Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 1 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figure 1: Map with the sampling points where species of Alexandrium were found and the sites from which the established strains were isolated.

Figures 38–43 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figures 38–43: Alexandrium pseudogonyaulax, LM. (38) Cell in ventral view. (39) Empty cell in ventral view, showing 1′, 4′, 6″ and the large ventral pore (arrow). (40) Detail of Po with the foramen. (41–43) Epitheca in ventral view showing 1′, 4′, 6″, and ventral pore (arrow).

Figures 22–24 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figures 22–24: Alexandrium margalefii, LM. (22) General outline of a cell. (23) An empty cell in ventral view showing 1′ and 6″ and the ventral pore (arrow) in the first apical plate (1′). (24) Hypotheca with plate tabulation.

Figures 12–19 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figures 12–19: Alexandrium globosum, LM. (12) Cell outline, with the central nucleus arrowed. (13, 14) Two different cells in ventro-lateral and ventral views, respectively, showing some plates of the epitheca and the sulcus. (15) Epitheca with plate tabulation, arrow indicates the location of the ventral pore in the first apical plate (1′). (16) Hypotheca showing plate tabulation. (17) Po plate. (18) Posterior sulcal plate (Sp). (19) Detail of some precingular, cingular and sulcal plates.

Figures 53–66 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figures 53–66: Alexandrium tamiyavanichii, LM and SEM. (53) Chain of 6 cells,LM. (54) Detail of two cells with cellular content of a chain, LM. (55) Cells in ventral view showing the anterior sulcal plate (Sa), LM. (56) Two cells slightly twisted in a chain, SEM. (57) Cell in ventral view showing plates of the ventral area, LM. (58) Empty cell in ventral view showing plate tabulation, the ventral pore is arrowed, LM. (59) Epitheca in ventro-lateral view with plate tabulation, the left sulcal list is arrowed, SEM. (60, 61) Hypotheca with plate tabulation and pore at the posterior sulcal plate (Sp),SEM.(62, 63) Po and plates around it; the ventral pore is arrowed, LM. (64) Posterior sulcal plate (Sp) with pore (arrow), LM. (65, 66) Anterior sulcal plate, LM.

Figure 71 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figure 71: Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree inferred from ITS sequences of Alexandrium. ML bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probabilities values are shown at branches. Bold letters indicate newly generated sequences in this study. Bootstrap values <50 and posterior probabilities <0.50 are not shown.

Figure 70 in Diversity and distribution of species of the planktonic dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium (Dinophyta) from the tropical and subtropical Mexican Pacific Ocean

Figure 70: Maximum-likelihood (ML) tree inferred from D1-D2 LSU rDNA sequences of Alexandrium. ML bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probabilities values are shown at branches. Bold letters indicate newly generated sequences in this study. Bootstrap values <50 and posterior probabilities <0.50 are not shown.

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →

35S-DMSP uptake by chemosensitive dinoflagellates

Dataset comprising uptake data of 35S-DMSP by three cultured dinoflagellates (K. armiger, O. marina and G. dominans) during incubations of 24-48h. This data was used in the article: The distinctive chemotactic responses of three marine herbivore protists to DMSP and related compounds.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomic studies of marine dinoflagellates and distribution in the coastal waters of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Fig. 4 — Station and depth-wise matrix plot of dinoflagellate abundance (ind./L) of each species in the study area. Colour bar: Dark blue represents minimum abundance per litre while yellow represents maximum abundance per litre

Fig. 1 in Taxonomic studies of marine dinoflagellates and distribution in the coastal waters of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Fig. 1 — Map of study area represented by four stations (APK1 green triangle; APK2 purple triangle; APK 3 orange triangle and APK 4 blue triangle)

Fig. 2 in Taxonomic studies of marine dinoflagellates and distribution in the coastal waters of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Fig. 2 — Micrographs (Light microscope and SEM images) of species recorded from Kakinada coastal waters: (a) Protoperidinium depressum (Bailey) Balech 1974; (b) Protoperidinium brochii (Kofoid & Swezy) Balech, 1974; (c) Protoperidinium leonis (Pavillard) Balech 1974; (d) Protoperidinium ovum (J. Schiller) Balech 1974; (e) Protoperidinium pallidum (Ostenfeld) Balech 1973; (f) Spiraulax kofoidii H. W Graham, 1942; (g) Dinophysis caudata Saville-Kent 1881; (h) Dinophysis caudata Saville-Kent 1881; (i) Ornithocercus magnificus Stein 1883; (j) Phalacroma doryphorum Stein 1883; (k) Tripos inflatus (Kofoid) F. Gómez, 2013; (l) Tripos trichoceros (Ehrenberg) F. Gómez, 2013; (m) Tripos candelabrum (Ehrenberg) F. Gómez, 2013; (n) Tripos vultur (Cleve) F. Gómez 2013; (o) Tripos vultur (Cleve) F. Gómez 2013 magnified view; and (p) Triadinium polyedricum (Pouchet) Dodge, 1981

