Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 4. Geographic distribution of the phylogenetic groups of avian piroplasmids (based on the 18S rRNA gene). Map prepared based on information provided in Criado et al. (2006), Yabsley et al. (2006, 2009), Jefferies et al. (2008), Paparini et al. (2014), Quillfeldt et al. (2014), Martínez et al. (2015), Montero et al. (2016) and Chavatte et al. (2017).

Fig. 2 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 2. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the ITS-1 (445 bp) and ITS-2 regions sequences (290 bp) of select avian-infecting Babesia lineages. Sequences identified in this study are emphasized in red, and those of other avian-infecting lineages are shown in blue. For each sequence, the following information is provided: morphospecies (individual identification or Genbank code) host species. Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance (scale bar shown corresponds to both trees). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 3 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 3. Distribution of the phylogenetic groups of avian piroplasmids (based on the 18S rRNA gene) in relation to the phylogeny of avian orders (based on multiple nuclear genes). Avian orders investigated in this study are shown in red, and other avian orders known to host piroplasmids are shown in blue. Avian phylogeny was adapted from Yuri et al. (2013). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Molecular characterization of Babesia peircei and Babesia ugwidiensis provides insight into the evolution and host specificity of avian piroplasmids

Fig. 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree of the 18S rRNA gene sequences (1450 bp) of the studied Babesia lineages. Sequences obtained in this study are emphasized in red, and those of other avian-infecting lineages are shown in blue. For each sequence, the following information is provided: morphospecies (individual identification or GenBank code) host species. For avian-infecting lineages, the host order is indicated with colored circles (see legend). Branch lengths are drawn proportionally to evolutionary distance. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2015View details →

FIGURE 6 in A Phylogenetic Overview of Sponge-inhabiting Barnacles and Their Host Specificity (Crustacea, Cirripedia)

FIGURE 6. Bayesian phylogenetic tree based from CO1 and H3 concatenated sequence data (869 bp). Numbers at nodes represent Bayesian posterior probability values. Numbers on branches represent substitutions per site on that branch. (A) Clade of Acastinae from Philippines and Madagascar in Phyllospongiinae hosts (blue-shaded box); (B) Clade of Bryozobiinae (3 genera) barnacles from Madagascar in encrusting sponge hosts Clathria (Microciona) sp. and Monanchora aff. unguiculata (orange-shaded box); (C) Clade of Eoatria sp. (Bryozobiinae) and 3 undescribed Acastinae barnacles in encrusting sponges (purple-shaded box). All barnacle taxa in this analysis are in the family Archaeobalanidae. All of the taxa identified as members of the Acastinae appear to be undescribed species. Semibalanus balanoides is used as the outgroup in the analysis and is not a sponge-inhabiting species. Numbers on taxon labels are CASIZ specimen catalog numbers.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

Main dataset 'Environmental specificity in Drosophila-bacteria symbiosis affects host developmental plasticity'

Main dataset from the manuscript 'Environmental specificity in Drosophila-bacteria symbiosis affects host developmental plasticity' (2019)

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2019View details →

MANOVA dataset 'Environmental specificity in Drosophila-bacteria symbiosis affects host developmental plasticity'

MANOVA dataset from the manuscript 'Environmental specificity in Drosophila-bacteria symbiosis affects host developmental plasticity' (2019)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Ecology of bat flies in Singapore: A study on the diversity, infestation bias and host specificity (Diptera: Nycteribiidae)

Fig. 1. Pteropodid fruit bats in Singapore with their ectoparasitic Nycteribiidae bat flies. Cynopterus brachyotis (a) and Leptocyclopodia ferrarii (b); Eonycteris spelaea (c) and Eucampsipoda sundaica (d); Penthetor lucasi (e), Eucampsipoda penthetoris (f), and Archinycteribia octophthalma (g).

