Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
407
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
407 results for “riparian”
Figure 4 from: Busmachiu G, Kováč Ľ, Dana M, Weiner WM (2017) Riparian Collembola (Hexapoda) communities of northern Moldova, Eastern Europe. ZooKeys 724: 119-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.12478
Figure 4 Box-plot diagram of Collembola specimens' number (a) and species richness (b) in riparian habitats of the Prut River. For abbreviations see Materials and methods.
Figure 5 from: Busmachiu G, Kováč Ľ, Dana M, Weiner WM (2017) Riparian Collembola (Hexapoda) communities of northern Moldova, Eastern Europe. ZooKeys 724: 119-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.12478
Figure 5 NMS ordination of Collembola species in riparian habitats of the Prut River from June–July 2013 and 2014, species with dominance ≥ 1% included. Colour circles and triangles represent localities and habitats, for abbreviations see Materials and methods, black dots represent species, for species abbreviations see Table 2. Variance explained by the first two axes was 38% and 34%, respectively.
Figure 1 from: Busmachiu G, Kováč Ľ, Dana M, Weiner WM (2017) Riparian Collembola (Hexapoda) communities of northern Moldova, Eastern Europe. ZooKeys 724: 119-134. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.724.12478
Figure 1 Location of the riparian habitats (colour: light green - upper catchment area of the Prut River, dark green - part of the Dniester (Nistru) River catchment area; the border between Romania and Moldova is represented by the Prut River).
FIGURE 6 in A distinct new species of riparian rock-dwelling gecko (genus: Hemidactylus) from the southern Western Ghats
FIGURE 6. Live individual (uncollected) of H. paaragowli sp. nov. A) dorsal and B) lateral views.
FIGURE 5 in A distinct new species of riparian rock-dwelling gecko (genus: Hemidactylus) from the southern Western Ghats
FIGURE 5. Habitat at the type locality of H. paaragowli sp. nov., Agastyamalai Hills, Kerala.
FIGURE 1 in A distinct new species of riparian rock-dwelling gecko (genus: Hemidactylus) from the southern Western Ghats
FIGURE 1. Full dorsal view of the holotype of Hemidactylus paaragowli sp. nov., CESL 718.
Fig 7 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 7 Cross section of a floodplain ecosystem in relation to diversity of Orthoptera and anthropogenic modification of the landscape.
Fig 2 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 2 The number of identified cricket (Gryllidae) species in a riparian paddy field near Mount Fuji at differing distances from a levee (after Ichihara et al. 2014b).
Fig 3 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 3 Arakawa super levee in Tokyo. Grassland is left uncut to produce a mosaic of habitats for Orthoptera. Photo by T. Gardiner.
Fig 5 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 5 Concrete paddy levee and field along the Tama River (Fussa) providing minimal habitat for Orthoptera. Photo by T. Gardiner.
Fig 6 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 6 Gravel floodplain along the Tama River, early successional habitat for the endangered Eusphingonotusjaponicus grasshopper and Asterkantoensis. Photo by T. Gardiner.
Fig 4 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 4 Flat terrace on the riverside slope of a flood defense embankment at Kasai Rinkai Park at the mouth of the Edogawa River in Tokyo Bay. The terrace is accumulating vegetation, including Astertripolium, a rare and declining species in the Bay. Photo by T. Gardiner.
Fig 1 from: Gardiner T, Kuramoto N, Matsuba M (2019) Big in Japan: The importance of riparian corridors for Orthoptera. Journal of Orthoptera Research 28(1): 27-35. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.28.31380
Fig 1 Grassland buffering the shoreline on Fukuura Island in Matsushima Bay, acting as a natural flood defense. Grasshoppers (Oxya spp.) were numerous in this coastal corridor. Photo by T. Gardiner.
