Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in A New Record Of Chaunocephalus Ferox (Digenea, Echinostomatidae) From Ciconia Nigra In Ukraine Including Morphological And Molecular Data

Fig. 1. Chaunocephalus ferox: 1— ventral view; 2 — head collar; 3 — head collar of hologenophore; 4 — uroproct.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Finding Of Pseudobacciger Harengulae (Digenea, Faustulidae) In The Mediterranean Horse Mackerel, Trachurus Mediterraneus (Actinopterygii, Carangidae), From The Gulf Of Odessa, Black Sea, Ukraine

Fig. 1. Pseudobacciger harengulae ex T. mediterraneus from the Gulf of Odessa, Black Sea. A — total view of adult (drawing); B — photograph of adult; C — seminal vesicle: Ap — anterior part, Pp — posterior part.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2015View details →

Fig. 3 in Mortality Of Juvenile So-Iuy Mullet, Liza Haematocheilus (Teleostei, Mugilidae), In The Sea Of Azov Associated With Metacercaria (Digenea)

Fig. 3.Relationship between the fish total length and the intensity of Diplostomum spp. in juveniles of L. haematocheilus.* Referred to a significant level of 95 %.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2015View details →

Fig. 2 in Mortality Of Juvenile So-Iuy Mullet, Liza Haematocheilus (Teleostei, Mugilidae), In The Sea Of Azov Associated With Metacercaria (Digenea)

Fig. 2. Frequency distribution of T. imbutiforme split following the pre-mortality and post-mortality events. Solid line with solid point and dashed line with open square = the observed and predicted pre-mortality frequency distribution; dashed line with solid triangle = the fitted post-mortality frequency distribution; solid double line with crosses and symbols = the estimated percentage survival of fish with that number of parasites.

Fig. 2 in Molecular Characterization Of The First Reported Neoplagioglyphe Megastomus (Digenea, Omphalometridae) In Poland

Fig. 2. Microphotographs and line drawing of live metacercariae of Neoplagioglyphe megastomus from Gammarus pulex. A. Encysted metacercaria. B. Dorsal view of ovarian complex and male terminal genitalia. C. and D. dorsal view of metacercaria removed from cyst. Abbreviations: C, cirrus; CS, cirrus sac; L, Laurer's canal; MG, Mehlis' gland cells; O, ovary; OO, ootype; T, anterior testis; VS, ventral sucker.

Fig. 1 in Molecular Characterization Of The First Reported Neoplagioglyphe Megastomus (Digenea, Omphalometridae) In Poland

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic trees based on 18S rRNA sequences using the ML method with 500 bootstrap replicates. The tree with the highest log likelihood (-1959,87) is shown. The percentage of trees in which the associated taxa clustered together is shown next to the branches.

Fig. 5 in Molecular characteristics of representatives of the genus Brachylecithum Shtrom, 1940 (Digenea, Dicrocoeliidae) with comments on life cycle and host specificity

Fig. 5 Comparison of morphometric characters of B. glareoli and B. lobatum. a Ratio of body length to vitellaria length, b distance between oral and ventral suckers, c testis area, and d vitellaria length

Fig. 4 in Molecular characteristics of representatives of the genus Brachylecithum Shtrom, 1940 (Digenea, Dicrocoeliidae) with comments on life cycle and host specificity

Fig. 4 Bayesian analysis of partial sequence 28S rDNA + partial sequence cox1 data of nine members of the Brachylecithum genus. Tree constructed with MrBayes using the GTR + G model for 28S rDNA and HKY + G for cox1. The analysis was run for one million generations, with 250,000 generations as burn-in. Scale bars: number of substitutions per site. Nodal support is indicated as Bayesian posterior probabilities. Host species are provided in parentheses. Outgroup— Lyperosomum collurionis

Fig. 2 in Molecular characteristics of representatives of the genus Brachylecithum Shtrom, 1940 (Digenea, Dicrocoeliidae) with comments on life cycle and host specificity

Fig. 2 Bayesian analysis of partial sequences of the 28S rDNA gene of 16 members of Dicrocoeliidae. The tree constructed with MrBayes using the GTR + G model. The analysis was run for one million generations, with 250,000 generations as burn-in. Scale bars: number of substitutions per site. Nodal support is indicated as Bayesian posterior probabilities. Host species are provided in parentheses. Outgroup—M. magellanica (Opecoelidae)

Fig. 3 in Molecular characteristics of representatives of the genus Brachylecithum Shtrom, 1940 (Digenea, Dicrocoeliidae) with comments on life cycle and host specificity

Fig. 3 Bayesian analysis of the partial mitochondrial proteincoding gene cox1 (data as amino acids) derived from nine isolates of Brachylecithum spp. Tree constructed using the HKY + G model. The analysis was run for two million generations; 500,000 generations were discarded as burn-in. The branch-length scale indicates the number of substitutions per site. Nodal support is indicated as Bayesian posterior probabilities. Host species are provided in parentheses. Outgroup— Lyperosomum collurionis

