Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
35
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
35 results for “Lasers, fiber”
Comparing Super Pulse Fiber Thulium Laser and Holmium Laser for Ureteral Stone Fragmentation During Ureteroscopy
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06667557. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) Versus Holmium MOSES Laser for Ureteroscopic Management of Kidney Stones
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05598645. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Histological Study of the Effects of a 2910 nm Fiber Laser Technology
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06317766. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Comparison of Holmium, Thulium:YAG, and Thulium Fiber Lasers in Prostate Enucleation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07350005. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Effectiveness of a rhGM-CSF-containing Gel on Promoting Recovery After 1927-nm Fractional Thulium Fiber Laser Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07305675. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
LaserEn: SOLTIVE™ Thulium Laser Fiber En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04979156. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thuflep/SOLEP : Initial Experience and Results of Prostate Laser Enucleation With Thulium-fiber Laser (TFL)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04580628. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thulium Fiber Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: Learning Curve and Functional Outcomes - A Prospective Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07349147. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thulium Fiber Laser (TFL) vs Holmium MOSES for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05240001. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thulium Fiber Laser vs. Holmium:YAG Laser for the Ureteroscopic Treatment of Patients With Urinary Stone Disease
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06306222. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Thulium Fiber Laser En-bloc Resection vs Conventional Transurethral Resection of Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04110483. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Prospective Multicentric Trial Between Radiofrequency Ablation With VNUS Closure Fast ® and Endovenous Ablation With 1470 nm Diode Laser and Tulip Fiber ® for Treatment of Primary Venous Insufficiency
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01722019. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
2910 nm Erbium-Doped Fluoride Fiber Glass Laser for the Treatment of Advanced Perioral Lines and Wrinkles
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07222397. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Safety and Efficacy of 2910 nm Fiber Laser Resurfacing and Laser-Coring
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07254884. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
Data set from "Combining fiber Brillouin amplification with a repeater laser station for fiber-based optical frequency dissemination over 1400 km"
<p>The data set contains the data underlying the fiber link performance evaluation published in Koke et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 123017 (https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/ab5d95). The experimental setup and the methodology used is explained in this publication.</p> <p>The data is stored in the Matlab(R)-native file format. Although proprietary, import of data from this file format is supported by other numerical computing environments, too. An example script for importing into Python is included.</p> <p>The files 'data_export_campaign_*.mat' contain the timeseries data shown in Figures 2, 3 and 4. Each of these files include variables with the following meaning:<br> 'date_year', 'date_month', 'date_day', 'time_hour', 'time_minute', 'time_second': Timestamp of the data sample in UTC time<br> 'inloop1' and 'inloop2': $\Lambda_{1s}$ frequency offset from nominal value in Hz of the beat signal used for stabilizing the uplink<br> 'aom': $\Lambda_{1s}$ frequency offset from nominal value in Hz of the uplink servo acoustic-optical modulator's drive frequency<br> 'remote1' and 'remote2': $\Lambda_{1s}$ frequency offset from nominal value in Hz of the roundtrip beat signal used for out-of-loop characterization of the frequency transfer error<br> 'no_of_run_in_NJP_21_123017': A flag indicating the measurement runs discussed in the paper. Samples with the same non-zero integer values belong to the same measurement run. Samples marked with 0 did not enter the publication.<br> 'DataCollected_FBAPTBLocked_CavityLocked': Result of our current monitoring of the fulfillment of the prerequisites for fiber link performance evaluation; values of 1/True indicate that data logging was active, the transfer laser was locked to the signal of the ultra-stable cavity, and the lock of the FBA(PTB) pump laser was active.</p> <p>The file 'data_export_uplink_downlink_aom.mat' contains the data underlying the fiber phase noise correlation analysis in Fig. 5.<br> 'aom_uplink': $\Lambda_{1s}$ frequency offset from nominal value in Hz of the uplink servo acoustic-optical modulator's drive frequency<br> 'aom_downlink': $\Lambda_{1s}$ frequency offset from nominal value in Hz of the downlink servo acoustic-optical modulator's drive frequency</p> <p>Since publication of the paper, we discovered a slight inconsistency of the nominal frequencies used in our analysis. Hence, remote fractional frequency offsets published in Koke et al 2019 New J. Phys. 21 123017 have to be corrected by subtracting fractional frequency values of 4.2E-22 (campaigns 2015-06, 2016-03, 2018-03) and 3.3E-22 (campaign 2018-12). This inconsistency does not change the conclusions drawn in the paper as these corrections are well below the associated statistical uncertainties. The correct nominal frequency values have been employed for the uploaded data set.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.