Riparian_Invertebrate_Movement_Data_SAFE
<b>Description: </b><p>Mark-Release-Recapture data for moths and dung beetles in riparian reserves within the SAFE project landscape. Data was collected as part of the Land use Options of Maintaining BiOdiversity and eKosystem functions project (LOMBOK) as part of the Human Modified Tropical Forests Programme (HMTF).</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/154"><b>Dynamics and dispersal of forest insects in riparian buffer strips within oil palm-dominated landscapes</b></a></p><p><b>Funding: </b>These data were collected as part of research funded by: </p><ul><li>Natural Environment Research Council (Grant, NE/K016261/1 , <a href="NA">NA</a>)</li></ul><p>This dataset is released under the CC-BY 4.0 licence, requiring that you cite the dataset in any outputs, but has the additional condition that you acknowledge the contribution of these funders in any outputs.</p><p></p><p><b>Permits: </b>These data were collected under permit from the following authorities:</p><ul><li>Sabah Biodiversity Council (Research licence JKM/MBS.1000-2/2 JLD.3(159))</li></ul><p></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3475406">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: Riparian_Invertebrate_Movement_Data_SAFE.xlsx</p><p><b>Riparian_Invertebrate_Movement_Data_SAFE.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 2 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Moth movement data</b> (described in worksheet Moth_Movement)</p><p>Description: Mark-Release-Recapture data for moths within riparian reserves in the SAFE project landscape.</p><p>Number of fields: 13</p><p>Number of data rows: 381</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>Location</b>: Trap name individual was recaptured in. (Field type: location)</li><li><b>Site</b>: Riparian reserve where the trapping took place. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Taxa</b>: Taxomomic name (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>Sex</b>: Sex of individual (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Habitat</b>: Habitat type. Riparian = riparian forest, Forest = continuous forest, Oil Palm = oil palm surrounding riparian reserve (Field type: ordered categorical)</li><li><b>Trap</b>: Trap Identification (Field type: id)</li><li><b>Distance</b>: Distance from release point in meters including a direction represented by positive and negative values. Negative is towards continuous forest and positive is away. (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Absolute_Distance</b>: Exact distance in meters from the release point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Habitat_Change</b>: Whether the movement from the release point to recapture included a habitat type change (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Orientation</b>: Orientation of movement from the release point. F = Towards continuous forest, R = Towards or along riparian forest, OP = Towards continuous oil palm plantation (Field type: ordered categorical)</li><li><b>Number_of_Days</b>: Number of days from release at release point to recapture (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Frequency</b>: Recaptue frequency (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Rate</b>: Recapture frequency divided by the number of days (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Dung beetle movement data</b> (described in worksheet Dung_Beetle_Movement)</p><p>Description: Mark-Release-Recapture data for dung beetles within riparian reserves in the SAFE project landscape.</p><p>Number of fields: 19</p><p>Number of data rows: 428</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>Location</b>: Trap name individual was recaptured in. (Field type: location)</li><li><b>Site</b>: Riparian reserve where the trapping took place. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Species</b>: Species or species complex (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>Before_Habitat</b>: Habitat dung beetle was original captured and marked in. (Field type: ordered categorical)</li><li><b>After_Habitat</b>: Habitat dung beetle was recaptured in. (Field type: ordered categorical)</li><li><b>Before_Trap</b>: Trap dung beetle was original captured and marked in. (Field type: id)</li><li><b>After_Trap</b>: Trap dung beetle was recaptured in. (Field type: id)</li><li><b>Distance</b>: Distance in meters between the trap the dung beetle was caught/marked in and the trap the dung beetle was recaptured in. (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Towards_Forest</b>: Whether the movment was towards continous forest of not. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Number_of Days</b>: Number of days between releasing the dung beetle and recapturing it again. (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Frequency</b>: Recapture frequency. Each line represents one recapture. (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Movement_Category</b>: Movement category. Movement from habitat to habitat. F = Continuous forest, R = Riparian reserve forest, OP = Oil palm plantation (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Movement_Type</b>: Whether the movement from capture to recapture was within or between habitats. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Orientation</b>: Orientation or peference of directional movement (which habitat moved towards). F = Continuous forest, R = Riparian reserve forest, OP = Oil palm plantation (Field type: ordered categorical)</li><li><b>Sex</b>: Sex of dung beetle. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Burial_Mode</b>: Burial mode used by the dung beetle. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Temporal_Activity</b>: Temporal activity of the dung beetle. (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Body_Area</b>: Body area of the dung beetle, calculated by multiplying the body length of the beetle by the width of the thorax. Data provided by Elizabeth Raine. (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Wing_Loading</b>: Wing loading of dung beetle, calculated by dividing the wing area (mm2) by the body area (mm2). Data provided by Jonathan Parrett. (Field type: numeric)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2016-11-01 to 2017-04-30</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.6000 to 4.7000</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>117.5160 to 117.5400</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Arthropoda <br> -  -  -  Insecta <br> -  -  -  -  Coleoptera <br> -  -  -  -  -  Scarabaeidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Catharsius</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Proagoderus watanebei</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Onthophagus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Onthophagus mulleri</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Onthophagus obscurior</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paragymnopleurus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Paragymnopleurus sparsus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sisyphus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Sisyphus thoracicus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  Lepidoptera <br> -  -  -  -  -  Noctuidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Ischyja</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Erebus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Erebus caprimulgus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Erebus gemmans</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Erebus ephesperis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Erebidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hypoprya</i> <br></div><p></p>
