Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 6 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 6. Microscopic internal hard structures of Olea hensoni n. sp. A, Close-up of SEM image of the penis, showing curved penial stylet. B, SEM image of the whole penis. C, D Light microscope images of two separately prepared radulae; scale bars = 15 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 5. Internal morphology of Olea hensoni n. sp. A, Dorsal view of visceral mass. B, Ventral view of kidney and pericardium. C, Reproductive system. D, Anterior view of central nervous system. E, Posterior view of central nervous system. ab, abdominal ganglion; ag, albumen gland; am, ampulla; an, anus; au, auricle; bc, bursa copulatrix; bg, buccal gland; bm, buccal mass; bu, buccal ganglion; cg, capsule gland; cp, cerebro-pleural ganglion; dg, digestive gland; ey, eye; fc, fertilization chamber; fp, female aperture; gr, genital receptacle; hd, hermaphrodite duct; hf, hermaphrodite follicles; in, intestine; kd, kidney; md, male duct; mg, mucus gland; ns, central nervous system; np, nephrostome; ov, oviduct; pe, penis; pg, pedal ganglion; pr, prostate gland; sp, supra-intestinal ganglion; tg, tail gland; vd, vas deferens; vg, vaginal opening; vt, ventricle. Scale: 0.5 mm

FIGURE 4 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 4. External morphology of Olea hensoni n. sp. A–C, Views of a 1.5 mm specimen with cerata. Dorsal view (A); right lateral view (B); and ventral view (C). D–E, Views of a 2 mm specimen with cerata removed. Dorsal view (D); right lateral view (E). an, anus; ct, cerata; ey, eye fp, female aperture; ft, foot; hf, hermaphrodite follicles; mo, mouth; mp, male aperture; np, nephrostome; tl, tail; vg, vaginal opening. Scale: 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 3 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 3. Evolutionary relationships in Sacoglossa with emphasis on family Limapontiidae. Topology of the uncollapsed phylogram based on ML analysis of four loci (COI, 16S, H3 and 28S); support values above branches are posterior probabilities, below are bootstrap percentages; asterisk = 1.0 or 100% support. Bolded name denotes new taxon. Horizontal slashes indicate branch length shortened by half. Images credits: L. depressa and L. senestra, www.seaslugforum.org; E. felina, C. Trowbridge; "Gascoignella" jabae, C. Swennen; C. bellula, Coelho et al. 2006; remaining images from the authors.

FIGURE 2 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 2. Live specimens and eggs of Olea hansineensis. A, Live specimen from San Juan Island, WA; 3 mm long crawling when fully extended. B, Live specimen from San Juan Island, WA; 5 mm long crawling. C, Specimens on Melanochlamys diomedea egg mass. One specimen (upper left) is feeding inside the egg mass, with only the tips of the cerata extending out above the outer membrane of the egg mass; the second specimen (lower right) is crawling on the outside of the egg mass. Field of view: 7 mm. D, Egg mass with uncleaved ova laid by O. hansineensis; scale bar = 100 µm.

FIGURE 1 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

FIGURE 1. Live specimens and eggs of Olea hensoni n. sp. A, Right lateral view of live specimen, 2 mm long crawling. B, Dorsal view of live specimen, 2.5 mm long crawling. C, Left lateral view of live specimen, 5 mm long crawling. D, Dorsal view of live specimen, 5 mm long crawling. E, Ventral view of same specimen as (D) showing foot sole. F, Egg mass laid by O. hensoni n. sp. in the laboratory; width of egg spiral = 6 mm. G, Live specimen of O. hensoni n. sp. crawling on the surface of the cephalaspidean egg mass on which it was feeding in the field; width of egg mass = 8 mm.

SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE S1 in Eggs sunny-side up: A new species of Olea, an unusual oophagous sea slug (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Sacoglossa), from the western Atlantic

SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE S1. Underwater photograph of cephalaspidean egg mass containing live specimens of an unidentified oophagous heterobranch, possibly an undescribed Olea sp., from the tropical Indo-West Pacific Two specimens (dark in coloration) visible inside the egg mass (indicated by white arrows), with additional specimens possibly visible scattered throughout the inner jelly matrix. Scale bar = 1 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →

Información suplementaria TFM "Determinación de los genes posiblemente relacionados con el estrés salino en Olea europaea

Material complementario del TFM “Determinación de los genes posiblemente relacionados con el estrés salino en Olea europaea” ·         in_comp_01.odf: tabla de datos en formato ODS con cuatro hojas que incluyen:. o   Hoja 1: Lista de genes de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de acebuche. o   Hoja 2: Lista de genes de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Farga” o   Hoja 3: Lista de genes de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Arbquina” o   Hoja 4: Lista de genes de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Picual” ·         in_comp_02.odf.: tabla de datos en formato ODS con dos hojas que incluyen:. o   Hoja 1: Lista con el recuento de genes enriquecidos en los procesos biológicas de arabidopsis, acebuche,  “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”. o   Hoja 1: Lista con el recuento de genes enriquecidos en las funciones moleculares de arabidopsis, acebuche, “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”. ·         in_comp_03.odf : tabla de datos en formato ODS con tres hojas que incluye: o   Hoja 1: Lista de los factores de transcripción de “Farga”. o   Hoja 2: Lista de los factores de transcripción de “Arbequina”. o   Hoja 3: Lista de los factores de transcripción de “Picual”.   ·         in_comp_04.odf : tabla de datos en formato ODS con cuatro hojas que incluye: o   Hoja 1: Recuento de factores de transcripción por familias de arabidopsis, acebuche, “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”. o   Hoja 2 : Proporción de factores de transcripción por familias respecto al total del organismo de arabidopsis, acebuche, “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”. ·         in_comp_05.odf: tabla de datos en formato ODS con tres hojas que incluye: o   Hoja 1: Lista de los factores de transcripción relacionados con el estrés salino de “Farga”. o   Hoja 2: Lista de los factores de transcripción relacionados con el estrés salino  de “Arbequina”. o   Hoja 3: Lista de los factores de transcripción relacionados con el estrés salino de “Picual”. ·         in_comp_06.odf: tabla de datos en formato ODS con cuatro hojas que incluyen:. o   Hoja 1: Lista de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de acebuche. o   Hoja 2: Lista de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Farga” o   Hoja 3: Lista de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Arbquina” o   Hoja 4: Lista de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía de arabidopsis con el ortólogo correspondiente de “Picual” ·         inf_comp_07.odf: in_comp_02.odf.: tabla de datos en formato ODS con dos hojas que incluyen:. o   Hoja 1: Recuento de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía enriquecidos en los procesos biológicas de arabidopsis, acebuche,  “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”. o   Hoja 1: Recuento de genes seleccionados de la bibliografía enriquecidos en las funciones moleculares de arabidopsis, acebuche, “Arbequina”, “Picual” y “Farga”.

Fig. 7 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 7. General overview of phenolic and lipophilic profile variation after stress treatments (exposure) and stress relief (recovery). Relative levels [expressed as log2 (stress/control)] are given besides each identified metabolite as a heatmap: WD – water deficit and WDHS+UVB – water deficit with heat and high UVB shocks. Nd - not detected.

Fig. 6 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 6. Carbohydrates profile of O. europaea leaves from plants under control (C) conditions and exposed to WD and WD HS+UVB treatments. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). For each compound, the different letters indicate statistical between treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 3 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 3. Fatty acids and sterols profiles of O. europaea leaves from plants under control (C) conditions and exposed to WD and WDHS+UVB treatments. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). For each compound, the different letters indicate statistical between treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 5 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 5. Terpenes profile of O. europaea leaves from plants under control (C) conditions and exposed to WD and WDHS+UVB treatments. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). For each compound, the different letters indicate statistical between treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 2 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 2. Secoiridoids and HCAds profiles of O. europaea leaves from plants under control (C) conditions and exposed to WD and WDHS+UVB treatments. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). For each compound, the different letters indicate statistical between treatments (P <0.05). Nd – not detected (2′′- methoxyoleuropein was not detected in DS plants and methyloleuropein was not detected in DSHS+UVB plants during the stress recovery phase).

