Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in Diversity and evolution of Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals

Fig. 2. Appearance of the HSB in variable light. A. Scheme of the fiber optic light guide effect of enamel prisms. Those prisms illuminated perpendicular to the long axis reflect brightly, while those illuminated parallel to the long axis appear dark. B. Transverse HSB illuminated from the left side in an incisor of the artiodactyl Myotragus. Note the regular bifurcation of the light bands to the left, of the dark bands to the right. C–E. Vertical HSB in an etched ground section of a molar of Coelodonta antiquitatis (Blumenbach, 1799) (Upper Pleistocene, Germany KOE 59) illuminated from different sides. Light source on the left (C), light source on the right (D), light source perpendicular to the direction of the bands (E), highlighting the transitional zones. White dotted lines connect identical spots.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2011View details →

Fig. 2 in Diversity of the adapisoriculid mammals from the early Palaeocene of Hainin, Belgium

Fig. 2. SEM pictures of the adapisoriculid Afrodon gheerbranti sp. nov. from the early Palaeocene of Hainin (Belgium). A. Right M1, IRSNB M1985 (Q2−28), in labial (A1) and occlusal (A2) views. B. Holotype: right M2, IRSNB M1982 (N2−17), in labial (B1) and occlusal (B2) views. C. Right M3, IRSNB M1983 (N2−16), in labial (C1) and occlusal (C2) views. D. Right p4, IRSNB M1986 (Q2−32), in labial (D1), occlusal (D2), and lingual (D3) views. E. Right m1, IRSNB M1987 (N2−13), in labial (E1), occlusal (E2), and lingual (E3) views. F. Right m2, IRSNB M1988 (Q1−06), in labial (F1), occlusal (F2), and lingual (F3) views. G. Left m3, IRSNB M1989 (N2−06), in labial (G1), occlusal (G2), and lingual (G3) views.

Fig. 1 in Diversity and evolution of Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals

Fig. 1. Vertical HSB configuration as figured by Quenstedt (1852: pl. 2: 1 [A]; pl. 3: 35 [B]). A. Occlusial view with HBS in the extoloph. B. Orienation and bifiurcation of the HSB in tangential aspect.

Fig. 5 in Diversity and evolution of Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals

Fig. 5. Transverse HSB configuration in Equoidea. A. Lower molar of Mesohippus sp. (KOE 1509); late Eocene–early Oligocene, Toadstool Park area, Nebraska, USA. The transverse HSB are to be seen in the tangential section. Note also the transversely oriented perikymata on the outer enamel surface. Both structures are independent from each other. B. Upper molar of Palaeotherium sp. (KOE 4050); upper Eocene, Frohnstetten, Germany; transverse HSB visible in the translucent enamel of the paracone from the outside.

Fig. 14 in Diversity and evolution of Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals

Fig. 14. Schematic diagram of the stratigraphic occurrence of the four configurations of Hunter−Schreger Bands (HSB) found in the various perissodactyl families. The range data of the families are taken from McKenna and Bell (1997). All four types occurred during the Paleogene in several families. The compound HSB configuration did not reach the Neogene. The three other types are represented by one family each in the extant fauna: the transverse HSB configuration in Equidae, the curved HSB configuration in Tapiridae, and the vertical HSB configuration in Rhinocerotidae.

Fig. 13 in Diversity and evolution of Hunter-Schreger Band configuration in tooth enamel of perissodactyl mammals

Fig. 13. Schematic hypothesis of the evolutionary interrelationship of the four configurations of Hunter−Schreger Bands (HSB) found in Perissodactyla. From the basal transverse HSB configuration evolved the curved HSB configuration on the one hand. On the other hand the compound HSB configuration evolved and gave rise to the vertical HSB configuration in Rhinocerotidae.

Fig. 4. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 in Suidae and Sanitheriidae from Wadi Moghra, early Miocene, Egypt

Fig. 4. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 from early Miocene of Wadi Moghra, Egypt (occlusal views of casts). A. Left mandible with p4–m3 (WM 06−49). B. Right M2 (WM 05−21). C. Right m3 (WM 05−48). D. Right m1(WM DEC06−11). E. Left m3 (WM 06−25). F. Left mandible with dp4–m2 (WM 06−14). G. Right mandible with m3 (WM 06−55).