Investigating the effects of retaining riparian forest buffer zones of differing width on stream channel geomorphology
<b>Description: </b><p>To monitor temporal stream shape change over a gradient of RBZ widths, channel cross section measurements were continued at preestablished points that have been present since 2011. The points are marked with 0.4-metre-long PVC pipes that are spray painted yellow for easier identification and surrounding bedrock or roots are also marked at the exact location of the pipes in case a pipe should be eroded away in future. Channel cross sections were calculated using a standardised method. Cross- sectional area (CSA) measurement was repeated for every pre-established cross section point along the stream. These were located 250 m apart and numbered 4- 10, depending on the accessibility of the trails upstream. The stream with a '0 metre' buffer, for instance, had only four measurement points due to a steep waterfall which could not be passed. The CSA of these stream points were re-measured on a yearly basis in 2011 - 2014, 2018 and 2019.</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/210"><b>Investigating the effects of retaining riparian forest buffer zones of differing width on stream channel geomorphology. </b></a></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3476390">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: Template_cross_sections.xlsx</p><p><b>Template_cross_sections.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 1 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Stream cross section measurements</b> (described in worksheet CrossSections)</p><p>Description: Cross section measurements</p><p>Number of fields: 7</p><p>Number of data rows: 8377</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>Identity</b>: Original site label in field data (Field type: id)</li><li><b>Stream</b>: Stream transect (Field type: location)</li><li><b>Site</b>: Location of stream cross section (Field type: location)</li><li><b>DistanceAcross</b>: Distance across the stream at which the measurement was taken (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Height</b>: Stream depth (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>BaseMaterial</b>: Ground cover at the measurement point (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>Date</b>: Date cross section was measured (Field type: date)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2011-01-12 to 2019-03-30</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.6314 to 4.7345</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>117.4554 to 117.6414</p>
Figure 6 in Eurhopalothrix oxente sp. nov. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), a new riparian species of São Francisco River, northeastern Brazil
Figure 6. Comparison of the mesosoma of some Eurhopalothrix. A. Eurhopalothrix aff. bruchi. B. Eurhopalothrix bruchi (syntype). The red arrow indicates the sub-rectangular lamella on the posterior surface of the propodeum. / Figura 6. Comparación del mesosoma de algunos Eurhopalothrix. A. Eurhopalothrix aff. bruchi. B. Eurhopalothrix bruchi (sintipo). La flecha roja indica la lamela subrectangular en la superficie posterior del propodio.
Figure 1 in Importance of riparian vegetation and wood-pastures in the maintenance of bat assemblages in a highly fragmented landscape in Veracruz, Mexico
Figure 1: Location of the study site on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico.
Data from: Effects of riparian forest harvest on streams: a meta-analysis
1. Riparian forest harvesting impacts streams in many ways, from altering temperature regimes, shifting geomorphic structure, increasing sediment fluxes and affecting fish populations. However, we have noted considerable variation in the results between studies that led us to ask whether the effects of forest harvesting on streams were consistent between studies. We used meta-analysis of 34 replicated studies to address the effects of riparian logging on biological and chemical components of streams in contrast to control sites. 2. We found that the overall effect sizes of several response variables in replicated studies were significantly higher than zero, especially benthic invertebrates, and nitrogen and potassium concentrations. However, there was a very large amount of variation in the effect sizes between studies, and for many measures, the effect sizes from different studies were positive or negative, indicating site-specific responses. 3. We explored whether stream size, stream gradient and regional potential evapotranspiration could explain some of the effect size variation between studies. Relations with these environmental variables were weak, but suggestive that some of the context-specific, individual outcomes might be due to underlying environmental differences between sites. 4. Synthesis and applications. Despite relatively low numbers of replicated studies, we found significant overall effects of riparian forest harvesting although the magnitude and direction of responses within individual studies were site specific. This lack of consistency in the direction of effect sizes suggests we need a more context-dependent approach to the protection of freshwaters from forest management.
Avian point count data from riparian corridors of protected areas in Marin County California
<p>The data set is a simplified version of avian point count data collected in Marin County, CA, USA between 1997 and 2019. Point count surveys (5 minutes) were conducted twice during the breeding season (May and June) along transects in riparian corridors within protected areas (Point Reyes National Seashore, Golden Gate National Recreation Area, Mount Tamalpais State Park, and Bolinas Lagoon Open Space Preserve). Data were collected by Point Blue Conservation Science biologists and were integrated into the National Park Service Inventory and Monitoring Program. All individuals detected at any distance were recorded during the surveys, but this simplified data set only includes the observations analyzed for this publication, specifically detections (aurally and visually) within 50 meters of each point count station for each of the fourteen species selected for analysis.</p>
Fig. 1 in A new riparian Andean Potamites (Reptilia, Squamata, Gymnophtalmidae) from El Sira Mountains, central Peru, with comments on P. ecpleopus Cope 1875, and on the taxonomy and biogeography of Potamites
Fig. 1. Map showing the type locality of Potamites hydroimperator sp. nov. (red star), and the potential geographic distribution of P. ecpleopus Cope, 1875: Balsapuerto, Moyobamba, and Rioja, proposed by Uzzell (1966) adding Pongo de Caynarachi and Cerros de Kampankis as potential localities suggested herein.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.