Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 5. Bayesian phylogram, showing the phylogenetic relationships among southern African tetraploid barbs based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches. Allele codes are indicated at terminal branches. NS: Not significant. The Bayesian posterior probability at higher NS node is 53%; at the subsequent node 77%.

Fig. 4 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 4. Scatterplot of anal fin length (% SL) vs SL (mm) of the witvis, sawfin and Clanwilliam yellowfish to show the consistently longer anal fin of the latter. Barbus andrewi: o = holotype; B. capensis: ¢ = holotype, N = specimens; B. serra: Ł = holotype, A = specimens; Labeobarbus seeberi: O = lectotype and paralectotype, O = specimens.

Fig. 3. A in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 3. A. Witvis, Barbus capensis now Cheilobarbus capensis Smith, 1841 (Gilchrist & Thompson 1913: fig. 70; Boulenger 1911: fig. 100). B. Clanwilliam yellowfish, Labeobarbus seeberi (Gilchrist & Thompson 1913: fig. 57; Boulenger 1916: fig. 150). C. Sawfin, Barbus serra now Cheilobarbus serra (Peters, 1864) (Gilchrist & Thompson 1913: fig. 61; Boulenger 1911: fig. 91), to show the overall body form and the form of the last unbranched dorsal-fin ray.

Fig. 2. A. A in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 2. A. A scale of the witvis Cheilobarbus capensis Smith, 1841 (SAIAB 52691) drawn by camera lucida to show the pattern of striae. Scale bar = 1 mm. Arrow indicates anterior (embedded field) to posterior (exposed field) orientation. Primary radii reach from radial centre to scale edge; secondary radii do not reach radial centre. B. Close up of the scales from the right flank of the lectotype of Barbus capensis (NHMUK 1845.7.3.99). Scale bar = 5 cm. Photograph by E. Vreven.

Fig. 1 in The identity of Barbus capensis Smith, 1841 and the generic status of southern African tetraploid cyprinids (Teleostei, Cyprinidae)

Fig. 1. The type (lectotype) of Barbus (Cheilobarbus) capensis Smith, 1841 (NHMUK 1845.7.3.99). Photograph credit: Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →

Data from: Rhizosphere bacterial community composition depends on plant species identity and soil legacy effects

This record contains supplementary information for the article "Rhizosphere bacterial community composition depends on plant diversity legacy in soil and plant species identity". Supplemental Table S1. The table contains the annotation for all the samples sequenced and analyzed. Supplemental Table S2. The table contains all primer sequences used in the study. Supplemental Table S3. The zip-file contains a table with the taxonomic annotation of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) identified in the study. Supplemental Table S4.  The zip-file contains a table with sequence counts of the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) identified in the study. Supplemental Table S5. The workbook contains a sheet with the number of operational taxonomic units (OTUs) exhibiting differential abundance in any of the contrasts tested in this study. Note that “down/up” indicates whether the OTU was less (“down”) or more (“up”) abundant in the first group of the contrast. For example, given the contrast “PH_mix_vs_mon_”, “down” corresponds to higher abundance in the pots from the monoculture plant history. Conversely, “up” refers to higher abundance in the pots from the mixed culture plant history. In addition, the workbook contains one sheet per contrast with the logBaseMean (log2 of the average normalized abundance across all samples), the logFC (log2 of the fold-change), the P-value, and the adjusted P-value (FDR). Only OTUs with a P-value <= 0.05 or an adjusted P-value (FDR) <= 0.1 are given. Supplemental Table S6. The table contains the number of bacterial OTUs annotated with a given bacterial phylum. Supplemental Table S7. The table contains all phyla tested for enrichment/depletion in the set of OTUs with an increased abundance in monoculture and mixed culture soils respectively. “Total counts (all OTUs)” corresponds to the total number of all OTUs annotated with a given phyla (reference set). “Observed” corresponds to the number of OTUs annotated with a given phyla in the set OTUs with increased abundance in monoculture/mixed culture soils (test set). "Expected" gives the number of OTUs which would be expected to be annotated with a given phyla if the test set were randomly sampled from the reference set. Supplemental File S1. The zip-file contains a fasta file with the 10'205 OTU sequences identified in the study.