Fig. 1. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 in Suidae and Sanitheriidae from Wadi Moghra, early Miocene, Egypt

Fig. 1. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 from early Miocene of Wadi Moghra, Egypt. A. Palate of a young adult (WM 05−50) in buccal (A1) and occlusal (A2) views (arrow points to the palatine foramen opposite front of M2). B. Left mandible (DPC 6618), m2–3 in buccal (B1), occlusal (B2), and lingual (B3) views. C. Juvenile left mandible (DPC 8997), m1–2, p4 erupting in lingual (C1) and occlusal (C2) views. D. Juvenile right mandible (DPC 6469) with part of dp3, complete dp4 and m1, m2 in crypt in occlusal view.

Fig. 3. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 in Suidae and Sanitheriidae from Wadi Moghra, early Miocene, Egypt

Fig. 3. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 from early Miocene of Wadi Moghra, Egypt. A. Left mandible (DPC 12599) preserving both central incisors, and left i2–p2, roots of p3, p4 and anterior root of m1 in buccal (A1), occlusal (A2), and lingual (A3) views. B. Edentulous symphysis (DPC 14581) in inferior (B1) and superior (B2) views.

Fig. 2. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 in Suidae and Sanitheriidae from Wadi Moghra, early Miocene, Egypt

Fig. 2. Sanitheriid mammal Diamantohyus africanus Stromer, 1922 from early Miocene of Wadi Moghra, Egypt, snout (DPC 17688) in right lateral (A), occlusal (B), left lateral (C), anterior (D), and superior (E) views (note palatine foramina opposite middle of M2).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in Non-volant mammals of the 'Lago di Tarsia' Regional Nature Reserve and Special Conservation Area (IT93100055; Cosenza, Southern Italy)

Fig. 1 - Land use map of the study area (Source: Brusco et al., 2017). Grid corresponds to 1x1 km squares. Black line: border of the 'Lago di Tarsia' Regional Nature Reserve and Special Conservation Area (IT93100055; Cosenza, Southern Italy). On the right: black circle represents the location along Italian peninsula. / Carta dell'uso del suolo dell'area di studio. Linea scura: confine della Riserva Naturale Regionale "Lago di Tarsia" e Zona Speciale di Conservazione (IT93100055; Cosenza, Italia meridionale). Sulla sinistra: la localizzazione nella penisola italiana.

Fig. 1 in Small mammal remains from the Temple of Neptune, a window on the ancient landscape of the Sele Plain (Southern Italy)

Fig. 1 - The location of the Temple of Neptune and other localities considered in the text. / La posizione del Tempio di Nettuno e di altre local- ità menzionate nel testo.

Fig. 2 in Small mammals from barn owl Tyto alba pellets in a Mediterranean agroforestry landscape of central Italy

Fig. 2 - Dendrogram of similarity based on species frequency (algorithm: Paired group - UPGMA, Euclidean similarity index). / Dendro- gramma di similarità basato sulla frequenza di specie (algoritmo: gruppi appaiati - UPGMA, indice di similarità euclidea). Sites: / Siti: A) Roccaccia. B) Riminino. C) Ripagretta. D) San Giorgio. E) Montericcio.

Fig. 1 in Small mammals from barn owl Tyto alba pellets in a Mediterranean agroforestry landscape of central Italy

Fig. 1 - The study area. Circles and letters (A-E) show the five investigated sites. / Area di studio. I cerchi e le lettere (A-E) indicano i cinque siti studiati.