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →

Fig. 2 in Ecology of bat flies in Singapore: A study on the diversity, infestation bias and host specificity (Diptera: Nycteribiidae)

Fig. 2. Posterior mean intensity of the three species of bats and 89% HDPI (High Density Posterior Interval).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 3 in The gastrointestinal nematodes of plains and Grevy's zebras: Phylogenetic relationships and host specificity

Fig. 3. Crossocephalus viviparus extracted from fresh zebra faeces were often infected with an apparent fungus. Hyphae emerging from the head (left, right) and from the tail (centre) of infected worms and stained with lactophenol blue (right). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 2 in The gastrointestinal nematodes of plains and Grevy's zebras: Phylogenetic relationships and host specificity

Fig. 2. Nematode prevalence in plains vs. Grevy's zebras in (a) a bipartite graph, where edge widths indicate prevalence in each zebra species, and (b) a linear regression, shown in black with shading representing standard error and the one-to-one line indicated by the dashed red line. Only sequences comprising>1% of total reads were used and they were clustered into mOTUs by 98% similarity. Taxon labels followed by a letter signify species-level matches (>98% similarity) to reference worms identified only to genus (see SI2), while those followed by a number represent sequences that matched a reference only to the genus level (>95% similarity). Black boxes/points are taxa without a match of>95% to any identified sequences. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

Fig. 1 in The gastrointestinal nematodes of plains and Grevy's zebras: Phylogenetic relationships and host specificity

Fig. 1. Phylogeny of all sequenced Strongylidae with species-level taxon assignments from GenBank and the present study, coloured by genus (the same colour code is used across all figures in this paper). Branch tips were pruned such that only one tip was kept of all immediate sister taxa with identical taxon assignments, and the number of samples merged in each tip is indicated in parentheses. Bootstrap percentages over 50% are displayed in bold to highlight nodes with high support. Branch lengths represent the number of base substitutions per site, estimated with the Tamura 3-parameter model assuming gamma-distributed substitution rate variation.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 3 in Association of bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) and bats: Richness and host specificity in Western Mexico

Fig. 3. Taxonomic trees with the STD value for the hosts that presented more than two species of parasites. *The value represents the number of steps to get from one host to another since there are only two host species.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Association of bat flies (Diptera: Streblidae) and bats: Richness and host specificity in Western Mexico

Fig. 2. Interaction network between bats and ectoparasites captured in Western Mexico. The lines represent interactions between species, and the width of the line indicates the strength of the interactions.

Fig. 5 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 5. Mean (± SE) development time of parasitoid eggs to adult emergence of (A) Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis and (B) Tamarixia radiata that developed on different Diaphorina citri instars in no-choice experiments. Treatment means with the same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 3 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 3. Mean (± SE) emergence of adult Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis from second through fifh instar Diaphorina citri nymphs in no-choice experiments when females foraged alone or with hetero- and conspecific competitors. Foraging scenario only affected parasitoid emergence when D. aligarhensis foraged for fourth instar D. citri nymphs (means with the same letters are not significantly different; P> 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 2. The effect of foraging scenario on mean (± SE) Diaphorina citri mortality when (A) second, (B) third, (C) fourth, and (D) fifh instar Diaphorina citri nymphs were exposed to female parasitoids in no-choice experiments. In each panel, means with the same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 1 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 1. Mean (± SE) proportion of oviposition events (αi), indicating preference of female parasitoids for second through fifh instar Diaphorina citri nymphs in choice arenas. For each parasitoid species, means with the same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05).

Fig. 4 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 4. Mean (± SE) adult Tamarixia radiata emergence from second through fifh instar Diaphorina citri nymphs in no-choice experiments. Means with the same letters are not significantly different (P> 0.05). *Only 1 F1 Tamarixia radiata emerged from second instar D. citri nymphs (mean [± SE] = 0.028 ± 0.028 F1 adults).

Fig. 6 in Two parasitoids of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) have shared, stage-specific preference for host nymphs that does not impact pest mortality rates

Fig. 6. The survival probability of adult (A) Diaphorencyrtus aligarhensis and (B) Tamarixia radiata that emerged from second, third, fourth, and fifh instar Diaphorina citri nymphs in no-choice experiments.