Spatial partial identity model for spatial capture-recapture analysis of large carnivores in Kasungu National Park, Malawi

Overview: Decline in global carnivore populations has led to increased demand for assessment of carnivore densities in understudied habitats. Spatial capture-recapture is used increasingly to estimate species densities, where individuals are often identified from their unique pelage patterns. However, uncertainty in bilateral individual identification can lead to the omission of capture data and reduce the precision of results. The recent development of the two-flank spatial partial identity model (SPIM), offers a cost-effective approach which can reduce uncertainty in individual identity assignment and provide robust density estimates. We conducted camera trap surveys annually between 2016 and 2018 in Kasungu National Park, Malawi, a primary miombo woodland and a habitat lacking baseline data on carnivore densities. We used SPIM to estimate density for leopard (Panthera pardus) and spotted hyaena (Crocuta crocuta), and report on the status of other large carnivores. Usage notes: These data are to estimate density for leopard and spotted hyaena in KNP, Malawi. They are provided as an example for using the spatial partial identity model for spatial capture-recapture analysis in populations where individuals are partially identified. Methods: Individual leopards and spotted hyaena were identified from photographs using their unique pelage patterns (Henschel & Ray, 2003). A database was maintained of identified individuals, with partial (single flank) or complete (two flank) identities, to build capture histories for SCR analysis. We identified individuals from left flank captures for both species, due to higher numbers of identified left flank individuals recorded during preliminary surveys. Complete identities were added where flanks were certain to come from the same individual (from baited stations outside of survey time, live captures, dual camera trap stations and multiple passes of a single camera trap). Leopards were sexed by visual determination of external genitalia, presence of the dewlap, frontal bossing and overall body size (Henschel & Ray, 2003; Devens et al. 2018). Sexing was not possible for spotted hyaena due to difficulties in determining sex from external genitalia and body size. Capture histories were developed for spatial captures and trap effort, with each day (24 hours) treated as a separate sampling occasion (Goldberg et al. 2015). Trap effort was measured through a binary matrix of active-inactive days, to improve estimates of detection probability, and included the spatial location of each camera location. Density was modelled using the package SPIM (Augustine, 2018) in R v.3.5.2 (R Development Core Team, 2018) to resolve the complete identity of individuals from single-flank samples probabilistically (see Augustine et al. 2018 for complete description of spatial partial identity model), and a Bernoulli observation model fitted, whereby an individual may be captured in each trap only once during each sampling occasion (Royle et al. 2013; Augustine et al. 2018). For Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulations, a single chain of 50,000 iterations per single session analysis was undertaken, with a burn-in of 500 iterations and data augmentation of 100-130 individuals for leopard and 125-250 for spotted hyaena. Analysis was conducted with an increasing buffer width from 10,000 to 25,000 metres (leopard) and 10,000 to 40,000 metres (spotted hyaena), using 5,000 metre increments, until density estimates stabilised (Chase-Grey et al. 2013; Devens et al. 2018).

Figures 50-57 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 50-57. Lectotypes and labels of new synonyms for Chauliognathus flavipes, C. plicatus, and C. latebasalis stat. nov: (50) C. flavipennis Pic, 1924 (= C. neopici Wittmer, 1951); (51) C. rufipes Pic, 1924; (52) C. rufipes var. quadrinotata Pic, 1928; (53) C. rufipes var. haasi Pic, 1928; (54) C. ensellatus var. innotatithorax Pic, 1944; (55) possible type of C. basalis Lacordaire, 1857; (56) C. flavipennis var. schneideri Pic, 1934 (= C. neopici var. schneideri = C. plicatus syn. nov.); (57) C. latebasalis Pic, 1925 stat. nov.

Figures 42-49 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 42-49. Lectotypes and labels of new synonyms for Chauliognathus flavipes: (42) C. inbasalis Pic, 1925; (43) C. bimaculatus Pic, 1925; (44) C. mendesensis Pic, 1933; (45) C. opacicollis Pic, 1946; (46) C. opacicollis var. freiburgana Pic, 1946; (47) C. bireductipennis Pic, 1947; (48) C. quadripunctatus var. lebisi Pic, 1947; (49) C. diversesignatus Pic, 1949.

Figures 1-5 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 1-5. Chauliognathus flavipes (Fabricius, 1781) and its synonyms: (1) Undetermined species from PALLAS (1782) [Cantharis flavipes according to FABRICIUS (1792) or Telephorus fallax according to GERMAR (1823)]; (2) Telephorus axillaris from FISCHER VON WALDHEIM (1823); (3) Telephorus flavipes from OLIVIER (1790); (4) Chauliognathus basalis from LACORDAIRE (1857); (5) Cantharis flavipes from HMUG. Figs. 1-4: public domain; Fig. 5: The Hunterian, University of Glasgow 2016©.

Figures 26-33 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 26-33. Lectotypes and labels of varieties of Chauliognathus fallax (Germar, 1823), new synonyms for C. flavipes: (26) C. fallax var. atrofasciata Pic, 1925; (27) C. fallax var. basireducta Pic, 1925; (28) C. fallax var. concolor Pic, 1927; (29) C. fallax var. medioreducta Pic, 1928; (30) C. fallax var. edmondi Pic, 1948; (31) C. fallax var. petri Pic, 1948; (32) C. fallax var. henrici Pic, 1948; (33) C. fallax var. reductemaculata Pic, 1949 (= C. fallax var. unimaculatus Pic, 1927).