Fig. 3 in Taxonomic studies of marine dinoflagellates and distribution in the coastal waters of Kakinada, Andhra Pradesh, India

Fig. 3 — Sunburst chart depicting the proportion of each taxon found in Kakinada. The average numerical abundance of each species has been taken to construct the chart, and each segment of the chart is directly proportional to the numerical abundance of that species

Fig. 5 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 5. The Lower Cretaceous heteromorph ammonite Crioceratites coniferus Busnardo, Charollais, Weidmann, and Clavel, 2003 from the Kościeliska Marl Formation in the Lejowa Valley, Tatra Mountains, Poland. A. GEO.1.2018. B. ZPAL Am. 25/1 (silicone cast). C. G/1729/MT. All in lateral view.

Fig. 3 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 3. The Lower Cretaceous ammonites from the Kościeliska Marl Formation in the Lejowa Valley, Tatra Mountains, Poland. A, C–E. Criosarasinella cf. subheterocostata Reboulet, 1996. A. ZPAL Am. 25/19. C. ZPAL Am. 25/7. D. ZPAL Am. 25/17. E. ZPAL Am. 25/14. B. Calcite valve of aptychus Didayilamellaptychus seranonis (Coquand, 1841), ZPAL Am. 25/12. F. Spitidiscus cf. cankovi Vašíček and Michalík, 1986, ZPAL Am. 25/9. G. Olcostephanus densicostatus (Wegner, 1909), ZPAL Am. 25/4. All in lateral view.

Fig. 1 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 1. Location of ammonite collection area (asterisk shows fossil sampling locality, 49°16.109' N, 19°51.194' E). Satellite views from the Google Maps.

Fig. 4. A–C. The Lower Cretaceous heteromorph ammonite Crioceratites primitivus Reboulet, 1996 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 4. A–C. The Lower Cretaceous heteromorph ammonite Crioceratites primitivus Reboulet, 1996 from the Kościeliska Marl Formation in the Lejowa Valley, Tatra Mountains, Poland. A. G/1728/MT. B. ZPAL Am. 25/2. C. ZPAL Am. 25/15. D. Distribution of anomiid individuals on a specimen of C. primitivus (ZPAL Am. 25/15). E–G. Close up views of bivalves attached to the body chambers of the ammonite C. primitivus (ZPAL Am. 25/15). All in lateral view.

Fig. 6 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 6. The Lower Cretaceous organicwalled dinoflagellate cysts from the Kościeliska Marl Formation in the Lejowa Valley, Tatra Mountains, Poland. A. Cometodinium habibii Monteil, 1991. B. Cymososphaeridium validum Davey, 1982. C. Phoberocysta neocomica (Gocht, 1957) Millioud, 1969. D. Stanfordella? cretacea (Neale and Sarjeant, 1962) Helenes and LucasClark, 1997. E. Prolixosphaeridium sp.. F. Endoscrinium campanula (Gocht, 1959) Vozzhennikova, 1967. G. Phoberocysta neocomica (Gocht, 1957) Millioud, 1969. H. Bourkidinium elegans Torricelli, 1997. I. Wallodinium krutzs chii (Alberti, 1961) Habib, 1972. J. Cribroperidinium orthoceras (Eisenack, 1958). A–I sampled from ZPAL Am. 25/2; J sampled from ZPAL Am. 25/7.

Fig. 2 in Early Cretaceous ammonites and dinoflagellates from the Western Tatra Mountains, Poland

Fig. 2. Outcrop of the Lower Cretaceous sequence of the Kościeliska Marl Formation, the Western Polish Tatra Mountains (arrow indicates approximate location of collected samples). Photo taken by Andrzej Gaździcki, 3 August 2018.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Achradina pulchra, a Unique Dinoflagellate (Amphilothales, Dinophyceae) with a Radiolarian-like Endoskeleton of Celestite (Strontium Sulfate)

Fig. 2. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of dinoflagellate SSU rDNA sequences, based on 1,610 aligned positions. Names in bold represent sequences obtained in this study. The clades containing sequences of the symbionts of acantharians and polycystine radiolarians are highlighted in shaded boxes. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values (values <50 are omitted). The scale bar represents the number of substitutions for a unit branch length.