Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
359
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
359 results for “Drosophila species”
FIG. 7 in The Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species group in the Americas (Diptera: Drosophilidae): review, revisions, and three new species
FIG. 7. Oviscapts and spermathecae (lateral views) of species in the affinis subgroup, with apical details for three species. A. D. affinis (ASG 28); B. D. athabasca (ASG 30); C. D. azteca (ASG 15); D. D. chibcha, n. sp. (ASG 17); E. D. dobzhanskii (ASG 33); F. D. narragansett (ASG 11); G. D. tolteca (ASG 24).
FIG. 1 in The Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species group in the Americas (Diptera: Drosophilidae): review, revisions, and three new species
FIG. 1. Distribution map of species in the affinis subgroup. Distributions derived from Miller (1958), M. Miller et al. (2017), new records provided in the present paper, and more recent published reports. For distributions of species in the pseudoobscura group, see Dobzhansky and Epling (1944) and Heed and O'Grady (2000). Distribution boundaries are approximate, especially northernmost boundaries.
FIG. 2 in The Drosophila (Sophophora) obscura species group in the Americas (Diptera: Drosophilidae): review, revisions, and three new species
FIG. 2. Heads and thoraces (lateral view) of representative New World species of the obscura group (A–D), and a male midleg of D. cuauhtemoci (E). A. D. chibcha holotype, n. sp. (ASG 05); B. D. maya holotype. C. D. narragansett paralectotype male. D. D. seminole holotype. E. D. cuauhtemoci, male midleg (lateral view), paratype.
Figure 5 in The range dynamics of a cactophilic Drosophila species under climate change scenarios
Figure 5. Last Interglacial, Last Glacial Maximum, Present (1960–1990), and the Future (2050 and 2070) predictions of the potential distribution of two cacti species (C. hildmannianus and P. machrisii) based on 10% thresholding approaches. The abbreviations are defined as follows: LGM-Last Glacial Maximum, LIG-Last Interglacial.
Figure 2 in The range dynamics of a cactophilic Drosophila species under climate change scenarios
Figure 2. Occurrence points used for ecological niche modeling are shown in red. Squares equal approximately 2 decimal degrees and the background image on thmap shows the elevational structure of Brazil.
Figure 1 in The range dynamics of a cactophilic Drosophila species under climate change scenarios
Figure 1. Approximate distribution of D. gouveai (green area) showed Caatinga and Cerrado domains and the localities sampled for the species (based on Moraes et al., 2009), descriptive statistics (n, number of individuals; H, the number of haplotype; H d, haplotype diversity; pi, nucleotide diversity) and median joining network of 48 individuals of D. gouveai. All statistics based on nucleotide sequences were adopted from Moraes et al. (2009). MIR: Pirapotanga; FOR: Morro do Forno; FUR: Furnas; CEU: Vale do Céu; CRI: Cristalina; FER: Fercal; PIR: Pirenópolis; SER: Serrinha; IBO: Ibotirama; BAX: Baxio.
Figure 4 in The range dynamics of a cactophilic Drosophila species under climate change scenarios
Figure 4. Last Interglacial, Last Glacial Maximum, Present (1960–1990), and the Future (2050 and 2070) predictions of the potential distribution of D. gouveai based on two thresholding approaches. Arrows shows very limited potential distribution of D. gouveai in 2050 and 2070. The abbreviations are defined as follows: LGM-Last Glacial Maximum, LIG-Last Interglacial. Additionally, specific climate models include LGM-cc (Community Climate System Model), LGM-me (MPI-ESM-P, General Circulation Models), and LGM-mr (Model for Interdisciplinary Research on Climate, Earth System version 2 for Long-term simulations).
Figure 3 in The range dynamics of a cactophilic Drosophila species under climate change scenarios
Figure 3. Isolation-by-distance of populations of D. gouveai based on mtDNA. Linear regression lines were drawn for all comparisons among populations (full line), and for populations not included MIR (dotted line).
Fig. 3 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 3. Effect of triethylamine anesthetic exposure on the recovery of Drosophila adults: D. melanogaster (white circles, n = 181 adults), D. suzukii (black circles, n = 175 adults).
Fig. 2 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 2. Effects of dietary ethanol (normal environmental ethanol range ≈ 0– 9% ethanol) on Drosophila suzukii survival when compared with D. melanogaster tolerance to ethanol (top graph) and sex-specific sensitivities of D. suzukii adults to ethanol (bottom graph). Summary of probit analyses are provided and statistics with bo = intercept estimate, b1 = estimated slope estimate for each fly species, with b1 = 0 for the baseline control in each graph (D. suzukii [top graph], D. suzukii males [bottom graph]).
