Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Figure 2 in Morphological characteristics of Neoseiulus setarius Ma, Meng & Fan, sp. nov. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from China

Figure 2. Neoseiulus setarius Ma, Meng & Fan, sp. nov., adult female. A. Dorsal idiosoma; B. Ventral idiosoma; C. Chelicera; D. Spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 40 μm; C–D = 10 μm.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Figure 1 in Morphological characteristics of Neoseiulus setarius Ma, Meng & Fan, sp. nov. (Acari: Phytoseiidae) from China

Figure 1. Neoseiulus setarius Ma, Meng & Fan, sp. nov., adult female. A. Dorsal idiosoma; B. Ventral idiosoma; C. Chelicera; D–E. Variations of spermatheca. Scale bars: A–B = 50 μm; C–E = 20 μm.

Fig. 2 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory

Fig. 2. Predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus preference for volatile compounds in two-choice olfactometer tests, comparing: conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae and Spodoptera frugiperda (C + Tu + Sf); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae and S. frugiperda (Bt + Tu + Sf). Numbers in bars represent individual predatory mites that choose the indicated odor. No significant p ≥ 0.05.

Fig. 5 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory

Fig. 5. Projection to principal component analysis (PCA) based on the headspace composition of volatiles of conventional maize plants uninfested (C = o); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu = •); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt = Δ); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu = N), using the first two principal components (Dim) with explained variance in brackets.

Fig. 1 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory

Fig. 1. Predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus preference for volatile compounds in two-choice olfactometer tests, comparing: conventional maize plants uninfested (C); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Numbers in bars represent individual predatory mites that choose the indicated odor. No significant p ≥ 0.05.

Fig. 3 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory

Fig. 3. Chromatograms of volatile compounds extracted from leaves of conventional maize plants uninfested (C); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); Bt maize plants uninfested (Bt); and Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu). The compounds observed in analysis were 1 = (E)-Hex-2-enal; 2 = heptanal; 3 = (E)-Oct-2-enal; 4 = α-pineno; 5 = β-cisocimeno; 6 = β-Ciclocitral; 7 = 1-metil-6-(3-metilbuta-1,3-dienil)-7-oxabiciclo[4,1,0]heptano; 8 = no identificated = C8; 9 = no identificated = C9; 10 = β-ionona; 11 = Ciclosativena; 12 = (E)-7-tetradecen-1-ol; 13 = no identificated = C13; 14 = Linolenic acid ethyl ester; 15 = no identificated = C15.

Fig. 4 in Preference of Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) for volatiles of Bt maize induced by multiple herbivory

Fig. 4. Chromatograms of volatile compounds extracted from leaves of conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae (C + Tu); conventional maize plants infested by Tetranychus urticae and Spodoptera frugiperda (C + Tu + Sf = +); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae (Bt + Tu); Bt maize plants infested by T. urticae and S. frugiperda (Bt + Tu + Sf). The compounds observed in analysis were 1 = (E)-Hex-2-enal; 2 = heptanal; 3 = (E)-Oct-2-enal; 4 = ˛-pineno; 5 = ˇ-cisocimeno; 6 = ˇ-Ciclocitral; 7 = 1-metil-6- (3-metilbuta-1,3-dienil)-7-oxabiciclo[4,1,0]heptano; 8 = ˇ-ionona; 9 = no identificated = C9; 10 = (E)-7-tetradecen-1-ol; 11 = no identificated = C11; 12 = Linolenic acid ethyl ester; 13 = no identificated = C13.

Fig. 9 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 9. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Navaho variety in a field experiment.

Fig. 5 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 5. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Arapaho variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)

Fig. 3 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 3. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs stages in N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Arapaho variety in a greenhouse experiment.

Fig. 1 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 1. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) plots (B), on Arapaho variety in a greenhouse experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)

Fig. 6 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 6. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) motiles in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Navaho variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)

Fig. 10 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries

Fig. 10. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Ouachita variety in a field experiment. (The arrows on the graph indicate the time of treatment and mite density at that time.)

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2021View details →

Figure 1 in Immature development and survival of Neoseiulus cucumeris (Oudemans) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) on eggs of Tyrophagus curvipenis (Fain & Fauvel) (Acari: Acaridae)

Figure 1 Correlations between the initial prey density and the number of prey consumed by Neoseiulus cucumeris with/without conspecific: (A) males, (B) female. The dashed line, the dotted line, and the solid line represent linear fit to the mites reared in the absence of conspecific, reared with conspecific, male/female pooled together regardless of the presence of conspecific, respectively.

Figure 10 in Morphological ontogeny and molecular analyses of geographic strains of two closely related Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Figure 10 World distribution of Neoseiulus womersleyi (open circles; from Akimov and Kolodochka 1991; Ho et al. 1995, 2003; Ehara and Amano 2004; Moraes et al.2004) andN. longispinosus (closed circles; from Hoet al.1995; Lin et al.2000; Ehara 2002; Moraes et al.2004; Ohno et al.2012).

Figure 1 in Morphological ontogeny and molecular analyses of geographic strains of two closely related Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Figure 1 Neoseiulus longispinosus (Evans). Female; A – dorsum; B – venter; C – chelicera; D – spermatheca; E – leg IV; Male; F – ventrianal shield; G – spermatodactyl.

Figure 5 in Morphological ontogeny and molecular analyses of geographic strains of two closely related Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Figure 5 Neoseiulus womersleyi (Schicha). Female; A – dorsum; B – venter; C – chelicera; D – spermatheca; E – leg IV; Male; F – ventrianal shield; G – spermatodactyl.

Figure 9 in Morphological ontogeny and molecular analyses of geographic strains of two closely related Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Figure 9 Maximum likelihood (ML) tree based on the 28S regions (666 bp) of nuclear ribosomal DNA (nrDNA) of phytoseiid mites using Kimura 2-Parameter model with gamma distribution. Bootstrap values based on 1,000 replications are indicated at the nodes. Only bootstrap values>50% are shown. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by accession number, abbreviation of species, individual identification number (three individuals for each strain/species) and voucher specimen number.

Figure 11 in Morphological ontogeny and molecular analyses of geographic strains of two closely related Neoseiulus species (Acari: Phytoseiidae)

Figure 11 Body color of females in various strains ofNeoseiulus longispinosus (Nl) andN. womersleyi (Nw).

Figure 1 in Does diet affect morphological parameters of Neoseiulus tunus (De Leon) (Acari: Phytoseiidae)?

Figure 1 Neoseiulus tunus (Denmark & Muma): Female: A – positions of measures established for dorsal shields; B – Positions of the measures established for the ventral shields. Adapted from Cavalcanteet al. 2017.