Figures 34-41 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 34-41. Lectotypes and labels of Chauliognathus plagiatus and its varieties, new synonyms for C. flavipes: (34) C. plagiatus Blanchard, 1844; (35) C. plagiatus var. latejuncta Pic, 1925; (36) C. plagiatus var. orbygnyi Pic, 1948; (37) C. plagiatus var. alcidei Pic, 1948. (38-41) labels of specimens in Pic's collection: (38) "fallax Germ. (ex descript) [based on description]"; (39) "fig. 23 de Pallas = fallax Germar"; (40) "plagiatus (ex type) [based on type]"; (41) "plagiatus Bl. (ex descript) [based on description]".

Figures 6-13 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 6-13. Chauliognathus flavipes: (6) habitus, male; (7) habitus, female; (8) male and female in copula; (9) head, dorsal; (10) head, ventral; (11) details of head, dorsal; (12) details of head, ventral; (13) pronotum.

Figures 21-25 in On the identity of Chauliognathus flavipes (Coleoptera: Cantharidae): revision of type specimens, new synonyms and new status

Figures 21-25. Lectotype of Cantharis flavipes Fabricius, 1781: (21) habitus, dorsal view; (22) pronotum, dorsal view; (23) head, dorsal view; (24) apex of abdomen, ventral view; (25) label.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2012View details →

Text-fig. 3. Rhinoppioides quadrituberculatus MIKO gen. et sp. nov. Above: assumed fragments of legs as seen in body cavity of holotype (Aa – in dorsal view, Ab – in ventral view) and paratype (B, only dorsal view available). Below: speculative reconstruction of legs, assumed segments leg IV in above rows (numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14), assumed segments of leg I below (numbers 6, 9, 10). Rest of the segments assumed to belong to legs II and III. Only trochanters III (nr. 8) and IV (nr. 7, 12) undoubtedly belonging to the new species. Bars indicating 50 µm, numbers indicate identity of segments. in Oribatid Mite Fossils From Quaternary And Pre-Quaternary Sediments In Slovenian Caves I.Two New Genera And Two New Species Of The Family Oppiidae From The Early Pleistocene

Text-fig. 3. Rhinoppioides quadrituberculatus MIKO gen. et sp. nov. Above: assumed fragments of legs as seen in body cavity of holotype (Aa – in dorsal view, Ab – in ventral view) and paratype (B, only dorsal view available). Below: speculative reconstruction of legs, assumed segments leg IV in above rows (numbers 1, 3, 5, 7, 12, 13, 14), assumed segments of leg I below (numbers 6, 9, 10). Rest of the segments assumed to belong to legs II and III. Only trochanters III (nr. 8) and IV (nr. 7, 12) undoubtedly belonging to the new species. Bars indicating 50 µm, numbers indicate identity of segments.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2008View details →

Figs. 1-3 in On the identity of Lobrathium indubium (Eppelsheim, 1893) (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Paederinae)

Figs. 1-3: Lobrathium indubium (Eppelsheim) (1 – labels first syntype; 2 – habitus of first syntype; 3 – labels of second syntype.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2015View details →

Figures 7–13 in Redescription and identity of Taphinella bengalensis Jacoby, 1900 (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae)

Figures 7–13. Cassena bengalensis (Jacoby, 1900). 7–12. lectotype of Taphinella bengalensis (male, 3.6 mm): 7 – dorsal view, 8 – ventral view, 9 – head and pronotum in frontal view, 10 – head and pronotum in dorsal, 11 – head and prosternum in ventral view, 12 – labels of lectotype. 13 – female (4.6 mm).

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Figure 4 in A Puzzle No More: The Identity of Spirobranchus tetraceros (Schmarda, 1861) (Annelida, Serpulidae) is Revealed

Figure 4. Scanning electron microscopic micrographs of S. tetraceros sensu stricto W.35308. (A) lateral view of the anterior part of the paratype; (B) collar chaetae bundle with special Spirobranchus-type chaetae; (C) thoracic chaetae; (D) thoracic uncini; (E) anterior abdominal uncini; (F) anterior abdominal chaetae.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →

Figure 5 in A Puzzle No More: The Identity of Spirobranchus tetraceros (Schmarda, 1861) (Annelida, Serpulidae) is Revealed

Figure 5. Photographs of S. schmardai sp. nov. holotype and paratype. (A) anterior part of the holotype W.42393, ventral view (left), lateral view (right); (B) paratype W.51857 in tube.