Fig. 1 in Molecular characteristics of representatives of the genus Brachylecithum Shtrom, 1940 (Digenea, Dicrocoeliidae) with comments on life cycle and host specificity

Fig. 1 Larval stages of Brachylecithum lobatum from Cepaea hortensis. a Sporocyst, b cercaria and metacercaria hatching from the cyst, c encysted metacercaria, and d cercaria, free metacercaria, cysts with metacercaria, and fragment of a sporocyst

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2015View details →

Fig. 1 in On the systematic position of Collyricloides massanae Vaucher, 1969 (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) with notes on distribution of this trematode species

Fig. 1 The phylogram resulting from Bayesian analysis of partial sequences of 28S rDNA gene. Posterior probabilities are expressed by the use of symbols: star (>90 % posterior probabilities) and filled square (>60 % posteriori probabilities). The arrow indicates the position of Collyricloides massanae

Figure 2. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 2. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Gorgoderidae) parasite ofLeptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Leptodactylidae) from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo state, Brazil. A) Detail of the oral sucker, oesophagus, and intestinal caeca; B) Acetabulum; C) Detail of the region of seminal vesicle and metraterm; D) Detail of the terminal genitalia and metraterm, highlighting the genital pore (left above corner); E) Ovary; F) Region of the ovary highlighting the Mehlis' gland and vitelline follicles; G) Detail of the Mehlis' gland; H) Eggs in the uterus, highlighting part of the descending loop of the uterus with immature eggs and an ascending part with mature eggs. Legend: ac – acetabulum, gp – genital pore, ic – intestinal caeca, ig – immature eggs, m – metraterm, me – mature eggs, mg – Mehlis' gland, mo – mature oocytes, od – ovary duct, oe – oesophagus, os – oral sucker, ov – ovary, pp – pars prostatica, sv – seminal vesicle, t – testis, u – uterus, vd – vitelline ducts, vi – vitelline follicles.

Figure 3 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 3. Maximum Likelihood topology based on partial 28S ribosomal DNA sequences of gorgoderid trematodes. GenBank accession numbers are indicated next to species names. Numbers above nodes represent supported nodes by posterior probabilities for Bayesian Bayesian inference and bootstrap for maximum likelihood analyses respectively (posterior probabilities> 0.90 and bootstrap scores> 70). Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.

Figure 4 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 4. Maximum Likelihood topology based on COI sequences of Gorgoderina, showing the phylogenetic position of the adults of Gorgoderina parvicava from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo State, Brazil. Numbers above nodes represent supported nodes by posterior probabilities for Bayesian Bayesian inference and bootstrap for maximum likelihood analyses respectively (posterior probabilities> 0.90 and bootstrap scores> 70). Branch length scale bar indicates the number of substitutions per site.

Figure 1. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 in Phylogenetic position of Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Digenea: Gorgoderidae), a parasite of Leptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Anura: Leptodactylidae) in Brazil

Figure 1. Gorgoderina parvicava Travassos, 1922 (Gorgoderidae) parasite ofLeptodactylus labyrinthicus (Spix, 1824) (Leptodactylidae) from Carandá Farm, municipality of Araraquara, São Paulo state, Brazil. Ventral view.

Fig. 2 in Tegumental topography and molecular characterisation of two trematodes (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in Kenya

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of Glossidium pedatum. (A) Round oral sucker, (B) spine surrounding the oral sucker (C) location of the genital pore and a protruding cirrus, (D) structure of the cirrus sac (abbreviations: pl-papillae like lappet; os-oral sucker; pp-papillae; dp-dome papillae; vs-ventral sucker; gp-genital pore; c -cirrus; rp-rows of small papillae).

Fig. 5 in Tegumental topography and molecular characterisation of two trematodes (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in Kenya

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic relationships of Tylodelphys mashonensis (Sudarikov, 1971) to other Diplostomidae based on cox1. Phylogram was reconstructed using Bayesian Inference (BI) with Diplostomum spathaceum (Rudolphi, 1819) as an outgroup. Nodal values <0.90 (BI) are indicated by dashes (sequences of the present study are highlighted in bold).

Fig. 3 in Tegumental topography and molecular characterisation of two trematodes (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in Kenya

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic relationships of Glossidium pedatum Loos, 1899 to other members of Plagiorchioidea based on 28S rDNA. Phylogram was reconstructed using Bayesian Inference (BI) with Alloglossidium corti (Lamont, 1921) as an outgroup. Nodal values <0.90 (BI) are indicated by dashes (sequences of the present study are highlighted in bold).

Fig. 1 in Tegumental topography and molecular characterisation of two trematodes (Platyhelminthes: Digenea) from Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) in Kenya

Fig. 1. Geographical location of the study area: A– Kenya shaded on the African continent; B – shows position of Nyandarua County in Kenya; C – indicates the position of the Lake Ol'Bolossat and the sampling sites (S1–S3).