Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 7. (a) Lectotype of Enteromius alberti (Poll, 1939) (MRAC 64723) with 74.3 mm SL. (b) Fresh specimen of E. alberti (RMCA 2018.008.P.0248 HP 3246) with 62.4 mm SL.

Fig. 4 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 4. Scatterplots of PC2 against PC1 of the PCA on (a) 24 log-transformed measurements (n = 69) and (b) on 15 meristics (n = 62). Specimens of group A, the filled circles (●) represent the genetically analysed specimens, the open circles (Ǫ) indicate the additional specimens. Specimens of E. alberti (Poll, 1939) (lectotype) (♦), E. alberti (paralectotypes) (◊), specimens from Tshambi (), E. cercops (Whitehead, 1960) (holotype) (▲), E. cercops (paratypes) (), E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼), E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼), E. perince (R̹ppell, 1835) (syntypes) (+) and E. stigmatopygus (Boulenger, 1903) (syntypes) (×).

Fig. 6 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 6. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 of the PCA (n = 83) on 24 log-transformed measurements. For group B, the filled squares (■) represent the specimens used for the genetic analysis, the open squares (□) indicate the additional specimens of the Lake Edward system and the two specimens from Tshambi. Specimens of E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼) and E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼).

Fig. 2 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 2. Scatterplot of PC2 against PC1 of a PCA on 24 log-transformed measurements on 71 specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867. Specimens of the genetic groups A (●) (n = 21) and B (■) (n = 50) are indicated separately.

Fig. 5 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 5. Scatterplots of PC2 against PC1 of (a) the PCA (n = 105) on 24 log-transformed measurements and (b) the PCA (n = 95) on 15 meristics. Specimens of group B, the filled squares (■) represent the genetic analysed specimens, the open squares (□) indicate the additional specimens. Specimens of E. alberti (Poll, 1939) (lectotype) (♦), E. alberti (paralectotypes) (◊), specimens from Tshambi (), E. cercops (Whitehead, 1960) (holotype) (▲), E. cercops (paratypes) (), E. mimus (Boulenger, 1912) (lectotype) (▼), E. mimus (paralectotypes) (▼), E. perince (R̹ppell, 1835) (syntypes) (+) and E. stigmatopygus (Boulenger, 1903) (syntypes) (×).

Fig. 1 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 1. Haplotype network of 651-bp-long COI sequences (n = 137) of the specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867 with a smooth, flexible last unbranched dorsal fin ray from the Lake Edward system. Each circle represents a haplotype, with the size of the circles indicating the number of individuals with this haplotype and the colour indicating the different parts of the basin. Each bar represents a mutation between two haplotypes.

Fig. 3 in Revalidation of Enteromius alberti and presence of Enteromius cf. mimus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) in the Lake Edward system, East Africa

Fig. 3. Scatterplots of (a) interorbital width (IOW), (b) pre-pelvic distance (PrPelD), (c) body depth (BD), (d) maximum caudal peduncle depth (MxCPD), (e) minimum caudal peduncle depth (MnCPD), (f) head width (HW), and (g) head depth (HD) in % SL against SL (in mm) on 72 specimens of Enteromius Cope, 1867. The genetic groups A (●) (n = 22) and B (■) (n = 50) are indicated separately. The dashed lines indicate the size class used for the MWU tests.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Analyzing and predicting urban land use forms in East Africa using OpenStreetMap data, satellite imagery, and Convolutional Networks

This multi-spectral satellite image data set is associated with our recent work on analyzing and predicting urban land use forms in East Africa using OpenStreetMap data, satellite imagery, and Convolutional Neural Networks. The images were extracted using an automated Python script from Google Maps Static API, based on sample locations in four East African capital cities namely Kampala, Nairobi, Dar es Salaam, and Kigali. Other data sets associated with this work, that is, ESRI shapefiles for administrative level 1 and OpenStreetMap data for the named cities may be downloaded directly from the respective URLs provided in the manuscript.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

FIG. 3 in New molecular and morphological evidences favor a combination of Blechnum bakeri C.Chr. in Cranfillia Gasper & V.A.O.Dittrich (Blechnaceae, Polypodiopsida), thus extending the distribution of Cranfillia to Madagascar and East Africa

FIG. 3. — Spores of Cranfillia and Austroblechnum as observed with SEM: A, B, C. bakeri Vázquez Ferreira & S.Molino, comb. nov. (MA389177); C, D, C. mucronata (MA655870 & UC1615719, respectively); E, F, A. lherminieri (Bory ex Kunze) Gasper & V.A.O.Dittrich (BA57587). Thick and straight muri are visible in Cranfillia, as well as the spongy-trabecular middle layer of the perine (B and D). Smooth and micro-granulated perine ornamentation is observed in A. lherminieri. Scale bar: A, 17 µm; B, 9 µm; C, 7 µm; D, 1 µm; E, 8 µm; F, 2 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

