Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,118
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
3,118 results for “resources”
ORKG overview resources
<p>The DILS2018 use-case dataset, collected via subject matter experts to represent DILS 2018 papers as a machine readable graph model. The data is presented as a tabular format for ease of use and import.</p>
Wikidata's linked data for cultural heritage digital resources: an evaluation based on the Europeana Data Model
<p>Wikidata is an open data source with many potential applications. Our study aims to evaluate the usability of Wikidata as a linked data source for acquiring richer descriptions of digital objects within the context of Europeana, a data aggregator from the cultural heritage domain. Specifically, we aim to crawl and convert Wikidata using the standard approaches and operations developed for the (Semantic) Web of Data, i.e. using technologies like linked data consumption and RDF(S)/OWL ontology expression and reasoning. We also seek to re-use existing “semantic” specifications, such as conversions to and from generic data models like Schema.org and SKOS. We have developed an experimental set-up and accompanying software to test the feasibility of this approach. We conclude that Wikidata’s linked data is able to express an interesting level of semantics for cultural heritage, but quality can still be improved and a human operator still must assist linked data applications to interpret Wikidata’s RDF.</p>
A Galaxy-based training resource for single-cell RNA-seq quality control and analyses
<p>This is the tutorial data for the 'Single-cell quality control with scater' tutorial on the Galaxy Training Network. The data is the same dataset that is used as the inbuilt example dataset within scater, but has been implemented as individual files.</p>
Dataset _ Bombus pauloensis telemetry: Spatio-temporal use of the environment and floral resources.
<p>These data includes the GPS points collected from the tracked bees (<em>Bombus pauloensis</em> queens) that were used in the analysis of the home ranges and kernal density, data were usesd in the the MCP and the LUC analysis and pollen collected from the queens.</p>
Fig. 2 in Daily activity of Dichotomius geminatus (Arrow, 1913) and Deltochilum verruciferum Felsche, 1911 (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) facing carrion: from resource perception to feeding
Fig. 2. Numbers of individuals of Deltochilum verruciferum (a) and Dichotomius geminatus (b) that performed some behaviour during the observations. The active and inactive individuals are not necessarily the same during the periods of activity. * From 10:00 to 17:00 no activity was observed for both species.
Figure 5 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 5. Station-wise variation in the 0–500 m column integrated mesozooplankton abundance/density and biomass in the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon.
Figure 6 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 6. Depth-wise variation in the number of zooplankton groups at each station in the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon.
Figure 1 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 1. Map of the sampling site in the Bay of Bengal. Stations CB1 to CB5 are located along the central (88°E) and WB1 to WB4 along the western margin of the bay.
Figure 13 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 13. Multivariate cluster analysis of the data of all 129 copepod species combined from all the stations and depths in the central and western bay using the 30% cut-off level of Bray–Curtis similarity. Cluster/Group I are assemblages mostly from the mixed layer (M) and thermocline (T) from central and western transects. Group II comprises assemblages found between the thermocline and 500 m and Group III includes only a few species found exclusively from 200–300 m depth at stations CB3–CB5.
Figure 4 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 4. Vertical profiles of day (D) and night (N) zooplankton biovolume from multinet tows in the western Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon. ng: negligible biovolume; NO DATA is where the net failed to open/close. *At WB3, medusae (100 mL 100 m–3) and at WB4 salps (200 mL 100 m–3) were observed at the surface during the day.
Figure 9 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 9. Vertical distribution of abundance (log number 100 m–3) of the major copepod species in the central Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon.
Figure 3 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 3. Vertical profiles of day (D) and night (N) zooplankton biovolume from multinet tows in the central Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon. ng: Negligible biovolume; NO DATA is where the net failed to open/close. *Swarms of medusae were observed at CB3 (their biovolume 90 mL 100 m–3) and CB4 (200 mL 100 m–3) at the surface at night.
Figure 8 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 8. Vertical distribution of the various types (orders) of copepods in the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal during the spring intermonsoon. The percentages at every depth are averages from 5 stations in the central and 4 stations in the western bay. Data are unavailable at 300–500 m in the central bay due to negligible abundance.
Figure 12 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 12. Variation in multivariate dispersion (MVDISP) indices between different depth strata (9 stations data combined) and between the central and western transects in the Bay of Bengal.
Figure 11 in Spatial structuring of zooplankton communities through partitioning of habitat and resources in the Bay of Bengal during spring intermonsoon
Figure 11. Variation in Shannon diversity (H'), species richness (d), and evenness (J') of copepods in different depth strata in the upper 500 m of the central (a) and western (b) Bay of Bengal.
Figure 6 in The morphometric and erythrometric analyses of Pelophylax ridibundus living in anthropogenic pollution resources
Figure 6. Other erythrocytic abnormalities: A- IE; immature erythrocyte (arrow), B- ME; mitotic erythrocyte (arrow), C- EE; enucleated erythrocyte (arrow), D- PE; picnotic erythrocyte (arrow), Giemsa.
Figure 4 in The morphometric and erythrometric analyses of Pelophylax ridibundus living in anthropogenic pollution resources
Figure 4. Erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities (2. and 3. stations). A- Bud nucleus (arrow), B- Blebbed nuclei (arrows), C- Kidney shaped nuclei (arrows), D- Binucleated erythrocyte (arrow). Giemsa.
Figure 5 in The morphometric and erythrometric analyses of Pelophylax ridibundus living in anthropogenic pollution resources
Figure 5. Cellular abnormalities of P. ridibundus (3. Station) A- Vacuolized erythrocytes (arrows), B- Erythrocytes with distorted elliptical shape (arrows). Giemsa.
Figure 3 in The morphometric and erythrometric analyses of Pelophylax ridibundus living in anthropogenic pollution resources
Figure 3. The erythrocytes of P. ridibundus. A- Normal erythrocyte (arrow) (1. station), B–D- Erythrocytic nuclear abnormalities (2. and 3. stations); B- Micronucleus (arrow), C- Lobed nucleus (arrow), D- Notched nuclei (arrows). Giemsa.
Figure 2. A in The morphometric and erythrometric analyses of Pelophylax ridibundus living in anthropogenic pollution resources
Figure 2. A- Normal symmetry of the frogs, symmetry line (arrow), (1. station). B- Abnormal symmetry of the frogs, radioulna spot (a), dorsal spots (b), femur spots (c), and tibia spot (d) asymmetries, (2. station). C- Abnormal symmetry of the frogs, femur spot (a), dorsal spots (b), and tarsus spot (c) asymmetries, (3. station). D- Asymmetry in the frog's dorsal midline (arrow) (3. station). SVL: 6,2 cm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.