Fig. 3 in Small mammals from barn owl Tyto alba pellets in a Mediterranean agroforestry landscape of central Italy

Fig. 3 - Detrended Correspondence Analysis. / Analisi delle Corrispondenze 'Detrended' Sites: / Siti: A) Roccaccia; B) Riminino; C) Ripagretta; D) San Giorgio; E) Montericcio. Species: / Specie: Sunetr: Suncus etruscus; Sorsam: Sorex samniticus; Crosua: Crocidura suaveolens; Croleu: Crocidura leucodon; Musave: Muscardinus avellanarius; Arvita: Arvicola italicus; Micsav: Microtus savii; Aposyl: Apodemus cfr. sylvaticus; Musdom: Mus domesticus; Ratrat: Rattus rattus; Ratnor: Rattus norvegicus.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Рис. 1. Δинамика чисΛенности меΛких мΛекопитающих в Цасучейском бору: 1 — суммарная чисΛенность (особей / 100 циΛинΑро-суток); Αоминирующие виΑы: 2 — забайкаΛьский хомячок, 3 — бурозубка тунΑряная, 4 — бурозубка крошечная, 5 — поΛёвка монгоΛьская, 6 — поΛёвка РаΑΑе, 7 — красная поΛёвка; A — остепнённый сосняк, B — первичная гарь, С — старая гарь, D — повторная гарь; стреΛка указывает время прохожΑения пожара. Ось X — гг., ось Y — чисΛенность Fig. 1. Population dynamics of small mammals in the Tsasucheysky Pine Forest: 1 — total abundance (individuals / 100 cylinder-days); dominant species: 2 — Cricetulus pseudogriseus, 3 — Sorex tundrensis, 4 — S. minutissimus, 5 — Alexandromys mongolicus, 6 — Lasiopodomys raddei, 7 — Myodes rutilus; A — steppe pine forest, B — primary burns site, С — old burns site; D — repeated burns site; the arrow indicates the time of the fire. The X-axis shows years; the Y-axis shows population density in Population dynamics of small mammals after spring fires in steppe pine forest

Рис. 1. Δинамика чисΛенности меΛких мΛекопитающих в Цасучейском бору: 1 — суммарная чисΛенность (особей / 100 циΛинΑро-суток); Αоминирующие виΑы: 2 — забайкаΛьский хомячок, 3 — бурозубка тунΑряная, 4 — бурозубка крошечная, 5 — поΛёвка монгоΛьская, 6 — поΛёвка РаΑΑе, 7 — красная поΛёвка; A — остепнённый сосняк, B — первичная гарь, С — старая гарь, D — повторная гарь; стреΛка указывает время прохожΑения пожара. Ось X — гг., ось Y — чисΛенность Fig. 1. Population dynamics of small mammals in the Tsasucheysky Pine Forest: 1 — total abundance (individuals / 100 cylinder-days); dominant species: 2 — Cricetulus pseudogriseus, 3 — Sorex tundrensis, 4 — S. minutissimus, 5 — Alexandromys mongolicus, 6 — Lasiopodomys raddei, 7 — Myodes rutilus; A — steppe pine forest, B — primary burns site, С — old burns site; D — repeated burns site; the arrow indicates the time of the fire. The X-axis shows years; the Y-axis shows population density

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2014View details →

Fig. 2. A in Trypanosomes of Australian mammals: A review

Fig. 2. A graphical representation of the phylogenetic relationship shared by some Australian trypanosome isolates based on gGAPDH sequences (=810 bp) (reproduced with permission from Botero et al. (2013), with modifications highlighted in grey).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2014View details →

Fig. 1 in Trypanosomes of Australian mammals: A review

Fig. 1. (a) General trypanosome shape (trypomastigote form from the blood of a woylie (Bettongia penicillata)) K = kinetoplast, N = nucleus and FF = free flagellum and RBC = red blood cells, (b) host: woylie (Bettongia penicillata).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2014View details →

Fig. 3 in Trypanosomes of Australian mammals: A review

Fig. 3. Geographical locations of trypanosomes identified from Australian indigenous mammals- (a) all Trypanosoma spp., (b) Trypanosoma vegrandis only, (c) Trypanosoma sp. H25 only, (d) Trypanosoma copemani only (cross (x) = the possible identification from Tasmania in 1998) and (e) Trypanosoma lewisi only (circle (o) = records from indigenous mammals and asterisk (‡) = records from introduced mammals).