Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 4 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 4. Sueus chatterjeei sp. nov. female holotype (USNMENT01595085), 2.4 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 8 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 8. Sueus obesus female (Thailand, Suratthani) 2.5 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 3 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 3. Sueus borneensis, female (Indonesia, Sulawesi Utara, RABC) 2.25 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 2 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 2. Phylogeny of Sueus species resulting from the parsimony analysis inferred from COI and CAD DNA sequences. Numbers above branch are bootstrap values, numbers below are posterior probabilities, circles are bootstrap values 90–99%, and squares are posterior probabilities 0.9–0.99.

FIGURE 6 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 6. Sueus insulanus sp. nov. female holotype, 2.0 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 1 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 1. Approximate collection localities of Sueus specimens used in the phylogenetic analysis. Numbers refer to last digits of DNA vouchers in Table 1. Blue square = Sueus niisimai, red circle = Sueus pilosus, yellow oval = Sueus obesus, purple polygon = Sueus insulanus, and orange star = Sueus granulatus.

FIGURE 7 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 7. Sueus niisimai female (MSUC_ARC_320284) 1.7 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

FIGURE 5 in A taxonomic review of Sueus Murayama, 1951 ambrosia beetles (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae: Hyorrhynchini) aided by molecular phylogenetic analyses

FIGURE 5. Sueus granulatus female (MSUC_ARC_320283), 2.43 mm A) dorsal view; B) lateral view; C) frons; D) posterolateral view.

Fig. 8 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 8 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; holotype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.25 mm: A, pereopod 4. Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; paratype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.45 mm: B, pereopod 5; C, pereopod 6; D, pereopod 7. Scale bars represent 1 mm

Fig. 1 in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 1 Multilocus Bayesian phylogeny of selected members of the Crangonyctoidea. Posterior probability is indicated by colored diamonds (black 0.90–1.0, gray 0.89–0.80, white 0.79–0.70). Inset (upper) Crangonyx hobbsi, female, Devil's Eye Spring, Gilchrist County, Florida (YPM IZ 105321), 8.82 mm, scale bar represents

Fig. 6 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 6 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; holotype female, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051869), 7.25 mm: A, upper lip; B, lower lip; C, maxilla 1 (outer plate spine-teeth enlarged); D, maxilla 2 (outer plate apical serrate seta enlarged); E, maxilliped (inner plate apical margin enlarged). Scale bars represent 0.5 mm

Fig. 10 Crangonyx parhobbsi n in A new species rises from beneath Florida: molecular phylogenetic analyses reveal cryptic diversity among the metapopulation of Crangonyx hobbsi Shoemaker, 1941 (Amphipoda: Crangonyctidae)

Fig. 10 Crangonyx parhobbsi n. sp.; allotype male, Madison Blue Spring, Madison County, Florida (UFID 051870), 5.87 mm: A, antenna 1 accessory flagellum; B, antenna 2 (single calceolus enlarged); C, gnathopod 1 (palmar margin and dactylus enlarged); D, gnathopod 2 (palmar margin and dactylus enlarged). Scale bars 0.5 mm (A), 1 mm (B–D)

FIGURE 10 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 10. Phylogeny of the liparid clade Aenigmoliparia from the majority rule (50%) consensus tree from the Bayesian inference of a 490 bp alignment of 270 cytochrome c oxidase subunit one gene (COI) sequences. Nodal values represent Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap values from the maximum likelihood analysis (above and below branches, respectively). Species names are followed by a catalog number or BOLD "Sequence ID" number when represented by a sequence from a single specimen in our dataset. N indicates number of sequences, when multiple sequences support a branch tip. Boldface species names indicate species placed in different positions in COI and RADseq trees. Only unique sequences were subjected to the analyses (Appendix Table 1); other identical sequences surveyed are listed in Appendix Table 2.

FIGURE 7 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 7. Majority-rule (50%) consensus phylogenetic tree of Shen et al. (2017, after fig. S6), derived from a Bayesian inference of a 440 bp alignment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (COI) sequences for 84 samples of 83 liparid species. Bayesian posterior probabilities are above branches. Tree is rooted with species of the Cyclopteridae. Corrected identifications based on our study are in parentheses.

FIGURE 9 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 9. Phylogeny of the genus Liparis, excluding L. fucensis depicted in Figure 8, from the majority rule (50%) consensus tree from the Bayesian inference of a 490 bp alignment of 270 cytochrome c oxidase subunit one gene (COI) sequences. Nodal values represent Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap values from the maximum likelihood analysis (above and below, respectively). Species names are followed by a catalog number or BOLD "Sequence ID" number when represented by a sequence from a single specimen in our dataset. N indicates number of sequences, when multiple sequences support a branch tip. Only unique sequences were subjected to the analyses (Appendix Table 1); other identical sequences surveyed are listed in Appendix Table 2.

FIGURE 6 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 6. Majority rule (50%) consensus phylogenetic tree of Gardner et al. (2016, after fig. 4), derived from Bayesian inference and maximum parsimony analysis of a 492 bp alignment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (COI) sequences of 492 bp for 128 samples of 23 liparid species. Bootstrap values are above and Bayesian posterior probabilities are below branches that lead to multiple species. Tree is rooted with Liparis gibbus. Corrected identifications based on our study are in parentheses.

FIGURE 12 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 12. Phylogeny of selected eastern North Pacific liparids inferred using genome-wide restriction-site associated DNA sequences (RADseq; –p 28, –r 0.5) with maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. Majority rule (50%) consensus tree of individual sequences. Nodal values represent Bayesian posterior probabilities and bootstrap values from the maximum likelihood analysis (above and below branches, respectively); double asterisks denote Bayesian posterior probabilities of 1 and bootstrap support of 100%. Species names are followed by the University of Washington Fish Collection catalog number for the specimen. Boldface species names indicate species placed in different positions in COI and RADseq trees.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 4. Unrooted neighbor-joining tree of Steinke et al. (2009, after fig. 4), derived from cluster analysis of a 650 bp alignment of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (COI) sequences for 78 samples of 19 liparid species. Bootstrap values>80 are above branches leading to multiple species. Corrected identifications based on our study are in parentheses.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic hypothesis of Balushkin (1996, after fig. 4), derived from a manual cladistic analysis of morphological data, including seven osteological and external characters, for 26 liparid genera.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular phylogenetics of snailfishes (Cottoidei: Liparidae) based on MtDNA and RADseq genomic analyses, with comments on selected morphological characters

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic hypothesis of Kido (1988, after fig. 20), derived from a maximum parsimony analysis of morphological data, using 34 osteological and external characters, for 60 liparid species.