Fig. 1 in Phenolic and lipophilic metabolite adjustments in Olea europaea (olive) trees during drought stress and recovery

Fig. 1. Flavonoids profile of O. europaea leaves from plants under control conditions (C) and exposed to WD and WDHS+UVB treatments. Values are means ± standard deviation (n = 4). For each compound, the different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments (P <0.05).

Fig. 2. A in The antioxidant system in Olea europaea to enhanced UV-B radiation also depends on flavonoids and secoiridoids

Fig. 2. A - Variation in reduced (AsA) and oxidized ascorbate (DHA), B - AsA redox state (AsA/DHA), C - reduced (GSH) and oxidized glutathione (GSSG), and D - and glutathione redox potential (GSH/GSSG) in leaves of O. europaea plants under control conditions and exposed to UV-B treatments (UV–B1 and UV-B2). Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 6–8). For each parameter, different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments (P <0.05) base on Holms Sidak Comparison Test.

Fig. 2 in The antioxidant system in Olea europaea to enhanced UV-B radiation also depends on flavonoids and secoiridoids

Fig. 2 presents the changes of AsA, DHA, GSH and GSSG, AsA/DHA and GSH/GSSG in O. europaea leaves after UV-B exposure. Compared with controls, plants exposed to UV-B1 had decreased levels of both AsA and DHA, which led to a maintenance of the AsA/DHA ratio (P> 0.05, Fig. 2A and B). Contrarily, GSH levels decreased while the GSSG increased significantly, decreasing the GSH/GSSG ratio (P <0.05, Fig. 2C and D). Plants exposed to UV-B2 showed an increase of DHA and, mostly, of AsA pools, which led to an increase of the AsA/DHA ratio (P <0.05, Fig. 2A and B). On other hand GSH levels also increased but GSSG was not influenced, which supported the increase of GSH/GSSG (P <0.05, Fig. 2C and D).

Fig. 3. A in The antioxidant system in Olea europaea to enhanced UV-B radiation also depends on flavonoids and secoiridoids

Fig. 3. A - secoiridoids, B - flavonoids, and C - hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in leaves of O. europaea plants under control conditions and exposed to UV-B treatments (UV–B1 and UV-B2). Values are mean ± s.d. (n = 3). For each compound, different letters indicate statistical differences between treatments (P <0.05) base on Holms Sidak Comparison Test.

Fig. 4 in The antioxidant system in Olea europaea to enhanced UV-B radiation also depends on flavonoids and secoiridoids

Fig. 4. General overview of the metabolites and antioxidant enzymes changes in O. europaea plants under UV-B doses: moderate (UV–B1) and high (UV–B2). Relative levels [expressed as log2 (UV–B/control)] are given besides (two colored rectangles) each identified metabolite/compound or enzyme activity as a heat-map, and the upper colored rectangle refers to UV-B1 treatment while the lower one refer to the UV-B2 treatment. Protective responses in O. europaea involve the activation of both enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant mechanisms to control ROS (namely H2O2) homeostasis, but the enzymatic and AsA/GSH pools are more required by higher UV doses, while polyphenols pathways are similarly solicited by both treatments. UV-B1 treatment increases SOD, CAT and GPox activities and GSSG content, reducing Gr and APX activities and the contents of AsA, DHA and GSH. UV-B2 treatment, besides SOD, CAT and GPox activation, also increases Gr activity and the contents of AsA, DHA and GSH. Flavonoids (4ʹ or 3ʹ-methoxy luteolin glucoside and 4ʹ-methoxy luteolin decrease), secoiridoids (oleuropein decrease and 2ʹʹ- methoxyoleuropein increase) and HCAds (β-hydroxyverbascoside increase) respond similarly to both UV-B doses, putatively acting as UV-B shields and/or ROS scavengers.