular fold on the internal surface of leg III seen in PCM (C) and SEM (D). E–F. Granulation on leg IV seen in PCM (E) and SEM (F). Filled indented arrowheads indicate the cuticular bulge, filled flat arrowheads indicate patch of granulation and empty indented arrowheads indicate the cuticular fold under the claws. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 8 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 8. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., habitus. A. Dorso-ventral projection (holotype, Hoyer's medium, PCM, IZiBB IN.030.08). B–C. Cuticular pores on the dorsal part of the body seen in PCM (B: holotype) and in SEM (C: paratype, IZiBB). Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 5 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 5. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., mouth opening and the oral cavity armature seen in SEM (paratype, IZiBB). A. Mouth opening with peribuccal sensory lobes and ten peribuccal lamellae. B–C. The oral cavity armature of a single paratype seen in SEM from different angles, in dorsal (B) and ventral (C) views, respectively. Empty flat arrowheads indicate the first band of teeth in the oral cavity, empty indented arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth in the oral cavity, filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth in the oral cavity. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 2 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 2. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., cuticular structures on legs (paratypes, IZiBB). A–B. External granulation on legs II and III seen in PCM (A) and SEM (B), respectively. C–D. A cuticular bulge (pulvinus) and a faint cuticular fold, covered by granulation, on the internal surface of legs I and III seen in PCM (C) and SEM (D), respectively. E–F. Granulation on leg IV seen in PCM (E) and SEM (F). Filled indented arrowheads indicate the cuticular bulge and empty indented arrowheads indicate the faint cuticular fold under the claws. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 13 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 13. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., mouth opening and the oral cavity armature seen in SEM (paratype, IZiBB). A. Mouth opening with peribuccal sensory lobes and ten peribuccal lamellae. B–C. The oral cavity armature of a single paratype seen in SEM from different angles, in dorsal (B) and ventral (C) views, respectively. Empty flat arrowheads indicate the first band of teeth in the oral cavity, empty indented arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth in the oral cavity and filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth in the oral cavity. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 11 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 11. Macrobiotus kamilae sp. nov., claws. A–B. Claws III and IV seen in PCM, with smooth and dentate lunules, respectively (holotype, IZiBB IN.030.08). C–D. Claws III and IV seen in SEM, with smooth and dentate lunules, respectively (paratype, IZiBB). Filled indented arrowheads indicate double muscle attachments under the claws whereas empty indented arrowhead indicates the horseshoe structure connecting the anterior and the posterior claw. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 6 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 6. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov. A–E. Egg, seen in PCM (IZiBB). A. Midsection under 400 × magnification. B. Surface under 400× magnification. C–D. Midsection under 1000 × magnification. E. Surface and terminal discs under 1000× magnification. F. Testis seen in PCM, with visible spermatozoa in male freshly mounted in Hoyer's medium (paratype, IZiBB). Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 4 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 4. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., buccal apparatus and the oral cavity armature seen in PCM (paratypes, IZiBB). A. Dorso-ventral projection of the entire buccal apparatus. B–C. Oral cavity armature visible in dorsal (B) and ventral (C) views, respectively. D–E. Placoid morphology visible in dorsal (D) and ventral (E) views, respectively. Empty indented arrowheads indicate the second band of teeth in the oral cavity, filled indented arrowheads indicate the third band of teeth in the oral cavity, empty flat arrowheads indicate central constrictions in first macroplacoids and subterminal constriction in second macroplacoids. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 3 in Two new species of the Macrobiotus hufelandi complex (Tardigrada: Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Australia and India, with notes on their phylogenetic position

Fig. 3. Macrobiotus noongaris sp. nov., claws (paratypes, IZiBB). A–B. Claws II and IV seen in PCM, with smooth and dentate lunules, respectively. C–D. Claws I and IV seen in SEM, with smooth and dentate lunules, respectively. Filled indented arrowheads indicate double muscle attachments under the claws. Scale bars in μm.