FIG. 2 in New molecular and morphological evidences favor a combination of Blechnum bakeri C.Chr. in Cranfillia Gasper & V.A.O.Dittrich (Blechnaceae, Polypodiopsida), thus extending the distribution of Cranfillia to Madagascar and East Africa

FIG. 2. — Morphology of sterile pinnae in Cranfillia species: A, Sterile frond of C. fullagari (K001092750); B-E, Basal pinnae morphology; B, C. opaca (US1431859); C, C. bakeri Vázquez Ferreira & S.Molino, comb. nov. (P00483198); D, C. mucronata (P01389538); E, C. nigra (K001092713). Scale bar: A, 28 mm; B, 6 mm; C, 10 mm; D, 17 mm; E, 7 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2020View details →

FIG. 1 in New molecular and morphological evidences favor a combination of Blechnum bakeri C.Chr. in Cranfillia Gasper & V.A.O.Dittrich (Blechnaceae, Polypodiopsida), thus extending the distribution of Cranfillia to Madagascar and East Africa

FIG. 1. — Majority rule consensus phylogenetic tree for the genus Cranfillia estimated by Bayesian inference on the combined plastid DNA dataset (rbcL, rps4, rps4-trnS, trnL/trnL-trnF), with support values from the Maximum likelihood method and Bayesian inference. Unless mentioned next to the nodes, support values are bootstraps (BS) = 100 and posterior probabilities (PP) = 1. Scale bar is for branch lengths of the phylogram (substitutions/site).

opencc-zeroDec 2004View details →

FIGURE 3 A, C in A new species of Strongylodesma Lévi, 1969 (Porifera; Demospongiae; Poecilosclerida; Latrunculiidae) from Aliwal Shoal on the east coast of South Africa

FIGURE 3 A, C. Skeletal architecture of the holotype (SAM H 5083) (A, 100 X; C, 50 X); C. Skeletal architecture showing the clear mesohyl region below the paratangential layer of anisostrongyles (100 X); B. Skeletal architecture of the paratype (SAF 94 23) (50 X); D. Skeletal architecture showing the region of convoluted tracts of anisostrongyles (100 X).

opencc-zeroDec 2004View details →

FIGURE 2. A in A new species of Strongylodesma Lévi, 1969 (Porifera; Demospongiae; Poecilosclerida; Latrunculiidae) from Aliwal Shoal on the east coast of South Africa

FIGURE 2. A. Gross morphology of Strongylodesma aliwaliensis sp. nov. (SAM H 5083); B. A close up frame of the fungiform areolate porefields and cylindrical oscules of Strongylodesma aliwaliensis sp. nov. (SAM H 5083); C. Smooth anisostrongyles with one end narrower within Strongylodesma aliwaliensis sp. nov. (Anisostrongyles) (1000 X).

Fig. 11 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 11. Gulella maraisi sp. nov., holotype (NMSA P1676/T4520), length 4.12 mm, width 1.63 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. View into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. E. Specimen from Eastern Cape population (ELMD 18754), length 3.57 mm, width 1.55 mm. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 8 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 8. Gulella calcicola sp. nov., holotype (NMSA P1675/T4519), length 2.05 mm, width 0.90 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. View into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 4 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 4. Gulella mkombeni sp. nov., holotype (NMSA P1674/T4518), length 2.45 mm, width 1.14 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. View into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 5 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 5. Gulella donaikeni sp. nov., holotype (NMSA W9640/T4521), length 1.85 mm, width 0.84 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. Oblique view into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 2. Distribution map of Gulella kenbrowni sp. nov. (pink circles), G. fordycei sp. nov. (blue squares), G. mkombeni sp. nov. (green triangles) and G. crookesi sp. nov. (orange square). Contour at 1000 m.

Fig. 1 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 1. Gulella kenbrowni sp. nov., holotype (NMSA P1678/T4524), length 2.20 mm, width 0.95 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. Oblique view into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 7 in Eight new species of Gulella Pfeiffer, 1856 from the south-east coast of South Africa (Gastropoda: Streptaxidae)

Fig. 7. Gulella crookesi sp. nov., holotype (NMSA P1680/T4526), length 2.44 mm, width 1.17 mm. A. Aperture view. B. Side view. C. View into aperture. D. Oblique view of base showing umbilicus. Scale bar = 0.5 mm.