Fig. 1 in Novel aspects of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae) biology and an improved method for culturing this invasive species with a modified D. melanogaster diet
Fig. 1. Dietary manipulation of Drosophila suzukii cultures based on the use of 5 berry species (blackberry, strawberry, black cherry, blueberry, and grape) with a no-fruit (No Fruit) control (grey bars), and cultures to which yeast was added (+Y) or omitted (−Y) from 4-24® drosophila media (white bars). Asterisks indicate mean differences from 2 respective baseline controls (B), i.e., Blackberry−Y (14 d) and Blackberry+Y (21 d), according to multiple Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.
Fig. 7 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 7. Drosophila ayauma sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3336). A. Abdomen. B. Epandrium, cerci, surstylus, decasternum. C. Hypandrium, gonopods and paraphyses in ventral view. D–F. Aedeagus in ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively.
Fig. 6 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 6. Drosophila saraguru sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3358). A. Abdomen. B. Epandrium, cerci, surstylus, decasternum. C. Hypandrium, gonopods and paraphyses in ventral view. D–F. Aedeagus in ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively.
Fig. 5 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 5. Drosophila chichu sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3356). A. Abdomen. B. Epandrium, cerci, surstylus, decasternum. C. Hypandrium, gonopods and paraphyses in ventral view. D–F. Aedeagus in ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively.
Fig. 4 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 4. Drosophila kurillakta sp. nov. Holotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3355). A. Epandrium, cerci, surstylus, decasternum. B. Hypandrium, gonopods and paraphyses in ventral view. C–E. Aedeagus in ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively.
Fig. 3 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 3. Drosophila warmi sp. nov. A–C. Allotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3345), aedeagus in ventro-lateral to lateral view, respectively; arrows show the two lateral sclerotized projections. D. Holotype, ♀ (QCAZ-I 3344), spermatheca; arrow shows the centrodistal spines. E. Paratype, ♀ (QCAZ-I 33XX), spermatheca; arrow shows the centrodistal spines.
Fig. 2 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 2. Drosophila warmi sp. nov. Allotype, ♂ (QCAZ-I 3345). A. Abdomen, dorsal view. B. Epandrium, cerci, surstylus, decasternum. C. Hypandrium, gonopods and paraphyses in ventral view. D–F. Aedeagus in ventral, lateral and dorsal view, respectively.
Fig. 1 in Five new species of the Drosophila tripunctata group (Diptera: Drosophilidae) from Podocarpus National Park, Ecuador
Fig. 1. Drosophila warmi sp. nov. Holotype, ♀ (QCAZ-I 3344). A. Abdomen and wing, dorsal view. B. Ovipositor. C. Spermatheca.
Fig. 9 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar
Fig. 9. Terminalia of the 'D. vulcana species complex'. A, C, E. D. vulcana Graber, 1957 (MNHN). A, C. ♂. E. ♀. B, D, F. D. mylenae David & Yassin sp. nov. (MNHN). B, D. ♂. F. ♀. Scale bars: A–B = 50 µm; D–F = 100 µm.
Fig. 2 in Resolving the synonymy and polyphyly of the ' Drosophila bakoue species complex' (Diptera: Drosophilidae: ' D. montium species group') with descriptions of two new species from Madagascar
Fig. 2. Comparison of Bayesian phylogenies of the 'D. seguyi species subgroup' Yassin, 2018 inferred from mitochondrial COI (left) and nuclear Amyrel (right) genes. Nodes supported by>95% posterior probability (pp) are labeled with black circles. An asterisk refers to species sequenced here, whereas two asterisks refer to the sequence of D. vulcana Graber, 1957 of Da Lage et al. (2007), which turned out to belong to D. seguyi Smart, 1945 from Kenya (see the text). Note the discrepancy in position of different geographical strains of D. bakoue Tsacas & Lachaise, 1974 (in red) between the two genes. Species belonging to 'D. bocqueti species complex' Tsacas & Lachaise, 1974, 'D. bakoue species complex' Rafael, 1984, 'D. nikananu species complex' Tsacas & Chassagnard, 1992, and 'D. megapyga species complex' Lachaise & Tsacas, 2001 are highlighted in orange, green, yellow and red, respectively.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.