Find research datasets worth reusing

FIG. 5 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 5. — Channe (comber). The one depicted is Serranus scriba (Linnaeus, 1758), the painted comber. Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).

FIG. 2. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 2. — A sparulus (Diplodus annularis (Linnaeus, 1758)), with its "shining golden nape" (Ovid). Photo credit: Waelbi (CC BY-SA 3.0).

FIG. 1 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 1. – Lat. gladius (above) with a detail of the bill (below), i.e. the "referential constraint" encoded in the descriptive name (lit. "sword"). Engraving from Salviani (1554: pl. 39).

FIG. 9. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 9. — A Roman lacertus (in the foreground). The one depicted is a Scomber sp. (Atlantic mackerel). Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).

FIG. 14 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 14. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of aquatic turtles (mus2, testudo). Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources; […], not in the checklist inasmuch as non-aquatic. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.

FIG. 17 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 17. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of cete/beluae marinae (lit. "marine beasts"), which comprises various marine animals. Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; LF, life-form; FG, folk-generic. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.

FIG. 13. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 13. — A spiny lobster (locusta), with some externally shelled molluscs: A, a mussel (musculus); B, clams (chemae); C, spiny dye murices (murices or purpurae). Fresco from Herculaneum, 1st century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credits: A. Guaspari).

FIG. 16. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 16. — A, European pond turtle Emys orbicularis (Linnaeus, 1758); B, Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1861). Photo credits: Katya, CC BY-SA 2.0 (A); Claudia Lombard, CC BY 2.0 (B).

FIG. 3. — A in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 3. — A sample of those aquatic animals the Romans would have called piscis, i.e. fish, molluscs and crustaceans. Detail from a Roman mosaic from Pompeii, Ist century CE (Museo Archeologico Nazionale, Napoli; photo credit: A. Guasparri).

FIG. 12 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 12. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of cancer2/crustata (i.e., mostly, our crustaceans). Abbreviations: Abbreviations: LF, life-form; LF1+, sublife-form; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: *, prototypical; /, synonymy; (…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources;+ (superscript), multiple ethnotaxonomic ascription due to different statements in the sources. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.

FIG. 4 in The Roman classification and nomenclature of aquatic animals: an annotated checklist (with a focus on ethnobiology)

FIG. 4. — The Roman folk-taxonomy of mollia (i.e. our cephalopods) and other invertebrates (sponges, jellyfish, etc.). Abbreviations: FK, folk kingdom; LF, lifeform; LF1+, sublife-form; INT, intermediate; FG, folk-generic; FS, folk-specific. Symbols: + (superscript), multiple ethnotaxonomic ascription due to different statements in the sources; /, synonymy;(…), ethnotaxonomic ascription only presumed, due to lack of explicit statements in the sources;?, presumed folk taxon. See each entry in Appendix 1 for details.

openmit-licenseFeb 2022View details →

Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base – materials

Supplementary material for the article titled "<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4364-5_48">Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base</a>". Citation If you use this data in research work, please cite this paper: Sowinski, P., Wasielewska-Michniewska, K., Ganzha, M., & Paprzycki, M. (2022). Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base. In Sustainable Technology and Advanced Computing in Electrical Engineering (pp. 673-693). Springer, Singapore. BibTeX: <pre><code>@incollection{sowinski2022topical, title={Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base}, author={Sowinski, Piotr and Wasielewska-Michniewska, Katarzyna and Ganzha, Maria and Paprzycki, Marcin}, booktitle={Sustainable Technology and Advanced Computing in Electrical Engineering}, pages={673--693}, year={2022}, publisher={Springer}, doi={10.1007/978-981-19-4364-5_48} }</code></pre>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →

Supplementary data to The vegetation of Chile and the EcoVeg approach in the context of the International Vegetation Classification project

The rar file contains a map of Macrogroups of Chile in ESRI shapefile format. Macrogroups are hierarchically included in the categories of division and formation of IVC classification. These categories can also be displayed using the table associated with the shapefile. Likewise, Chilean zonal vegetation units of Luebert & Pliscoff (2017) are included, so the crosswalk for generating the map of Macrogroups based on the Chilean zonal vegetation units is fully documented.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →

Dataset - Classification of abrupt changes along viewing profiles of scientific articles

This is the dataset used to run experiments described in "Classification of abrupt changes along viewing profiles of scientific articles" (more info in https://github.com/carolmb/viewing-profiles-of-scientific-articles). Data original from PlosOne papers views.

Fig. 9 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 9. The structure of four species' anuran amphibian's sucker at the first stage of development (view from below).

Fig. 6 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 6. Stages characterizing the beginning of metamorphosis: 23 — resorption of the fin's cloacal piece; 24 — front limbs are seen through the skin.

Fig. 5 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 5. Stages defined according to the development of fingers and hind limb joints: 14 — the leg is in the shape of a shovel; 15 — embryos of two fingers; 16 — embryos of three fingers; 17 — embryos of four fingers; 18 — embryos of five fingers; 19 — embryos of three fingers are segregated; 20 — embryos of five fingers

Fig. 4 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 4. Stages defined according to limb bud's length and diameter correlation: 9–l <1/2d; 10–l ≥ 1/2d; 11–l ≥ 1d; 12– l ≥ 11/2d; 13–l = 2d.

Fig. 3 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 3. Stages of operculum's development: 6 — operculum touches the belly skin or accretes it, gills can be seen from both sides; 7 — operculum completely covers gills from one (right) side; 8 — external gills are completely covered by operculum.

Fig. 1 in Eight Species Of Anuran Amphibians (Amphibia, Anura) Found In Ukraine: Comparative Morphology And Classification Of Larval Development Stages

Fig. 1. Stages of external gills' development: 1 — external gills ridges get separated; 2 — gills branches embryos; 3 — emergence of gills filaments on external gills branches (filaments development may vary; operculum has not started developing yet).